The relationships between the transmission coefficient and the cure depth were evaluated on eight commercially available light-activated resin composites. The determination of transmission coefficient was carried out by the use of a radiometer for various shades of the resin composites. The transmission coefficient, ranging from 0.042 to 0.263, was dependent upon the shade of the resin. There was a good correlation between the transmission coefficient and the cure depth for different shades for each resin composite, except for one hybrid resin composite (P-50). The microfilled resin composite showed transmission coefficient and cure depth loser than those of the hybrid and small-particle-filled resin composites.
Blankenau RJ, Cavel WT, Kelsey WP, Blankenau P. (1983). Wavelength and intensity of seven systems for visible light-curing resin composites : a comparative study. J ADA106:471-474.
2.
Campbell PM, Johnston WM, O'Brien WJ (1986). Light scattering and gloss of an experimental quartz-filled composite. J Dent Res65 :892-894.
3.
Chung KH (1990). The relationship between composition and properties of posterior resin composites. J Dent Res69:852-856.
Cook WD, Standish PM (1983). Cure of resin based restorative materials. II. White light photopolymerized resins. Aust Dent J28:307-311.
6.
DeWald JP, Ferracane JL (1987). A comparison of four modes of evaluatingdepth of cure of light-activated composites. J Dent Res66:727-730.
7.
Eliades GC, Vougiouklakis GJ, Caputo AA (1987). Degree of double bond conversion in light-cured composites. Dent Mater3:19-25.
8.
Ferracane JL, Aday P., Matsumoto H., Marker VA (1986). Relationship between shade and depth of cure for light-activated dental resin composites. Dent Mater2:80-84.
9.
Ferracane JL, Antonio RC, Matsumoto H. (1987). Variables affecting the fracture toughness of dental composites. J Dent Res66:1140-1145.
10.
Ferracane JL, Condon JR (1991). Degradation of composites caused by accelerated aging (abstract). J Dent Res70:480.
11.
Fraunhofer JA, Curtis P. (1989). The physical and mechanical properties of anterior and posterior composite restorative materials. Dent Mater5:365-368.
12.
Hosoda H., Yamada T., Inokoshi S.( 1990). SFM and elemental analysis of resin composites. J Prosthet Dent64:669-676.
13.
Matsumoto H., Gres JE, Marker VA, Okabe T., Ferracane JL, Harvey GA (1986). Depth of cure of visible light-cured resin: Clinical simulation. J Prosthet Dent55:574-578.
Ruyter IE, 0ysaed H. (1982). Conversion in different depths of ultraviolet and visible light activated composite materials. Acta Odontol Scand40:179-192.
21.
Swartz ML, Phillips RW, Rhodes B. (1983). Visible light-activated resins-depth of cure. J ADA106:634-637.
22.
Tani Y. ( 1985). Current status of posterior resin composites in Japan . In: Posterior resin composite dental restorative materials . Vanherle G, Smith DC, editors. Utrecht: P. Szulc Publishing Co., pp. 185-197.
23.
Tirtha R., Fan PL, Dennison JB, Powers JM (1982). In vitro depth of cure of photo-activated composites . J Dent Res61:1184-1187.
24.
Yearn JA (1985). Factors affecting cure of visible light activated composites. Int Dent J35:218-225.
25.
Watts DC (1992). Dental restorative materials. In: Materials science and technology: a comprehensive treatment. Cahn RW, Haasen P, Kramer EJ, editors.Weinheim: VCH Publishers , 14:pp. 209-258.
