Laboratory testing of dentin adhesive systems still requires corroboration by long-term clinical trials for their ultimate clinical effectiveness to be validated. The objective of this clinical investigation was to evaluate, retrospectively, the clinical effectiveness of earlier-investigated dentin adhesive systems (Scotchbond, Gluma, Clearf il New Bond, Scotchbond 2, Tenure, and Tripton), and to compare their clinical results with those obtained with four modern total-etch adhesive systems (Bayer exp. 1 and 2, Clearfil Liner Bond System, and Scotchbond Multi-Purpose). In total, 1177 Class V cervical lesions in the teeth of 346 patients were restored following two cavity designs: In Group A, enamel was neither beveled nor intentionally etched, as per ADA guidelines; in Group B, adjacent enamel was beveled and conditioned. Clinical retention rates definitely indicated the improved clinical efficacy of the newest dentin adhesives over the earlier systems. With regard to adhesion strategy, adhesive systems that removed the smear layer and concurrently demineralized the dentin surface layer performed clinically better than systems that modified the disorderly layer of smear debris without complete removal. Hybridization by resin interdiffusion into the exposed dentinal collagen layer, combined with attachment of resin tags into the opened dentin tubules, appeared to be essential for reliable dentin bonding but might be insufficient by itself. The additional formation of an elastic bonding area as a polymerization shrinkage absorber and the use of a microfine restorative composite apparently guaranteed an efficient clinical result. The perfect one-year retention recorded for Clearfil Liner Bond System and Scotchbond Multi-Purpose must be confirmed at later recalls.
Asmussen E., Munksgaard EC (1985). Adhesion of restorative resins to dentinal tissues . In: Posterior composite resin dental restorative materials . Vanherle G, Smith DC, editors. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Peter Szulc Publishing Co., pp. 217-229.
3.
Bayne SC, Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD, Sluder TB (1991). Contributing co-variables on clinical trials. Am J Dent4:247-250.
4.
Braem M., Lambrechts P., Van Doren V., Vanherle G. (1986). The impact of composite structure on its elastic response. J Dent Res65:648-653.
5.
Braem M., Lambrechts P., Vanherle G. (1992). Stress-induced cervical lesions. J Prosthet Dent67:718-722.
6.
Buonocore DH (1955). A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res34:849-853.
7.
Causton BE (1984). Improved bonding of composite restorative to dentine . Br Dent J156:93-95.
8.
Chan DCN, Reinhardt JW, Boyer DB (1985). Composite resin compatibility and bond longevity of a dentin bonding agent. J Dent Res64:1402-1404.
9.
Council on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment (1987a). Dentin bonding systems: an update. J Am Dent Assoc114:91-95.
10.
Council on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment (1987b). ADA clinical protocol guidelines for dentin and enamel adhesive restorative materials. Chicago: American Dental Association.
11.
Council on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment (1991). Revised acceptance program-ADA guidelines. Chicago: American Dental Association.
12.
Crim GA ( 1990). Prepolymerization of Gluma 4 sealer: effect on bonding . Am J Dent3:25-27.
13.
Duke ES ( 1991a). Adhesion and tooth-coloured restoratives. Curr Opin Dent1:163-171.
14.
Duke ES ( 1991b). Clinical studies of adhesive systems. Oper Dent (Suppl 5) :103-110.
15.
Duke ES, Lindemuth JS (1990). Polymeric adhesion to dentin: Contrasting substrates . Am J Dent3:264-270.
16.
Duke ES, Lindemuth JS (1991). Variability of clinical dentin substrates. Am J Dent4:241-246.
17.
Duke ES, Robbins JW, Snyder DE (1991). Clinical evaluation of a dentinal adhesive system: three-year results. Quintessence Int22:889-895.
18.
Eick JD, Cobb CM, Chapell RP, Spencer P., Robinson SJ (1991). The dentinal surface: Its influence on dentinal adhesion. PartI. Quintessence Int22:967-977.
19.
Eick JD, Robinson SJ, Cobb CM, Chapell RP, Spencer P. (1992). The dentinal surface: Its influence on dentinal adhesion. Part II. Quintessence Int23:43-51.
20.
Eick JD, Robinson SJ, Byerley TJ, Chappelow CC (1993a). Adhesives and nonshrinking dental resins of the future. Quintessence Int24:632-640.
21.
Eick JD, Robinson SJ, Chapell RP, Cobb CM, Spencer P. (1993b). The dentinal surface: Its influence on dentinal adhesion. Part III. Quintessence Int24:571-582.
22.
Eliades GC, Vougiouklakis GJ (1989). 31P-NMR study of P-based dental adhesives and electron probe microanalysis of simulated interfaces with dentin. Dent Mater5:101-108.
23.
Eliades G., Palaghias G., Vougiouklakis G. (1990). Surface reactions of adhesives on dentin. Dent Mater6:208-216.
24.
Erickson RL (1989). Mechanism and clinical implications of bond formation for two dentin bonding agents. Am J Dent2:117-123.
25.
Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL (1987). Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 66:1636-1639. Fujitani M, Hosoda H, Yamauchi J (1992). Advanced bonding system using salicylic acid derivate and phosphate monomers (abstract). J Dent Res 71:667.
26.
Fusayama T. (1980). New concepts in operative dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co.
27.
Goel VK, Khera SC, Ralston JL, Chang KH (1991). Stresses at the dentinoenamel junction of human teeth-A finite element investigation. J Prosthet Dent66:451-459.
28.
Gwinnett AJ (1988). Aluminum oxalate for dentin bonding. An SEM study . Am J Dent1:5-8.
29.
Gwinnett AJ (1993). Quantitative contribution of resin infiltration/hybridization to dentin bonding. Am J Dent6:7-9.
30.
Gwinnett AJ, Kanca J. III (1992). Interfacial morphology of resin composite and shiny erosion lesions. Am J Dent5:315-317.
31.
Hamilton AI, Phillips RW, Howard WW, Schuchard AS, Lund MR, Miller CH, et al. (1980). Special report. Report of the committee on scientific investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry . J Prosthet Dent43:663-686.
32.
Hansen EK (1986). Effect of cavity depth and application technique on marginal adaptation of resins in dentin cavities. J Dent Res65:1319-1321.
33.
Hansen EK (1989). Three-year study of cervical erosions restored with resin and dentin-bonding agent. Acta Odontol Scand47:301-306.
34.
Hansen SE, Swift EJ (1989). Microleakage with Gluma: effects of unfilled resin polymerization and storage time. Am J Dent2:266-268.
35.
Harashima I., Hirasawa T. (1990). Adsorption of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate on dentin from aqueous solution. Dent Mater J9:36-46.
36.
Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Brunson WD, Wilder AD, Sluder TB, Bayne SC (1988). Twelve-month clinical study of dentinal adhesives in Class V cervical lesions. J Am Dent Assoc116:179-183.
37.
Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Bayne S., Wilder AD, Sluder TB, Brunson WD (1991). Examining tooth flexure effects on cervical restorations: a two-year clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc122:41-47.
38.
Horsted-Bindslev P., Knudsen J., Baelum V. (1988). Dentin adhesive materials for restoration of cervical erosions. Two and three year clinical observations. Am J Dent1:195-199.
39.
Ianzano JA, Gwinnett AJ (1993). Clinical evaluation of class V restorations using a total etch technique: 1-year results. Am J Dent6:207-210.
40.
Inokoshi S., Hosoda H., Harnirattisai C., Shimida Y., Tatsumi T. (1990). A study on the resin-impregnated layer of dentin: Part I. A comparative study on the decalcified and undecalcified sections and the application of argon ion beam etching to disclose the resin-impregnated layer of dentin. Jpn J Conserv Dent33:427-442.
41.
Inokoshi S., Hosoda H., Harnirattisai C., Shimida Y. (1993). Interfacial structure between dentin and seven dentin bonding systems revealed using argon ion beam etching. Oper Dent18:8-16.
42.
Jordan RE, Suzuki M., MacLean DF (1989). Early clinical evaluation of Tenure and Scotchbond 2 for conservative restoration of
43.
cervical erosion lesions. J Esthet Dent1:10-13.
44.
Jordan RE, Suzuki M., Davidson DF (1993). Clinical evaluation of a universal dentin bonding resin: preserving dentition through new materials. J Am Dent Assoc124:71-76.
45.
Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL (1990a). Complete marginal seal of class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res69:1240-1243.
46.
Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL (1990b). Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. J Prosthet Dent64:658-664.
47.
Kinloch AJ (1987). Adhesion and adhesives. Science and technology . London: Chapman and Hall.
48.
Knudsen J., Horsted-Bindslev P. (1992). Adhesive restorations using experimental conditioning and bonding materials (abstract). J Dent Res71:666.
49.
Lambrechts P., Braem M., Vanherle G. (1987). Evaluation of clinical performance for posterior composite resins and dentin adhesives. Oper Dent12:53-78.
50.
Lee WC, Eakle WS (1984). Possible role of tensile stress in the etiology of cervical erosive lesions of teeth. J Prosthet Dent52:374-380.
51.
McGuckin RS, Tao L., Thompson WO, Pashley DH (1991). Shear bond strength of Scotchbond in vivo. Dent Mater7:50-53.
52.
McLean JW (1979). The future of restorative materials. Prosthet Dent42:154-158.
53.
Moon PC, Chang YH (1992). Effect of DBA layer thickness on composite resin shrinkage stress (abstract). J Dent Res71:275.
54.
Munksgaard EC, Irie M., Asmussen E. (1985). Dentin-polymer bond promoted by Gluma and various resins. J Dent Res64:1409-1411.
55.
Nakabayashi N., Takarada K. (1992). Effect of HEMA on bonding to dentin. Dent Mater8:125-130.
56.
Nakabayashi N., Kojima K., Masuhara E. (1982). The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res16:265-273.
57.
Pashley DH (1989). Dentin: A dynamic substrate-A review. Scanning Microsc3:161-176.
58.
Pashley DH (1990). Interactions of dental materials with dentin. Trans Acad Dent Mater3:55-73.
59.
Pashley DH (1991). Dentin bonding: overview of the substrate with respect to adhesive material. J Esthet Dent3:46-50.
60.
Pashley DH, Ciucchi B., Sano H., Horner JA (1993). Permeability of dentin to adhesive agents. Quintessence Int24:618-631.
61.
Pashley EL, Tao L., Pashley DH (1993). Effects of oxalate on dentin bonding. Am J Dent6:116-118.
62.
Perdigao J., Swift EJ (1994). Analysis of dental adhesive systems using scanning electron microscopy. IntDent J (in press).
63.
Phillips RW (1981). Past, present and future composite resin systems . Dent Clin North Am25:209-218.
64.
Plasmans Pjjm, Reukers EAJ, Vollenbrock-Kuipers L., Vollenbrock HR (1993). Air humidity: a detrimental factor in dentine adhesion. J Dent21:228-233.
65.
Powell LV, Gordon GE, Johnson GH (1992). Clinical comparison of Class 5 resin composite and glass ionomer restorations. Am J Dent5:249-252.
66.
Rueggeberg FA, Margeson DH (1990). The effect of oxygen inhibition on an unfilled/filled composite system. J Dent Res69:1652-1658.
67.
Snuggs HM, Powell CS, Cox CF, White KC (1992). Six-month clinical evaluation of cervical lesions after acid etching and restoration (abstract). J Dent Res71:661.
68.
Soderholm K-JM (1991). Correlation of in vivo and in vitro performance of adhesive restorative materials: A report of the ASC MD156 Task Group on test methods for the adhesion of restorative materials. Dent Mater7:74-83.
69.
Spencer P., Byerley TJ, Eick JD, Witt JD ( 1992). Chemical characterization of the dentin/adhesive interface by Fourier Transform Infrared Photoacoustic Spectroscopy. Dent Mater8:10-15.
70.
Stangel I., Ostro E., Domingue A., Sacher E., Bertrand L. (1991). Photoacoustic Fourier transform IR spectroscopic study of polymer-dentin interaction. In: Polymer-solid interfaces . Pireaux JJ, Bertrand P, Bredas JL, editors. Bristol and Philadelphia: Institute of Physics Publishing, pp. 157-167.
71.
Suzuki M., Kato H., Wakumoto S. (1991). Vibrational analysis by Raman spectroscopy of the interface between dental adhesive resin and dentin. J Dent Res70:1092-1097.
72.
Swift EJ, Cloe BC ( 1993). Shear bond strengths of new enamel etchants. Am J Dent6:162-164.
73.
Swift EJ, Denehy GE, Beck MD ( 1993). Use of phosphoric acid etchants with Scotchbond Multi-Purpose . Am J Dent6:88-90.
74.
Taleghani M., Leinfelder K. (1991). Two-year clinical evaluation of Tenure dentin bonding agent (abstract). J Dent Res70:457.
75.
Tam LE, Pilliar RM (1994). Fracture surface characterization of dentin-bonded interfacial fracture toughness specimens. J Dent Res73:607-619.
76.
Torney DL (1978). The retentive ability of acid-etched dentin. J Prosthet Dent39:169-172.
77.
Torstenson BC, Oden A. ( 1989). Effects of bonding agent types and incremental techniques on minimizing contraction gaps around resin composites. Dent Mater5:218-223.
78.
Tyas MJ ( 1991). Three-year clinical evaluation of dentine bonding agents . Aust Dent J36:298-301.
79.
Tyas MJ ( 1992). One-year clinical performance of PMDM-based dentine bonding agents. Aust Dent J37:445-448.
80.
Tyas MJ ( 1994). Clinical evaluation of five adhesive systems. Am J Dent7:77-80.
81.
Tyas MJ, Chandler JE (1993). One-year clinical evaluation of three dentine bonding agents. Aust Dent J38:294-298.
82.
Tyas MJ, Burns GA, Byrne PF, Cunningham PJ, Dobson BC, Widdop FT (1989). Clinical evaluation of Scotchbond: three-year
83.
results. Aust Dent J34:277-279.
84.
van Dijken JWV (1990a). The effect of cavity pretreatment procedures on dentin bonding: A four-year clinical evaluation. J Prosthet Dent64:148-152.
85.
van Dijken JWV (1990b). A 3-year evaluation of Gluma and Gluma/Scotchbond for restoration of cervical erosions. Scand] Dent Res98:341-344.
86.
van Dijken JWV (1992). Two-year clinical evaluation of four new dentin bonding agents (abstract). J Dent Res71:662.
87.
Vanherle G., Verschueren M., Lambrechts P., Braem M. (1986). Clinical investigation of dentin adhesive systems. Part I: An in vivo study. J Prosthet Dent55:157-163.
88.
Vanherle G., Lambrechts P., Braem M. (1991). An evaluation of different adhesive restorations in cervical lesions. J Prosthet Dent65:341-347.
89.
Van Meerbeek B., Inokoshi S., Braem M., Lambrechts P., Vanherle G. (1992). Morphological aspects of the resin-dentin interdiffusion zone with different dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res71:1530-1540.
90.
Van Meerbeek B., Braem M., Lambrechts P., Vanherle G. (1993a). Evaluation of two dentin adhesives in cervical lesions. J Prosthet Dent70:308-314.
91.
Van Meerbeek B., Braem M., Lambrechts P., Vanherle G. (1993b). Two-year clinical evaluation of two dentin-adhesive systems in cervical lesions. J Dent21:195-202.
92.
Van Meerbeek B., Dhem A., Goret-Nicaise M., Braem M., Lambrechts P., Vanherle G. (1993c). Comparative SEM and TEM examination of the ultrastructure of the resin-dentin interdiffusion zone. J Dent Res72:495-501.
93.
Van Meerbeek B., Willems G., Celis JP, RoosJR,Braem M., Lambrechts P., et al. (1993d). Assessment by nano-indentation of the hardness and elasticity of the resin-dentin bonding area. J Dent Res72:1434-1442.
94.
Van Meerbeek B., Braem M., Lambrechts P., Vanherle G. (1994). Morphological characterisation of the interface between resin and sclerotic dentine. J Dent22:141-146.
95.
Willems G., Lambrechts P., Braem M., Celis JP, Vanherle G. (1992). A classification of dental composites according to their morphological and mechanical characteristics. Dent Mater8:310-319.
96.
Ziemiecki TL, Dennison JB, Charbeneau GT (1987). Clinical evaluation of cervical composite resin restorations placed without retention. Oper Dent12:27-33.
