According to the resource curse theory, persistent violence in developing areas results from rebels’ ability to finance warfare with natural resource revenues. Surprisingly, this overlooks the complexities of raising revenue from a mobile mining population that values security as well as income. The literature thus neglects a fundamental question: what are the incentives of rebel groups to prevent or perpetuate conflict in mining areas? This paper delineates a rational to both increase and decrease violence. Protecting a mine should allow rebels to extract taxes in return. Simultaneously, to maintain this demand for security, rebels may need to destabilize the wider area. The hypotheses are tested with novel data on rebel taxation at over 3’000 artisanal mines in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo. Supporting the hypotheses, the results show that rebel-taxed mines appear exempt from violence nearby but imperiled at the perimeter.
AddisonTonyLePhilippeBillonMurshedS. Mansoob. 2003. “Conflict in Africa: The Cost of Peaceful Behavior.” Journal of African Economies11 (3): 365–86.
2.
AngristJoshua D.KuglerAdriana D.. 2008. “Rural Windfall or a New Resource Curse? Coca, Income, and Civil Conflict in Colombia.” Review of Economics and Statistics90 (2): 191–215.
3.
ArezkiRabahBhattacharyyaSambitMamoNemera. 2015. “Resource Discovery and Conflict in Africa: What Do the Data Show.” CSAE Working Paper WPS/2015-14, Center for the Study of African Economies, Oxford, UK.
4.
BatesRobertGreifAvnerSinghSmita. 2002. “Organizing Violence.” Journal of Conflict Resolution46 (5): 599–628.
5.
BehalalZobelAlusalaNelsonMonchyVirginieVanthommeBartZounmenouDavid. 2018. Letter Dated 18 December 2018 from the Group of Experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo Addressed to the President of the Security Council. New York: United Nations.
6.
BellowsJohnMiguelEdward. 2009. “War and Local Collective Action in Sierra Leone.” Journal of Public Economics93:1144–57.
7.
BermanNicolasCouttenierMathieuRohnerDominicTheonigMathias. 2017. “This Mine Is Mine! How Minerals Fuel Conflicts in Africa.” American Economic Review107 (6): 1564–610.
8.
BrunnschweilerChrista N.BulteErwin H.. 2009. “Natural Resources and Violent Conflict: Resource Abundance, Dependence, and the Onset of Civil Wars.” Oxford Economic Papers61:651–74.
9.
BuhaugHalvard. 2010. “Dude, Where’s My Conflict? LSG, Relative Strength, and the Location of Civil War.” Conflict Management and Peace Science27 (2): 107–28.
10.
BuhaugHalvardGatesScott. 2002. “The Geography of Civil War.” Journal of Peace Research39 (4): 417–33.
11.
BuhaugHalvardGatesScottLujalaPäivi. 2009. “Geography, Rebel Capability, and the Duration of Civil Conflict.” Journal of Conflict Resolution53 (4): 544–69.
12.
BuhaugHalvardRødJan Ketil. 2006. “Local Determinants of African Civil Wars 1970-2001.” Political Geography25:315–35.
13.
CollierPaulHoefflerAnke. 2004. “Greed and Grievance in Civil War.” Oxford Economic Papers56 (4): 563–95.
14.
CuvelierJeroenBockstaelSteven vanVlassenrootKoenIgumaClaude. 2014. Analyzing the Impact of the Dodd–Frank Act on Congolese Livelihoods. New York: Social Science Research Council.
15.
Dal BóErnestoDal BóPedro. 2011. “Workers, Warriors and Criminals: Social Conflict in General Equilibrium.” Journal of the European Economic Association9 (4): 646–77.
16.
De la SierraRaul Sanchez. 2020. “On the Origin of States: Stationary Bandits and Taxation in Eastern Congo.” Journal of Political Economy128 (1): 32–74.
17.
De SoysaIndra. 2002. “Paradise Is a Bazaar? Greed, Creed, and Governance in Civil War 1989–99.” Journal of Peace Research39 (4): 395–416.
LaudatiAnn. 2013. “Beyond Minerals: Broadening ‘Economies of Violence’ in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo.” Review of African Political Economy40 (135): 32–50.
31.
Le BillonPhilippe. 2001. “The Political Ecology of War. Natural Resources and Armed Conflicts.” Political Geography20 (5): 561–84.
32.
Le BillonPhilippe. 2012. Wars of Plunder Conflicts, Profits and the Politics of Resources. London, UK: C. Hurst.
33.
LujalaPaivi. 2009. “Deadly Combat over Natural Resources. Gems, Petroleum, Drugs, and the Severity of Armed Civil Conflict.” Journal of Conflict Resolution53 (1): 50–71.
34.
LujalaPäiviGleditschNils PetterGilmoreElisabeth. 2005. “A Diamond Curse? Civil War and a Lootable Resource.” Journal of Conflict Resolution49 (4): 538–62.
35.
MatthysenKenSpittaelsStevenSchoutenPeer. 2019. Mapping Artisanal Mining Areas and Mineral Supply Chains in Eastern DR Congo: Impact of Armed Interference & Responsible Sourcing. Antwerp, Belgium: International Information Service & Danish Institute for International Studies.
36.
MaystadtJean-FrancoisLucaGiacomo DeSekerisPetro G.UlimwenguJohn. 2014. “Mineral Resources and Conflicts in DRC: A Case of Ecological Fallacy?” Oxford Economic Papers66:721–49.
37.
MehlumHalvorMoeneKarlTorvikRagnar. 2006. “Institutions and the Resource Curse.” The Economic Journal116 (508): 1–20.
38.
OlsonMancur. 1993. “Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development.” The American Political Science Review87 (3): 567–76.
39.
ØstbyGudrunNordåsRagnhildRødJan Ketil. 2009. “Regional Inequalities and Civil Conflict in Sub-Saharan Africa.” International Studies Quarterly53:301–24.
40.
ParkerDominic P.VadheimBryan. 2017. “Resource Cursed or Policy Cursed? US Regulation of Conflict Minerals and Violence in the Congo.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists4 (1): 1–49.
41.
RaleighClionadhDowdCaitriona. 2015. Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project (ACLED) Codebook 2015. Oslo, Norway: International Peace Research Institute (PRIO).
42.
RossMichael L.2004. “How Do Natural Resources Influence Civil War? Evidence from Thirteen Cases.” International Organization58 (1): 35–67.
43.
RossMichael L.2006. “A Closer Look at Oil, Diamonds, and Civil War.” Annual Review of Political Science9:265–300.
44.
SalehyanIdeanSirokyDavidWoodReed M.. 2014. “External Rebel Sponsorship and Civilian Abuse: A Principal-agent Analysis of Wartime Atrocities.” International Organization68:633–61.
45.
SchoutenPeerMurairiJanvierKubuyaSaidi. 2017. “Everything that Moves will be Taxed”: The Political Economy of Roadblocks in North and South Kivu. Copenhagen, Denmark: International Peace and Information Service & Danish Institute for International Studies.
46.
SkaperdasStergios. 2002. “Warlord Competition.” Journal of Peace Research39 (4): 435–46.
47.
SnyderRichardBhavnaniRavi. 2005. “Diamonds, Blood, and Taxes. A Revenue-centered Framework for explaining Political Order” Journal of Conflict Resolution49 (4): 563–97.
48.
SorensJason. 2011. “Mineral Production, Territory, and Ethnic Rebellion: The Role of Rebel Constituencies.” Journal of Peace Research48(5): 571–85.
49.
StoopNikVerpoortenMarijkeWindtPeter van der. 2018. “More Legislation, More Violence? The Impact of Dodd-Frank in the DRC.” PLoS One13 (8): e0201783.
50.
SundbergRalphMelanderErik. 2013. “Introducing the UCDP Georeferenced Event Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research50 (4): 523–32.
51.
Van BockstaelStevenVlassenrootKoen. 2009. “From Conflict to Development Diamonds. The Kimberly Process, and Africa’s Artisanal Diamond Mines.” Studia Diplomatica62 (2): 79–96.
52.
VerweijenJudithMarijnenEsther. 2018. “The Counterinsurgency/Conservation Nexus: Guerrilla Livelihoods and the Dynamics of Conflict and Violence in the Virunga National Park, Democratic Republic of the Congo.” The Journal of Peasant Studies45 (2): 300–20.
53.
WeinsteinJeremy. 2007. Inside Rebellion. The Politics of Insurgent Violence. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
54.
WeynsYannickHoexLotteMatthysenKen. 2016. Analysis of the Interactive Map of Artisanal Mining Areas in Eastern DR Congo. Antwerp, Belgium: International Peace Information Service.
55.
WoodReed M.2010. “Rebel Capability and Strategic Violence against Civilians.” Journal of Peace Research47 (5): 601–14.
56.
WoodReed M.KathmanJacob D.. 2013. “Too Much of a Bad Thing? Civilian Victimization and Bargaining in Civil War.” British Journal of Political Science44:685–706.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
