The release of mercury vapor from class I amalgam restorations prepared in human molar teeth was studied during chewing simulations in an artificial mouth of a bi-axial servo-hydraulic mechanical test system. So that the total mercury released from the restoration over a fixed time could be determined, a closed chamber surrounded the envelope of chewing motion. In addition, the influence of sampling frequency on mercury release was corrected by the use of different sampling frequencies over a fixed time interval of mercury release measurement and extrapolation to zero sampling time. Thus, a combination of a closed environment and an extrapolation method to determine the mercury release under continuous sampling was used to determine the mercury released under normal breathing conditions. The measured mercury release rate data were used to calculate the potential daily mercury dose in a patient due to a single amalgam restoration, following the method previously outlined by Berglund. The mercury release from both a conventional and a high-copper amalgam was evaluated at different age intervals after the restoration was placed in the teeth. The results show that while the age of the amalgam and the amalgam type influence the extent of mercury release during the initial non-steady-state conditions, the steady-state value of mercury daily dose due to a single amalgam filling is 0.03 ug/day, which is well below the calculated threshold-limiting value (TLV) of 82.29 μg/day considered dangerous for occupational exposure in the United States.
Abraham JE, Svare CW, Frank CW (1984). The effects of dental restorations on blood mercury levels. J Dent Res63:71-73.
2.
Aker JR ( 1982). New composite resins: comparison of their resistance to toothbrush abrasion and characteristics of abraded surfaces. J Am Dent Assoc105:633-635.
3.
American Dental Association (1990). When your patients ask about mercury in amalgam: Special report. J Am Dent Assoc120:395-398.
4.
Bauer JG (1985). Action of mercury exposure in dental exposures to mercury. Oper Dent10:104-113.
5.
Bauer JG, First HA (1982). The toxicity of mercury in dental amalgams. CA Dent Assoc J10:47-61.
6.
Berdouses E. (1992). Effect of age and alloy composition on mercury release from amalgam, an in vitro study (MS thesis). Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Medicine and Dentistry of NJ .
7.
Berglund A. (1990). Estimation by a 24-hour study of the daily dose of intra-oral mercury vapor after release from dental amalgam. J Dent Res69:1646-1651.
8.
Berglund A. (1993). An in vitro and in vivo study of the release of mercury vapor from different types of amalgam alloys. J Dent Res72:939-946.
9.
Berglund A., Pohl L., Olsson S., Bergman M. (1988). Determination of the rate of release of intraoral mercury vapor from amalgam. J Dent Res67:1235-1242.
10.
Brune D. (1981). Corrosion of amalgams. Scand J Dent Res89 :506-514.
11.
Burgh T. (1863). Amalgam. Dent Cosmos4:531-535.
12.
Camner P., Bakke B. (1980). Nose or mouth breathing? Environ Res21:394-398.
13.
Clarkson TW, Freiberg L., Hursh JB, Nylander M. (1988). The prediction of intake of mercury vapor from amalgams. In: Biological monitoring of toxic metals. Clarkson TW, Freiberg L, Nordberg GF, Sager P , editors. New York: Plenum Press .
14.
Coffey JP, Goodkind RJ, DeLong R., Douglas WH (1985). In vitro study of the wear characteristics of natural and artificial teeth. J Prosthet Dent54:273-279.
15.
Craig RG (1986). Biocompatibility of mercury derivatives. Dent Mater2:91-96.
16.
Dean DH ( 1991). Toothbrushes with graduated wear: correlation with in vitro cleansing performance. Clin Prev Dent13:25-30.
17.
DeLong R, Douglas WH (1983). Development of an artificial oral environment for the testing of dental restoratives: Bi-axial force and movement control. J Dent Res 62:32-36. DeLong R, Sakaguchi RL, Douglas WH, Pintado MR (1985). The wear of dental amalgam in an artificial mouth: a clinical correlation. Dent Mater 1:238-242.
18.
Derand T. (1989). Mercury vapor from dental amalgams, an in vitro study. Swed Dent J13:169-175.
19.
Eames WB, Gasper JD, Mohler C. (1976). The mercury enigma in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc92:1199-1203.
20.
Efraimsen HE, Johansen JR, Haugen E., Holland RI (1990). The abrasive effect of a rotating electrical toothbrush on dentin. Clin Prev Dent12:13-18.
21.
Ferracane JL, Adey JD, Okabe T. (1994). The effect of alloy composition on mercury vaporization from amalgams (abstract). J Dent Res 73(Spec Iss)73:212.
22.
Ferracane JL, Hanawa T., Okabe T. (1992). Effectiveness of oxide films in reducing mercury release from amalgams. J Dent Res71:1151-1155.
23.
Fuhner H. (1927). Chronic mercury poisoning and amalgam fillings . Klin Wochenschr6:1545-1548.
Gleeson K, Zwillich CW, Braier K, White DP (1986). Breathing route during sleep. Am Rev Resp Dis 134:115-120. Goldstein GR, Lerner T (1991). The effect of toothbrushing on a hybrid composite resin. J Prosthet Dent 66:498-500. Grossman LI, Dannenberg JR (1949). Amount of mercury vapor in air of dental offices and laboratories. J Dent Res 25 :435-438.
26.
Hahn LJ, Kloiber R., Vimy MJ, Takahashi Y., Lorscheider FL (1989). Dental "silver" tooth fillings: a source of mercury exposure revealed by whole-body image scan and tissue analysis. FASEB J3:2641-2646.
27.
Hahn LJ, Kloiber R., Leininger RW, Vimy MJ, Lorscheider FL (1990). Whole-body imaging of the distribution of mercury released from dental fillings into monkey tissues. FASEB J4:3256-3260.
28.
Hero H., Brune D., Jorgensen B., Evje DM ( 1983). Surface degradation of amalgams in vitro during static and cyclic loading. Scand J Dent Res91:488-495.
29.
Huggins HA (1982). Mercury: A factor in mental disease? J Orthomol Psych11:3-16.
30.
Kozono Y., Moore BK, Phillips RW, Swartz ML (1982). Dissolution of amalgam in saline solution. J Biomed Mater Res16:767-774.
31.
Langworth S., Kohlbeck KG, Akesson A. (1988). Mercury exposure from dental fillings. II. Release and absorption. Swed Dent J12:71-72.
32.
Lawrence A (1866). The amalgam question. Dent Cosmos 7:62-64. Mackert JR Jr (1987). Factors affecting estimation of dental amalgam mercury exposure from measurements of mercury vapor levels in intra-oral and expired air. J Dent Res 66:1775-1780.
33.
Marek M. (1990). The release of mercury from dental amalgam: The mechanism and in vitro testing. J Dent Res69 :1167-1174.
34.
Marek M. (1994). Mercury vapor emission from fresh fracture surfaces of dental amalgam (abstract). J Dent Res 73(Spec Iss)73:26.
35.
Marshall GW, Marshall SJ (1979). Time-dependent phase changes in Cu-rich amalgams . J Biomed Mater Res13 :395-406.
36.
Merfield DP, Taylor A., Gemmell DM, Parrish JA (1976). Mercury intoxication in a dental surgery following unreported spillage. Br Dent J141(6):179-186.
37.
Olsson S., Bergman M. (1992). Daily dose calculations from measurements of intra-oral mercury vapor. J Dent Res71:414-423.
38.
Olsson S., Berglund A., Pohl L., Bergman M. (1989). Model of mercury vapor transport from amalgam restorations in the oral cavity. J Dent Res68:504-508.
39.
Patterson JE, Weissberg BG, Dennison PJ (1985). Mercury in human breath from dental amalgams. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol34:459-468.
40.
Phillips RW, Schwartz ML (1949). Mercury analysis of one hundred amalgam restorations. J Dent Res 28:569-572. Pinto OF, Huggins HA (1976). Mercury poisoning in America. J Int Acad Prev Med 3:42-58.
41.
Rupp NW ( 1973). Clinical use of dental materials. Amalgams. J IN Dent Assoc52:432-434.
42.
Souder W., Sweeney AB (1931). Is mercury poisonous in dental amalgam restorations ? Dent Cosmos73:1145-1152.
43.
Stanford J. (1984). Workshop: Biocompatibility of metals in dentistry . J Am Dent Assoc109:469-471.
44.
Stock A. (1926a). Danger of mercury vapor and amalgams. Med Klin22:1209-1212.
45.
Stock A. (1926b). Danger of mercury vapor and amalgams. Med Klin22:1250-1252.
46.
Stokinger HE (1981). Mercury (Hg). In: Patty's industrial hygiene and toxicology. 3rd ed. Clayton GD, Clayton FE, Editors. New York: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 1769-1792. Svare CW, Peterson LC, Reinhardt JW, Boyer DB, Frank CW, Gay DD, et al (1981). The effects of dental amalgams on mercury levels in expired air. J Dent Res 60:1668-1671.
47.
Svinnseth PN, Gjerdet NR, Lie T. (1987). Abrasivity of toothpastes. An in vitro study of toothpastes marketed in Norway. Acta Odontol Scand45:195-202.
48.
Uddstromer M. (1940). Nasal respiration. Acta Otolaryngol42(Suppl):5-146.
49.
Vimy MJ, Lorscheider EL (1985a). Intra-oral air mercury release from dental amalgam . J Dent Res64:1069-1071.
50.
Vimy MJ, Lorscheider FL (1985b). Serial measurements of intraoral air mercury: Estimation of daily dose from dental amalgam. J Dent Res64:1072-1075.
51.
Vimy MJ, Luft AJ, Lorscheider FL (1986). Estimation of mercury body burden from dental amalgam: Computer simulation of the metabolic compartment model. J Dent Res 65:1415-1419. Vimy MJ, Takahashi Y, Lorscheider FL (1990). Maternal fetal distribution of mercury (203Hg) released from dental amalgam fillings. Am J Physiolog Soc 258(Pt 2):R939-945.
