AxelrodR. (1997). The dissemination of culture a model with local convergence and global polarization. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41, 203-226.
2.
BerryJ. W.PoortingaY. H.SegallM. H.DasenP. R. (1992). Cross-cultural psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3.
ChiuC. Y.GelfandM. J.YamagishiT.ShteynbergG.WanC. (2010). Intersubjective culture: The role of intersubjective perceptions in cross-cultural research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 482-493.
4.
ChiuC. Y.QiuL. (2014). Communication and culture: A complexity theory approach. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 108-111.
5.
ChudekM.HenrichJ. (2011). Culture–gene coevolution, norm-psychology and the emergence of human prosociality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 218-226.
6.
CialdiniR. B.KallgrenC. A.RenoR. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24(20), 1-243.
7.
ClarkH. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
GoodwinG. P.DarleyJ. M. (2008). The psychology of meta-ethics: Exploring objectivism. Cognition, 106, 1339-1366.
9.
KagitçibasiÇ. (1997). Individualism and collectivism. In BerryJ.SegallM.KagitçibasiC. (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 3, 2nd ed., pp. 1-49). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
10.
KashimaY. (2014). Meaning, grounding, and the construction of social reality. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 81-95.
11.
KashimaY. (2015). Culture and psychology in the 21st century: Conceptions of culture and person revisited. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0022022115599445
12.
KashimaY.KleinO.ClarkA. E. (2007). Grounding: Sharing information in social interaction. In FiedlerK. (Ed.), Social communication (pp. 27-77). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
13.
KayA. C.GaucherD.PeachJ. M.LaurinK.FriesenJ.ZannaM. P.SpencerS. J. (2009). Inequality, discrimination, and the power of the status quo: Direct evidence for a motivation to see the way things are as the way they should be. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 421-434.
14.
LewisD. (1969). Convention: A philosophical study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
McKenzie-MohrD. (2011). Fostering sustainable behaviour: An introduction to community-based social marketing. Gabriola Island, British Columbia, Canada: New Society Publishers.
16.
MeadG. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
17.
Mitleton-KellyE. (Ed.). (2003). Complex systems and evolutionary perspectives of organisations: The application of complexity theory to organisations. London, England: Elsevier.
18.
MorrisM. W.HongY. Y.ChiuC. Y.LiuZ. (2015). Normology: Integrating insights about social norms to understand cultural dynamics. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 129, 1-13. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.03.001
19.
MorrisM. W.LiuZ. (2015). Psychological functions of subjective norms: Reference groups, moralization, adherence and defiance. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46, 1279-1360.
20.
NowakA.SzamrejJ.LatanéB. (1990). From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact. Psychological Review, 97, 362-376.
21.
PfauJ.KirleyM.KashimaY. (2013). The co-evolution of cultures, social network communities, and agent locations in an extension of Axelrod’s model of cultural dissemination. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 392, 381-391.
22.
SawyerR. K. (2005). Social emergence: Societies as complex systems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23.
SchellingT. C. (1960). The strategy of conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
StalnakerR. (2002). Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy, 25, 701-721.
25.
TriandisH. C. (1972). The analysis of subjective culture. New York, NY: John Wiley.
26.
TurielE. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
27.
WilsonD. S.HayesS. C.BiglanA.EmbryD. D. (2014). Evolving the future: Toward a science of intentional change. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 37, 395-416.