This research tests the theoretical prediction that the self-concept of bicultural Chinese would become more socially connected when Chinese primed than when Western primed. Measures of social connectedness are derived from the Self-Reference Effect, according to which information will be memorized better when it references the Self than when it references the non-Self. Under Western priming ( n = 91), memory of information referencing Self is better than that referencing font (a nonperson condition referring to the style in which the information is printed), a Nonidentified Person (NIP), or Mother, which suggests a relatively distinct Self (Hypothesis 1). Under Chinese priming (n = 96), the Self-font distinction remains, but the Self—NIP and Self—Mother distinctions disappear as predicted, suggesting a more socially connected Self (Hypothesis 2). The predicted Priming × Referencing interaction effects are (marginally) significant, which confirm that the Self—NIP and Self—Mother connectedness is higher under Chinese priming than under Western priming (Hypothesis 3).
Aron, A., Aron, E.N., & Norman, C. (2004). Self-expansion model of motivation and cognition in close relationships and beyond. In M. B. Brewer & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Self and social identity (pp. 99-123). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
2.
Aron, A., Aron, E.N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596-612.
3.
Ashmore, R.D., & Jussim, L. (1997). Towards a second century of the scientific analysis of "I" and identity. In R. Ashmore & L. Jussim (Eds.), "I" and identity: Fundamental issues (pp. 3-19). New York: Oxford University Press.
4.
Benet-Martínez, V., Leu, J., Lee, F., & Morris, M.W. (2002). Negotiating biculturalism: Cultural frame switching in biculturals with oppositional versus compatible cultural identities. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 492-516.
5.
Bond, M.H., & Cheung, M.-K. (1984). Experimenter language choice and ethnic affirmation by Chinese trilinguals in Hong Kong. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 8, 347-356.
6.
Bond, M.H., & Smith, P.B. (1996). Cross-cultural social and organizational psychology . Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 205-235.
7.
Brewer, M.B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 17, 475-482.
8.
Brewer, M.B., & Chen, Y.R. (2007). Where (who) are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism. Psychological Review, 114, 133-151.
9.
Brewer, M.B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this `we'? Level of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83-93.
10.
Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (2005). Cultural competence: Dynamic processes. In A. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and competence (pp. 489-505). New York: Guilford.
11.
Conway, M.A., & Dewhurst, S.A. (1995). The "I" and recollective experience. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 1-19.
12.
Conway, M.A., & Pleydell-Pearce, C.W. (2000). The construction of autobiographical memories in the self-memory system. Psychological Review, 107, 262-288.
13.
Gardiner, J.M., Ramponi, C., & Richardson-Klavehn, A. (1998). Experience of remembering, knowing, and guessing. Consciousness and Cognition, 7, 1-26.
14.
Higgins, E.T., & Bargh, J.A. (1987). Social cognition and social perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 369-425.
15.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. London: Sage.
16.
Hong, Y.-I., Morris, M.W., Chiu, C.-Y., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2000). Multi-cultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychologist, 55, 709-720.
17.
James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.
18.
Johnson, C., Gadon, O., Carlson, D., Southwick, S., Faith, M., & Chalpin, J. (2002). Self-reference and group membership: evidence for a group-reference effect. European Journal of Social Psychology , 32, 261-274.
19.
Kashima, Y., Yamaguchi, S., Kim, U., Choi, S.-C., Gelfand, J.M., & Yuki, M. (1995). Culture, gender and self: A perspective from individualism-collectivism research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 925-937.
20.
Keenan, J.M., & Baillet, S.D. (1980). Memory for personally and significant events. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and performance (pp. 651-669). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
Klein, S.B., & Loftus, J. (1988). The nature of referent encoding: The contributions of elaborative and organizational process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 5-11.
22.
Lehman, D.R., Chiu, C.-Y., & Schaller, M. (2004). Culture and psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 689-714.
23.
Markus, H.R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
24.
Mead, G.H. (1934). Mind, self and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
Meier, M.K., & Cheng, B.Y.-M. (2004). Language and self-construal priming: A replication and extension in a Hong Kong sample. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 35, 705-712.
26.
Messick, D.M. (1988). Coda. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The cross-cultural challenge to social psychology (pp. 286-289). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27.
Ng, S.H., & Lai, J. (2007). Bicultural selves, multiple ingroup identities and dual patriotisms among Chinese in Hong Kong. Unpublished paper, City University of Hong Kong.
28.
Ng, S.H., & Zhu, Y. (2001). Attributing causality and remembering events in individual- and group-acting situations: A Beijing, Hong Kong, and Wellington comparison. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 4, 39-52.
29.
Oyserman, D., & Lee, S.W. (in press). Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism. Psychological Bulletin .
30.
Qi, J., & Zhu, Y. (2002). The self-reference effect of Chinese college students . Psychological Science (China), 25, 275-278. (In Chinese)
31.
Rogers, T.B., Kuiper, N.A., & Kirker, W.S. (1977). Self-reference and the encoding of personal information . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 677-688.
32.
Ross, M., Xun, W.Q.E., & Wilson, A.E. (2002). Language and the bicultural "I."Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1040-1050.
33.
Snodgrass, J.G., & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory; Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34-50.
34.
Sui, J., Zhu, Y., & Chiu, C.-Y. (2007). Bicultural mind, self-construal, and self- and mother-reference effects: Consequences of cultural priming on recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 818-824.
35.
Symons, C.S., & Johnson, B.T. (1997). The self-reference effect in memory: A meta-analysis . Psychological Bulletin, 121, 371-394.
36.
Trafimow, D., Triandis, H.C., & Goto, S.G. (1991). Some tests of the distinction between the private self and the collective self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 649-655.
37.
Triandis, H.C. (1989). The "I" and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 269-289.
38.
Tulving, E. (1999). On the uniqueness of episodic memory. In L.-G. Nilsson & H. J. Markowitsch (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience of memory (pp. 11-42). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Horgrefe & Huber.
39.
Turner, J.C., Hogg, M.A., Oakes, P.J., Reicher, S.D., & Wetherell, M.S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
40.
Yang, K.S., & Li, B.H. (1971). Desirability, meaning and familiarity of 557 Chinese personality traits (Research Report No. 13). Taipei: Taiwan National University. (In Chinese)
41.
Zhu, Y., & Zhang, L. (2002). An experimental study on the self-reference effect . Science in China (Series C), 45, 120-128.
