The present research explores cultural understandings of what it means to be human. We used open-ended responses to examine whether the most culturally salient aspects of humanness are captured by two theoretical dimensions: human uniqueness (HU) and human nature (HN). Australians, Italians, and Chinese (N = 315) showed differences in the characteristics considered human and in the emphasis placed on HU and HN. These findings contribute to developing cross-cultural folk psychological models of humanness.
BainP. G.ParkJ.KwokC.HaslamN. (2009). Attributing human uniqueness and human nature to cultural groups: Distinct forms of subtle dehumanization. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 789-805.
2.
HaslamN. (2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 10, 252-264.
3.
HaslamN.BainP.DougeL.LeeM.BastianB. (2005). More human than you: Attributing humanness to self and others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 937-950.
4.
HaslamN.LoughnanS.KashimaY.BainP. (2008). Attributing and denying humanness to others. European Review of Social Psychology, 19, 55-85.
5.
HayesA. F.KrippendorffK. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1, 77-89.
6.
HofstedeG. (1980). Culture’s consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
7.
LeyensJ. P.PaladinoM. P.RodriguezR. T.VaesJ.DemoulinS.RodriguezA. P.GauntR. (2000). The emotional side of prejudice: The attribution of secondary emotions to ingroups and outgroups. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 4, 186-197.
8.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
9.
OysermanD.CoonH. M.KemmelmeierM. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3-72.
10.
SchwartzS. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1-65). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
11.
VaesJ. (2010). The human nature content of Italian stereotypes. Unpublished raw data, University of Padova, Italy.
12.
VaesJ.PaladinoM. P. (2010). The uniquely human content of stereotypes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 23-29.
13.
WrightsmanL. S. (1992). Assumptions about human nature: Implications for researchers and practitioners (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
