BestAMLangTAGreenbergBLGunsolleyJCIoannidouE; Task Force on Design and Analysis in Oral Health Research. 2024. The OHStat guidelines for reporting observational studies and clinical trials in oral health research: manuscript checklist. J Dent Res [epub ahead of print 13 Jul 2024] in press. doi:10.1177/00220345241247028
2.
CamererCFDreberAForsellEHoT-HHuberJJohannessonMKirchlerMAlmenbergJAltmejdAChanT, et al. 2016. Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics. Science. 351(6280):1433–1436.
3.
ChalmersIGlasziouP.2009. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet. 374(9683):86–89.
4.
DelgadoAHSSauroSLimaAFLoguercioADDella BonaAMazzoniACollaresFMStaxrudFFerracaneJTsoiJ, et al. 2022. RoBDEMAT: a risk of bias tool and guideline to support reporting of pre-clinical dental materials research and assessment of systematic reviews. J Dent. 127:104350.
5.
ElsonM. 2024. Pay researchers to spot errors in published papers. Nature. 629(8013):730.
6.
ErringtonTMDenisAPerfitoNIornsENosekBA. 2021. Challenges for assessing replicability in preclinical cancer biology. eLife. 10:e67995.
7.
ErringtonTMMathurMSoderbergCKDenisAPerfitoNIornsENosekBA. 2021. Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology. eLife. 10:e71601.
8.
GardnerMJAltmanDG. 1986. Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing. BMJ. 292(6522):746–750.
9.
IoannidisJPA. 2005. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2(8):e124.
10.
KorbmacherMAzevedoFPenningtonCRHartmannHPownallMSchmidtKElsherifMBreznauNRobertsonOKalandadzeT, et al. 2023. The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes. Commun Psychol. 1:Article 3. doi:10.1038/s44271-023-00003-2
11.
Open Science Collaboration. 2015. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science. 349(6251):aac4716.
12.
PandisNFlemingPSKatsarosCIoannidisJPA. 2021. Dental research waste in design, analysis, and reporting: a scoping review. J Dent Res. 100(3):245–252.
13.
SchulzKFAltmanDGMoherDGroupC.2010. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 340:c332.
14.
SchwendickeFMarazitaMLJakubovicsNSKroisJ.2022. Big Data and complex data analytics: breaking peer review?J Dent Res. 101(4):369–370.
VauxDLFidlerFCummingG.2012. Replicates and repeats—what is the difference and is it significant? A brief discussion of statistics and experimental design. EMBO Rep. 13(4):291–296.
17.
von ElmEAltmanDGEggerMPocockSJGøtzschePCVandenbrouckeJPSTROBEInitiative. 2007. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Epidemiology. 18(6):800–804.
18.
WassersteinRLLazarNA. 2016. The ASA Statement on p-values: context, process, and purpose. Am Stat. 70(2):129–133.
