Although global brands entering local markets often use localized communication (i.e., incorporation of local cultural elements in their marketing communications), the fundamental question of when and why the local community would react favorably to this strategy is still not fully answered. This research draws on the communication accommodation theory to address this question. Results from four studies show that local consumers evaluate a global brand less positively when it incorporates high-symbolic (vs. low-symbolic) local cultural elements in its marketing communication. Notably, the positive effect of culturally polite communication on consumers’ evaluations of a global brand occurs only in the local market, but not when the communication occurs in another market. Moreover, localization efforts by a global brand result in a strong localness perception, which has a positive effect on brand evaluation. Indeed, a strong localness perception of the global brand could even overshadow the need for culturally polite communication.
AldenD. L.SteenkampJ.-B. E. M.BatraR. (1999). Brand positioning through advertising in Asia, North America and Europe: The role of global consumer culture. Journal of Marketing, 63(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252002
3.
BagozziR. P.YiY. (2012). Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(1), 8–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/009207038801600107
4.
Bar-AnanY.LibermanN.TropeY. (2006). The association between psychological distance and construal level: Evidence from an implicit association test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(4), 609–622. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.135.4.609
5.
Barner-RasmussenW.EhrnroothM.KoveshnikovA.MäkeläK. (2014). Cultural and language skills as resources for boundary spanning within the MNC. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(7), 886–905. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2014.7
6.
BellD. E.ShelmanM. L. (2011). KFC’s radical approach to China. Harvard Business Review, 89(11), 137–142.
7.
BergerJ.HeathC. (2007). Where consumers diverge from others: Identity signaling and product domains. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(2), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1086/519142
8.
BlieseP. D.HangesP. J. (2004). Being both too liberal and too conservative: The perils of treating grouped data as though they were independent. Organizational Research Methods, 7(4), 400–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428104268542
9.
BlieseP. D.PloyhartR. E. (2002). Growth modeling using random coefficient models: Model building, testing, and illustrations. Organizational Research Methods, 5(4), 362–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442802237116
10.
BrownP.LevinsonS. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
ChenC. Y.MathurP.MaheswaranD. (2014). The effects of country-related affect on product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(4), 1033–1046. https://doi.org/10.1086/678194
13.
ChengY. Y. (2010). Social psychology of globalization: Joint activation of cultures and reactions to foreign cultural influence [Doctoral dissertation, Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign].
14.
CheonB. K.ChristopoulosG. I.HongY.-y. (2016). Disgust associated with cultural mixing: Why and who?Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47(10), 1268–1285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022116667845
15.
ChiuC.-y.WanC.ChengS. Y. Y.KimY.-h.YangY.-j. (2010). Cultural perspectives on self-enhancement and self-protection. In AlickeM. D.SedikidesC. (Eds.), Handbook of self-enhancement and self-protection (pp. 425–452). Guilford Press.
16.
ChoiW. J.WinterichK. P. (2013). Can brands move in from the outside? How moral identity enhances out-group brand attitudes. Journal of Marketing, 77(2), 96–111. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.11.0544
17.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
18.
GalloisC.CallanV. J. (1991). Interethnic accommodation: The role of norms. In GilesH.CouplandJ.CouplandN. (Eds.), Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics (pp. 245–269). Cambridge University Press.
19.
GilesH.OgayT. (2007). Communication accommodation theory. In WhaleyB. B.SamterW. (Eds.), Explaining communication: Contemporary theories and exemplars (pp. 293–310). Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
HaoJ.LiD.PengL.PengS.TorelliC. J. (2016). Advancing our understanding of culture mixing. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47(10), 1257–1267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022116670514
21.
HofmannD. A.GavinM. B. (1998). Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. Journal of Management, 24(5), 623–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(99)80077-4
22.
HoltgravesT. (2002). Language and social action: Social psychology and language use. Lawrence Erlbaum.
23.
HoltgravesT. (2010). Social psychology and language: Words, utterances, and conversations. In FiskeS. T.GilbertD. T.LindzevG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 1386–1422). Wiley.
24.
HongY. Y.MorrisM. W.ChiuC. Y.Benet-MartinezV. (2000). Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychologist, 55(7), 709–720. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.7.709
25.
IacobucciD. (2012). Mediation analysis and categorical variables: The final frontier. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(4), 582–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2012.03.006
KervynN.FiskeS. T.MaloneC. (2012). Brands as intentional agents framework: How perceived intentions and ability can map brand perception. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(2), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.09.006
28.
KleinJ. G.EttensonR. E.MorrisM. D. (1998). The animosity model of foreign product purchase: An empirical test in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Marketing, 62(1), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251805
29.
LuhtanenR.CrockerJ. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one’s social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(3), 302–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292183006
30.
MajorB.TestaM.BylsmaW. H. (1991). Responses to upward and downward social comparisons: The impact of esteem-relevance and perceived control. In SulsJ. M.WillsT. A. (Eds.), Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 237–260). Lawrence Erlbaum.
31.
MullerD.JuddC. M.YzerbytV. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 852–863. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.852
32.
OysermanD.CoonH. M.KemmelmeierM. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3–72. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.128.1.3
ShavittS.LalwaniA. K.ZhangJ.TorelliC. J. (2006). The horizontal/vertical distinction in cross-cultural consumer research. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(4), 325–342. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1604_3
35.
ShimpT. A.SharmaS. (1987). Consumer ethnocentrism: Construction and validation of the CETSCALE. Journal of Marketing Research, 24(3), 280–289. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151638
StephanE.LibermanN.TropeY. (2010). Politeness and psychological distance: A construal level perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 268–280. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016960
38.
ThomasD. C.LiaoY.AycanZ.CerdinJ.-L.PekertiA. A.RavlinE. C.. . . vandeVijverF. (2015). Cultural intelligence: A theory-based, short form measure. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(9), 1099–1118. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2014.67
39.
TorelliC. J.ChiuC.-y.TamK.-p.AuA. K. C.KehH. T. (2011). Exclusionary reactions to foreign cultures: Effects of simultaneous exposure to cultures in globalized space. Journal of Social Issues, 67(4), 716–742. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01724.x
40.
TorelliC. J.RodasM. A.StonerJ. L. (2017). The cultural meaning of brands. Foundations and Trends in Marketing, 10(3), 153–214. https://doi.org/10.1561/1700000048
41.
WanC.ChiuC.-y.TamK.-p.LeeS. I.LauI. Y.-m.PengS. (2007). Perceived cultural importance and actual self-importance of values in cultural identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(2), 337–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.2.337
42.
WanC.TorelliC. J.ChiuC.-y. (2010). Intersubjective consensus and the maintenance of normative shared reality. Social Cognition, 28(3), 422–446. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2010.28.3.422
43.
YangD. Y.-J.ChenX.XuJ.PrestonJ. L.ChiuC.-y. (2016). Cultural symbolism and spatial separation: Some ways to deactivate exclusionary responses to culture mixing. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47(10), 1286–1293. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022116665169
44.
ZhangY.KhareA. (2009). The impact of accessible identities on the evaluation of global versus local products. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(3), 524–537. https://doi.org/10.1086/598794
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
