This present research explores a progressive repurposing of Virtual Reality technology, Virtual Immersive Contact (VIC), in a real-world setting to; explore viability to reduce prejudice and investigate the role of empathy in motivating prosocial behavior. The study employed a between-subjects repeated-measures experimental design of a randomized sample (n = 113) split into two conditions to reduce prejudice and discrimination in the active conflict area of the Central African Republic (CAR). In line with the study’s hypotheses, VIC produced a significant increase in empathic concern for the Muslim outgroup and intentions to donate to a Muslim family, while also showing that the relationship between empathy and helping behaviours was mostly explained by confounding variables. This research provides both the first evidence of its kind that VIC could be a new form of fostering positive intergroup contact in an active conflict setting, crating a new facet of intergroup contact theory, and further evolving the literature on the empathy, prosocial behaviour relationship.
AhnSun Joo (Grace)LeAmanda Minh TranBailensonJeremy. 2013. “The Effect of Embodied Experiences on Self-Other Merging, Attitude, and Helping Behavior.” Media Psychology16 (1): 7-38. doi: 10.1080/15213269.2012.755877.
2.
AjzenIcek. 2005. Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior. Maidenhead, Berkshire, England: Open University Press.
3.
AjzenI.FishbeinM.. 1980. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4.
BailensonJeremy. 2018. Experience on Demand: What Virtual Reality Is, How It Works, and What It Can Do. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
5.
BatsonDaniel. 2011. Altruism in Humans. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341065.001.0001.
6.
BatsonDaniel. 2017. “The Empathy-Altruism Hypothesis: What and So What?” In The Oxford Handbook of Compassion Science, edited by SeppalaESimon-ThomasEBrownSWorlineMCameronCDotyJames R., 27-40. New York: Oxford University Press.
7.
BatsonDanielChangJoheeOrrRyanRowlandJennifer. 2002. “Empathy, Attitudes, and Action: Can Feeling for a Member of a Stigmatized Group Motivate One to Help the Group?” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin28 (12): 1656-66. doi: 10.1177/014616702237647.
8.
BatsonDanielShawLaura L.. 1991. “Evidence for Altruism: Toward a Pluralism of Prosocial Motives.” Source: Psychological Inquiry2 (2): 107-22. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1449242
9.
BatsonDanielPolycarpouMarina P.Harmon-JonesEddieImhoffHeidi J.MitchenerErin C.BednarLori L.KleinTricia R.HighbergerLori. 1997. “Empathy and Attitudes: Can Feeling for a Member of a Stigmatized Group Improve Feelings Toward the Group?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology72 (12): 105-18. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.105.
10.
BevenJaimie P.Brien-MaloneAngela O.HallGuy. 2004. “Using the Interpersonal Reactivity Index to Assess Empathy in Violent Offenders.” International Journal of Forensic Psychology1 (2): 33-41.
11.
BilaliRezartaStaubErvin. 2015. “Interventions in Real World Settings: Using Media to Overcome Prejudice and Promote Intergroup Reconciliation in Central Africa.” In Cambridge Handbook of the Psychology of Prejudice Prejudice, edited by SibleyChris G.BarlowFiona Kate, 607-31. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.2644.2081.
12.
BilaliRezartaRay VollhardtJohannaRarickJason. 2016. “Assessing the Impact of a Media-Based Intervention to Prevent Intergroup Violence and Promote Positive Intergroup Relations in Burundi.” Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology26: 221-35. doi: 10.1002/casp.2246.
13.
BloomPaul. 2016. Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion. New York: Random House.
14.
BranhamL.2018. Even in the Rain [Film]. NOVO Films.
15.
BrownRupertHewstoneMiles. 2005. “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Contact.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology37: 255-343. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(05)37005-5.
16.
BurchNoel. 1976. Narrative/Diegesis- Thresholds, Limits. Theory of Film Practice. London: Seeker Martin & Warburg.
17.
CameronLindseyRutlandAdamBrownRupertDouchRebecca. 2006. “Changing Children’s Intergroup Attitudes toward Refugees: Testing Different Models of Extended Contact.” Child Development77 (5): 1208–19.
18.
CarayannisTatianaFowlisMignonne. 2017. Violence in the Central African Republic. Council on Foreign Relations. doi: 10.1080/10246029.2017.1302707.
19.
DavisM. H.1996. Empathy: A Social Psychological Approach. New York: Westview Press.
20.
DavisMark H.1983. “Measuring Individual Differences in Empathy: Evidence for a Multidimensional Approach.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology44 (1): 113-26. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113.
21.
de la PeñaNonny deWeilPeggyLloberaJoanSpanlangBernhardFriedmanDoronSanchez-VivesMaria VSlaterMelSanchez-VivesMaria V.SlaterMel. 2010. “Immersive Journalism: Immersive Virtual Reality for the First-Person Experience of News.” Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments19 (4): 291-301. doi: 10.1162/PRES_a_00005.
22.
DovidioJohnLoveAngelikaSchellhaasFabian M. H.HewstoneMiles. 2017. “Reducing Intergroup Bias Through Intergroup Contact: Twenty Years of Progress and Future Directions.” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. doi: 10.1177/1368430217712052.
23.
DovidioJohnGaertnerS. L.AdamPearson.. 2017. “Aversive Racism and Contemporary Bias.” In The Cambridge Handbook of the Psychology of Prejudice, edited by ChrisG, (University of Auckland) Sibley and Fiona Kate (University of Queensland) Barlow267-94. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781316161579.012.
24.
DovidioJohnGaertnerSamuel L.KawakamiKerry. 2003. “Intergroup Contact: The Past, Present, and the Future.” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations6 (1): 5-21. doi: 10.1177/1368430203006001009.
25.
DovidioJohn F.JohnsonJames D.GaertnerSamuel L.AdamPearsonR.SaguyTamarAshburn-NardoLeslie. 2010. “Empathy and Intergroup Relations.” In Prosocial Motives, Emotions, and Behavior: The Better Angels of Our Nature, edited by MikulincerMarioShaverPhilipp, 393-408. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/12061-000.
26.
DovidioJohn F.PiliavinJaneSchroederDavidPennerLouis. 2006. The Social Psychology of Prosocial Behavior. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.
27.
DovidioJohn F.HewstoneMilesGlickPeterEssesVictoria M.. 2010. The SAGE Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping and Discrimination. Boston: Sage Publications.
28.
DuckittJohn. 2010. “Historical Overview.” In The SAGE Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping and Discrimination, edited by HewstoneMilesEssesVictoria M.DovidioJohn F.GlickPeter, 29–44. London: Sage Publications.
EriksenT.1996. “A Non-Ethnic State for Africa? On Integration, Disintegration, Difference and Similarity in Contemporary Africa.” In In Paper Delivered at ASEN Conference, London, March, 1996.
31.
FinlayKrystina A.StephanWalter G.. 2000. “Improving Intergroup Relations: The Effects of Empathy on Racial Attitudes.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology30 (8): 1720-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02464.x.
32.
FrijdaNico H.KuipersPeterter SchureElisabeth. 1989. “Relations Among Emotion, Appraisal, and Emotional Action Readiness.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology57 (2): 212-28. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.2.212.
33.
GehlbachHunterMariettaGeoffKingAaron M.KarutzCodyBailensonJeremy N.DedeChris. 2015. “Many Ways to Walk a Mile in Another’s Moccasins: Type of Social Perspective Taking and Its Effect on Negotiation Outcomes.” Computers in Human Behavior52: 523-32. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.035.
34.
GreenMelanie C.BrockTimothy C.. 2000. “The Role of Transportation in the Persuasiveness of Public Narratives.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology79 (5): 701-21. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701.
35.
HatmakerT. (2023, February 4). Meta's Reality Labs Lost $13.7 billion on VR and AR last year. Tech Crunch. https://tcrn.ch/3HTTiI8.
36.
HenryP. J.2008. “Student Sampling as a Theoretical Problem.” Psychological Inquiry19 (2): 114-26. doi: 10.1080/10478400802049951.
37.
HerreraFernandaBailensonJeremy. 2021. “Virtual Reality Perspective-Taking at Scale: Effect of Avatar Representation, Choice, and Head Movement on Prosocial Behaviors.” New Media & Society23: 2189-2209. doi: 10.1177/1461444821993121.
38.
HerreraFernandaBailensonJeremyWeiszErikaOgleEliseZakiJamil. n.d. Building Long-Term Empathy: A Large-Scale Comparison of Traditional and Virtual Reality Perspective-Taking.
39.
HusnuShenelCrispRichard J.. 2015. “Perspective-Taking Mediates the Imagined Contact Effect.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations44: 29–34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.11.005.
40.
Isaacs-MartinWendy. 2016. “Political and Ethnic Identity in Violent Conflict: The Case of Central African Republic.” International Journal of Conflict and Violence10 (1): 25-39.
JooSunAhnGraceBailensonJeremy NParkDooyeon. 2014. Short and Long-Term Effects of Embodied Experiences in Immersive Virtual Environments on Environmental Locus of Control and Behavior. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.025.
43.
KarlsonKristian BerntHolmAnders. 2011. “Decomposing Primary and Secondary Effects: A New Decomposition Method.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility29 (2): 221-37. doi: 10.1016/j.rssm.2010.12.005.
44.
LanzaStephanieMooreJuliaButeraNicole. 2014. Drawing Causal Inferences Using Propensity Scores: A Practical Guide for Community Psychologists, Vol. 52. doi: 10.1007/s10464-013-9604-4.Drawing.
45.
LolliotSimonFellBenjaminSchmidKatherineWolferRalfSwartHermannAlbertoVociChristOliverRachel NewHewstoneMiles. 2015. “Measures of Intergroup Conflict.” In Meausres of Personality and Social Psychologial Constructs.
46.
LombardLouisa. 2016. State of Rebellion: Violence and Intervention in the Central African Republic. London, England: Zed Books Ltd.
MutzDiana C.GoldmanSeth K.. 2010. “Mass Media.” In The SAGE Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping and Discrimination, edited by DovidioJohn F.HewstoneMilesGlickPeterEssesVictoria M., 241-57. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
49.
NewtonH. JosephBaumChristopher F.BeckNathanielCamerona ColinEpsteinDavidHardinJamesBenJannJenkinsStephenKohlerUlrich. 2010. “The Stata Journal.” Stata Journal10 (3): 288-308.
50.
PaluckElizabeth Levy. 2009. “Reducing Intergroup Prejudice and Conflict Using the Media: A Field Experiment in Rwanda.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology96 (3): 574-87. doi: 10.1037/a0011989.
51.
PaluckElizabeth Levy. 2016. “How to Overcome Prejudice.” Science (New York, N.Y.)352 (6282): 147. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf5207.
52.
PaluckElizabeth LevyDonaldGreen. 2009. “Prejudice Reduction: What Works? A Review and Assessment of Research and Practice.” Annual Review of Psychology60 (1): 339-67. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163607.
53.
PaluckElizabeth LevyPoratRoniClarkChelsey S.GreenDonald P.. 2021. “Prejudice Reduction: Progress and Challenges.” Annual Review of Psychology72: 533-60. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-071620-030619.
54.
PeñaJ.WolffG.WojcieszakM. (2021). “Virtual Reality and Political Outgroup Contact: Can Avatar Customization and Common Ingroup Identity Reduce Social Distance?” Social Media + Society7 (1): 2056-3051. doi: 10.1177/2056305121993765.
55.
PettigrewThomas F.HewstoneMiles. 2017. “The Single Factor Fallacy: Implications of Missing Critical Variables from an Analysis of Intergroup Contact Theory1.” Social Issues and Policy Review11 (1): 8-37. doi: 10.1111/sipr.12026.
56.
PettigrewThomas F.TroppLinda R.. 2006. “A Meta-Analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology90 (5): 751-83. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751.
57.
PettyRichard E.CacioppoJohn T.. 1986. Communication and Persuasion. New York, NY: Springer New York. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1.
58.
RosenbaumPaul R.RubinDonald B.. 1983. “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects.” Source: Biometrika Biometrika70 (1): 41-55. doi: 10.2307/2335942.
SchiappaEdwardGreggPeter B.HewesDean E.. 2005. “The Parasocial Contact Hypothesis.” Communication Monographs72 (1): 92-115. doi: 10.1080/0363775052000342544.
62.
ShoshaniA.2023. “From Virtual to Prosocial Reality: The Effects of Prosocial Virtual Reality Games on Preschool Children’s Prosocial Tendencies in Real Life Environments.” Computers in Human Behavior139: 107546. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107546.
63.
SlaterMelWilburSylvia. 1997. “A Framework for Immersive Virtual Environments (FIVE): Speculations on the Role of Presence in Virtual Environments.” Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments6 (6): 603-16. doi: 10.1162/pres.1997.6.6.603.
64.
StelzmanDanielaTothR.SchieferdeckerD.2021. “Can Intergroup Contact in Virtual Reality (VR) Reduce Stigmatization Against People with Schizophrenia?” Journal of Clinical Medicine10 (13): 2961. doi: 10.3390/jcm10132961.
65.
StephanWalter G.FinlayKrystina. 1999. “The Role of Empathy in Improving Intergroup Relations.” Journal of Social Issues55 (4): 729-43. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00144.
66.
TafjelH.TurnerJ.. 1979. An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict, edited by WorcS., Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
67.
TroppLinda RMazziottaAgostinoWrightC.. 2016. “Recent Developments in Intergroup Contact Research: Affective Processes, Group Status, and Contact Valence.” In Cambridge Handbook of the Psychology of Prejudice, edited by ChrisG.(University of Auckland) Sibley and Fiona Kate (University of Queensland) Barlow, 463–80. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781316161579.
68.
TurnerRhiannon N.CrispRichard J.LambertEmily. 2007. “Imagining Intergroup Contact Can Improve Intergroup Attitudes.” Group Processes and Intergroup Relations10 (4): 427-41. doi: 10.1177/1368430207081533.
VezzaliLoris. 2017. “Valence Matters: Positive Meta-Stereotypes and Interethnic Interactions.” Journal of Social Psychology157 (2): 247-61. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2016.1208140.
71.
VezzaliLorisHewstoneMilesCapozzaDoraGiovanniniDinoWölferRalf. 2014. “Improving Intergroup Relations with Extended and Vicarious Forms of Indirect Contact.” European Review of Social Psychology25 (1): 314-89. doi: 10.1080/10463283.2014.982948.
72.
VezzaliLorisStathiSofiaGiovanniniDinoCapozzaDoraElenaTrifiletti. 2015. “The Greatest Magic of Harry Potter: Reducing Prejudice.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology45 (2): 105-21. doi: 10.1111/jasp.12279.
73.
WagnerUlrichHewstoneMiles. 2012. Intergroup Contact. The Oxford Handbook of Intergroup Conflict. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199747672.013.0012.
74.
WölferRalfJaspersEvaBlaylockDanielleWigoderClarissaHughesJoanneHewstoneMiles. 2017. “Studying Positive and Negative Direct and Extended Contact.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin43 (11): 1566-81. doi: 10.1177/0146167217719732.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
