The leg-to-body ratio (LBR) is a morphological index that has been shown to influence a person’s attractiveness. In our research, 3,103 participants from 27 nations rated the physical attractiveness of seven male and seven female silhouettes varying in LBR. We found that male and female silhouettes with short and excessively long legs were perceived as less attractive across all nations. Hence, the LBR may significantly influence perceptions of physical attractiveness across nations.
Bertamini, M., & Bennett, K.M. ( 2009). A study on the effect of leg to body ratio on perceived attractiveness of simplified stimuli. Journal of Social, Evolutionary and Cultural Psychology, 3, 233-250.
2.
Cavanagh, P.R., & Kram, R. ( 1989). Stride length in distance running: Velocity, body dimensions, and added mass. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise , 21, 467-479.
3.
Dangoury, A.D., Schilg, S., Hulse, J.A., & Cole, T.J. ( 2002). Sitting height and subischial leg length centile curves for boys and girls from Southeast England. Annals of Human Biology, 29, 290-305.
4.
Davey Smith, G., Greenwood, R., Gunnell, D., Sweetnam, P., Yarnell, J., & Elwood, P. ( 2001). Leg length, insulin resistance, and coronary heart disease risk: The Caerphilly Study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 55, 867-872.
5.
Fielding, R., Schooling, C.M., Adab, P., Cheng, K.K., Lao, X.Q., Jiang, C.Q., & Lam, T.H. ( 2008). Are longer legs associated with enhanced fertility in Chinese women? Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 434-443.
6.
Frederick, D.A., Hadji-Michael, M., Furnham, A., & Swami, V. ( 2010). The influence of leg-to-body ratio (LBR) on judgments of female physical attractiveness: Assessments of computer-generated images varying in LBR. Body Image, 7, 51-55.
7.
Pawlowski, B. ( 2000). The biological meaning of preferences on the human mate market. Anthropological Review, 63, 66-72.
8.
Rilling, J.K., Torres, L., Kaufman, E.O., Smith, R., Patel, C., & Worthman, M. ( 2009). Abdominal depth and waist circumference as influential determinants of human female attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 21-31.
9.
Sorokowski, P., & Pawlowski, B. ( 2008). Adaptive preferences for leg length in a potential partner . Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 86-91.
10.
Swami, V., Einon, D., & Furnham, A. ( 2006). The leg-to-body ratio as a human aesthetic criterion . Body Image, 3, 317-323.
11.
Swami, V., Einon, D., & Furnham, A. ( 2007). Cultural significance of leg-to-body ratio preferences? Evidence from Britain and rural Malaysia. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 265-269.
12.
Wadsworth, M.E.J., Hardy, R.J., Paul, A.A., Marshall, S.F., & Cole, T.J. ( 2002). Leg and trunk length at 43 years in relation to childhood health, diet and family circumstances, evidence from 1946 national birth cohort . International Journal of Epidemiology, 31, 383-391.
