Research on substance use, health-, and risk-seeking behavior has focused on various control mechanisms, which are either embedded in the person (self-control) or in the social environment (social control), that prevent individuals from engaging in unhealthy behavior. The present article examines the role of both types of control with respect to alcohol consumption. Whereas most previous research into the interdependence of the two control types has focused on indirect concepts of social control, the present study targets direct social control exerted through social interaction with network persons. The study’s findings indicate that both control types have a mutually independent influence as well as an interdependent influence on drinking behavior. The results show that the effect of one control instance is attenuated when the control level of the other instance is high. The results are discussed with respect to the life-course interdependence model, the cumulative control model, and action-theoretical perspectives of health-related social interventions.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1998). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newberry Park, CA: SAGE.
2.
BeaverK. M. (2011). The effects of genetics, the environment, and low self-control on perceived maternal and paternal socialization: Results from a longitudinal sample of twins. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 27, 85-105.
3.
BeaverK. M.SchuttJ. E.BoutwellB. B.RatchfordM.RobertsK.BarnesJ. C. (2009). Genetic and environmental influences on levels of self-control and delinquent peer affiliation: Results from a longitudinal sample of adolescent twins. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 41-60.
4.
BerkmanL. F.GlassT. (2000). Social integration, social networks, social support, and health. In BerkmanL. F.KawachiI. (Eds.), Social epidemiology (pp. 137-173). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
5.
BoothA.OsgoodW. D. (1993). The influence of testosterone on deviance in adulthood: Assessing and explaining the relationship. Criminology, 31, 93-117.
6.
BurkleyE. (2008). The role of self-control in resistance to persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 419-431.
7.
BurkleyE.AndersonD.CurtisJ. (2011). You wore me down: Self-control strength and social influence. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 487-499.
8.
CaspiA. (1998). Personality development across the life course. In DamonW.EisenbergN. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Volume 3: Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 311-388). New York, NY: Wiley.
9.
CohenS.WillsT. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310-357.
10.
DemmelR.HagenJ. (2002). Faktorenstruktur und psychometrische Eigenschaften einer gekürzten deutschsprachigen Version des Alcohol Expectancy Questionnaire (Brief AEQ-G). [Factor structure and psychometric properties of a brief German version of the alcohol expectancy questionnaire (Brief AEQ-G)]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 23(2), 205-216.
11.
DohertyE. E. (2006). Self-control, social bonds, and desistance: A test of life-course interdependence. Criminology, 44, 807-833.
12.
GibsonC.WrightJ. (2001). Low self-control and coworker delinquency: A research note. Journal of Criminal Justice, 29, 483-492.
13.
GottfredsonM. R.HirschiT. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
14.
GrasmickH. G.TittleC. R.BursikR. J.Jr.ArneklevB. J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research on Crime & Delinquency, 30, 5-29.
HelgesonV. S.NovakS. A.LeporeS. J.EtonD. T. (2004). Spouse social control efforts: Relations to health behavior and well-being among men with prostate cancer. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 53-68.
17.
HirschiT. (2004). Self-control and crime. In BaumeisterR. F.VohsK. D. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (pp. 537-552). New York, NY: Guilford.
18.
JonesS.LynamD. R. (2009). In the eye of the impulsive beholder: The interaction between impulsivity and perceived informal social control on offending. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 307-321.
19.
JonesS.LynamD. R.PiqueroA. R. (2011). Substance use, personality, and inhibitors: Testing Hirschi’s predictions about the reconceptualization of self-control. Crime & Delinquency. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0011128711420109.
20.
LewisM. A.ButterfieldR. M.DarbesL. A.Johnston-BrooksC. (2004). The conceptualization and assessment of health-related social control. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 669-686.
21.
LewisM. A.RookK. S. (1999). Social control in personal relationships: Impact on health behaviors and psychological distress. Health Psychology, 18, 63-71.
22.
LongshoreD.ChangE.HsiehS.MessinaN. (2004). Self-control and social bonds: A combined control perspective on deviance. Crime & Delinquency, 50, 542-564.
23.
MaindonaldJ.BraunJ. W. (2003). Data analysis and graphics using R: An example-based approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24.
McGloinJ. M.ShermerL. O. (2009). Self-control and deviant peer network structure. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 46, 35-72.
25.
MeldrumR. C.YoungJ. T. N.WeermanF. M. (2009). Reconsidering the effect of self-control and delinquent peers: Implications of measurement for theoretical significance. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 46, 353-376.
26.
OuseyG. C.WilcoxP. (2007). The interaction of antisocial propensity and life-course varying predictors of delinquent behavior: Differences by method of estimation and implications for theory. Criminology, 45, 313-354.
27.
PrattT. C.CullenF. T. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 38, 931-964.
28.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891.
29.
RookK. S.ThurasP. D.LewisM. A. (1990). Social control, health risk taking, and psychological distress among the elderly. Psychology and Aging, 5, 327-334.
30.
RussellC. J.DeanM. A. (2000). To log or not to log: Bootstrap as an alternative to the parametric estimation of moderation effects in the presence of skewed dependent variables. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 166-185.
31.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
SobelM. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290-312.
33.
ThoitsP. A. (1985). Social support and psychological wellbeing: Theoretical possibilities. In SarasonI. G.SarasonB. R. (Eds.), Social support: Theory, research and applications (pp. 51-72). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
34.
ThoitsP. A. (2011). Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 52, 145-161.
35.
TropeY.FishbachA. (2005). Going beyond the motivation given: Self-control and situational control over behavior. In HassinR. R.UlemanJ. S.BarghJ. A. (Eds.), The new unconscious (pp. 537-565). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
36.
TuckerJ. S.AndersS. L. (2001). Social control of health behaviors in marriage. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 467-485.
37.
UchinoB. N. (2006). Social support and health: A review of physiological processes potentially underlying links to disease outcomes. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 29, 377-387.
38.
UmbersonD. (1992). Gender, marital status, and the social control of health behavior. Social Science & Medicine, 34, 907-917.
39.
UmbersonD.CrosnoeR.ReczekC. (2010). Social relationships and health behavior across the life course. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 139-157.
40.
UpmarkM.MöllerJ.RomelsjöA. (1999). Longitudinal, population-based study of self-reported alcohol habits, high levels of sickness absence, and disability pensions. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 53, 223-229.
41.
WrightB. R. E.CaspiA.MoffittT. E.SilvaP. A. (2001). The effects of social ties on crime vary by criminal propensity: A life-course model of interdependence. Criminology, 39, 321-352.
