Organized crime-related violence has important electoral consequences. Analyses of aggregate panel data on Mexican elections and an original postelectoral survey conducted in Mexico show that the strategic use of violence by organized crime groups during electoral campaigns demobilizes voters at large. Regions where criminal organizations attempted to influence elections and politics by targeting government officials and party candidates exhibited significantly lower levels of electoral participation. Consistently, at the individual level, results reveal that voters living in regions where organized crime engaged in high-profile violence were more cautious when deciding whether to vote or not. Prior research has focused on the role of crime victimization in nonelectoral participation, but the empirical evidence presented here suggests that the impact of a criminal context on turnout transcends personal victimization experiences.
AbramsSamuelIversenTorbenSoskiceDavid. 2011. “Informal Social Networks and Rational Voting.” British Journal of Political Science41 (2): 229–57.
2.
AlbarracínJuan. 2016. “Criminalized Electoral Politics in Brazilian Urban Peripheries.” Paper presented at the 2016 Conference of the Latin American Studies Association, May 27–30, New York, NY.
3.
AldrichJohn. 1993. “Rational Choice and Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science37 (1): 246–78.
4.
AldrichJohnMontgomeryJacobWoodWendy. 2011. “Turnout as a Habit.” Political Behavior33 (4): 535–63.
5.
ArjonaAnaChacónMario. 2013. “The Impact of War on the Quality of Local Governance: Evidence from Colombia.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
6.
BakerAndyAmesBarryRenoLucio R.. 2006. “Social Context and Campaign Volatility in New Democracies: Networks and Neighborhoods in Brazil’s 2002 Elections.” American Journal of Political Science50 (2): 382–99.
7.
BaliValentina A.2007. “Terror and Elections: Lessons from Spain.” Electoral Studies26:669–87.
8.
BatesonRegina. 2012. “Crime Victimization and Political Participation.” American Political Science Review106 (3): 570–87.
9.
BellowsJohnMiguelEdward. 2009. “War and Local Collective Action in Sierra Leone.” Journal of Public Economics93 (11–12): 1144–57.
10.
Berk-SeligsonSusanSeligsonMitchell A.. 2016. “Reported Threat: The Routinization of Violence in Central America.” Pragmatics26 (4): 583–607.
11.
BlancoLuisa R.2013. “The Impact of Crime on Trust in Institutions in Mexico.” European Journal of Political Economy32:38–55.
12.
BlattmanChristopher. 2009. “From Violence to Voting: War and Political Participation in Uganda.” American Political Science Review103 (2): 231–47.
13.
Bravo RegidorCarlosHernándezGerardo Maldonado. 2012. “Balas y Votos: Qué Efecto Tiene la Violencia sobre las Elecciones.” In Las Bases Sociales del Crimen Organizado y la Violencia en Mexico, edited by Antonio AguilarJosé, 309–36. Mexico City: Secretaría de Seguridad Pública.
14.
CarrerasMiguelCastañeda-AngaritaNéstor. 2013. “Who Votes in Latin America? A Test of Three Theoretical Perspectives.” Comparative Political Studies47 (8): 1079–104.
15.
DorffCassy. 2017. “Violence, Kinship Networks, and Political Resilience: Evidence from Mexico.” Journal of Peace Research54 (4): 558–73.
16.
DownsAnthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper Collins.
17.
EriksonRobertWlezienChristopher. 2012. The Timeline of Presidential Elections: How Campaigns Do (and Do Not) Matter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
FernandezKenneth E.KuenziMichael. 2010. “Crime and Support for Democracy in Africa and Latin America.” Political Studies58 (3): 450–71.
19.
GallegoJorge Andrés. 2011. “Civil Conflict and Voting Behavior: Evidence from Colombia.” Working paper, New York University, New York.
20.
GarcíaAdán.2011. “Baja el narco a candidato.” Reforma, October 16, 2011, p. 5.
21.
García-SánchezMiguel. 2010. “Violent Contexts, Electoral Participation and Vote Choices in Colombia: A Hierarchical Approach.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
22.
GrilloIoan. 2011. El Narco: Inside Mexico’s Criminal Insurgency. New York: Bloomsbury Press.
23.
GuerreroJesús. 2009. “Amagan Sicarios a Aspirante Panista.” Reforma, Nacional, June 30, 2009, p. 4.
24.
HöglundKristineJarstadAnna K.KovacsMimmi Söderberg. 2009. “The Predicament of Elections in War-torn Societies.” Democratization16 (3): 530–57.
LessingBenjamin. 2015. “Logics of Violence in Criminal War.” Journal of Conflict Resolution59 (8): 1486–516.
28.
MarcusGeorge E.Russell NeumanW.MacKuenMichael. 2000. Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
MarshallJohn. 2015. “Political Information Cycles: When Do Voters Sanction Incumbent Parties for High Homicide Rates?” Working Paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
30.
MerinoJoséZarkinJessicaFierroEduardo. 2015. “Desaparecidos.” Nexos, January 1, 2015. Accessed October 4, 2016. http://www.nexos.com.mx/?p=23811.
31.
OsorioJavier. 2013. “Hobbes on Drugs: Understanding Drug Violence in Mexico.” PhD thesis, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN.
Reforma. 2011a. “Frenan candidaturas por miedo al narco.” Reforma, September 29, 2011, p. 17.
34.
Reforma. 2011b. “Matan a Edil Michoacano.” Reforma, November 3, 2011, p. 1.
35.
Reforma. 2012. “Impacta acoso a 13 candidatos.” Reforma, March 28, 2012, p. 1.
36.
RíosViridiana. 2012. “Tendencias y Explicaciones al Asesinato de Periodistas y Alcaldes en México: El Crimen Organizado y la Violencia de Alto Perfil.” In Las Bases Sociales del Crimen Organizado y la Violencia en México, edited by Antonio Aguilar RiveraJosé , 275–308. Mexico City: Secretaría de Seguridad Publica.
37.
RobbinsJosephHunterLanceMurrayGregg R.. 2013. “Voters versus Terrorists: Analyzing the Effect of Terrorist Events on Voter Turnout.” Journal of Peace Research50 (3): 1–14.
38.
RoseWilliamMurphyRysiaAbrahmsMax. 2007. “Does Terrorism Ever Work? The 2004 Madrid Train Bombings.” International Security32 (1): 185–92.
39.
SbernaSalvatore. 2011. “Electoral Competition and Criminal Violence in Italy (1983–2003).” Presented at the ECPR Joint Session Conference Workshop on Political Institutions and Conflict, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
40.
SchedlerAndreas. 2014. “The Criminal Subversion of Mexican Democracy.” Journal of Democracy25 (1): 5–18.
41.
ShirkDavidWallmanJoel. 2015. “Understanding Mexico’s Drug Violence.” Journal of Conflict Resolution59 (8): 1348–76.
42.
SnyderRichardDurán-MartínezAngélica. 2009. “Does Illegality Breed Violence? Drug Trafficking and State-sponsored Protection Rackets.” Crime, Law and Social Change52 (3): 253–73.
TrejoGuillermoLeySandra. 2016a. “Federalism, Drugs, and Violence. Why Intergovernmental Partisan Conflict Stimulated Inter-cartel Violence in Mexico.” Política y Gobierno23 (1): 9–52.
45.
TrejoGuillermoLeySandra. 2016b. “High-profile Criminal Violence. Why Drug Cartels Murder Subnational Authorities and Party Candidates in Mexico.” Working Paper, University of Notre Dame and CIDE, Notre Dame, IN.
46.
TrejoGuillermoLeySandra. 2018. “Why Did Drug Cartels Go to War in Mexico? Subnational Party Alternation, the Breakdown of Criminal Protection, and the Onset of Large-scale Violence.” Comparative Political Studies51 (7): 900–37.
47.
TrellesAlejandroCarrerasMiguel. 2012. “Bullets and Votes: Violence and Electoral Participation in Mexico.” Journal of Politics in Latin America4 (2): 89–123.
48.
ValentinoNicholas A.BraderTedGroenendykEric W.GregorowiczKryshaHutchingsVincent L.. 2011. “Election Nights Alright for Fighting: The Role of Emotions in Political Participation.” The Journal of Politics73 (1): 156–70.
49.
VillarrealAndrésSilvaBraulio F.. 2006. “Social Cohesion, Criminal Victimization and Perceived Risk of Crime in Brazilian Neighborhoods.” Social Forces84 (3): 1725–53.
50.
VoorsMaartenNillesenEleonoraVerwimpPhilipBulteErwinLensinkRobertSoestDaan Van. 2012. “Violent Conflict and Behavior: A Field Experiment in Burundi.” American Economic Review102 (2): 941–64.
51.
WeberChristopher. 2013. “Emotions, Campaigns, and Political Participation.” Political Research Quarterly66 (2): 414–28.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
