Conservatism Negatively Predicts Creativity: A Study Across 28 Countries

Abstract

Previous studies have found a negative relationship between creativity and conservatism. However, as these studies were mostly conducted on samples of homogeneous nationality, the generalizability of the effect across different cultures is unknown. We addressed this gap by conducting a study in 28 countries. Based on the notion that attitudes can be shaped by both environmental and ecological factors, we hypothesized that parasite stress can also affect creativity and thus, its potential effects should be controlled for. The results of multilevel analyses showed that, as expected, conservatism was a significant predictor of lower creativity, adjusting for economic status, age, sex, education level, subjective susceptibility to disease, and country-level parasite stress. In addition, most of the variability in creativity was due to individual rather than country-level variance. Our study provides evidence for a weak but significant negative link between conservatism and creativity at the individual level (β = −0.08, p < .001) and no such effect when country-level conservatism was considered. We present our hypotheses considering previous findings on the behavioral immune system in humans.

Keywords

creativity TCT-DP behavioral immune system parasite stress conservatism liberalism cross-cultural

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Altemeyer

(1996). The authoritarian specter. Harvard University Press.

Amabile

T. M.

(1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357–376.

Ari

Ustazhanov

(2014). Matplotlib in python [Conference session]. 2014 11th International Conference on Electronics, Computer and Computation (ICECCO), Abuja, Nigeria, 29 September–1 October 2014.

Arnett

J. J.

(2016). The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. American Psychologist, 63, 602–614. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.7.602.

Bates

Kliegl

Vasishth

Baayen

(2015). Parsimonious mixed models. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1506.04967.

Batey

Furnham

(2006). Creativity, intelligence, and personality: A critical review of the scattered literature. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132(4), 355–429.

Brandt

M. J.

Crawford

J. T.

(2019). Studying a heterogeneous array of target groups can help us understand prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28, 292–298.

Brandt

M. J.

Reyna

Chambers

J. R.

Crawford

J. T.

Wetherell

(2014). The ideological-conflict hypothesis: Intolerance among both liberals and conservatives. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413510932

Brislin

R. W.

(1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216.

10.

Burnham

K. P.

Anderson

D. R.

(2004). Multimodel inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods & Research, 33(2), 261–304.

11.

Conroy-Beam

Buss

D. M.

Asao

Sorokowska

Sorokowski

Aavik

. . . & Zupančič

(2019a). Contrasting computational models of mate preference integration across 45 countries. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 16885.

12.

Conroy-Beam

Roney

J. R.

Lukaszewski

A. W.

Buss

D. M.

Asao

Sorokowska

. . . Zupančič

(2019b). Assortative mating and the evolution of desirability covariation. Evolution and Human Behavior, 40(5), 479–491.

13.

Conway

L. G.

Gornick

L. J.

Houck

S. C.

Anderson

Stockert

Sessoms

McCue

(2016). Are conservatives really more simple-minded than liberals? The domain specificity of complex thinking. Political Psychology, 37(6), 777–798. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12304

14.

Cropley

(2006). In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 391–404.

15.

Crowson

H. M.

(2009). Are all conservatives alike? A study of the psychological correlates of cultural and economic conservatism. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 143(5), 449–463. https://doi.org/10.3200/JRL.143.5.449-463

16.

Crowson

H. M.

Thoma

S. J.

Hestevold

(2005). Is political conservatism synonymous with authoritarianism? The Journal of Social Psychology, 145(5), 571–592. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.145.5.571-592

17.

Dai

D. Y.

Tan

Marathe

Valtcheva

Pruzek

R. M.

Shen

(2012). Influences of social and educational environments on creativity during adolescence: Does SES matter? Creativity Research Journal, 24(2–3), 191–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.677338

18.

Dollinger

S. J.

(2007). Creativity and conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(5), 1025–1035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.02.023

19.

Dollinger

S. J.

Burke

P. A.

Gump

N. W.

(2007). Creativity and values. Creativity Research Journal, 19(2–3), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410701395028

20.

Duarte

J. L.

Crawford

J. T.

Stern

Haidt

Jussim

Tetlock

P. E.

(2015). Political diversity will improve social psychological science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 38, Article e130. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X14000430

21.

Duncan

L. A.

Schaller

Park

J. H.

(2009). Perceived vulnerability to disease: Development and validation of a 15-item self-report instrument. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(6), 541–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.05.001

22.

Dziedziewicz

Karwowski

(2015). Development of Children’s creative visual imagination: A theoretical model and enhancement programmes. Education 3-13, 43(4), 382–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2015.1020646

23.

Faulkner

Schaller

Park

J. H.

Duncan

L. A.

(2004). Evolved disease-avoidance mechanisms and contemporary xenophobic attitudes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 7(4), 333–353.

24.

Feist

G. J.

(1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290–309.

25.

Fincher

C. L.

Thornhill

(2012). Parasite-stress promotes in-group assortative sociality: The cases of strong family ties and heightened religiosity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(2), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11000021

26.

Finke

R. A.

Ward

T. B.

Smith

S. M.

(1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. The MIT Press.

27.

Frimer

J. A.

Skitka

L. J.

Motyl

(2017). Liberals and conservatives are similarly motivated to avoid exposure to one another’s opinions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 72, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.04.003

28.

Gignac

G. E.

Szodorai

E. T.

(2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 74–78.

29.

Glăveanu

V. P.

(2019). Measuring creativity across cultures: Epistemological and methodological considerations. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(2), 227–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000216

30.

Gocłowska

M. A.

Ritter

S. M.

Elliot

A. J.

Baas

(2019). Novelty seeking is linked to openness and extraversion, and can lead to greater creative performance. Journal of Personality, 87(2), 252–266.

31.

Gocłowska

M. A.

Crisp

R. J.

(2014). How dual-identity processes foster creativity. Review of General Psychology, 18, 216–236. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000008

32.

Guilford

J. P.

(1967). Creativity: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 1(1), 3–14.

33.

Henningham

J. P.

(1996). A 12-item scale of social conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences, 20(4), 517–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(95)00192-1

34.

Ionescu

(2012). Exploring the nature of cognitive flexibility. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(2), 190–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.11.001

35.

Jost

J. T.

Glaser

Kruglanski

A. W.

Sulloway

F. J.

(2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375.

36.

Karwowski

(2016). Culture and psychometric studies of creativity. In Glăveanu

V. P.

(Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of creativity and culture research (pp. 159–186). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46344-9_8

37.

Karwowski

Kowal

Groyecka

Białek

Lebuda

Sorokowska

Sorokowski

(2020). When in danger, turn right: does Covid-19 threat promote social conservatism and right-wing presidential candidates? Human Ethology, 35(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.22330/he/35/037-048

38.

Knowles

J. E.

Frederick

Whitworth

Knowles

M. J. E.

(2016). Package ‘merTools. http://cran.fhcrc.org/web/packages/merTools/merTools.pdf

39.

Kowal

Sorokowski

Sorokowska

Dobrowolska

Pisanski

Oleszkiewicz

. . . Yordanova Stoyanova

(2020). Reasons for facebook usage: Data from 46 countries. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 505966.

40.

Lebuda

Zielińska

Karwowski

(2021). On surface and core predictors of real-life creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42, Article 100973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100973

41.

J. G.

Benet-Martíne

Wang

L. C.

(2023). A socioecological-genetic framework of culture and personality: Their roots, trends, and interplay. Annual Review of Psychology, 74, 363–390. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-032420-032631

42.

Lüdecke

Ben-Shachar

M. S.

Patil

Makowski

(2020). Extracting, computing and exploring the parameters of statistical models using R. Journal of Open Source Software, 5(53), Article 2445.

43.

McCann

S. J. H.

(2011). Conservatism, openness, and creativity: Patents granted to residents of American states. Creativity Research Journal, 23(4), 339–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2011.621831

44.

Mortensen

C. R.

Becker

D. V.

Ackerman

J. M.

Neuberg

S. L.

Kenrick

D. T.

(2010). Infection breeds reticence: The effects of disease salience on self-perceptions of personality and behavioral avoidance tendencies. Psychological Science, 21(3), 440–447.

45.

Murray

D. R.

(2014). Direct and Indirect Implications of Pathogen Prevalence for Scientific and Technological Innovation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(6), 971–985. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022114532356

46.

Murray

D. R.

Schaller

(2012). Threat (s) and conformity deconstructed: Perceived threat of infectious disease and its implications for conformist attitudes and behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(2), 180–188.

47.

Murray

D. R.

Trudeau

Schaller

(2011). On the origins of cultural differences in conformity: Four tests of the pathogen prevalence hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(3), 318–329.

48.

Navarrete

C. D.

Fessler

D. M. T.

(2006). Disease avoidance and ethnocentrism: The effects of disease vulnerability and disgust sensitivity on intergroup attitudes. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(4), 270–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.12.001

49.

Navarrete

C. D.

Fessler

D. M. T.

Eng

S. J.

(2007). Elevated ethnocentrism in the first trimester of pregnancy. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(1), 60–65.

50.

Niu

Kaufman

J. C.

(2013). Creativity of Chinese and American cultures: A synthetic analysis. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.25

51.

Osborne

Dufresne

Eady

Lees-Marshment

Van Der Linden

(2017). Is the personal always political? Education and political knowledge strengthen the relationship between openness and conservatism. Journal of Individual Differences, 38(3), 133–143.

52.

Proulx

Brandt

M. J.

(2017). Beyond threat and uncertainty: The underpinnings of conservatism. Social Cognition, 35(4), 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2017.35.4.313

53.

R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing.

54.

Revelle

M. W.

(2015). Package “psych.” The Comprehensive R Archive Network.

55.

Ritter

S. M.

Damian

R. I.

Simonton

D. K.

van Baaren

R. B.

Strick

Derks

Dijksterhuis

(2012). Diversifying experiences enhance cognitive flexibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(4), 961–964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.02.009

56.

Rubinstein

(2003). Authoritarianism and its relation to creativity: A comparative study among students of design, behavioral sciences and law. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(4), 695–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00055-7

57.

Rudowicz

(2003). Creativity and culture: A two way interaction. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(3), 273–290.

58.

Runco

M. A.

Acar

Cayirdag

(2017). Further evidence that creativity and innovation are inhibited by conservative thinking : Analyses of the 2016 Presidential Election. Creativity Research Journal, 29(3), 331–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2017.1360069

59.

Runco

M. A.

Jaeger

G. J.

(2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092

60.

Schaller

Duncan

L. A.

(2007). The behavioral immune system: Its evolution and social psychological implications. In Forgas

J. P.

Haselton

M. G.

Hippel

W. V.

(Eds.), Sydney symposium of social psychology. Evolution and the social mind: Evolutionary psychology and social cognition (pp. 293–307). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

61.

Schaller

Murray

D. R.

(2008). Pathogens, personality, and culture: Disease prevalence predicts worldwide variability in sociosexuality, extraversion, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 212–221. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.212

62.

Schutte

N. S.

Malouff

J. M.

(2020). A meta-analysis of the relationship between curiosity and creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(4), 940–947.

63.

Schwartz

S. H.

(1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In Zanna

M. P.

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). Elsevier.

64.

Simonton

D. K.

(1990). Political pathology and societal creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 3(2), 85–99.

65.

Sorokowska

Kowal

Saluja

Aavik

Alm

Anjum

. . . & Croy

(2023). Love and affectionate touch toward romantic partners all over the world. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 5497.

66.

Sorokowska

Saluja

Sorokowski

Frąckowiak

Karwowski

Aavik

. . . Croy

(2021). Affective interpersonal touch in close relationships: A cross-cultural perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(12), 1705–1721.

67.

Sorokowski

Groyecka

Kowal

Sorokowska

Białek, M., Lebuda

Dobrowolska

Zdybek

Karwowski

(2020). Can Information about pandemics increase negative attitudes toward foreign groups? A case of {COVID}-19 outbreak. Sustainability, 12(12), Article 4912. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124912

68.

Sorokowski

Kowal

Sternberg

R. J.

Aavik

Akello

Alhabahba

M. M.

. . . Sorokowska

(2023). Modernization, collectivism, and gender equality predict love experiences in 45 countries. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 773.

69.

Sorokowski

Sorokowska

Karwowski

Groyecka

Aavik

Akello

. . . Sternberg

R. J.

(2021). Universality of the triangular theory of love: Adaptation and psychometric properties of the triangular love scale in 25 countries. The Journal of Sex Research, 58(1), 106–115.

70.

Terrizzi

J. A.

Shook

N. J.

McDaniel

M. A.

(2013). The behavioral immune system and social conservatism: A meta-analysis. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(2), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.10.003

71.

Thórisdóttir

Jost

J. T.

(2011). Motivated closed-mindedness mediates the effect of threat on political conservatism. Political Psychology, 32(5), 785–811.

72.

Thornhill

Fincher

C. L.

Aran

(2009). Parasites, democratization, and the liberalization of values across contemporary countries. Biological Reviews, 84(1), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00062.x

73.

Treffinger

D. J.

Isaksen

S. G.

Stead-Dorval

K. B.

(2023). Creative problem solving: An introduction. Routledge.

74.

Urban

K. K.

(2005). Assessing creativity: The Test for Creative Thinking—Drawing Production (TCT-DP). International Education Journal, 6(2), 272–280.

75.

Urban

K. K.

Jellen

H. G.

(1996). Test for creative thinking-drawing production manual. Harcourt Test Publishers.

76.

Walter

K. V.

Conroy-Beam

Buss

D. M.

Asao

Sorokowska

Sorokowski

. . . Zupančič

(2020). Sex differences in mate preferences across 45 countries: A large-scale replication. Psychological Science, 31(4), 408–423.

77.

Walter

K. V.

Conroy-Beam

Buss

D. M.

Asao

Sorokowska

Sorokowski

. . . Zupančič

(2021). Sex differences in human mate preferences vary across sex ratios. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 288(1955), 20211115.

78.

Wang

Leung

(2016). A cross-cultural analysis of creativity. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290438322

79.

Ward

T. B.

(1994). Structured imagination: The role of category structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psychology, 27(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1006/COGP.1994.1010

80.

Wolfe

N. D.

Dunavan

C. P.

Diamond

(2007). Origins of major human infectious diseases. Nature, 447(7142), 279.

81.

Zumbo

B. D.

Gadermann

A. M.

Zeisser

(2007). Ordinal versions of coefficients alpha and theta for Likert rating scales. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 6(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1177992180

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.28 MB