In American samples, compassionate goals to support others enhance relationships, whereas self-image goals to construct and defend desired self-images undermine relationships. But do these goals exist as separate factors, and do they predict similar outcome variables in Japan? How much do compassionate goals overlap with having an interdependent self-construal? We examined the factor structure of compassionate and self-image goals scale among American undergraduates, Japanese undergraduates, and Japanese adults and obtained similar correlated two-factor solutions in all three samples. In all three samples, compassionate goals were associated with non-zero-sum belief, growth-seeking, and self-compassion, whereas self-image goals were associated with validation-seeking and defensive responses to conflicts. Although compassionate goals correlated with interdependence in Japan, controlling for interdependence did not affect the above associations.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
2.
BresnahanM. J.ChiuH.- C.LevineT. R. (2004). Self-construal as a predictor of communal and exchange orientation in Taiwan and the USA. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 187-203.
3.
BrownJ. D.KobayashiC. (2002). Self-enhancement in Japan and America. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 145-168.
4.
ByrneB. M. (1994). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
5.
CanevelloA.CrockerJ. (2010). Creating good relationships: Responsiveness, relationship quality, and interpersonal goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 78-106.
6.
CanevelloA.CrockerJ. (2011). Changing relationship growth belief: Intrapersonal and interpersonal consequences of compassionate goals. Personal Relationships, 18, 370-391.
7.
CortinaJ. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98-104.
8.
CovingtonM. V. (2000). Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: An integrative review. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 171-200.
9.
CrockerJ.CanevelloA. (2008). Creating and undermining social support in communal relationships: The role of compassionate and self-image goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 555-575.
10.
CrockerJ.CanevelloA. (2012). Consequences of self-image and compassionate goals. In DevineP. G.PlantA. (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 45, pp. 229-277). New York: Elsevier.
11.
CrockerJ.OliverM.- A.NuerN. (2009). Self-image goals and compassionate goals: Costs and benefits. Self and Identity, 8, 251-269.
12.
DalskyD.GohmC. L.NoguchiK.ShiomuraK. (2008). Mutual self-enhancement in Japan and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39, 215-223.
13.
DykmanB. M. (1998). Integrating cognitive and motivational factors in depression: Initial tests of a goal-orientation approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 139-158.
14.
GarlandR. (1991). The mid-point on a rating scale: Is it desirable?Marketing Bulletin, 2, 66-70.
15.
GrantH.DweckC. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 541-553.
16.
HamamuraT.HeineS. J. (2008). The role of self-criticism in self-improvement and face maintenance among Japanese. In ChangE. C. (Ed.), Self-criticism and self-enhancement: Theory, research, and clinical implications (pp. 105-122). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
17.
HeineS. J. (2005). Where is the evidence for pancultural self-enhancement? A reply to Sedikides, Gaertner, and Toguchi (2003). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 531-538.
18.
HeineS. J. (2007). Culture and motivation: What motivates people to act in the ways that they do? In KitayamaS.CohenD. (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (pp. 714-733). New York: Guilford Press.
19.
HeineS. J.HamamuraT. (2007). In search of East Asian self-enhancement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 1-24.
20.
HeineS. J.LehmanD. R.MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1999). Is there a universal need for positive self-regard?Psychological Review, 106, 766-794.
21.
KitayamaS.DuffyS.UchidaY. (2007). Self as cultural mode of being. In KitayamaS.CohenD. (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (pp.136-174). New York: Guilford Press.
22.
KlineR. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
23.
KneeC. R.LonsbaryC.CanevelloA.PatrickH. (2005). Self-determination and conflict in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 997-1009.
24.
KurmanJ. (2003). Why is self-enhancement low in certain collectivist cultures? An investigation of two competing explanations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 496-510.
25.
MischkowkiD.CrockerJ.NiiyaY.CanevelloA.MoellerS. (2011). Benefits of compassionate goals for relationships: Increased academic growth goals and engagement. Unpublished manuscript, The Ohio State University.
26.
NaJ.GrossmannI.VarnumM. E. W.KitayamaS.GonzalezR.NisbettR. E. (2010). Cultural differences are not always reducible to individual differences. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 6192-6197.
27.
NeffK. D. (2003). Development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self and Identity, 2, 223-250.
28.
NichollsJ. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91, 328-346.
29.
SedikidesC.GaertnerL.VeveaJ. L. (2005). Pancultural self-enhancement reloaded: A meta-analytic reply to Heine (2005). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 539-551.
30.
SingelisT. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 580-591.
31.
TakataT. (2000). Sogo dokuritsu teki sogo kyocho teki jikokan shakudo ni tsuite [On the scale for measuring independent and interdependent view of self]. (Bulletin of Research Institute, 8, 145-163). Nara, Japan: Nara University, Department of Sociology.
32.
Ting-ToomeyS. (Ed.). (1994). The challenge of facework: Cross-cultural and interpersonal issues. New York: State of New York–Albany Press.
33.
TobinJ. J.WuD. Y. H.DavidsonD. H. (1989). Preschool in three cultures: Japan, China, and the United States. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
34.
UchidaY.ParkJ.KitayamaS. (2008, February). Explicit and implicit social orientations: Independence and interdependence in Japan and the U.S. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
35.
YamaguchiS. (1994). Collectivism among the Japanese: A perspective from the self. In KimU.TriandisH. C.KagitcibasiC.ChoiS.- C.YoonG. (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 175-188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
