The Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) is a commonly used life satisfaction scale. Cross-cultural researchers use SWLS to compare mean scores of life satisfaction across countries. Despite the wide use of SWLS in cross-cultural studies, measurement invariance of SWLS has rarely been investigated, and previous studies showed inconsistent findings. Therefore, we examined the measurement invariance of SWLS with samples collected from 26 countries. To test measurement invariance, we utilized three measurement invariance techniques: (a) multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (MG-CFA), (b) multilevel confirmatory factor analysis (ML-CFA), and (c) alignment optimization methods. The three methods demonstrated that configural and metric invariances of life satisfaction held across 26 countries, whereas scalar invariance did not. With partial invariance testing, we identified that the intercepts of Items 2, 4, and 5 were noninvariant. Based on two invariant intercepts, factor means of countries were compared. Chile showed the highest factor mean; Spain and Bulgaria showed the lowest. The findings enhance our understanding of life satisfaction across countries, and they provide researchers and practitioners with practical guidance on how to conduct measurement invariance testing across countries.
ByrneB. M. (1994). Testing for the factorial validity, replication, and invariance of a measuring instrument: A paradigmatic application based on the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 289-311.
4.
ByrneB. M.ShavelsonR. J.MuthénB. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456-466.
5.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14, 464-504.
6.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 233-255.
7.
DawesJ. G. (2008). Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used? An experiment using 5 point, 7 point and 10 point scales. International Journal of Market Research, 51, 61-77.
8.
DavidovE.DülmerH.SchlüterE.SchmidtP.MeulemanB. (2012). Using a multilevel structural equation modeling approach to explain cross-cultural measurement noninvariance. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(4), 558-575.
9.
De BeuckelaerA.SwinnenG. (2011). Biased latent variable mean comparisons due to measurement non-invariance: A simulation study. In DavidovE.SchmidtP.BillietJ. (Eds.), Cross-cultural analysis: methods and applications (pp. 117-148). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.
10.
DienerE. D. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542-575.
11.
DienerE. D.EmmonsR. A.LarsenR. J.GriffinS. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.
12.
DouglasS. P.CraigC. S. (1983). Examining performance of US multinationals in foreign markets. Journal of International Business Studies, 14(3), 51-62.
13.
EidM.LangeheineR.DienerE. (2003). Comparing typological structures across cultures by multigroup latent class analysis: A primer. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 195-210.
14.
FredricksonB. L.TugadeM. M.WaughC. E.LarkinG. R. (2003). What good are positive emotions in crises? A prospective study of resilience and emotions following the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11th, 2001. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 365-376.
15.
HeineS. J.LehmanD. R.MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1999). Is there a universal need for positive self-regard?Psychological Review, 106, 766-794.
16.
HoferJ.ChasiotisA.CamposD. (2006). Congruence between social values and implicit motives: Effects on life satisfaction across three cultures. European Journal of Personality, 20, 305-324.
17.
HornJ. L.McArdleJ. J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 18, 117-144.
18.
HornJ. L.McArdleJ. J.MasonR. (1983). When is invariance not invariant: A practical scientist’s look at the ethereal concept of factor invariance. The Southern Psychologist, 1, 179-188.
19.
HouseR. J.HangesP. J.JavidanM.DorfmanP. W.GuptaV. (Eds.). (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55.
21.
HultellD.GustavssonJ. P. (2008). A psychometric evaluation of the Satisfaction With Life Scale in a Swedish nationwide sample of university students. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1070-1079.
22.
JakS.OortF. J.DolanC. V. (2013). A test for cluster bias: Detecting violations of measurement invariance across clusters in multilevel data. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20, 265-282.
23.
Koivumaa-HonkanenH.HonkanenR.ViinamaekiH.HeikkilaeK.KaprioJ.KoskenvuoM. (2001). Life satisfaction and suicide: a 20-year follow-up study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158(3), 433-439.
24.
LyubomirskyS.KingL.DienerE. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success?. Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803-855.
25.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
26.
MarshH. W.HauK. T.ArteltC.BaumertJ.PescharJ. L. (2006). OECD’s brief self-report measure of educational psychology’s most useful affective constructs: Cross-cultural, psychometric comparisons across 25 countries. International Journal of Testing, 6, 311-360.
27.
MarshH. W.VallerandR. J.LafrenièreM. A. K.ParkerP.MorinA. J.CarbonneauN.. . . Salah AbduljabbarA. (2013). Passion: Does one scale fit all? Construct validity of two-factor passion scale and psychometric invariance over different activities and languages. Psychological Assessment, 25, 796-809.
MeredithW.MillsapR. E. (1992). On the misuse of manifest variables in the detection of measurement bias. Psychometrika, 57, 289-311.
30.
MillsapR. E. (2011). Statistical approaches to measurement invariance. New York, NY: Routledge.
31.
MuthénB. O.AsparouhovT. (2014). IRT studies of many groups: The alignment method. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 978. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00978
32.
OishiS. (2006). The concept of life satisfaction across cultures: An IRT analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 411-423.
33.
OishiS.DienerE. F.LucasR. E.SuhE. M. (1999). Cross-cultural variations in predictors of life satisfaction: Perspectives from needs and values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 980-990.
34.
PavotW.DienerE. D.ColvinC. R.SandvikE. (1991). Further validation of the Satisfaction With Life Scale: Evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 149-161.
35.
ReiseS. P.WidamanK. F.PughR. H. (1993). Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 552-566.
36.
RosterC.AlbaumG.RogersR. (2006). Can cross-national/cultural studies presume etic equivalency in respondents’ use of extreme categories of Likert rating scales?International Journal of Market Research, 48, 741-759.
37.
RutkowskiL.SvetinaD. (2014). Assessing the hypothesis of measurement invariance in the context of large-scale international surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74, 31-57.
38.
ShinD. C.JohnsonD. M. (1978). Avowed happiness as an overall assessment of the quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 5, 475-492.
39.
SpectorP. E.AllenT. D.PoelmansS. A. Y.LapierreL. M.CooperC. L.O’DriscollM.. . . Widerszal-BazylM. (2007). Cross-national differences in relationships of work demands, job satisfaction and turnover intentions with work-family conflict. Personnel Psychology, 60, 805-835.
40.
SteenkampJ. B. E.BaumgartnerH. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 78-90.
41.
VandenbergR. J.LanceC. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4-70.
42.
van de VijverF. J.LeungK. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
43.
YoonM.KimE. S. (2014). A comparison of sequential and nonsequential specification searches in testing factorial invariance. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 1199-1206.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
