Do costly signals work? Despite their widespread popularity, both hands-tying and sunk-cost signaling have come under criticism, and there’s little direct evidence that leaders understand costly signals the way our models tell us they should. We present evidence from a survey experiment fielded on a unique sample of elite decision makers from the Israeli Knesset. We find that both types of costly signaling are effective in shaping assessments of resolve for both leaders and the public. However, although theories of signaling tend to assume homogenous audiences, we show that leaders vary significantly in how credible they perceive signals to be, depending on their foreign policy dispositions, rather than their levels of military or political experience. Our results thus encourage international relations scholars to more fully bring heterogeneous recipients into our theories of signaling and point to the important role of dispositional orientations for the study of leaders.
AlatasV.CameronL.ChaudhuriA.ErkalN.GangadharanL.. 2009. “Subject Pool Effects in a Corruption Experiment.” Experimental Economics12 (1): 113–32.
2.
BakDaeheePalmerGlenn. 2010. “Leader Tenure, Age, and International Conflict.” Foreign Policy Analysis6 (3): 257–73.
3.
BayramA. Burcu. 2017. “Due Deference: Cosmopolitan Social Identity and the Psychology of Legal Obligation in International Politics.” International Organization71 (S1): S136–63.
4.
Ben-Nun BloomPazitArikanGizemCourtemancheMarie. 2015. “Religious Social Identity, Religious Belief, and Anti-immigration Sentiment.” American Political Science Review109 (2): 203–21.
5.
BrewerPaul R.GrossKimberlyAdaySeanWillnatLars. 2004. “International Trust and Public Opinion about World Affairs.” American Journal of Political Science48 (1): 93–109.
6.
BrutgerRyanKertzerJoshua D.. 2018. “A Dispositional Theory of Reputation Costs.” International Organization72 (3): 693–724.
7.
CalinCostelPrinsBrandon C.. 2015. “The Sources of Presidential Foreign Policy Decision Making: Executive Experience and Militarized Interstate Conflicts.” International Journal of Peace Studies20 (1): 17–34.
8.
CarsonAustinYarhi-MiloKeren. 2017. “Covert Communication: The Intelligibility and Credibility of Signaling in Secret.” Security Studies26 (1): 124–56.
9.
ChaudoinStephen. 2014. “Promises or Policies? An Experimental Analysis of International Agreements and Audience Reactions.” International Organization68 (1): 235–56.
10.
DafoeAllanRenshonJonathanHuthPaul. 2014. “Reputation and Status as Motives for War.” Annual Review of Political Science17:371–93.
11.
DaviesGraeme A. M.JohnsRobert. 2013. “Audience Costs among the British Public.” International Studies Quarterly57 (4): 725–37.
12.
DownesAlexanderSechserTodd. 2012. “The Illusion of Democratic Credibility.” International Organization66 (3): 457–89.
13.
FearonJames D.1994. “Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes.” American Political Science Review88 (3): 577–92.
14.
FearonJames. 1995. “Rationalist Explanations for War.” International Organization49 (3): 379–414.
15.
FearonJames. 1997. “Tying Hands versus Sinking Costs: Signaling Foreign Policy Interests.” Journal of Conflict Resolution41 (1): 68–90.
16.
FeaverPeter D.GelpiChristopher. 2005. Choosing Your Battles: American Civil-military Relations and the Use of Force. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17.
FuhrmannMatthewHorowitzMichael C.. 2015. “When Leaders Matter: Rebel Experience and Nuclear Proliferation.” Journal of Politics77 (1): 72–87.
18.
FuhrmannMatthewSechserTodd S.. 2014. “Signaling Alliance Commitments: Hand-tying and Sunk Costs in Extended Nuclear Deterrence.” American Journal of Political Science58 (4): 919–35.
19.
GelpiChristopherGriecoJoseph M.. 2001. “Attracting Trouble: Democracy, Leadership Tenure, and the Targeting of Militarized Challenges, 1918-1992.” Journal of Conflict Resolution45 (6): 794–817.
20.
GeorgeAlexander L.1969. “The “Operational Code”: A Neglected Approach to the Study of Political Leaders and Decision Making.” International Studies Quarterly13 (2): 190–222.
21.
GeorgeAlexander L.GeorgeJuliette L.. 1964. Woodrow Wilson and Colonel House: a Personality Study. New York: Dover Press.
22.
GlaserCharles L.1992. “Political Consequences of Military Strategy: Expanding and Refining the Spiral and Deterrence Models.” World Politics44 (4): 497–538.
23.
GlaserCharles L.1994. “Realists as Optimists: Cooperation as Self-help.” International Security19 (3): 50–90.
24.
GoldgeierJames M.1994. Leadership Style and Soviet Foreign Policy: Stalin, Khrushchev, Brezhnev, Gorbachev. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
25.
GrynaviskiEric. 2014. Constructive Illusions: Misperceiving the Origins of International Cooperation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
26.
Hafner-BurtonEmilie M.HughesAlexVictorDavid G.. 2013. “The Cognitive Revolution and the Political Psychology of Elite Decision Making.” Perspectives on Politics11 (2): 368–86.
27.
Hafner-BurtonEmilie M.LeVeckBrad L.VictorDavid G.. 2015. “How Activists Perceive the Utility of International Law.” Journal of Politics78 (1): 167–80.
28.
Hafner-BurtonEmilie M.LeVeckBrad L.VictorDavid G.FowlerJames H.. 2014. “Decision Maker Preferences for International Legal Cooperation.” International Organization68 (4): 845–76.
29.
HallToddYarhi-MiloKeren. 2012. “The Personal Touch: Leaders’ Impressions, Costly Signaling, and Assessments of Sincerity in International Affairs.” International Studies Quarterly56 (3): 560–73.
30.
HerrmannRichard K.FischerkellerMichael P.. 1995. “Beyond the Enemy Image and Spiral Model: Cognitive-strategic Research after the Cold War.” International Organization49 (3): 415–50.
31.
HerrmannRichard K.TetlockPhilip E.VisserPenny S.. 1999. “Mass Public Decisions to Go to War: A Cognitive-interactionist Framework.” American Political Science Review93 (3): 553–73.
32.
HolmesMarcus. 2013. “Mirror Neurons and the Problem of Intentions.” International Organization67 (4): 829–61.
33.
HorowitzMichael C.StamAllan C.. 2014. “How Prior Military Experience Influences The Future Militarized Behavior of Leaders.” International Organization68 (3): 527–59.
34.
HorowitzMichael C.StamAllan C.EllisCali M.. 2015. Why Leaders Fight. New York: Cambridge University Press.
35.
HorowitzMichael C.SechserTodd S.PotterPhilip B. K.StamAllan C.. 2018. “Sizing Up the Adversary: Leader Attributes, Credibility, and Reciprocation in International Conflict.” Journal of Conflict Resolution.
36.
HuntingtonSamuel P.1957. The Soldier and the State: The Theory and Politics of Civil-military Relations. Cambridge, MA: Belknap/Harvard University Press.
37.
HydeSusan D.2015. “Experiments in International Relations: Lab, Survey, and Field.” Annual Review of Political Science18:403–24.
38.
JervisRobert. 1970. The Logic of Images in International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39.
JervisRobert. 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40.
JervisRobert. 2002. Signaling and Perception: Drawing Inferences and Projecting Images. In Political Psychology, edited by MonroeK. R., 304–405. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
41.
JervisRobert. 2013. “Do Leaders Matter and How Would We Know?” Security Studies22 (2): 153–79.
42.
KahnemanDanielTverskyAmos. 2000. Choices, Values and Frames. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
KennedyAndrew Bingham. 2012. The International Ambitions of Mao and Nehru: National Efficacy Beliefs and the Making of Foreign Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
45.
KertzerJoshua D.2016. Resolve in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
46.
KertzerJoshua D.BrutgerRyan. 2016. “Decomposing Audience Costs: Bringing the Audience Back into Audience Cost Theory.” American Journal of Political Science60 (1): 234–49.
47.
KhongYuen Foong. 1992. Analogies at War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
48.
KingGaryZengLangche. 2007. “When Can History Be Our Guide? The Pitfalls of Counterfactual Inference.” International Studies Quarterly51 (1): 183–210.
49.
KyddAndrew H.2005. Trust and Mistrust in International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
50.
LaiBrian. 2004. “The Effects of Different Types of Military Mobilization on the Outcome of International Crises.” Journal of Conflict Resolution48 (2): 211–29.
51.
LakeDavid A.PowellRobert. 1999. International Relations: A Strategic-choice Approach. In Strategic Choice and International Relations, edited by LakeDavid A.PowellRobert, 3–38. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52.
LarsonDeborah Welch. 1997. “Trust and Missed Opportunities in International Relations.” Political Psychology18 (3): 701–34.
53.
LevenduskyMatthew S.HorowitzMichael C.. 2012. “When Backing Down Is the Right Decision: Partisanship, New Information, and Audience Costs.” Journal of Politics74 (2): 323–38.
54.
McDermottRose. 2002. “Experimental Methods in Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science5:31–61.
55.
McDermottRose. 2014. “The Biological Bases for Aggressiveness and Nonaggressiveness in Presidents.” Foreign Policy Analysis10 (4): 313–27.
56.
MercerJonathan. 2010. “Emotional Beliefs.” International Organization64 (1): 1–31.
57.
MercerJonathan. 2012. “Audience Costs Are Toys.” Security Studies21 (3): 398–404.
58.
MilnerHelen V.TingleyDustin. 2015. Sailing the Water’s Edge: The Domestic Politics of American Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
59.
MintzAlexGevaNehemiaReddSteven B.CarnesAmy. 1997. “The Effect of Dynamic and Static Choice Sets on Political Decision Making.” American Political Science Review91 (3): 553–66.
60.
MorrowJames D.1994. “Alliances, Credibility, and Peacetime Costs.” Journal of Conflict Resolution38 (2): 270–97.
61.
MostBenjamin A.StarrHarvey. 1984. “International Relations Theory, Foreign Policy Substitutability, and ‘Nice’ Laws.” World Politics36 (3): 383–406.
62.
PotterPhilip B. K.BaumMatthew A. 2010. “Democratic Peace, Domestic Audience Costs, and Political Communication.” Political Communication27 (4): 453–70.
63.
QuekKai. 2016. “Are Costly Signals More Credible? Evidence of Sender-receiver Gaps.” Journal of Politics78 (3): 925–40.
64.
RathbunBrian C.2011. Trust in International Cooperation: International Security Institutions, Domestic Politics and American Multilateralism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
65.
RathbunBrian C.KertzerJoshua D.ReiflerJasonGorenPaulScottoThomas J.. 2016. “Taking Foreign Policy Personally: Personal Values and Foreign Policy Attitudes.” International Studies Quarterly60 (1): 124–37.
66.
RathbunBrian C.KertzerJoshua D.ParadisMark. 2017. “Homo Diplomaticus: Mixed-method Evidence of Variation in Strategic Rationality.” International Organization71 (S1): S33–60.
67.
RenshonJonathan. 2008. “Stability and Change in Belief Systems: The Operational Code of George W. Bush from Governor to Second-term President.” Journal of Conflict Resolution52 (6): 820–49.
68.
RenshonJonathan. 2015. “Losing Face and Sinking Costs: Experimental Evidence on the Judgment of Political and Military Leaders.” International Organization69 (3): 659–95.
69.
RenshonJonathanYarhi-MiloKerenKertzerJoshua D.. 2016. “Democratic Leaders, Crises and War: Paired Experiments on the Israeli Knesset and Public.” Working Paper, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
70.
SartoriAnne. 2002. “The Might of the Pen: A Reputational Theory of Communication in International Disputes.” International Organization56 (1): 121–49.
71.
SaundersElizabeth N.2011. Leaders at War: How Presidents Shape Military Interventions. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
72.
SaundersElizabeth N.2017. “No Substitute For Experience: Presidents, Advisers, and Information in Group Decision-making.” International Organization17 (S1): S219–247.
73.
SaundersElizabeth N.2018. “Leaders, Advisers, and the Political Origins of Elite Support for War.” Journal of Conflict Resolution.
74.
SchellingThomas C.1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
75.
SchellingThomas C.1966. Arms and Influence. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
76.
SchultzKenneth A.1999. “Do Democratic Institutions Constrain or Inform? Contrasting Two Institutional Perspectives on Democracy and War.” International Organization53 (2): 233–66.
77.
SchultzKenneth A.2001. “Looking for Audience Costs.” Journal of Conflict Resolution45 (1): 32–60.
78.
SchwellerRandall L.1994. “Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back In.” International Security19 (1): 72–107.
79.
SechserTodd S.2004. “Are Soldiers Less War-prone than Statesmen?” Journal of Conflict Resolution48 (5): 746–74.
80.
SechserTodd S.PostAbigail S.. 2015. Hand-tying versus Muscle-flexing in Crisis Bargaining. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, September 5, San Francisco, CA.
81.
SlantchevBranislav L.2005. “Military Coercion in Interstate Crises.” American Political Science Review99 (4): 533–47.
82.
SlantchevBranislav L.2010. “Feigning Weakness.” International Organization64 (3): 357–88.
83.
SnyderGlenn H.DiesingPaul. 1977. Conflict among Nations: Bargaining, Decision Making, and System Structure in International Crises. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
84.
SnyderJackBorghardErica D.. 2011. “The Cost of Empty Threats: A Penny, Not a Pound.” American Political Science Review105 (3): 437–56.
85.
StoessingerJ. G.1981. Nations in Darkness. New York: Random House.
86.
TangShiping. 2008. “Fear in International Politics: Two Positions.” International Studies Review10 (3): 451–71.
87.
TetlockPhilip E.2005. Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
88.
TingleyDustin H.WalterBarbara F.. 2011a. “Can Cheap Talk Deter? An Experimental Analysis.” Journal of Conflict Resolution55 (6): 996–1020.
89.
TingleyDustin H.WalterBarbara F.. 2011b. “The Effect of Repeated Play on Reputation Building: An Experimental Approach.” International Organization65 (2): 343–65.
90.
TomzMichael. 2007. “Domestic Audience Costs in International Relations: An Experimental Approach.” International Organization61 (4): 821–40.
91.
TomzMichael2009. “The Foundations of Domestic Audience Costs: Attitudes, Expectations, and Institutions.” In Kitai, Seido, Gurobaru-shakai[Expectations, Institutions, and Global Society], edited by KohnoMasaruTanakaAiji, 85–97. Tokyo: Keiso-Shobo.
TragerRobert F.2010. “Diplomatic Calculus in Anarchy: How Communications Matter.” American Political Science Review104 (2): 347–68.
94.
TragerRobert F.VavreckLynn. 2011. “The Political Costs of Crisis Bargaining: Presidential Rhetoric and the Role of Party.” American Journal of Political Science55 (3): 526–45.
95.
WeeksJessica L.2008. “Autocratic Audience Costs: Regime Type and Signaling Resolve.” International Organization62 (1): 35–64.
96.
WeissJessica Chen. 2013. “Authoritarian Signaling, Mass Audiences, and Nationalist Protest in China.” International Organization67 (1): 1–35.
97.
Yarhi-MiloKeren. 2014. Knowing the Adversary: Leaders, Intelligence, and Assessment of Intentions in International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
