This article explores the phenomenon of high levels of public trust in the military across the Global South. We extend arguments from the US civil-military relations literature to a broader context and generate testable hypotheses to explain trust in the armed forces driven by the military’s performance and professionalism, and the public’s patriotism and partisanship. Using public opinion survey data from 73 countries between 1995 and 2017, we find broad but nuanced support for the hypotheses. Many determinants of public trust in the military, theorized in the US context, generalize globally: battlefield performance, resources, national pride, and right-wing partisanship all increase trust in the military, while coups and civil wars decrease it. By contrast, the effect of conscription is opposite to that in the United States, with national service providing a trust boost. The study highlights the implications of public trust for civil-military relations, political stability, and governance.
AbouzzohourYasminaYousefTarik M.. 2023. “What Drives Public Trust in the Military in Non-Democracies: Evidence from Libya (2014-2019).” The Journal of North African Studies28 (6): 1373–1401.
2.
Afrobarometer Data. 2012. “Liberia Round 5.” Available at:https://www.afrobarometer.org. Accessed December 11, 2017.
3.
Afrobarometer Data. 2015. “Liberia Round 6.” Available at:https://www.afrobarometer.org. Accessed December 11, 2017.
4.
AlbrechtHolgerBufanoMichaelKoehlerKevin. 2022. “Role Model or Role Expansion? Popular Perceptions of the Military in Tunisia.” Political Research Quarterly75 (2): 321-337.
5.
AshKonstantinShapovalovMiroslav. 2021. “What Affects Trust in a Reforming Military? Evidence from a Lab-in-the-Field Experiment in Ukraine.” Working Paper.
BacevichAndrew J.2005. The New American Militarism: How Americans are Seduced by War. New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
BerndtssonJoakimDandekerChristopherYdénKarl. 2015. “Swedish and British Public Opinion of the Armed Forces After a Decade of War.” Armed Forces & Society41 (2): 307-28.
9.
BiehlHeiko. 2022. “Just Paying Lip Service? Public Trust and Public Support for Armed Forces in Germany.” Armed Forces & Society49 (2): 395.
10.
BienenHenry. 1981. “Civil-Military Relations in the Third World.” International Political Science Review2 (3): 363-70.
11.
BoveVincenzoDi LeoRiccardoGianiMarco. 2022. “Military Culture and Institutional Trust: Evidence from Conscription Reforms in Europe.” American Journal of Political Science68 (2): 714.
BrooksRisa. 2019. “Integrating the Civil-Military Relations Subfield.” Annual Review of Political Science22: 379-98.
14.
BrooksRisa. 2020. “Paradoxes of Professionalism: Rethinking Civil-Military Relations in the United States.” International Security44 (4): 7-44.
15.
BrooksRisaGrewalSharan. 2022. ““Twice the Citizen”: How Military Attitudes of Superiority Undermine Civilian Control in the United States.” Journal of Conflict Resolution66 (4–5): 623-650.
16.
Bueno de MesquitaBruceSiversonRandolph M.. 1995. “War and the Survival of Political Leaders: A Comparative Study of Regime Types and Political Accountability.” The American Political Science Review89 (4): 841-55.
17.
BurbachDavid T.2017. “Gaining Trust While Losing Wars: Confidence in the U.S. Military after Iraq and Afghanistan.” Orbis61 (2): 154-71.
18.
BurbachDavid T.2019. “Partisan Dimensions of Confidence in the U.S. Military, 1973-2016.” Armed Forces & Society45 (2): 211-33.
19.
CingranelliDavid L.RichardsDavid L.ClayK. Chad. 2014. “The CIRI Human Rights Dataset, Version 2014.04.14.” doi:10.7910/DVN/UKCPXT.
20.
CookTimothy E.GronkePaul. 2005. “The Skeptical American: Revisiting the Meanings of Trust in Government and Confidence in Institutions.” Journal of Politics67: 784-803.
21.
DerpanopoulosGeorgeFrantzEricaGeddesBarbaraWrightJoseph. 2016. “Are Coups Good for Democracy?” Research & Politics3 (1): 1-7.
22.
DuckittJohnBizumicBorisKraussStephen W.HeledEdna. 2010. “A Tripartite Approach to Right-Wing Authoritarianism: The Authoritarianism-Conservatism-Traditionalism Model.” Political Psychology31 (5): 685-715.
23.
DueckColin. 2010. Hard Line: The Republican Party and U.S. Foreign Policy since World War II. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
FeaverPeter D.2005. Armed Servants: Agency, Oversight, and Civil-Military Relations. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
26.
FeaverPeter D.2023. Thanks for Your Service: The Causes and Consequences of Public Confidence in the US Military. New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
FeldmanStanleyStennerKaren. 1997. “Perceived Threat and Authoritarianism.” Political Psychology18 (4): 741-770.
28.
FinerSamuel E.1962. The Man on Horseback: The Role of the Military in Politics. New York: Praeger.
29.
FoaRoberto StefanMounkYascha. 2016. “The Democratic Disconnect.” Journal of Democracy27 (3): 5-17.
30.
GarbMaja. 2015. “Public Trust in the Military: The Slovenian Armed Forces in a Comparative Analysis.” Current Sociology63 (3): 450-469.
31.
GeddesBarbara. 1999. “What Do We Know About Democratization After Twenty Years?” Annual Review of Political Science2 (1): 115-144.
32.
GeddesBarbaraWrightJoseph G.FrantzErica. 2014. “Military Rule.” Annual Review of Political Science17 (1): 147-62.
33.
GleditschKristian SkredeSalehyanIdeanSchultzKenneth. 2008. “Fighting at Home, Fighting Abroad: How Civil Wars Lead to International Disputes.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution52 (4): 479-506.
34.
GleditschNils PetterWallensteenPeterErikssonMikaelSollenbergMargaretaStrandHåvard. 2002. “Armed Conflict 1946-2001: A New Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research39 (5): 615-637.
35.
GronkePaulFeaverPeter D.. 2001. “Uncertain Confidence: Civilian and Military Attitudes About Civil-Military Relations.” In Soldiers and Civilians: The Civil-Military Gap and American National Security, edited by FeaverPeter D.KohnRichard H.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36.
GwartneyJamesLawsonRobertHallJoshua. 2017. Economic Freedom of the World. Vancouver, BC, CA: Fraser Institute.
37.
HerbstJeffrey. 2004. “African Militaries and Rebellion: The Political Economy of Threat and Combat Effectiveness.” Journal of Peace Research41 (3): 357-69.
38.
HetheringtonMarc J.1998. “The Political Relevance of Political Trust.” American Political Science Review92 (4): 791-808.
39.
HetheringtonMarc J.HusserJason A.. 2012. “How Trust Matters: The Changing Political Relevance of Political Trust.” American Journal of Political Science56 (2): 312-25.
40.
HuntingtonSamuel P.1957. The Soldier and the State: The Theory and Politics of Civil-Military Relations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
HutchisonMarc L.JohnsonKristin. 2011. “Capacity to Trust? Institutional Capacity, Conflict, and Political Trust in Africa, 2000-2005.” Journal of Peace Research48 (6): 737-52.
42.
JamalAmaneyNooruddinIrfan. 2010. “The Democratic Utility of Trust: A Cross-National Analysis.” The Journal of Politics72 (1): 45-59.
43.
JanowitzMorris. 1960. The Professional Soldier: A Social and Political Portrait. 1st ed. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
44.
JoyceRenanah. 2020. ““A Force for Good”: Army-Building After War in Liberia.” Journal of the Middle East and Africa11 (2): 273-293.
45.
KasherAsa. 2003. “Public Trust in a Military Force.” Journal of Military Ethics2 (1): 20-45.
46.
KingDavid C.KarabellZachary. 2003. The Generation of Trust: Public Confidence in the U.S. Military Since Vietnam. Washington, DC: AEI Press.
47.
KoehlerKevinGrewalSharanAlbrechtHolger. 2022. “Who Fakes Support for the Military? Experimental Evidence from Tunisia.” Democratization29 (6): 1055-1076.
48.
KrebsRonald R.2004. “A School for the Nation? How Military Service Does Not Build Nations, and How it Might.” International Security28 (4): 85-124.
49.
KrebsRonald R.RalstonRobert. 2020. “Patriotism or Paychecks: Who Believes What About Why Soldiers Serve.” Armed Forces & Society48: 25–48.
50.
KreutzJoakim. 2010. “How and When Armed Conflicts End: Introducing the UCDP Conflict Termination Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research47 (2): 243-250.
51.
LiebertH.GolbyJames. 2017. “Midlife Crisis? The All-Volunteer Force at 40.” Armed Forces & Society43: 115-138.
52.
MagaloniBeatriz. 2008. “Credible Power-Sharing and the Longevity of Authoritarian Rule.” Comparative Political Studies41 (4–5): 715-741.
53.
MalešičMarjanGarbMaja. 2018. “Public Trust in the Military from Global, Regional and National Perspectives.” In Handbook of the Sociology of the Military, edited by CaforioGiuseppeNuciariMarina, 2nd ed. New York: Springer.
54.
MarinovNikolayGoemansHein. 2014. “Coups and Democracy.” British Journal of Political Science44 (4): 799-825.
55.
Martínez-GallardoCeciliade la CerdaNicolásHartlynJonathanHoogheLiesbetMarksGaryBakkerRyan. 2022. “Revisiting Party System Structuration in Latin America and Europe: Economic and Socio-Cultural Dimensions.” Party Politics29 (4): 780-792. doi:10.1177/13540688221090604.
56.
MillerMichael K.2012. “Economic Development, Violent Leader Removal, and Democratization.” American Journal of Political Science5656 (4): 1002-20.
57.
MillerRoss A.1999. “Regime Type, Strategic Interaction, and the Diversionary Use of Force.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution43 (3): 388-402.
58.
MishlerWilliamRoseRichard. 1997. “Trust, Distrust and Skepticism: Popular Evaluations of Civil and Political Institutions in Post-Communist Societies.” The Journal of Politics59 (2): 418-51.
59.
MoskosCharles. 2003. “Patriotism-Lite Meets the Citizen Soldier.” In United We Serve: National Service and the Future of Citizenship, edited by DionneE. J.DrogoszKayla MeltzerLitanRobert E.. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
60.
NarangVipinTalmadgeCaitlin. 2017. “Civil-Military Pathologies and Defeat in War.” Journal of Conflict Resolution62 (7): 1379.
61.
ÖrsH. Birsen. 2015. “The Perception of the Army by Armenian Minorities Living in Turkey.” Armed Forces & Society36 (4): 604-626.
62.
OrtmannsVerenaSchneiderSilke L.. 2015. “Harmonization Still Failing? Inconsistency of Education Variables in Cross-National Public Opinion Surveys.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research28 (4): 562-582.
SchakeKoriMattisJames. 2016. Warriors and Citizens: American Views of Our Military. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
72.
ShlapentokhVladimir. 2006. “Trust in Public Institutions in Russia: The Lowest in the World.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies39 (2): 153-74.
73.
SilverJasmine R.PickettJustin T.. 2015. “Toward a Better Understanding of Politicized Policing Attitudes: Conflicted Conservatism and Support for Police Use of Force.” Criminology53 (4): 650-676.
74.
SIPRI (Stockholm International Peace Research Institute). 2022. SIPRI Yearbook 2022: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security.
75.
SolarCarlos. 2022. “Trust in the Military in Post-Authoritarian Societies.” Current Sociology70 (3): 317-337.
76.
StepanAlfred. 1988. Rethinking Military Politics: Brazil and the Southern Cone. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
77.
TaylorTerrill O.WilcoxMelanie M.. 2021. “Patriotism and Perceptions of Police: Examining the Racial Divide between Black and White Americans.” Translational Issues in Psychological Science7: 392-404.
78.
ThomWilliam G.1995. An Assessment of Prospects for Ending Domestic Military Conflict in Sub-Saharan Africa. 177. CSIS Africa Notes.
79.
ThyneClayton L.PowellJonathan M.. 2016. “Coup d’état or coup d’autocracy? How coups impact Democratization, 1950–2008.” Foreign Policy Analysis12 (2): 192-213.
80.
V-Dem. 2024. “V-Dem Dataset v14.” Varieties of Democracy Project. doi:10.23696/mcwt-fr58
81.
WalterBarbara F.1997. “The Critical Barrier to Civil War Settlement.” International Organization51 (3): 335-364.
WongTimothy Ka-yingWanPo-sanHsiaoHsin-Huang Michael. 2011. “The Bases of Political Trust in Six Asian Societies: Institutional and Cultural Explanations Compared.” International Political Science Review32 (3): 263-81.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
