Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Unlike other political leaders, leaders coming to power through military coups face a dual legitimation challenge: they must justify not only why they should rule but also how they came to power. Little attention has been paid to how coup leaders solve this legitimacy deficit and even less to the audiences of this legitimation. We ask: why do some coup leaders legitimate their coups by holding elections while others do not? Counterintuitively, we argue that coup leaders who oust democratically elected leaders are less likely to hold elections, except when tied to US military aid. We test these hypotheses through a data set of military coup regimes from 1946 to 2014 and trace out mechanisms through case studies of the Nigerian coup of 1983 and the Egyptian coup of 2013. This argument provides a new explanation for the emergence of authoritarian elections and a new perspective on the international dimensions of dictatorship.

Keywords

civil–military relations coups elections legitimacy political survival democratic institutions foreign aid

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahram Online . 2013. “Egypt Military Unveils Transitional Roadmap.” July 3. Accessed April 23, 2018. http://english.ahram.org.eg/News/75631.aspx.

Alagappa

. 1995. Political Legitimacy in Southeast Asia: The Quest for Moral Authority. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

Apter

1987. “Things Fell Apart? Yoruba Responses to the 1983 Elections in Ondo State, Nigeria.” Journal of Modern African Studies 25 (3): 489–503.

Associated Press. 1970. “U.S. Resumes Military Aid to Greece.” Herald-Journal, September 23.

Baron

R. M.

Kenny

D. A.

. 1986. “The Moderator-mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (6): 1173–82.

Beetham

. 1991. The Legitimation of Power. New York: Macmillan Press.

Blaydes

. 2011. Elections and Distributive Politics in Mubarak’s Egypt. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bogardus

2013. “Egypt Turns to K Street After Aid Cut.” The Hill, October 12. Accessed April 23, 2018. http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/328195-egypt-hires-top-washington-lobbyists-after-us-aid-suspension.

Boix

Miller Rosato

. 2013. “A Complete Data Set of Political Regimes, 1800–2007.” Comparative Political Studies 46 (12): 1523–54.

10.

Boix

Svolik

. 2013. “The Foundation of Limited Authoritarian Government: Institutions, Commitment, and Power-Sharing in Dictatorships.” Journal of Politics 75 (2): 300–16.

11.

Booth

J. A.

Seligson

M. A.

. 2009. The Legitimacy Puzzle in Latin America: Democracy and Political Support in Eight Nations. New York: Cambridge University Press.

12.

Briggs

R. C

. 2017. “Explaining Case Selection in African Politics Research.” Journal of Contemporary African Studies 35 (4): 565–72.

13.

Brownlee

. 2007. Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization. New York: Cambridge University Press.

14.

Buhari

1984. “Coup Speech of Major-General Muhammad Buhari.” Accessed April 23, 2018. http://www.nairaland.com/622847/coup-speech-major-general-muhammadu-buhari.

15.

Canache

2002. “From Bullets to Ballots: The Emergence of Popular Support for Hugo Chavez.” Latin American Politics and Society 44 (1): 69–90.

16.

Carter

D. B.

Signorino

C. S.

. 2010. “Back to the Future: Modeling Time Dependence in Binary Data.” Political Analysis 18:271–93.

17.

Cheibub

J. A.

Gandhi

Vreeland

J. R.

. 2010. “Democracy and Dictatorship Revisited.” Public Choice 143 (2-1): 67–101.

18.

Cook

. 2007. Ruling But Not Governing: The Military and Political Development in Egypt, Algeria, and Turkey. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

19.

Debs

2016. “Living by the Sword and Dying by the Sword? Leadership Transitions in and out of Dictatorships.” International Studies Quarterly 60:73–84.

20.

Democracy International. 2014. “Egypt Constitutional Referendum Observation Report.” Accessed April 23, 2018. http://democracyinternational.com/media/Egypt%20Constitutional%20Referendum%20Observation%20Report.pdf.

21.

Derpanopolous

Frantz

Geddes

Wright

. 2016. “Are Coups Good for Democracy?” Research and Politics 3 (1): 1–7.

22.

Diamond

1984, 3 1. “Nigeria in Search of Democracy.” Foreign Affairs 62 (4): 905–27.

23.

Ekwe-Ekwe

1985. “The Nigerian Plight: Shagari to Buhari.” Third World Quarterly 7 (3): 610–25.

24.

Euraque

D. A

. 1996. Reinterpreting the Banana Republic: Region and State in Honduras, 1870–1972. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

25.

Fadel

2014. “No Surprise Here: Sisi Rolls to Victory in Egypt’s Election.” National Public Radio, May 29. Accessed April 23, 2018. http://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2014/05/29/317050568/no-surprise-here-sisi-rolls-to-victory-in-egypts-election.

26.

Finer

S. E

. 1962. The Man on Horseback: The Role of the Military in Politics. New York: Routledge.

27.

Frankel

Atef

. 2014. “How Egypt’s Rebel Movement Helped Pave the Way for a Sisi Presidency.” BuzzFeed News, April 15. Accessed April 23, 2018. http://www.buzzfeed.com/sheerafrenkel/how-egypts-rebel-movement-helped-pave-the-way-for-a-sisi-pre.

28.

Gandhi

Lust-Okar

. 2009. “Elections under Authoritarianism.” Annual Review of Political Science 12:403–22.

29.

Gandhi

Przeworski

. 2007. “Authoritarian Institutions and the Survival of Autocrats.” Comparative Political Studies 40 (11): 1279–301.

30.

Gasiorowski

1995. “Economic Crisis and Political Regime Change: An Event History Analysis.” American Political Science Review 89:882–97.

31.

Geddes

1999. “What Do We Know about Democratization after Twenty Years?” Annual Review of Political Science 2:115–44.

32.

Geddes

. 2003. Paradigms and Sand Castles: Theory Building and Research Design in Comparative Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

33.

Geddes

Wright

Frantz

. 2014. “Autocratic Breakdown and Regime Transitions: A New Data Set.” Perspectives on Politics 12 (2): 313–31.

34.

Gerschewski

2013. “The Three Pillars of Stability: Legitimation, Repression, and Co-optation in Autocratic Regimes.” Democratization 20 (1): 13–38.

35.

Gordon

M. R.

2013. “Egyptians Following Right Path, Kerry Says.” The New York Times, November 3. Accessed April 23, 2018. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/04/world/middleeast/kerry-egypt-visit.html.

36.

Gordon

M. R.

Fahim

. 2013. “Kerry Says Egypt’s Military Was ‘Restoring Democracy’ in Ousting Morsi.” The New York Times, August 1. Accessed April 23, 2018. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/02/world/middleeast/egypt-warns-morsi-supporters-to-end-protests.html.

37.

Grewal

2015. “Why Tunisia Didn’t Follow Egypt’s Path.” The Washington Post, February 4. Accessed April 23, 2018. https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2015/02/04/why-egypt-didnt-follow-tunisias-path/.

38.

Horowitz

D. L

. 1980. Coup Theories and Officers’ Motives: Sri Lanka in Comparative Perspective. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

39.

Huntington

S. P

. 1957. The Soldier and the State: The Theory and Politics of Civil–Military Relations. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

40.

Huntington

S. P

. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

41.

Hyde

S. D.

Marinov

. 2012. “Which Elections Can Be Lost?” Political Analysis 20 (2): 191–201.

42.

Imai

Keele

Tingley

. 2010. “A General Approach to Causal Mediation Analysis.” Psychological Methods 15 (4): 309–34.

43.

Jamal

. 2012. Of Empires and Citizens: Pro-American Democracy or No Democracy at All? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

44.

Kerry

2014. “Secretary of State John Kerry and Egyptian Foreign Minister Shoukry Joint Statements after Meeting with Egyptian President al-Sisi.” Accessed April 23, 2018. https://2009-2017.state.gov/secretary/remarks/2014/07/229626.htm.

45.

Kim

N. K.

Kroeger

A. M.

. 2017. “Regime and Leader Instability under Two Forms of Military Rule.” Comparative Political Studies: Firstview 51 (1): 3–37.

46.

Kirkpatrick

D. D.

2014a. “Egyptians Vote on New Constitution in Referendum.” The New York Times, January 14. Accessed April 23, 2018. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/15/world/middleeast/egypt.html.

47.

Kirkpatrick

D. D.

2014b. “International Observers Find Egypt’s Presidential Election Fell Short of Standards.” The New York Times, May 29. Accessed April 23, 2018. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/30/world/middleeast/international-observers-find-fault-with-egypt-vote.html.

48.

Knutsen

C. H.

Nygrd

H. M.

Wig

. 2017. “Autocratic Elections: Stabilizing Tool or Force for Change?” World Politics 69 (1): 98–143.

49.

Lai

Slater

. 2006. “Institutions of the Offensive: Domestic Sources of Dispute Initiation in Authoritarian Regimes, 1950–1992.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (1): 113–26.

50.

Lane

1984. “Legitimacy and Power in the Soviet Union through Socialist Ritual.” British Journal of Political Science 14 (2): 207–17.

51.

Levitsky

Way

. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press.

52.

Lindberg

S. I.

Clark

J. F.

. 2008. “Does Democratization Reduce the Risk of Military Interventions in Politics in Africa?” Democratization 15 (1): 86–105.

53.

Londregan

J. B.

Poole

K. T.

. 1990. “Poverty, the Coup Trap, and the Seizure of Executive Power.” World Politics 42 (2): 151–83.

54.

Lust-Okar

2006. “Elections under Authoritarianism: Preliminary Lessons from Jordan.” Democratization 13 (3): 456–71.

55.

Maeda

2010. “Two Models of Democratic Breakdown: A Competing Risks Analysis of Democratic Durability.” The Journal of Politics 72 (4): 1129–43.

56.

Magaloni

. 2006. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press.

57.

Malesky

Schuler

. 2011. “The Single-party Dictator’s Dilemma: Information in Elections without Opposition.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 36 (4): 491–530.

58.

Malik

Williamson

. 2017. The Norm of Civilian Authority and Collective Action under Military Rule. Unpublished.

59.

Marinov

Goemans

. 2014. “Coups and Democracy.” British Journal of Political Science 44: 799–825.

60.

Marshall

M. G.

Marshall

D. R.

. 2015. Coup d’Etat Events, 1946–2014. Vienna, VA: Center for Systemic Peace.

61.

Marshall

. 2015. The Egyptian Armed Forces and the Remaking of an Economic Empire. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

62.

Miller

2015. “Democratic Pieces: Autocratic Elections and Democratic Development since 1815.” British Journal of Political Science 45:501–30.

63.

Miller

2016. “Reanalysis: Are Coups Good for Democracy?” Research and Politics 3 (4): 1–5.

64.

Miller . 2017. “The Strategic Origins of Electoral Authoritarianism.” British Journal of Political Science 1–28. doi:10.1017/S0007123417000394.

65.

Morgenbesser

. 2016. Behind the Facade: Elections under Authoritarianism in Southeast Asia. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

66.

Morse

Y. L.

2012. “The Era of Electoral Authoritarianism.” World Politics 64 (1): 161–98.

67.

Myerson

2008. “The Autocrats Credibility Problem and Foundations of the Constitutional State.” American Political Science Review 102 (1): 125–39.

68.

Nassif

H. B.

2017. “Coups and Nascent Democracies: The Military and Egypts Failed Consolidation.” Democratization 24 (1): 157–74.

69.

Needler

M. C

. 1964. Anatomy of A Coup d’Etat: Ecuador 1963. Washington, DC: Institute for the Comparative Study of Political Systems.

70.

Nordlinger

E. A

. 1977. Soldiers in Politics: Military Coups and Governments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

71.

Norris

P. E.

1998. Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance. New York: Oxford University Press.

72.

Obama

2013, July 3. “Statement by President Barack Obama on Egypt.” The White House. Accessed April 23, 2018. https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/07/03/statement-president-barack-obama-egypt.

73.

Psaki

2013a, 7 26. “Daily Press Briefing.” U.S. Department of State. Accessed April 23, 2018. https://2009-2017.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2013/07/212484.htm.

74.

Psaki

2013b, 10 9. “Press Statement: U.S. Assistance to Egypt.” U.S. Department of State. Accessed April 23, 2018. https://2009-2017.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2013/10/215258.htm.

75.

Reuter

O. J.

Robertson

G. B.

. 2015. “Legislatures, Cooptation, and Social Protest in Contemporary Authoritarian Regimes.” Journal of Politics 77 (1): 235–48.

76.

Rose

Mishler

Munro

. 2011. Popular Support for an Undemocratic Regime: The Changing Views of Russians. New York: Cambridge University Press.

77.

Schedler

2002. “The Menu of Manipulation.” Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 36–50.

78.

Singer

J. D.

Bremer

Stuckey

. 1972. “Capability Distribution, Uncertainty, and Major Power War, 1820–1965.” In Peace, War, and Numbers, edited by Russett

, 19–48. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

79.

Siollun

. 2013. Soldiers of Fortune: A History of Nigeria (1983–1993). Abuja, Nigeria: Cassava Republic Press.

80.

Stepan

. 1971. The Military in Politics: Changing Patterns in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

81.

Stepan

. 1988. Rethinking Military Politics: Brazil and the Southern Cone. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

82.

Svolik

2015. “Which Democracies Will Last? Coups, Incumbent Takeovers, and the Dynamic of Democratic Consolidation.” British Journal of Political Science 45 (4): 715–38.

83.

Thyne

Powell

J. M.

. 2016. “Coup d’état or Coup d’Autocracy? How Coups Impact Democratization, 1950–2008.” Foreign Policy Analysis 12 (2): 192–213.

84.

Thyne

Powell

J. M.

Parrott

VanMeter

. 2017. “Even Generals Need Friends: How Domestic and International Reactions to Coups Influence Regime Survival.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 1–31.

85.

Weber

. 1968. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. New York: Bedminster Press.

86.

White

1986. “Economic Performance and Communist Legitimacy.” World Politics 38 (3): 462–82.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.14 MB

0.00 MB

0.28 MB

How to Sell a Coup: Elections as Coup Legitimation

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material