Why do some states project military force to seek control of resources, while others do not? Conventional wisdom asserts that resource-scarce states should have the strongest interest in securing control over resources. Counter-intuitively, I argue that, under existing conditions, the opposite is true. It is not resource-scarce states that will be more interested in militarily seeking additional resources, but rather states that are resource-abundant and dependent on income from extracting those resources. I test this proposition by leveraging a natural experiment that analyzes how states reacted to an exogenous shock that exposed resources in the Arctic in 2007. I employ original data that measures the change in states’ Arctic military presence before and after the shock. I find that dependence, not scarcity, explains how states responded to the shock. The findings enhance our understanding of the causes of resource competition and the geopolitical implications of climate change.
BertoliAndrew D.2017. “Nationalism and Conflict: Lessons From International Sports.” International Studies Quarterly61, no. 4: 835‐49. doi: 10.1093/ISQ/SQX029.
7.
BP. 2021. “BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2021.”
8.
BrecherMichaelWilkenfeldJonathanBeardsleyKyleJamesPatrickQuinnDavid. 2017. “International Crisis Behavior Data Codebook.Version 12.”
9.
BrendesBørge. 2013. “An Active High North Policy – Growth and Innovation in the North.” Speech. Tromsø, Norway: University of Tromsø.
10.
BrooksStephen. 1999. “The Globalization of Production and the Changing Benefits of Conquest.” Journal of Conflict Resolution43, no. 5: 646‐670.
CheonAndrewUrpelainenJohannes. 2014. “Escaping Oil’s Stranglehold: When Do States Invest in Energy Security?” Journal of Conflict Resolution59, no. 6: 953‐83. doi: 10.1177/0022002713520529.
13.
CohenAriel. 2011. “Russia in the Arctic: Challenges to U.S. Energy and Gepolitics in the High North.” In Russia in the Arctic, edited by BlankStephen J.CarlisleP. A.. London, UK: Strategic Studies Insittue.
14.
ColganJeff. 2013a. Petro-Aggression: When Oil Causes War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
ColganJeff. 2013b. “Fueling the Fire: Pathways From Oil to War.” International Security38, no. 2: 147‐80.
16.
FifeRolf Einar. 2013. Interview by Author.
17.
GartzkeErik. 2007. “The Capitalist Peace.” American Journal of Political Science51, no. 1: 166‐91.
18.
HuebertRobExner-PirotHeatherAdamLajeunesseGulledgeJay. 2012. Climate Change and International Security: The Arctic as a Bellwether.
19.
KeilKathrin. 2013. “The Arctic: A New Region of Conflict? The Case of Oil and Gas.” Cooperation and Conflict49, no. 2: 162‐90. doi: 10.1177/0010836713482555.
20.
KelanicRosemary A.2016. “The Petroleum Paradox: Oil, Coercive Vulnerability, and Great Power Behavior.” Security Studies25, no. 2: 181‐213. doi: 10.1080/09636412.2016.1171966.
21.
KinnardChristopheZdanowiczChristian M.FisherDavid A.IsakssonElisabethVernalAnne deThompsonLonnie G.. 2011. “Reconstructed Changes in Arctic Sea Ice over the Past 1,450 Years.” Nature479, no. 7374: 509‐12.
22.
KlareMichael. 2001. Resource Wars: The New Landscape of Global Conflict. New York: Henry Holt.
23.
LangeGlenn-MarieWodonQuentinCareyKevin, eds. 2018. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2018: Building a Sustainable Future. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
24.
LaruelleMarlène. 2013. Russia’s Arctic Strategies and the Future of the Far North. Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.
25.
LibermanPeter. 1998. Does Conquest Pay? The Exploitation of Occupied Industrial Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
LindJenniferPressDaryl G.. 2018. “Markets or Mercantilism? How China Secures Its Energy Supplies.” International Security42, no. 4: 170‐204. doi: 10.1162/isec_a_00310.
28.
LindemannOle Andreas. 2009. Norwegian Foreign Policy in the High North. International Cooperation and the Relations to Russia. Norway: Forsvaret. https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/handle/11250/99637
29.
LundeLevi. 2013. Interview by Author.
30.
LyallJason. 2009. “Does Indiscriminate Violence Incite Insurgent Attacks? Evidence from Chechnya.” Journal of Conflict Resolution53, no. 3: 331‐62. doi: 10.1177/0022002708330881.
31.
MangersnesJon M.2012. The Role of the National Joint Headquarters of Norway. Carlisle, PA: United States Army War College.
32.
MarkowitzJonathanFarissChristopherMcMahonR. Blake. 2019. “Producing Goods and Projecting Power: How What You Make Influences What You Take.” Journal of Conflict Resolution63, no. 6: 1368‐1402. doi: 10.1177/0022002718789735.
33.
MarkowitzJonathanMuleskySuzieGrahamBenjamin A. T.FarissChristopher J.. 2020. “Productive Pacifists: The Rise of Production-Oriented States and Decline of Profit-Motivated Conquest.” International Studies Quarterly64, no. 3: 558‐72. doi: 10.1093/isq/sqaa045.
34.
MeierdingEmily. 2020. The Oil Wars Myth: Petroleum and the Causes of International Conflict. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
OECD National Accounts Statistics. 2019. Quarterly GDP (Indicator).
42.
OsthagenAndreas. 2015. “Coastgaurds in Peril: A Study of Arctic Defense Collaboration.” Defense Studies15: 143‐160. doi: 10.1080/14702436.2015.1035949.
43.
PalmerGlennD’OrazioVitoKenwickMichaelLaneMatthew. 2015. “The MID4 Dataset, 2002–2010: Procedures, Coding Rules and Description.” Conflict Management and Peace Science32, no. 2: 222‐42. doi: 10.1177/0738894214559680.
44.
PerryCharles M.AndersenBobby. 2012. New Strategic Dynamics in the Arctic Region. Washington, DC: The Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis.
RosecranceRichard N.1986. The Rise of the Trading State: Commerce and Conquest in the Modern World. New York, NY: Basic Books.
50.
RossMichael L.2015. “What Have We Learned about the Resource Curse?” Annual Review of Political Science18: 239‐59.
51.
Russian Federation. 2009. National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation up to 2020, 12. Russia: Russian Security Council.
52.
SingerJ. DavidBremerStuartStuckeyJohn. 1972. “Capability Distribution, Uncertainty, and Major Power War.” In Peace, War, and Numbers, edited by RussettBruce M., 19‐48. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
53.
SlantchevBranislav L.2005. “Military Coercion in Interstate Crises.” American Political Science Review99, no. 4: 533‐47. doi: 10.1017/S0003055405051865.
54.
SokoloffKenneth L.EngermanStanley L.. 2000. “Institutions, Factor Endowments, and Paths of Development in the New World.” Journal of Economic Perspectives14, no. 3: 217‐32. doi: 10.1257/jep.14.3.217.
TammesRolf. 2011. “Arctic Security and Norway.” In Arctic Security in an Age of Climate Change, edited by JamesKraska, New York: Cambridge University Press.
WangMuyinOverlandJames E.. 2012. “A Sea Ice Free Summer Arctic within 30 Years: An Update from CMIP5 Models.” Geophysical Research Letters39, no. L18501: 6.
60.
WezemanSiemon T.2012. “Military Capabilities in the Arctic.” SIPRI Background Paper. March 24.
ZyskKatarzyna. 2011. “Military Aspects of Russia’s Arctic Policy: Hard Power and Natural Resources.” In Arctic Security in an Age of Climate Change, edited by JamesKraska. New York: Cambridge University Press.
64.
ZyskKatarzyna. 2013. Interview by Author.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
