Effect of Heating Delay on Conversion and Strength of a Post-cured Resin Composite

Abstract

Physical property enhancement in light-cured resin composites from post-cure heating is attributed to free radicals created during initial photocuring, the number of which decreases following initial light-curing. Clinically, it is important to know when the number of remaining free radicals is too low to provide for additional conversion of monomer in post-cure-heated specimens. The hypothesis tested is that the potential for additional conversion in post-cure-heated resin composite restorations is dependent upon the time after initial light-curing at which the specimen is exposed to heat treatment. This research examined the effect of delay in post-cure heating after initial photo-activation on strength and monomer conversion of a commercial resin composite material. Discs (10 x 1 mm) of Herculite XRV (Kerr/Sybron, Orange, CA) were photocured at standardized conditions. One group was left unheated, and another was subjected to post-cure heating (Brilliant DI-500, Coltene AG, Altstatten, Switzerland) at the following times after being light-cured : 5 and 30 min, and 6, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hrs. After the appropriate delay time, unheated and heated specimens (n = 10) were tested for biaxial flexural strength at a constant stressing rate. Recovered, fractured strength specimens (n = 10) were analyzed for cure by means of IR spectroscopy. Post-cure heating increased strength over that of the unheated specimens only for the shortest delay times: 5 or 30 min. Thereafter, strength values were statistically equivalent (p < 0.05). Delay in heating did not significantly enhance strength of post-cure-heated specimens, but delay in time did improve strength of the unheated groups. The greatest monomer conversion was obtained when post-cure heating was applied within 6 hrs following light-curing. The difference in cure between unheated and heated specimens remained significant up to 96 hrs of delay. Flexural strength of post-cure-heated specimens remained unchanged with time delay for heating specimens. Maximal monomer conversion of post-cured specimens is obtained only within 6 hrs of light-curing. The potential for additional conversion arising from post-cure heat treatment is dependent upon the time following initial curing at which heat is applied following initial light-curing. However, delay in heat application has no influence on flexural strength.

Keywords

post-cure composite strength composite cure.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Asmussen E. , Peutzfeldt A. (1990). Mechanical properties of heat treated restorative resins for use in the inlay/onlay technique. Scand J Dent Res 98:564-567.

ASTM Designation F394-78 (1978). American standard test method for biaxial flexure strength (modulus of rupture) of ceramic substrates. In: Annual book of ASTM standards. Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials (re-approved, 1984).

Bausch JR , de Lange C. , Davidson CL (1981). The influence of temperature on some physical properties of dental composites. J Oral Rehabil 8:309-317.

Burtscher P. (1993). Stability of radicals in cured composite materials . Dent Mater 9:218-221.

Covey DA , Tahaney SR , Davenport JM (1992). Mechanical properties of heat-treated composite resin restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 68:458-461.

De Gee AJ , Pallav P. , Werner A. , Davidson CL (1990). Annealing as a mechanism of increasing wear resistance of composites. Dent Mater 6:266-270.

Dionysopoulos P, Watts DC (1989). Dynamic mechanical properties of an inlay composite. J Dent 17:140-144. Fairhurst CW, Lockwood PE, Ringle RD, Thompson WO (1992). The effect of glaze on porcelain strength. Dent Mater 8 :203-207.

Ferracane JL , Condon JR (1992). Post-cure heat treatments for composites: properties and fractography. Dent Mater 8 :290-295.

Ferracane JL , Greener EH (1984). Fourier transform infrared analysis of degree of polymerization in unfilled resins-methods comparison. J Dent Res 63:1093-1095.

10.

Gregory WA , Berry S. , Duke E. , Dennison JB (1992). Physical properties and repair bond strength of direct and indirect composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 68:406-411.

11.

Johnston WM , Leung RL , Fan PL (1985). A mathematical model for post-irradiation hardening of photoactivated composite resins. Dent Mater 1:191-194.

12.

Rueggeberg FA , Hashinger DT , Fairhurst CW (1990). Calibration of FTIR conversion analysis of contemporary dental resin composites. Dent Mater 6:241-249.

13.

Ruyter IE , Svendsen SA (1978). Remaining methacrylate groups in composite restorative materials. Acta Odontol Scand 36:75-82.

14.

Wendt SL Jr (1987). The effect of heat used as a secondary cure upon the physical properties of three composite resins. I. Diametral tensile strength, compressive strength and marginal dimensional stability. Quintessence Int 18:265-271. Wendt SL Jr, Leinfelder KF (1992). Clinical evaluation of a heat-treated resin composite inlay: 3-year results. Am J Dent 5:258-262.

15.

Wu W. , Fanconi BM (1983). Post-curing of dental restorative resin polymer . Polymer Eng & Sci 23:704-707.