We compare generational change in culturally related personal values as represented by the Schwartz values taxonomy, across two decades of individuals representing independent samples of the urban, Turkish workforce, employed in a variety of occupations and in numerous urban centers, in both 1998 and 2009 (N = 779). Results indicate that whereas self-transcendence (harmony) and conservation (collectivism) values have decreased over time, self-enhancement (mastery) has increased. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
BakanD. (1966). The duality of human existence: Isolation and communion in Western man. Boston, MA: Beacon.
2.
CeylanS.OzbekG.KavakG.MertY. (2009, July). The role of identity, personality, value, and culture on bribery actions in Turkish organizations. Paper presented at the 14th Congress of the European Association of Work and Organizational Psychology, Oslo, Norway.
3.
ChaoG. T.MoonH. (2005). The cultural mosaic: A metatheory for understanding the complexity of culture. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1128-1140.
4.
CheungM. W. L.LeungK.AuK. (2006). Evaluating multilevel models in cross-cultural research: An illustration with Social Axioms. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 522-541.
5.
CostanzaD. P.BadgerJ. M.FraserR. L.SevertJ. B.GadeP. A. (2012). Generational differences in work-related attitudes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27, 375-394.
6.
CukurC. S.de GuzmanM. R.CarloG. (2004). Religiosity, values, and horizontal and vertical individualism-collectivism: A study of Turkey, the United States, and the Philippines. The Journal of Social Psychology, 144, 613-634.
7.
DealJ. J.AltmanD. G.RogelbergS. G. (2010). Millennials at work: What we know and what we need to do (if anything). Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 191-199.
8.
DemirutkuK.SumerN. (2010). Temel Değerlerin Ölçümü: Portre Değerler Anketinin Türkçe Uyarlaması [Measurement of basic values: Turkish adaptation of portrait values questionnaire]. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 25, 17-25.
9.
ErkocT. E. (2014). Economy and democratisation: Turgut Ozal era in Turkey. Journal of Business Economics and Political Science, 3, 55-74.
10.
FischerR.MilfontT. L. (2010). Standardization in psychological research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3, 88-96.
11.
GouveiaV. V.VioneK. C.MilfontT. L.FischerR. (2015). Patterns of value change during the life span: Some evidence from a functional approach to values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 1276-1290.
12.
GrahamJ. W.CumsilleP. E.Elek-FiskE. (2003). Methods for handling missing data. In SchinkaJ. A.VelicerW. F. (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology: Vol. 2. Research methods in psychology (pp. 87-114). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
13.
HofstedeG. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. (Original work published 1980)
14.
HouseR. J.HangesP. J.JavidanM.DorfmanP. W.GuptaV. (Eds.). (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
KagitcibasiC. (2005). Modernization does not mean Westernization: Emergence of a different pattern. In FriedlmeierW.ChakkarathP.SchwarzB. (Eds.), Culture and human development: The importance of cross-cultural research for the social sciences (pp. 255-272). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
16.
KagitcibasiC. (2007). Family, self, and human development across cultures: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
KagitcibasiC.AtacaB. (2005). Value of children and family change: A three-decade portrait from Turkey. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54, 317-337.
18.
KowskeB. J.RaschR.WileyJ. (2010). Millennials’ (lack of) attitude problem: An empirical examination of generational effects on work attitudes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 265-279.
19.
KozanK.ErginC. (1999). The influence of intra-cultural value differences on conflict management practices. International Journal of Conflict Management, 10, 249-267.
20.
KusdilM. E. (1991). A study on the core characteristics of collectivism: A comparison between local Turkish and immigrant Bulgarian Turkish teachers (Unpublished master’s thesis). Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey.
21.
MarcusJ.LeH. (2013). Interactive effects of levels of individualism-collectivism on cooperation: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 813-834.
22.
MayerB.TrommsdorffG.KagitcibasiC.MishraR. C. (2012). Family models of independence/interdependence and their intergenerational similarity in Germany, Turkey, and India. Family Science, 3, 64-74.
23.
NardonL.SteersR. M. (2009). The culture theory jungle: Divergence and convergence in models of national culture. In BhagatR. S.SteersR. M. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of culture, organizations, and work (pp. 3-22). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24.
OzaslanM.DincerB.OzgurH. (2003). Regional disparities and territorial indicators in Turkey: Socio Economic Development Index (SEDI). Denizli, Turkey: Turkish State Planning Organization and Pamukkale University.
25.
RobinsonO. C. (2013). Values and adult age: Findings from two cohorts of the European Social Survey. European Journal of Ageing, 10, 11-23.
SchwartzS. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In ZannaM. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1-65). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
28.
SchwartzS. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values?Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19-45.
29.
SchwartzS. H. (2006a). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative Sociology, 3, 137-182.
30.
SchwartzS.H. (2006b). Value orientations: Measurement, antecedents and consequences across nations. In JowellR.RobertsC.FitzgeraldR.EvaG. (Eds.), Measuring attitudes cross-nationally: Lessons from the European Social Survey (pp. 169-203). London, England: Sage.
31.
SchwartzS. H.MelechG.LehmannA.BurgessS.HarrisM.OwensV. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 519-542.
32.
SmolaK. W.SuttonC. D. (2002). Generational differences: Revisiting generational work values for the new millennium. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 363-382.
33.
StraussW.HoweN. (1991). Generations: The history of America’s future, 1584 to 2069. New York, NY: William Morrow.
34.
StraussW.HoweN. (1997). The fourth turning: An American prophecy. New York, NY: Broadway Books.
35.
TarasV.SteelP.KirkmanB. L. (2012). Improving national cultural indices using a longitudinal meta-analysis of Hofstede’s dimensions. Journal of World Business, 47, 329-341.
TwengeJ. M. (2001). Changes in women’s assertiveness in response to status and roles: A cross-temporal meta-analysis, 1931-1993. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 133-145.
39.
TwengeJ. M. (2010). A review of the empirical evidence on generational differences in work attitudes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 201-210.
40.
TwengeJ. M.CampbellS. M. (2008). Generational differences in psychological traits and their impact on the workplace. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 862-877.
41.
TwengeJ. M.CampbellW. K.FreemanE. C. (2012). Generational differences in young adults’ life goals, concern for others, and civic orientation, 1966-2009. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1045-1062.
42.
TwengeJ. M.CampbellW. K.GentileB. (2012). Generational increases in agentic self-evaluations among American college students. Self and Identity, 11, 409-427.
43.
UzI. (2015). The index of cultural tightness and looseness among 68 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46, 319-335.
