Content and Structure of Values in Middle Adolescence: Evidence From Singapore,the Philippines,Indonesia,and Australia

Abstract

Schwartz’s theory of the content and structure of human values has been validated mostly with adult (teacher and university student) samples. The present study examines the content and structure of values of middle adolescents in Singapore, the Philippines, Indonesia, and Australia. The 40-item version of the Portrait Values Questionnaire was administered to 230 adolescents in each country (total N = 920; boys and girls were equal) and smallest space analysis was performed. Consistent with theory, the 10 first-order values and the four second-order values, organized in two bipolar dimensions, were identified in all samples. In support of the developmentally modified value model for young people, there was some evidence for the periphery of power to achievement. Interestingly, the location of benevolence and universalism were reversed across all cultural groups, and tradition values separated into self-restriction and faith. Overall, the findings support the claim that Schwartz’s theory of values is neither restricted to adults nor solely based on a particular instrument and is generalizable across diverse national contexts.

Keywords

Schwartz theory values content values structure adolescence PVQ

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amar, R. , & Toledano, S. ( 2001). HUDAP manual with mathematics and windows interface (2nd ed.). Jerusalem: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Computation Authority.

Bilsky, W. , Niemann, F. , Schmitz, J. , & Rose, I. ( 2005). Value structure at an early age: Cross-cultural replications . In W. Bilsky & D. Elizur (Eds.), Facet theory: Design, analysis and applications. Proceedings of the 10th International Facet Theory Conference in Rome, 10-13 July 2005 (pp. 241-248). Prague: Agentura Action M.

Bubeck, M. , & Bilsky, W. ( 2004). Value structure at an early age. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 63, 31-41.

Huismans, S. , & Schwartz, S.H. (1992). Religiosity and value priorities: A study of Protestants, Catholics, and Jews. In S. Iwawaki , Y. Kashima , & K. Leung (Eds.), Innovations in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 237-249). Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.

Levy, S. ( 1985). Lawful roles of facets in social theories. In D. Canter (Ed.), The facet approach to social research (pp. 59-96). New York: Springer-Verlag .

Liem, A.D. ( 2006). The influences of sociocultural and educational contexts on approaches to learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, National University of Singapore.

Nunnally, J.C. ( 1968). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Rohrbaugh, J. , & Jessor, R. ( 1975). Religiosity in youth: A personal control against deviant behavior. Journal of Personality, 43, 136-155.

Schwartz, S.H. ( 2005). Robustness and fruitfulness of a theory of universals in individual human values. In A. Tamayo & J. B. Porto (Eds.), Valores e comportamento nas organizações [Values and behavior in organizations] (pp. 56-95). Petrópolis , Brazil: Vozes.

10.

Schwartz, S.H. , Melech, G. , Lehman, A. , Burgess, S. , Harris, M. , & Owens, V. ( 2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 519-542.