Based on the Model of Family Change, the authors examined how mother–child relations among non-Western immigrants and natives were characterized by patterns of solidarity. Latent Class Analysis was applied to data from the Netherlands Kinship Panel Study (2004) on the practical and emotional support that Dutch, Turkish, Moroccan, Surinamese, and Antillean adult children gave and received from their mother (N = 1,267). A similar five-class typology in all origin groups revealed three types of full-interdependence (“reciprocal,” “upward,” and “downward”), emotional-interdependent, and independent mother–child relationship. Whereas full-interdependence prevailed among immigrants, Dutch were more characterized by downward-interdependence and emotional-interdependence. Irrespective of the child’s origin, independent relationships were uncommon. The results evidence the importance of emotional intergenerational ties in adulthood across families of different origins.
AlbaR.NeeV. (1997). Rethinking assimilation for a new era of immigration. International Migration Review, 31, 826-874.
2.
AtacaB. (2006). Turkey. In GeorgasJ.BerryJ. W.Van de VijverF.KagitçibasiC.PoortingaY. H. (Eds.), Families across cultures (pp. 467-474). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3.
AtkinsonM. P.KivettV. R.CampbellR. T. (1986). Intergenerational solidarity: An examination of a theoretical model. Journal of Gerontology, 41, 408-416.
4.
Attias-DonfutC.WolffF. C. (2008). Patterns of intergenerational transfers among immigrants in France: A comparative perspective. In SaracenoC. (Ed.), Families, ageing and social policy: Generational solidarity in European welfare state (pp. 259-284). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
5.
BengtsonV. L.SchraderS. S. (1982). Parent-child relations. In MangenD. J.PetersonW. A. (Eds.), Research instruments in social gerontology (Vol. 2, pp. 115-128). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
6.
BerryJ. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46, 5-8.
7.
BurrJ. A.MutchlerJ. E. (1999). Race and ethnic variation in norms of filial responsibility among older persons. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 647-687.
8.
CollinsL. M.LanzaS. T. (2010). Latent class and latent transition analysis: With applications in the social, behavioral, and health sciences. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
9.
De ValkH. A. G. (2010). Children of immigrants in the Netherlands: Growing up in diversity. Child Indicators Research, 3, 503-524.
10.
De ValkH. A. G.LiefbroerA. C. (2007). Parental influences in union formation preferences among Turkish, Moroccan and native Dutch adolescents in the Netherlands. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 487-506.
11.
De ValkH. A. G.SchansD. (2008). They ought to do this for their parents: Perceptions of filial obligations among immigrant and Dutch older people. Ageing & Society, 28, 49-66.
12.
DurgelE. S.LeyendeckerB.YagmurluB.HarwoodR. (2009). Sociocultural influences on German and Turkish immigrant mothers’ long-term socialization goals. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40, 834-852.
13.
DykstraP. A.FokkemaT. (2011). Relationships between parents and their adult children: A West European typology of late-life families. Ageing & Society, 31, 545-569.
14.
DykstraP. A.KalmijnM.KnijnT. C. M.KomterA. E.LiefbroerA. C.MulderC. H. (2004). Codebook of the Netherlands Kinship Panel Study, a multi-actor, multi-method panel study on solidarity in family relationships, Wave 1. The Hague: Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute.
15.
DykstraP. A.KalmijnM.KnijnT. C. M.KomterA. E.LiefbroerA. C.MulderC. H. (Eds.). (2006). Family solidarity in the Netherlands. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Dutch University Press.
16.
FawcettJ. T. (1983). Perceptions of the value of children: Satisfactions and costs. In BulataoR.LeeR. D.HollerbachP. E.BongaartsJ. (Eds.), Determinants of fertility in developing countries (Vol. 1, pp. 347-369). Washington, DC: Academy Press.
17.
FokkemaT.Ter BekkeS.DykstraP. A. (2008). Solidarity between parents and their adult children in Europe (NIDI report 76). The Hague: Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute.
18.
GarssenJ.NicolaasH.SprangersA. (2005). Demografie van allochtonen in Nederland [Demography of immigrants in the Netherlands]. Bevolkingstrends, 54, 15-31.
19.
GeorgasJ.BerryJ. W.Van de VijverF. J. R.KagitcibasiÇ.PoortingaY. H. (2006). Families across cultures: A 30-nation psychological study. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20.
GeorgasJ.ChristakopoulouS.PoortingaY. H.AngleiterA.GoodwinR.CharamboulosN. (1997). The relationship of family bonds to family structure and functions across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28, 303-320.
21.
GerstelN.GallagherS. (2001). Men’s caregiving: Gender and the contingent character of care. Gender & Society, 15, 197-217.
22.
GlaserK.TomassiniC.GrundyE. (2004). Revisiting convergence and divergence: Support for older people in Europe. European Journal of Ageing, 1, 64-72.
23.
GreenfieldP. M.KellerH.FuligniA.MaynardA. (2003). Cultural pathways through universal development. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 461-490.
24.
HankK.BuberI. (2009). Grandparents caring for their grandchildren: Findings from the 2004 survey of health, ageing, and retirement in Europe. Journal of Family Issues, 30, 53-73.
25.
HofstedeG. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
HuschekD.De ValkH. A. G.LiefbroerA. C. (2012). Partner choice patterns among the descendants of Turkish immigrants in Europe. European Journal of Population/Revue Européenne de Population, 28, 241-269.
27.
IdemaH.PhaletK. (2007). Transmission of gender-role values in Turkish-German migrant families: The role of gender, intergenerational and intercultural relations. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung, 19, 71-105.
28.
InglehartR. (1991). Changing human goals and values: A proposal for a study of global change. In PawlikK. (Ed.), Perception and assessment of global environmental conditions and change (Report No. 1, Human dimensions of global environmental change). Paris, France: International Social Science Council.
29.
InglehartR.BakerW. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65, 19-51.
30.
InglehartR.NorrisP. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
31.
KagitçibasiC. (1982). The changing value of children in Turkey. Honolulu, HI: East-West Population Institute.
32.
KagitçibasiC. (1996). Family and human development across cultures: A view from the other side. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33.
KagitçibasiC. (2005). Autonomy and relatedness in cultural context: Implications for self and family. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 403-422.
34.
KagitçibasiC.AtacaB. (2005). Value of children and family change: A three-decade portrait from Turkey. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54, 317-337.
35.
KagitçibasiC.AtacaB.DiriA. (2005). Intergenerational relationships in the family: Ethnic, socioeconomic, and country variations in Germany, Israel, Palestine, and Turkey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41, 652-670.
36.
KellerH.BorkeJ.YovsiR. D.LohausA.JensenH. (2005). Cultural orientations and historical changes as predictors of parenting behaviour. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 229-237.
37.
KellerH.PapaligouraZ.KuensemuellerP.VoelkerS.PapaliouC.LohausA.MousouliV. (2003). Concepts of mother-infant interactions in Greece and Germany. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 677-689.
38.
KomterA. E.SchansD. (2008). Reciprocity revisited: Give and take in Dutch and immigration families. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 39, 279-298.
39.
KomterA. E.VolleberghW. A. M. (2002). Solidarity in Dutch families: Family ties under strain?Journal of Family Issues, 23, 171-188.
40.
KwakK. (2003). Adolescents and their parents: A review of intergenerational family relations for immigrant and non-immigrant families. Human Development, 46, 115-136.
41.
KwakK.BerryJ. W. (2001). Generational differences in acculturation among Asian families in Canada: A comparison of Vietnamese, Korean, and East-Indian groups. International Journal of Psychology, 36, 152-162.
42.
LewisJ. (2001). The end of marriage? Individualism and intimate relations. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
43.
MerzE.-M.SchuengelC.SchulzeH.-J. (2008). Inter-generational relationships at different ages: An attachment perspective. Ageing & Society, 28, 717-736.
44.
NauckB. (2001). Intercultural contact and intergenerational transmission in immigrant families. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 159-173.
45.
NauckB. (2007). Immigrant families in Germany: Family change between situational adaption, acculturation, segregation and remigration. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung, 19, 34-54.
46.
NauckB. (2010). Intergenerational relationships and female inheritance expectations: Comparative results from eight societies in Asia, Europe, and North America. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41, 690-705.
47.
NauckB.SteinbachA. (2009). Intergenerational relationships (Working Paper 116). Berlin: German Council for Social and Economic Data (RatSWD).
48.
NosakaA.ChasiotisA. (2005). Exploring the variation in intergenerational relationships among Germans and Turkish immigrants: An evolutionary perspective on behaviour in a modern social setting. In VolandE.ChasiotisA.SchiefenhövelW. (Eds.), Grandmotherhood: The evolutionary significance of the second half of female life (pp. 256-276). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
49.
OtterbeinK. F. (1965). Caribbean family organization: A comparative analysis. American Anthropologist, 67, 66-79.
50.
PelsT.De HaanM. J. (2007). Socialization practices of Moroccan families after migration: A reconstruction in an “acculturative arena.”Young, 15, 71-89.
51.
PhaletK.GüngörD. (2009). Cultural continuity and discontinuity in Turkish immigrant families: Extending the model of family change. In BekmanS.Aksu-KoçA. (Eds.), Perspectives on human development, family, and culture (pp. 241-262). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
52.
PhaletK.SchönpflugU. (2001). Intergenerational transmission of collectivism and achievement values in two acculturation contexts: The case of Turkish families in Germany and Turkish and Moroccan families in the Netherlands. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 186-201.
53.
PhinneyJ. S.VedderP. H. (2006). Family relationship values of adolescents and parents: Intergenerational discrepancies and adaptation. In BerryJ. W.PhinneyJ. S.SamD. L.VedderP. H. (Eds.), Immigrant youth in cultural transition: Acculturation, identity and adaptation across national contexts (pp. 167-184). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
54.
RossiA. S.RossiP. H. (1990). Of human bonding: Parent-child relations across the life course. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
55.
SchansD.De ValkH. A. G. (2011). Filial obligations among immigrants and native Dutch: A comparison of perceptions and behaviour among ethnic groups and generations. In KralerA.KofmanE.KohliM.SchmollC. (Eds.), Gender, generations and the family in international migration (pp. 99-119.). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
56.
SchansD.KomterA. E. (2010). Ethnic differences in intergenerational solidarity in the Netherlands. Journal of Aging Studies, 24, 194-203.
57.
SchönpflugU. (2001). Intergenerational transmission of values: The role of transmission belts. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 174-185.
58.
SilversteinM.BengtsonV. L. (1997). Intergenerational solidarity and the structure of adult child-parent relationships in American families. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 429-460.
ThorntonA.Young-DeMarcoL. (2001). Four decades of trends in attitudes toward family issues in the United States: The 1960s through the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63, 1009-1037.
61.
ToddE. (1985). The explanation of ideology: Family structures and social systems. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
62.
TomassiniC.KalogirouS.GrundyE.FokkemaT.MartikainenP.Broese van GroenouM.KaristoA. (2004). Contacts between elderly parents and their children in four European countries: Current patterns and future prospects. European Journal of Ageing, 1, 54-63.
63.
TriandisH. C.McCuskerC.BetancourtH.IwaoS.LeungK.SalazarJ. M.. . . ZaleskiZ. (1993). An etic-emic analysis of individualism-collectivism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 24, 366-383.
64.
TrommsdorffG.NauckB. (Eds.). (2005). The value of children in cross-cultural perspective: Case studies from eight societies. Lengerich, Germany: Pabst Science.
65.
Van GaalenR.DykstraP. A. (2006). Solidarity and conflict between adult children and parents: A latent class analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 947-960.
66.
Van TubergenF. (2003). Religieuze participatie en geloof van immigranten in Nederland [Religious participation and religion of immigrants in the Netherlands]. Mens en Maatschappij, 78, 331-354.
67.
VermeulenH.PenninxR. (2000). Immigrant integration: The Dutch case. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Het Spinhuis.
68.
VermuntJ. K.MagidsonJ. (2002). Latent class cluster analysis. In HagenaarsJ.McCutcheonA. (Eds.), Applied latent class analysis (pp. 89-106). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
WarnesT.FriedrichK.KellaherL.TorresS. (2004). The diversity and welfare of older immigrants in Europe. Ageing & Society, 24, 307-326.
71.
YoungN. (1992). Postmodern self-psychology mirrored in science and the arts. In KvaleS. (Ed.), Psychology and postmodernism (pp. 135-145). London, England: Sage.
