Poor dental status negatively relates to dietary intakes. However, this issue has not been researched among the most vulnerable groups in society. We aimed to investigate, in a national low-income sample, the association between dental status and fruit and vegetable consumption. We analyzed data on adults aged 50 years and older from the Low Income Diet and Nutrition Survey, a representative sample of deprived UK households. Considerable numbers reported difficulty eating specific foods, with significantly worse experience among edentate than dentate people. The mean daily fruits and vegetables consumption was low (256.5 g for dentate, 207.1 g for edentate). After adjustment for socio-demographic and behavioral variables, edentate individuals consumed 50.7 g (27.0, 74.3) fewer fruits/vegetables per day than the dentate. Over and above the effects of material deprivation on nutrient intake, edentulism negatively relates to eating fruits and vegetables and achieving a healthy diet in materially deprived older adults.
BatesBNatarajanLErensBNelsonMRobertsCWilliamsonC. (2004). Low Income Diet and Nutrition Survey (LIDNS): a methodological report on the Feasibility Study. London: National Centre for Social Research.
2.
BatesBSpeightSTippingS (2007). Methodology and response. In: Low income diet and nutrition survey. Volume 1: Background, methods, sample characteristics. NelsonMErensBBatesBChurchSBoshierT, editors. London: TSO, pp. 17-40.
3.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2003). Public health and aging: retention of natural teeth among older adults—United States, 2002. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep52:1226-1229.
4.
DowlerE (2001). Inequalities in diet and physical activity in Europe. Public Health Nutr4:701-709.
5.
DowlerECaraherMLincolnP (2007). Inequalities in food and nutrition: challenging ‘lifestyles’. In: Challenging health inequalities: from Acheson to ‘Choosing Health’. DowlerESpencerN, editors. Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 127-155.
6.
FeineJSLundJP (2006). Measuring chewing ability in randomized controlled trials with edentulous populations wearing implant prostheses. J Oral Rehabil33:301-308.
7.
HallingABengtssonCLennerRA (1988). Diet in relation to number of remaining teeth in a population of middle-aged women in Gothenburg, Sweden. Swed Dent J12:39-45.
8.
HendersonLGregoryJSwanG (2002). The National Diet and Nutrition Survey: adults aged 19 to 64 years. Volume 1: Types and quantities of foods consumed. Norwich: HMSO.
9.
HendersonLGregoryJIrvingKSwanG (2003). The National Diet and Nutrition Survey: adults aged 19 to 64 years. Volume 2: Energy, protein, carbohydrate, fat and alcohol intake. Norwich: HMSO.
10.
HerrickKHolmesB (2007). Anthropometry. In: Low income diet and nutrition survey. Volume 3: Nutritional status, physical activity, economic, social and other factors. NelsonMErensBBatesBChurchSBoshierT, editors. London: TSO, pp. 9-40.
11.
HolmesB (2007). Energy intake. In: Low income diet and nutrition survey. Volume 2: Food consumption, nutrient intake. NelsonMErensBBatesBChurchSBoshierT, editors. London: TSO, pp. 99-114.
12.
Irala-EstevezJDGrothMJohanssonLOltersdorfUPrattalaRMartinez-GonzalezMA (2000). A systematic review of socio-economic differences in food habits in Europe: consumption of fruit and vegetables. Eur J Clin Nutr54:706-714.
13.
KellyMSteeleJGNuttallNBradnockGMorrisJNunnJ. (2000). Adult Dental Health Survey. Oral Health in the United Kingdom 1998. London: The Stationery Office.
14.
KrallEHayesCGarciaR (1998). How dentition status and masticatory function affect nutrient intake. J Am Dent Assoc129:1261-1269.
15.
LockerD (1992). The burden of oral disorders in a population of older adults. Community Dent Health9:109-124.
16.
MoynihanPJSnowSJepsonNJButlerTJ (1994). Intake of non-starch polysaccharide (dietary fibre) in edentulous and dentate persons: an observational study. Br Dent J177:243-247.
17.
NelsonMBatesBErensBMindellJ (2007). Background and purpose of LIDNS. In: Low income diet and nutrition survey. Volume 1: Background, methods, sample characteristics. NelsonMErensBBatesBChurchSBoshierT, editors. London: TSO, pp. 9-16.
18.
Nowjack-RaymerRESheihamA (2003). Association of edentulism and diet and nutrition in US adults. J Dent Res82:123-126.
19.
Nowjack-RaymerRESheihamA (2007). Numbers of natural teeth, diet, and nutritional status in US adults. J Dent Res86:1171-1175.
20.
SahyounNRLinCLKrallE (2003). Nutritional status of the older adult is associated with dentition status. J Am Diet Assoc103:61-66.
21.
SheihamASteeleJGMarcenesWFinchSWallsAW (1999). The impact of oral health on stated ability to eat certain foods; findings from the National Diet and Nutrition Survey of Older People in Great Britain. Gerodontology16:11-20.
22.
SheihamASteeleJGMarcenesWLoweCFinchSBatesCJ. (2001). The relationship among dental status, nutrient intake, and nutritional status in older people. J Dent Res80:408-413.
23.
SmithJMSheihamA (1979). How dental conditions handicap the elderly. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol7:305-310.
24.
SteeleJSheihamAMarcenesWWallsA (1998). National Diet and Nutrition Survey: people aged 65 years and over. Volume 2: Report of the oral health survey. London: TSO.
25.
SteeleJGTreasureEPittsNBMorrisJBradnockG (2000). Total tooth loss in the United Kingdom in 1998 and implications for the future. Br Dent J189:598-603.
26.
TsakosGWattRSheihamA (2007). Oral health. In: Low income diet and nutrition survey. Volume 3: Nutritional status, physical activity, economic, social and other factors. NelsonMErensBBatesBChurchSBoshierT, editors. London: TSO, pp. 151-162.
27.
WallsAWSteeleJG (2004). The relationship between oral health and nutrition in older people. Mech Ageing Dev125:853-857.
28.
World Health Organization (2003). Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases. Report of the Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation. Report No. 916. Geneva: WHO.
