The level of female representation has been found to lead to lower military spending and a lower level of state aggression. However, I argue that previous work has largely overlooked the impact of the international system on these three domestic characteristics. Specifically, the presence of an external threat from an interstate rival increases military spending, increases state aggression, and lowers female representation. Tests of this theory on democratic states from the years 1981 to 2007 find that the level of female representation decreases in states involved in an interstate rivalry and has a greater effect on female representation than factors routinely found to influence female representation. This article brings the international system into the discussion of factors that influence female representation while adding to previous literature on how the international system influences domestic politics.
BaumChristopherSchafferMarkStillmanSteven. 2007. “Enhanced Routines for Instrumental Variables/Generalized Method of Moments Estimation and Testing.” Stata Journal7 (4): 465–506.
2.
BennettD. ScottStamAllanIII. 1996. “The Duration of Interstate Wars, 1816–1985.” American Political Science Review90 (2): 239–57.
3.
BrattonKathleenHaynieKerry. 1999. “Agenda Setting and Legislative Success in State Legislatures: The Effects of Gender and Race.” Journal of Politics61 (3): 658–79.
4.
BriansCraig Leonard. 2005. “Women for Women? Gender and Party Bias in Voting for Female Candidates.” American Politics Research33 (3): 357–75.
5.
BryskAlisonMehtaAashish. 2014. “Do Rights at Home Boost Rights Abroad? Sexual Equality and Humanitarian Foreign Policy.” Journal of Peace Research51 (1): 97–110.
6.
BurrisVal. 2008. “From Vietnam to Iraq: Continuity and Change in Between-group Differences in Support for Military Action.” Social Problems55 (4): 443–79.
7.
BushSarah Sunn. 2011. “International Politics and the Spread of Quotas for Women in Legislatures.” International Organization65:103–37.
8.
CaprioliMary. 2005. “Primed for Violence: The Role of Gender Inequality in Predicting Internal Conflict.” International Studies Quarterly49:161–78.
9.
CaprioliMaryBoyerMark. 2001. “Gender, Violence, and International Crisis.” Journal of Conflict Resolution45:503–18.
10.
CarrollSusan. 2008. “Security Moms and Presidential Politics: Women Voters in the 2004 Election.” In Voting the Gender Gap, edited by WhitakerL. D., 75–90. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
11.
CaulMiki. 1999. “Women’s Representation in Parliament: The Role of Political Parties.” Party Politics5 (1): 79–98.
12.
CentenoMiguel A.2002. Blood and Debt: War and the Nation-state in Latin America. University Park, PA: The Pennyslvania State Press.
ClarkCalClarkJanet. 2008. “The Reemergence of the Gender Gap in 2004.” In Voting the Gender Gap, edited by WhitakerL. D., 50–74. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
15.
ColaresiMichael. 2004. “When Doves Cry: International Rivalry, Unreciprocated Cooperation, and Leadership Turnover.” American Journal of Political Science48 (3): 555–70.
16.
ColaresiMichael. 2014. “With Friends Like These, Who Needs Democracy? The Effects of Transnational Support from Rivals on Post-conflict Democratization.” Journal of Peace Research51 (1): 65–79.
17.
ColaresiMichaelRaslerKarenThompsonWilliam. 2007. Strategic Rivalries in World Politics: Position, Space, and Conflict Escalation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18.
ColaresiMichaelThompsonWilliam. 2002. “Strategic Rivalries, Protracted Conflict, and Crisis Escalation.” Journal of Peace Research39 (3): 263–87.
19.
ColeWade. 2013. “Government Respect for Gendered Rights: The Effect of the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women on Women’s Rights Outcomes, 1981-2004.” International Studies Quarterly57 (2): 233–49.
20.
CoserLewis. 1956. The Functions of Social Conflict. Glencoe, Scotland: The Free Press.
21.
DahlerupDrude. 1988. “From a Small to a Large Minority: Women in Scandinavian Politics.” Scandinavian Political Studies11 (4): 275–98.
22.
DiehlPaulCrescenziMark. 1998. “Reconfiguring the Arms Race-war Debate.” Journal of Peace Research35 (1): 111–18.
23.
DolanKathleen. 2008. “Women Votes, Women Candidates: Is There a Gender Gap in Support for Women Candidates?” In Voting the Gender Gap, edited by WhitakerL. D., 91–107. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
24.
ElshtainJean Bethke. 1995. Women and War. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
25.
EnloeCynthia. 1983. Does Khaki Become You? The Militarization of Women’s Lives. London, UK: Pandora Press.
26.
FalkErikaKenskiKate. 2006. “Issue Saliency and Gender Stereotypes: Support for Women as Presidents in Times of War and Terrorism.” Social Science Quarterly87 (1): 1–18.
27.
FishM. Steven. 2002. “Islam and Authoritarianism.” World Politics55:4–37.
28.
GandhiJennifer. 2008. Political Institutions under Dictatorship. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29.
GedalyaEinatHerzogHannaShamirMichal. 2011. “Tzip(p)ing through the Elections: Gender in the 2009 Elections.” In The Elections in Israel 2009, edited by ArianA.ShamirM., 165–93. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
30.
GhosnFatenPalmerGlennBremerStuart. 2004. “The MID3 Data Set, 1993–2001: Procedures, Coding Rules, and Description.” Conflict Management and Peace Science21 (2): 133–54.
31.
GiblerDouglas. 2010. “Outside-in: The Effects of External Threat on State Centralization.” Journal of Conflict Resolution54:519–42.
32.
GiblerDouglasRiderTobyHutchisonMarc. 2005. “Taking Arms against a Sea of Troubles: Conventional Arms Races during Periods of Rivalry.” Journal of Peace Research42 (2): 131–47.
33.
GoemansHenkGleditschKristian SkredeChiozzaGiacomo. 2009. “Introducing Archigos: A Dataset of Political Leaders.” Journal of Peace Research46 (2): 269–83.
34.
GoertzGaryDiehlPaul. 1993. “Enduring Rivalries: Theoretical Constructs and Empirical Patterns.” International Studies Quarterly37:147–71.
35.
GoldsteinJoshua. 1992. “A Conflict-cooperation Scale for WEIS Events Data.” Journal of Conflict Resolution36 (2): 369–85.
36.
GoldsteinJoshua. 2001. War and Gender: How Gender Shapes the War System and Vice Versa. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37.
GourevitchPeter. 1978. “The Second Image Reversed: The International Sources of Domestic Politics.” International Organization32 (4): 881–912.
38.
GroseChristianOppenheimerBruce. 2007. “The Iraq War, Partisanship, and Candidate Attributes: Variations in Partisan Swing in the 2006 U.S. House Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly32 (4): 531–57.
39.
HenselPaul. 1999. “An Evolutionary Approach to the Study of Interstate Rivalry.” Conflict Management and Peace Science17 (2): 175–206.
40.
HinojosaMagda. 2012. Selecting Women, Electing Women: Political Representation and Candidate Selection in Latin America. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
41.
HuddyLeonieTerkildsenNayda. 1993. “The Consequences of Gender Stereotypes for Women Candidates at Different Levels and Types of Office.” Political Research Quarterly46 (3): 503–23.
42.
HutchisonMarc. 2011. “Territorial Threat, Mobilization, and Political Participation in Africa.” Conflict Management and Peace Science28 (3): 183–208.
43.
InglehartRonaldNorrisPippa. 2003. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change around the World. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
44.
JonesMark. 1998. “Gender Quotas, Electoral Laws, and the Election of Women: Lessons from the Argentine Provinces.” Comparative Political Studies31 (1): 3–21.
45.
JonesMark. 2009. “Gender Quotas, Electoral Laws, and the Election of Women: Evidence from the Latin American Vangard.” Comparative Political Studies42 (56): 56–81.
46.
KanterRosabeth Moss. 1977. “Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women.” American Journal of Sociology82 (5): 965–90.
47.
KenworthyLaneMalamiMelissa. 1999. “Gender Inequality in Political Representation: A Worldwide Comparative Analysis.” Social Forces78 (1): 235–68.
48.
KerberLinda. 1993. “‘A Constitutional Right to be Treated Like … Ladies’: Women, Civic Obligation and Military Service.” University of Chicago Law School Roundtable95:95–128.
49.
KittilsonMiki Caul. 2006. Challenging Parties, Changing Parliament: Women and Elected Office in Contemporary Western Europe. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
50.
KleinJamesGoertzGaryDiehlPaul. 2006. “The New Rivalry Dataset: Procedures and Patterns.” Journal of Peace Research43 (3): 331–48.
51.
KleinUta. 1998. “War and Gender: What Do We Learn from Israel.” In The Women and War Reader, edited by LorentzenLois AnnTurpinJennifer, 148–156. New York: New York University Press.
52.
KochMichaelFultonSarah. 2011. “In the Defense of Women: Gender, Office Holding, and National Security Policy in Established Democracies.” Journal of Politics73 (1): 1–16.
53.
KrinerDouglasShenFrancis. 2007. “Iraq Casualties and the 2006 Senate Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly32 (4): 507–30.
54.
KrookMona Lena. 2014. “Electoral Gender Quotas: A Conceptual Analysis.” Comparative Political Studies47 (9): 1268–93.
55.
KwonInsook. 2001. “A Feminist Exploration of Military Conscription: The Gendering of the Connections between Nationalism, Militarism, and Citizenship in South Korea.” International Feminist Journal of Politics3 (1): 26–54.
56.
LawlessJennifer. 2004. “Women, War, and Winning Elections: Gender Stereotyping in the Post-September 11th Era.” Political Research Quarterly57 (3): 479–90.
57.
MaozZeevHendersonErrol. 2013. “The World Religion Dataset, 1945–2010: Logic, Estimates, and Trends.” International Interactions39 (3): 265–91.
58.
MathersJennifer. 2013. “Women and State Military Forces.” In Women and Wars, edited by CohnC., 124–45. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
59.
MatlandRichardBrownDebrorah. 1992. “District Magnitude’s Effect on Female Representation in US State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly17 (4): 469–92.
60.
MelanderErik. 2005. “Gender Equality and Intrastate Armed Conflict.” International Studies Quarterly49:695–714.
61.
MerollaJenniferZechmeisterElizabeth. 2009. “Terrorist Threat, Leadership, and the Vote: Evidence from Three Experiments.” Political Behavior31:575–601.
62.
MichaelRobert. 1985. “Consequences of the Rise in Female Labor Force Participation Rates: Questions and Probes.” Journal of Labor Economics3 (1): 117–46.
63.
MoonSeungsook. 1998. “Gender, Militarization, and Universal Male Conscription in South Korea.” In The Women and War Reader, edited by LorentzenL. A.TurpinJ., 90–100. New York, NY: New York University Press.
64.
NincicMiroslavNincicDonna. 2002. “Race, Gender, and War.” Journal of Peace Research39 (5): 547–68.
65.
NordhausWilliamOnealJohnRussettBruce. 2011. “The Effects of the International Environment on National Military Expenditure: A Multicountry Study.” International Organization66:491–513.
66.
NorrisPippa. 2008. Driving Democracy: Do Power-sharing Institutions Work?Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
67.
NormanElizabeth. 1990. Women at War: The Story of Fifty Military Nurses Who Served in Vietnam. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
PaxtonPamelaGreenJenniferHughesMelanie. 2008. Women in Parliament, 1945–2003: Cross-national Dataset. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
70.
RashidTahmina. 2009. “Militarized Masculinities, Female Bodies, and ‘Security Discourse’ in Post-9/11 Pakistan.” Strategic Analysis33 (4): 566–78.
71.
ReardonBetty. 1996. Sexism and the War System. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
72.
ReganPatrickPaskeviciuteAida. 2003. “Women’s Access to Politics and Peaceful States.” Journal of Peace Research40 (3): 287–302.
73.
RichardsonLewis. 1939. “Generalized Foreign Politics: A Study in Group Psychology.” British Journal of Psychology, Monograph Supplements23 (7): 1–91.
74.
RosenwasserShirleyRogersRobynFlingSheilaSilvers-PickensKaylaButemeyerJohn. 1987. “Attitude toward Women and Men in Politics: Perceived Male and Female Candidate Competencies and Participant Personality Characteristics.” Political Psychology8 (2): 191–200.
75.
RossMichael. 2008. “Oil, Islam, and Women.” American Political Science Review102 (1): 107–23.
76.
RuddickSara. 1989. Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
77.
RuleWilma. 1987. “Electoral Systems, Contextual Factors and Women’s Opportunities for Election to Parliament in Twenty-three Democracies.” Political Research Quarterly40:477–98.
78.
SapiroVirginia. 1981–1982. “If U.S. Senator Baker Were a Woman: An Experimental Study of Candidate Image.” Political Psychology3:61–83.
79.
Schwindt-BayerLeslie. 2006. “Still Supermadres? Gender and the Policy Priorities of Latin American Legislators.” American Journal of Political Science50 (3): 570–85.
80.
Schwindt-BayerLeslie. 2009. “Making Quotas Work: The Effect of Gender Quota Laws on the Election of Women.” Legislative Studies Quarterly34 (February): 5–28.
81.
SimmelGeorg. 1955. Conflict and the Web of Group-affiliations. New York, NY: The Free Press.
82.
SingerJ. DavidBremerStuartStuckeyJohn. 1972. “Capability Distribution, Uncertainty, and Major Power War, 1820–1965.” In Peace, War, and Numbers, edited by RussettB., 19–48. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
83.
SmithTom. 1984. “The Polls: Gender and Attitudes toward Violence.” Public Opinion Quarterly48:384–96.
84.
StockJamesYogoMotohiro. 2005. “Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression.” In Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg, edited by AndewsD. W. K.StockJ. H., 80–108. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
85.
SwersMichele. 1998. “Are Women More Likely to Vote for Women’s Issue Bills than Their Male Colleagues?” Legislative Studies Quarterly23 (3): 435–48.
86.
SwersMichele. 2007. “Building a Reputation on National Security: The Impact of Stereotypes Related to Gender and Military Experience.” Legislative Studies Quarterly32 (4): 559–95.
87.
TesslerMarkNachtweyJodiGrantAudra. 1999. “Further Tests of the Women and Peace Hypothesis: Evidence from Cross-national Survey Research in the Middle East.” International Studies Quarterly43:519–31.
88.
TesslerMarkWarrinerIna. 1997. “Gender, Feminism, and Attitudes toward International Conflict: Exploring Relationships with Survey Data from the Middle East.” World Politics49 (January): 250–81.
89.
ThiesCameron. 2005. “War, Rivalry, and State Building in Latin America.” American Journal of Political Science49 (3): 451–65.
90.
ThompsonWilliam. 2001. “Identifying Rivals and Rivalries in World Politics.” International Studies Quarterly45:557–86.
91.
ThompsonWilliamDreyerDavid. 2011. Handbook of International Rivalries, 1494–2010. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
92.
TicknerJ. Ann. 1992. Gender in International Relations. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
93.
TillyCharles. 1985 “War Making and State Making as Organized Crime.” In Bringing the State Back In, edited by EvansPeterRueschemeyerD.SkocpolTheda, 169–91. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
94.
TogebyLise. 1994. “The Gender Gap in Foreign Policy Attitudes.” Journal of Peace Research31 (4): 375–92.
95.
WallaceMichael. 1979. “Arms Races and Escalation: Some New Evidence.” Journal of Conflict Resolution23 (1): 3–16.
96.
WilcoxClydeHewittLaraAllsopDee. 1996. “The Gender Gap in Attitudes toward the Gulf War: A Cross-national Perspectives.” Journal of Peace Research33 (1): 67–82.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
