What kind of war is Mexico’s drug war? The prominent “criminal insurgency” approach helpfully focuses attention on cartel–state conflict, but unnecessarily redefines insurgency as “state-weakening,” eliding critical differences in rebels’ and cartels’ aims. Whereas rebels fight states, and cartels fight with one another, to conquer mutually prized territory and resources, cartels fight states “merely” to constrain their behavior and influence policy outcomes. This distinction yields a typology with theoretical consequences: decisive victory plays an important role in most models of civil war but is impossible or undesirable in wars of constraint. Theories of criminal war must therefore explain how ongoing coercive violence can be preferable to pacific strategies. I distinguish two such coercive logics of cartel–state conflict: violent lobbying and violent corruption. Lobbyings' more universalistic benefits elicit free riding, so turf war among cartels should make it rarer than violent corruption. This prediction accords with qualitative and quantitative evidence from Mexico, Colombia, and Brazil.
AcemogluDaronWolitzkyAlexander. 2011. “The Economics of Labor Coercion.” Econometrica79 (2): 555–600.
2.
AdornoSérgioSallaFernando. 2007. “Criminalidade Organizada nas Prisões e os Ataques do PCC.” Estudos Avançados21 (61): 7–29.
3.
BaileyJohnTaylorMatthew M.. 2009. “Evade, Corrupt, or Confront? Organized Crime and the State in Brazil and Mexico.” Journal of Politics in Latin America1 (2): 3–29.
4.
BergalCarina. 2011. “Mexican Drug War: The Case for Non-International Armed Conflict Classification.” Fordham International Law Journal34: 1042–1088.
5.
BlattmanChristopherMiguelEdward. 2010. “Civil War.” Journal of Economic Literature48 (1): 3–57.
6.
BonnerRobert C.2010. “The New Cocaine Cowboys: How to Defeat Mexico’s Drug Cartels.” Foreign Affairs89 (4): 35–47.
7.
BunkerRobert J.2011. “Criminal (Cartel & Gang) Insurgencies in Mexico and the Americas: What You Need to Know, Not What You Want to Hear.” Testimony Before the House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere, Washington, DC, September 13.
CastilloFabio. 1987. Los jinetes de la cocaína. Bogota: Documentos Periodísticos.
10.
CerqueiraDaniel. 2011. “Mortes Violentas Não Esclarecidas e Impunidade no Rio de Janeiro.” Mimeograph. Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada.
11.
ChepesiukR.2003. The Bullet or the Bribe: Taking down Colombia’s Cali Drug Cartel. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
12.
ChweMichael Suk-Young. 1990. “Why Were Workers Whipped? Pain in a Principal-Agent Model.” The Economic Journal100 (403): 1109–121.
13.
CollierDavidHidalgoFernando DanielMaciuceanuAndra Olivia. 2006. “Essentially Contested Concepts: Debates and Applications.” Journal of Political Ideologies11 (3): 211–46.
14.
CollierDavidLevitskySteven. 1997. “Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research.” World Politics49 (December): 430–51.
15.
CollierPaul. 2000. “Rebellion as a Quasi-Criminal Activity.” Journal of Conflict Resolution44 (6): 839–53.
16.
CollierPaulHoefflerAnne. 2004. “Greed and Grievance in Civil War.” Oxford Economic Papers56: 563–595.
17.
CostaAntonio Maria. 2007. “Free Drugs or Drug Free?” Speech Delivered at the International Drug Policy Reform Conference, New Orleans, December 7.
18.
DalBóPedro Dal BóErnestoTellaRafael Di. 2006. “‘Plata o Plomo?’ Bribe and Punishment in a Theory of Political Influence.” American Political Science Review100 (1): 41–53.
ContrerasEzequiel F. 2012. “En narcomantas, Caballeros Templarios dan la bien-venida a Peña.” Proceso(December 19). Accessed May 19, 2015. http://www.proceso.com.mx/?p=328278b.
23.
FearonJames D.1994. “Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes.” American Political Science Review88 (3): 577–92.
24.
FearonJames D.1995. “Rationalist Explanations for War.” International Organization49 (3): 379–414.
25.
FearonJames D.2004. “Why Do Some Civil Wars Last So Much Longer than Others?” Journal of Peace Research41 (3): 275–301.
26.
FearonJames D.2007. “Fighting Rather than Bargaining.” To be presented at the 2007 Annual Meetings of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, August 30–September 2, 2007.
27.
FearonJames D.LaitinDavid D.. 2003. “Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War.” American Political Science Review97 (1): 75–90.
28.
FearonJames D.LaitinDavid D.. 2007. “Civil War Termination.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, August 30: Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.
29.
Felbab-BrownVanda. 2010. Shooting Up: Counterinsurgency and the War on Drugs. Washington, D.C.: Brookings.
GallieW. B.1956. “Essentially Contested Concepts.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society56: 167–98.
32.
GambettaDiego. 1993. The Sicilian Mafia: the Business of Private Protection. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
33.
GambettaDiego. 2009. Codes of the Underworld. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
34.
García MárquezGabriel. 1997. News of a Kidnapping. New York: Knopf.
35.
GleditschNils PetterWallensteenPeterErikssonMikaelSollenbergMargaretaStrandHavard. 2002. “Armed Conflict 1946–2001: A New Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research39 (5): 615–37. http://jpr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/39/5/615.
36.
GrilloIoan. 2011. El Narco: Inside Mexico’s Criminal Insurgency. New York: Bloomsbury Press.
37.
HagedornJohn M.2005. “The Global Impact of Gangs.” Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice21 (2): 153–69.
38.
ISP-RJ (Insituto de Segurança Pública do Rio de Janeiro). 2013. “Dados Oficiais.” Monthly reports, 2004-2013. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto de Segurança Pública.
39.
KalyvasStathis N.2001. ““New” and “Old” Civil Wars: A Valid Distinction?” World Politics54 (October): 99–118.
40.
KalyvasStathis N.2006. The Logic of Violence in Civil War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
KillebrewBobBernalJennifer. 2010. Gangs, Cartels and US National Security. Washington, D.C.: Center for a New American Security.
42.
KleimanMark. 2011. “Surgical Strikes in the Drug Wars.” Foreign AffairsSeptember/October, 89-101.
43.
LaceyMarc. 2008. “Grenade Attack in Mexico Breaks from Deadly Script.” New York TimesSeptember 25, 14.
44.
LeeRensselaer W.1994. “Global reach: The Threat of International Drug Trafficking.” Current History592 (May): 207–11.
45.
LeedsElizabeth. 1996. “Cocaine and Parallel Polities in the Brazilian Urban Periphery: Constraints on Local-Level Democratization.” Latin American Research Review31 (3): 47–83.
46.
LessingBenjamin. 2013. “The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars: Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia.” CDDRL Working Paper No. 145, Stanford University.
47.
LeventoluBaharSlantchevBranislav. 2007. “The Armed Peace: A Punctuated Equilibrium Theory of War.” American Journal of Political Science51 (4): 755–771.
48.
López RestrepoAndrés. 2005. “Conflicto interno y narcotráfico entre 1970 y 2005.” In Narcotráfico en Colombia Economía y Violencia. Bogotá: Fundación Seguridad y Democracia. 183–226.
49.
MagaloniBeatrizCalderónGabrielaDiaz-CayerosAlbertoRoblesGustavoOlarteJorge. 2013. “The Beheading of Criminal Organizations and the Dynamics of Violence in Mexicos Drug War.” Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.
50.
ManwaringMax G.2005. Street Gangs: the New Urban Insurgency. Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute.
51.
MejíaDanielCastilloJuan CamiloRestrepoPascual. 2013. “Illegal Drug Markets and Violence in Mexico: The Causes Beyond Calderón.” Unpublished manuscipt, Universidad de los Andes.
52.
MetzSteven. 1993. The Future of Insurgency. Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College.
53.
MetzSteven. 2007. Rethinking Insurgency. Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College.
54.
MoralesNataliaRottaSantiago La. 2009. Los Pepes: Desde Pablo Escobar hasta Don Berna, Macaco, y Don Mario. Bogotá: Planeta.
55.
RonaldoMunckde SilvaPurnaka L., eds. 2000. Postmodern Insurgencies: Political Violence, Identity Formation and Peacemaking in Comparative Perspective. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
56.
OlsonMancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
57.
PapeRobert A.2003. “The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism.” American Political Science Review97 (3): 343–361.
58.
Pardo RuedaRafael. 1996. De primera mano: Colombia 1986-1994, entre conflictos y esperanzas. Bogotá: CEREC.
59.
PenglaseBen. 2005. “The Shutdown of Rio de Janeiro. The Poetics of Drug Trafficker Violence.” Anthropology Today21 (5): 3–6.
PoppaTerrence E.2010. Drug Lord: The Life and Death of a Mexican Kingpin. El Paso: Cinco Puntos Press.
64.
PowellRobert. 2002. “Bargaining Theory and International Conflict.” Annual Reviews in Political Science5 (1): 1–30.
65.
PowellRobert. 2004a. “Bargaining and Learning While Fighting.” American Journal of Political Science48 (2): 344–361.
66.
PowellRobert. 2004b. “The Inefficient Use of Power: Costly Conflict with Complete Information.” American Political Science Review98 (02): 231–241.
67.
PowellRobert. 2006. “War as a Commitment Problem.” International Organization60 (01): 169–203.
68.
PowellRobert. 2012. “Persistent Fighting and Shifting Power.” American Journal of Political Science56 (3): 620–637.
69.
Proceso. 2011. “Por cada narco detenido, 1.1 policías pierden la vida: SSP.” July 11. Accessed May 19, 2015. http://www.proceso.com.mx/?p=275561.
70.
Reforma. 2009. “Arma ‘La Familia’ protesta antimilitary.” April 21: p4.
71.
ReuterPeter. 2009. “Systemic Violence in Drug Markets.” Crime, Law and Social Change52 (3): 275–284.
72.
RíosViridiana. 2013. “Why Did Mexico Become So Violent?” Trends in Organized Crime16 (2): 138–155.
73.
SalazarAlfonso. 2001. La parábola de Pablo: auge y caída de un gran capo del narcotráfico. Bogotá: Planeta Columbiana.
74.
SartoriGiovanni. 1970. “Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics.” American Political Science Review64 (4): 1033–1053.
75.
SchedlerAndreas. 2013. “Mexico’s Civil War Democracy.” Paper prepared for presentation at the 109th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, August 30.
76.
SchellingThomas C.1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
77.
SchellingThomas C.1966. “The Diplomacy of Violence.” In Arms and Influence. New Haven: Yale University Press. 1–34.
78.
SchellingThomas C.1967. “Economics and Criminal Enterprise.” The Public Interest (7): 61–78.
79.
ScottJames C.1969. “Corruption, Machine Politics, and Political Change.” American Political Science Review63 (4): 1142–1158.
Serrano CadenaRosso José. 1999. Jaque mate: de cómo la policía le ganó la partida a “El Ajedrecista” ya los carteles del narcotráfico. Bogotá: Grupo Editorial Norma.
82.
ShirkDavid AMolzahnCoryFerreiraOctavio R. 2013. Drug Violence in Mexico: Data and Analysis Through 2012. San Diego: Trans-Border Institute.
83.
SkaperdasStergios. 2001. “The Political Economy of Organized Crime: Providing Protection When the State Does Not.” Economics of Governance2 (3): 173–202.
84.
SoaresLuiz EduardoBillM VAthaydeCelso. 2005. Cabeça de porco. Rio de Janeiro: Objetiva.
85.
SpenceMichael. 2002. “Signaling in retrospect and the informational structure of markets.” The American Economic Review92 (3): 434–459.
86.
StilleAlexander. 1996. Excellent Cadavers: The Mafia and the Death of the First Italian Republic. New York: Random House.
87.
SullivanJohn P.2012. “From Drug Wars to Criminal Insurgency.” Bogotá: Vortex.
SullivanJohn P.BunkerRobert J.. 2011. “Rethinking Insurgency: Criminality, Spirituality, and Societal Warfare in the Americas.” Small Wars & Insurgencies22 (5): 742–763.
UCDP (Uppsala Conflict Data Program). 2013. “UCDP Battle-Related Deaths Dataset v.5-2013.” Uppsala Conflict Data Program. Uppsala: Uppsala University. www.ucdp.uu.se.
93.
UNODC (United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime). 2010. The Globalization of Crime. Vienna, Austria: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.
94.
WagnerR. Harrison. 1994. “Peace, War, and the Balance of Power.” American Political Science Review88 (3): 593–607.
95.
WalterBarbara F.1997. “The Critical Barrier to Civil War Settlement.” International Organization51 (3): 335–364.
96.
WalterBarbara F.2009. “Bargaining Failures and Civil War.” Annual Review of Political Science12: 243–261.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
