A significant relationship between a sense of power and financial risk-taking has been established in the literature. However, the boundary conditions for this relationship remain unclear. This article presents the results of an online experimental study (N = 192) that explores the moderating role of cognitive load in the relationship between power and financial risk-taking in the domains of gambling and investing. The findings validate a positive association between a sense of power and financial risk-taking, alongside a negative impact of cognitive load on financial risk. Notably, cognitive load moderates the relationship between power and financial risk-taking in a way that the link is positive when individuals have full access to their cognitive resources, but it becomes nonsignificant when they are under cognitive load.
AdrianJ.PostalV.MoessingerM.RascleN.CharlesA. (2011). Personality traits and executive functions related to on-road driving performance among older drivers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 43, 1652–1659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.03.023
2.
AndersonC.GalinskyA. D. (2006). Power, optimism, and risk-taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(4), 511–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.324
BaggettaP.AlexanderP. A. (2016). Conceptualization and operationalization of executive function. Mind, Brain, and Education, 10(1), 10–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12100
5.
BenjaminD. J.BrownS. A.ShapiroJ. M. (2013). Who is ‘behavioral’? Cognitive ability and anomalous preferences. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(6), 1231–1255. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12055
6.
BlaisA. R.WeberE. U. (2006). A domain-specific risk-taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations. Judgment and Decision Making, 1, 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500000334
7.
CaoS.YangD. (2024). The relationship between power, sense of power, and cognitive flexibility: An analysis of parallel mediating effects based on reward and punishment sensitivity. Behavioral Sciences, 14(7), 513. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14070513
ChoM.KeltnerD. (2020). Power, approach, and inhibition: Empirical advances of a theory. Current Opinion in Psychology, 33, 196–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.08.013
10.
DeckC.JahediS. (2015). The effect of cognitive load on economic decision making: A survey and new experiments. European Economic Review, 78, 97–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.05.004
De NeysW.SchaekenW. (2007). When people are more logical under cognitive load: Dual task impact on scalar implicature. Experimental Psychology, 54(2), 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.54.2.128
13.
DeWallC. N.BaumeisterR. F.MeadN. L.VohsK. D. (2011). How leaders self-regulate their task performance: Evidence that power promotes diligence, depletion, and disdain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020932
14.
DiamondA. (2006). The early development of executive functions. In BialystockE.CraigF. I. (Eds.), Lifespan cognition: Mechanisms of change (pp. 70–95). Oxford University Press.
DjamshidianA.O’SullivanS. S.LeesA.AverbeckB. B. (2011). Stroop test performance in impulsive and non impulsive patients with Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, 17(3), 212–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2010.12.014
GalinskyA. D.MageeJ. C.GruenfeldD. H.WhitsonJ. A.LiljenquistK. A. (2008). Power reduces the press of the situation: Implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(6), 1450–1466. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012633
19.
GalinskyA. D.RuckerD. D.MageeJ. C. (2015). Power: Past findings, present considerations, and future directions. In MikulincerM.ShaverP. R.SimpsonJ. A.DovidioJ. F. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Vol. 3. Interpersonal relations (pp. 421–460). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14344-016
20.
GerhardtH.BieleG. P.HeekerenH. R.UhligH. (2016). Cognitive load increases risk aversion (SFB 649 Discussion Paper 2016-011). Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.
21.
GneezyU.PottersJ. (1997). An experiment on risk taking and evaluation periods. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 631–645. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355397555217
22.
GuinoteA. (2007). Power affects basic cognition: Increased attentional inhibition and flexibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(5), 685–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.06.008
23.
HadarB.LuriaR.LibermanN. (2020). Induced social power improves visual working memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(2), 285–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219855045
24.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. The Guilford Press.
KliestikT.ValaskovaK.LazaroiuG.KovacovaM.VrbkaJ. (2020). Remaining financially healthy and competitive: The role of financial predictors. Journal of Competitiveness, 12(1), 74–92. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2020.01.05
28.
LagattutaK.SayfanL.MonsourM. (2011). A new measure for assessing executive function across a wide age range: Children and adults find “Happy-Sad” more difficult than “Day-Night.”Developmental Science, 14, 481–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00994
29.
MageeJ. C.GalinskyA. D. (2008). 8 social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 351–398.
30.
Martin-BassolsN. (2024). Risky and non-risky financial investments and cognition. Journal of Economic Psychology, 100, 102677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2023.102677
31.
PharoH.SimC.GrahamM.GrossJ.HayneH. (2011). Risky business: Executive function, personality, and reckless behavior during adolescence and emerging adulthood. Behavioral Neuroscience, 125, 970–978. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025768
32.
SchiebenerJ. (2013). On the role of executive subcomponents, goal mechanisms, and methods of measurement in decision making under risk conditions [Doctoral dissertation]. Universität Duisburg-Essen.
33.
SeeberK. G. (2015). Cognitive load. Routledge encyclopedia of interpreting studies. Routledge.
34.
SekścińskaK.JaworskaD.Rudzinska-WojciechowskaJ. (2024a). The effect of state and trait power on financial risk taking: The mediating and moderating roles of focus on rewards versus threats. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 37(1), Article e2363. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2363
35.
SekścińskaK.JaworskaD.Rudzinska-WojciechowskaJ. (2024b). Executive functions and financial risk-taking: The crucial role of cognitive flexibility and mediating effect of risk-perception [Manuscript Under Review].
36.
SekścińskaK.Rudzinska-WojciechowskaJ. (2023). Investment decisions in response to gains and losses: The joint role of psychological and sociodemographic variables. Personality and Individual Differences, 202, 111972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111972
37.
SekścińskaK.Rudzinska-WojciechowskaJ.JaworskaD. (2022). The effect of state and trait power on financial risk-taking: The mediating and moderating roles of optimism. PLOS ONE, 17(10), Article e0276878. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276878
38.
SekścińskaK.Rudzinska-WojciechowskaJ.KusevP. (2022). How decision-makers’ sense and state of power induce their propensity to take financial risks. Journal of Economic Psychology, 89, 102474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2021.102474
39.
ShengN.YangC.HanL.JouM. (2023). Too much overload and concerns: Antecedents of social media fatigue and the mediating role of emotional exhaustion. Computers in Human Behavior, 139, 107500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107500
SmithP. K.TropeY. (2006). You focus on the forest when you’re in charge of the trees: Power priming and abstract information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 578–596. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.578
TautivaJ. A. D.CarreraE. S.Vásquez-LavínF.OlivaR. D. P. (2023). Understanding the role of institutions and economic context on entrepreneurial value creation choice. Oeconomia Copernicana, 14(2), 405–447. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.011
44.
VlaevI.KusevP.StewartN.AldrovandiS.ChaterN. (2010). Domain effects and financial risk attitudes. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 30(9), 1374–1386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01433.x
45.
WhitneyP.RinehartC. A.HinsonJ. M. (2008). Framing effects under cognitive load: The role of working memory in risky decisions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 1179–1184. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.6.1179
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
