This study investigated cultural differences in probabilistic thinking and risk taking. A View of Uncertainty Questionnaire assessed the probabilistic thinking of Chinese and English gamblers and nongamblers and a hypothetical Horse Racing Task assessed risk-taking behavior (N = 120). The Chinese exhibited significantly less probabilistic thinking and riskier gambling decisions. A path analysis found that degree of probabilistic thinking was one (but not the only) source of the observed cultural differences in risk taking.
Hsee, C. K., & Weber, E. U. (1999). Cross-national differences in risk preference and lay predictions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 165-179.
2.
Keren, G. (1994). The rationality of gambling: Gamblers’ conceptions of probability, chance and luck. In G. Wright & P. Ayton (Eds.), Subjective probability (pp. 485-499). Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
3.
Kogan, N., & Wallach, M. A. (1964). Risk taking: A study in cognition and personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
4.
Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 311-328.
5.
Lau, L., & Ranyard, R. (1999). Chinese and English speakers’ linguistic expression of probability and probabilistic thinking. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 411-421.
6.
Phillips, L. D., & Wright, G. N. (1977). Cultural differences in viewing uncertainty and assessing probabilities. In H. Jungermann & G. de Zeeuw (Eds.), Decision making and change in human affairs (pp. 507-519). Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel.
7.
Wagenaar, W. A. (1988). Paradoxes of gambling behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Weber, E. U., & Hsee, C. K. (1999). Models and mosaics: Investigating cross-cultural differences in risk perception and risk preference. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6(4), 611-617.
9.
Weber, E. U., & Hsee, C. K. (2000). Culture and individual judgment and decision making. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49(1), 32-61.
10.
Wright, G. N., & Phillips, L. D. (1980). aCultural variation in probabilistic thinking: Alternative ways of dealing with uncertainty. International Journal of Psychology, 15, 239-257.
11.
Yates, J. F., Lee, J., & Bush, J. G. (1997). General knowledge overconfidence: Cross-national variations, response style, and “reality.”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 87-94.
12.
Yates, J. F., Lee, J., & Shinotsuka, H. (1996). Beliefs about overconfidence, including its cross-national variation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 138-147.
13.
Yates, J. F., & Stone, E. R. (1992). The risk construct. In J. F. Yates (Ed.), Risk taking behavior (pp.1-25). Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
