This article analyzes the role of individual redistributive preferences on protest participation. The article focuses on Latin America, a region that has experienced substantial protests and demonstrations in the last decade, making use of individual-level data on redistributive preferences and protest participation collected across eighteen countries in 2010, 2012, and 2014. The results show evidence for an association between strong individual preferences for redistribution and participation in protests motivated by the low quality of services and institutions, failures to reduce corruption, and perceived lower standards of living. The results are robust to alternative estimators, samples, and model specifications and not affected by endogeneity concerns.
AcemogluDaronRobinsonJames A.2006. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
2.
AlesinaAlbertoAngeletosGeorge-Marios. 2005a. “Corruption, Inequality and Fairness.” Journal of Monetary Economics52:1227–44.
3.
AlesinaAlbertoAngeletosGeorge-Marios. 2005b. “Fairness and Redistribution.” American Economic Review95 (4): 960–80.
4.
AlesinaAlbertoCozziGuidoMantovarNoemi. 2012. “The Evolution of Ideology, Fairness and Redistribution.” Economic Journal122 (565): 1244–61.
5.
AlesinaAlbertoGiulianoPaola. 2011. “Preferences for Redistribution.” In Handbook of Social Economics, edited by BenhabibJessBisinAlbertoJacksonMatthew, 93–132. San Diego, CA: North Holland.
6.
AlesinaAlbertoGlaeserEdward. 2004. Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe: A World of Difference. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
7.
AlesinaAlbertoLaFerraraEliana. 2005. “Preferences for Redistribution in the Land of Opportunities.” Journal of Public Economics89:897–931.
8.
AlesinaAlbertoStantchevaStefanieTesoEdoardo. 2018. “Intergenerational Mobility and Preferences for Redistribution.” American Economic Review108 (2): 521–54.
9.
AlexanderPeter. 2010. “Rebellion of the Poor: South Africa’s Service Delivery Protests.” Review of African Political Economy37 (123): 25–40.
10.
AlganYannPapaioannouEliasPassariEvgeniaGurievSergei. 2018. “The European Trust Crisis and the Rise of Populism.” EBRD Working Paper 208. London. Available at SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3128274.
11.
AltonjiJosephElderTood E.TaberChristopher. 2005. “Selection on Observed and Unobserved Variables: Assessing the Effectiveness of Catholic School.” Journal of Political Economy113 (1): 151–84.
12.
BairdSarahHicksJoan HamoryMiguelEdward. 2008. “Tracking, Attrition and Data Quality in the Kenyan Life Panel Survey Round 1 (KLPS-1).” University of California, Berkeley, Center for International and Development Economics Research, Working Paper.
13.
BellingerPaul T.ArceMoisés. 2011. “Protest and Democracy in Latin America’s Market Era.” Political Research Quarterly64 (3): 688–704.
14.
BellowsJohnMiguelEdward. 2009. “War and Local Collective Action in Sierra Leone.” Journal of Public Economics93:1144–57.
15.
BenabouRolandOkEfe A.. 2001. “Mobility as Progressivity: Ranking Income Processes According to Equality of Opportunity.” NBER Working paper 8431. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
16.
BiekartKees2015. “The choice of the new Latin American middle classes: Sharing or self-caring.” European Journal of Development Research27 (2): 238–45.
17.
BoixCarles. 2008. “Economic Roots of Civil Wars and Revolutions in the Contemporary World.” World Politics60 (3): 390–437.
18.
BoothJohnSeligsonMitchell. 2009. The Legitimacy Puzzle in Latin America. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
19.
BradyHenryVerbaSidneySchlozmanKay S.. 1995. “Beyond SES: A Resource Model of Political Participation.” American Political Science Review89:271–94.
20.
BruhnKatherine. 2008. Urban Protest in Mexico and Brazil. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21.
BushRay. 2010. “Food Riots: Poverty, Power and Protest.” Journal of Agrarian Change10 (1): 119–29.
22.
CalvoErnestoMoscovichLorena. 2017. “Inequality, Protests, and the Progressive Allocation of Cash Transfers in the Argentine Provinces.” Latin American Politics and Society59 (2): 3–26.
23.
CampanteFilipeChorDavid. 2012. “Why Was the Arab World Poised for Revolution? Schooling, Economic Opportunities and the Arab Spring.” Journal of Economic Perspectives26 (2): 167–87.
24.
CastilloJuan C.PalaciosDiegoJoignantAlfredoThamMaximiliano. 2015. “Inequality, Distributive Justice and Political Participation: An Analysis of the Case of Chile.” Bulletin of Latin American Research34 (4): 486–502.
25.
ColemanJames. 1974. Power and the Structure of Society. New York: W. W. Norton.
26.
CorakMiles. 2013. “Income Inequality, Equality of Opportunity, and Intergenerational Mobility.” Journal of Economic Perspectives27 (3): 79–102.
27.
CrucesGuillermoPerez-TrugliaRicardoTetazMartin. 2013. “Biased Perceptions of Income Distribution and Preferences for Redistribution: Evidence from a Survey Experiment.” Journal of Public Economics98:100–12.
28.
DaltonRussellSickleAlix VanWeldonSteven. 2010. “The Individual–Institutional Nexus of Protest Behaviour.” British Journal of Political Science40 (1): 51–73.
29.
della PortaDonatella. 1995. Social Movements, Political Violence and the State: A Comparative Analysis of Italy and Germany. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30.
DevarajanShantayananIanchovichinaElena. 2018. “A Broken Social Contract, Not High Inequality, Led to the Arab Spring.” Review of Income and Wealth64: S5–S25.
31.
Diaz-CayerosAlbertoEstevezFedericoMagaloniBeatriz. 2012. Strategies of Vote Buying: Democracy, Clientelism and Poverty Relief in Mexico. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Accessed October 21, 2016. http://web.stanford.edu/∼magaloni/dox/2012strategiesvotebuying.pdf.
32.
DubrowJoshua KjerulfSlomczynskiKazimierz M.Tomescu-DubrowIrina. 2008. “Effects of Democracy and Inequality on Soft Political Protest in Europe: Exploring the European Social Survey Data.” International Journal of Sociology38 (3): 36–51.
33.
FinkelStevenMullerEdward. 1998. “Rational Choices and the Dynamics of Collective Political Action: Evaluating Alternative Models with Panel Data.” American Political Science Review92:37–49.
GerberAlan S.KarlanDeanBerganDaniel. 2009. “Does the Media Matter? A Field Experiment Measuring the Effect of Newspapers on Voting Behavior and Political Opinions.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics1 (2): 35–52.
36.
GingerichDaniel W.2009. “Corruption and Political Decay: Evidence From Bolivia.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science4:1–34.
37.
GonzálezFelipeMiguelEdward. 2015. “War and Local Collective Action in Sierra Leone: A Comment on the Use of Coefficient Stability Approaches.” Journal of Public Economics128:30–33.
38.
GoodwinJeffJasperJames. 2003. Rethinking Social Movements: Structure, Meaning and Emotion. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
39.
GurrTed R.1970. Why Men Rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40.
HirschmanAlbert O.RothschildMichael. 1973. “The Changing Tolerance for Income Inequality in the Course of Economic Development; with a Mathematical Appendix.” Quarterly Journal of Economics87 (4): 544–66.
41.
HollyerJames R.Peter RosendorffB.VreelandJames R.. 2015. “Transparency, Protest, and Autocratic Instability.” American Political Science Review109 (4): 764–84.
42.
HuntingtonSamuel P.2006. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
43.
KlandermansBertvan der ToornJojannekevan StekelenburgJacquelien. 2008. “Embeddedness and Identity: How Immigrants Turn Grievances into Action.” American Sociological Review73 (6): 992–1012.
44.
KlorEstebanShayoMoses. 2010. “Social Identity and Preferences over Redistribution.” Journal of Public Economics94 (3-4): 269–78.
45.
KriesiHanspeterGrandeEdgarDolezalMartinHelblingMarcHoglingDominicHutterSwenWuestBruno. 2012. Political Conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
46.
LaytonMatthew L.2014. “The World Cup and Protests: What Ails Brazil?” Americas Barometer Insights Series 106. Latin American Public Opinion Project. Vanderbilt University.
47.
LichbachMark. 1989. “An Evaluation of ‘Does Economic Inequality Breed Political Conflict?’ Studies.” World Politics41 (4): 431–70.
48.
LópezGarcíaIsabelAna2017. “Legislative Coalition Size and Antigovernment Protests in Latin America.” Journal of Politics in Latin America9(3): 91–120.
49.
LuttmerErzo F. P.2001. “Group Loyalty and the Taste for Redistribution.” Journal of Political Economy109 (3): 500–28.
50.
MaasCora J. M.HoxJoop J.. 2004. “The Influence of Violations of Assumptions on Multilevel Parameter Estimates and Their Standard Errors.” Computational Statistics & Data Analysis46 (3): 427–40.
51.
MachadoFabianaScartasciniCarlosTommasiMariano. 2011. “Political Institutions and Street Protests in Latin America.” Journal of Conflict Resolution55 (3): 340–65.
52.
MadestamAndreasShoagDanielVeugerStanYanagizawa-DrottDavid. 2013. “Do Political Protests Matter? Evidence from the Tea Party Movement.” Quarterly Journal of Economics128 (4): 1633–85.
53.
ManacordaMarcoTeseiAndrea. 2016. “Liberation Technology: Mobile Phones and Political Mobilization in Africa.” Working Paper 785. London: School of Economics and Finance, Queen Mary University of London.
54.
McAdamDoug. 1986. “Recruitment to High-Risk Activism: The Case of Freedom Summer.” American Journal of Sociology92:64–90.
55.
McAdamDougMcCarthyJohnZaldMayer. 1988. “Social Movements.” In Handbook of Sociology, 695-737, edited by SmelserNeil J.. 695–737, London, UK: Sage.
56.
McCarthyJohnZaldMayer N.. 1977. “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory.” American Journal of Sociology82:1212–41.
57.
McClurgScott. 2003. “Social Networks and Political Participation: The Role of Social Interaction in Explaining Political Participation.” Political Research Quarterly56 (4): 449–64.
58.
McKenzieDavid. 2012. “Beyond Baseline and Follow-Up: The Case for More t in Experiments.” Journal of Development Economics99 (2): 210–21.
59.
MeltzerAllan H.RichardScott F.. 1981. “A rational theory of the size of government.” Journal of Political Economy89(6): 914–27.
60.
MorganStephenGruskyDavid B.FieldsGary. 2006. Mobility and Inequality: Frontiers of Research in Sociology and Economics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
61.
MoseleyMason W.2015. “Contentious Engagement: Understanding Protest Participation in Latin American Democracies.” Journal of Politics in Latin America7(3): 3–48.
62.
NollertMichael. 1995. “Neocorporatism and Political Protest in the Western Democracies: A Cross-National Analysis.” In The Politics of Social Protest: Comparative Perspectives on States and Social Movements, edited by Craig JenkinsJ.KlandermansBert, 68–81. London, UK: University College of London Press.
63.
OberschallAnthony. 1973. Social Conflict and Social Movements. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
64.
OlsenMarvin E.1968. “Perceived Legitimacy of Social Protest Actions.” Social Problems15:297–310.
65.
OrtizIsabelBurkeSaraBerradaMohamedCortesHernan. 2013. World Protests 2006-2013. New York: IPD Columbia University and Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
66.
OsterEmily. 2017. “Unobservable Selection and Coefficient Stability: Theory and Validation.” Journal of Business Economics and Statistics1–18.
67.
PaxtonPamela. 2002. “Social Capital and Democracy: An Interdependent Relationship.” American Sociological Review67:254–77.
68.
PohlmanJohn T.LeitnerDennis W.. 2003. “A Comparison of Ordinary Least Squares and Logistic Regression.” The Ohio Journal of Science103 (5): 118–25.
69.
PonticelliJacopoVothHans-Joachim. 2011. “Austerity and Anarchy: Budget Cuts and Social Unrest in Europe 1919-2008.” CEPR Discussion Paper 8513. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
70.
PutnamRobert. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
71.
SafaHelen Icken. 1990. “Women’s Social Movements in Latin America.” Gender & Society4 (3): 354–69.
72.
ScartasciniCarlosTommasiMariano. 2012. “The Making of Policy: Institutionalized or Not?” American Journal of Political Science56 (4): 787–801.
73.
SnijdersTom A. B.BoskerRoel J.. 1999. Multilevel Analysis. London, UK: Sage.
74.
SoltFrederick. 2015. “Economic Inequality and Nonviolent Protest.” Social Science Quarterly96 (5): 1314–27.
75.
TarrowSidney. 1989. Democracy and Disorder: Protest and Politics in Italy 1965-1975. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
76.
TarrowSidney. 1998. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
77.
TeorellJanDahlbergStefanHolmbergSörenRothsteinBoHartmannFelixSvenssonRichard. 2015. “The Quality of Government Standard Dataset.” version Jan15. University of Gothenburg: The Quality of Government Institute. Accessed January 25, 2016. http://www.qog.pol.gu.se.
78.
TillyCharles. 1978. From Mobilization to Revolution. New York: McGraw-Hill.
ValenzuelaSebastián. 2013. “Unpacking the Use of Social Media for Protest Behavior: The Roles of Information, Opinion Expression, and Activism.” American Behavioral Scientist57 (7): 920–42.
81.
van StekelenburgJacquelianKlandermansBert. 2007. “Individuals in Movements: A Social Psychology of Contention.” In Handbook of Social Movements across Disciplines, edited by KlandermansBertRoggebandConny, 157–204. New York: Springer.
82.
VerbaSidneySchlozmanKay L.BradyHenry. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
83.
VermePaoloMilanovicBrankoAl-ShawarbySherineTawilaSahar ElGadallahMayEl-MajeedEnas Ali A.. 2014. Inside Inequality in the Arab Republic of Egypt: Facts and Perceptions across People, Time, and Space. Washington, DC: World Bank.
84.
WeinbergJoeBakkerRyan. 2015. “Let Them Eat Cake: Food Prices, Domestic Policy and Social Unrest.” Conflict Management and Peace Science32 (3): 309–26.
85.
Yanagizawa-DrottDavid. 2014. “Propaganda and Conflict: Evidence from the Rwandan Genocide.” Quarterly Journal of Economics129 (4): 1947–94.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
