Civil conflicts constitute one of the most significant threats to human security. Understanding when belligerents are willing to undertake conflict management efforts is an important first step in better understanding how civil conflicts can be dealt with by the international community. In this article, I examine the occurrence of mediation in low-intensity conflicts. Drawing on insights from the war termination literature, I develop a theoretical argument that links mediation in low-intensity conflicts to the evolution of fighting. I argue that, while the characteristics of a conflict and its belligerents influence when mediation happens, how events unfold on the battlefield also influences the occurrence of mediation. I test this argument by looking at low-intensity conflicts in Africa from 1997 to 2004 using data on mediation in low-intensity conflicts and battle-level civil conflict events. The analysis highlights the important effect of battlefield outcomes and locations upon the occurrence of mediation in low-intensity conflicts.
BapatN. 2005. “Insurgency and the Opening of Peace Processes.” Journal of Peace Research42 (6): 699–717.
2.
BeardsleyK.2011. The Mediation Dilemma. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
3.
BercovitchJ.AnagnosonJ. T.WilleD. L.. 1991. “Some Conceptual Issues and Empirical Trends in the Study of Successful Mediation in International Relations.”Journal of Peace Research28:7–17.
4.
BuhaugH. 2010. “Dude, Where’s My Conflict? LSG, Relative Strength, and the Location of Civil War.” Conflict Management and Peace Science27 (2): 107–28.
5.
BuhaugH.GatesS.LujalaP.. 2009. “Geography, Rebel Capability, and the Duration of Civil Conflict.” Journal of Conflict Resolution53 (4): 544–69.
6.
CrescenziM.KaderaK.MitchellS.ThyneC.. 2011. “A Supply Side Theory of Third Party Conflict Management.”International Studies Quarterly55 (4): 1069–94.
7.
CunninghamD.GleditschK.SalehyanI.. 2009. “It Takes Two: A Dyadic Analysis of Civil War Duration and Outcome.” Journal of Conflict Resolution53 (4): 570–97.
8.
DeRouenK.SobekD.. 2004. “The Dynamics of Civil War Duration and Outcome.” Journal of Peace Research41 (3): 303–20.
9.
FearonJ. D.1995. “Rationalist Explanations for War.”International Organization49 (3): 379–414.
10.
FearonJ. D.2004. “Why Do Some Civil Wars Last So Much Longer than Others?”Journal of Peace Research41 (3): 275–301.
11.
FearonJ. D.2008. “Economic Development, Insurgency, and Civil War.” In Institutions and Economic Performance, edited by HelpmanElhanan, 292–328. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
FearonJ. D.LaitinD. D.. 2003. “Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War.”American Political Science Review97 (1): 75–90.
13.
FilsonD.WernerS.. 2002. “A Bargaining Model of War and Peace: Anticipating the Onset, Duration, and Outcome of War.”American Journal of Political Science46 (4): 819–37.
14.
FilsonD.WernerS.. 2004. “Bargaining and Fighting: The Impact of Regime Type on War Onset, Duration, and Outcomes.”American Journal of Political Science48 (2): 296–313.
15.
GartnerS.BercovitchJ.. 2006. “Overcoming Obstacles to Peace: The Contribution of Mediation to Short-lived Conflict Settlements.”International Studies Quarterly50 (4): 819–40.
16.
GleditschK. S.2002. “Expanded Trade and GDP Data.”Journal of Conflict Resolution46 (5): 712–24.
17.
GleditschN.WallensteenP.ErikssonM.SollenbergM.StrandH.. 2002. “Armed Conflict 1946-2001: A New Dataset.”Journal of Peace Research39 (5): 615–37.
18.
GoemansH.2000. War and Punishment: The Causes of War Termination and the First World War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
GreigJ. M.DiehlP.. 2006. “Softening Up: Making Conflicts More Amenable to Diplomacy.”International Interactions32 (4): 355–84.
20.
GreigJ. M.DiehlP.. 2012. International Mediation. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
21.
GreigJ. M.ReganP. M.. 2008. “When Do They Say Yes? An Analysis of the Willingness to Offer and Accept Mediation in Civil Wars.”International Studies Quarterly52 (4): 759–81.
IsacsonA.RodriquezJ.. 2009. “Origins, Evolution, and Lessons of the Colombian Peace Movement.” In Colombia: Building Peace in a Time of War, edited by BouvierVirginia M., 19–38. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
24.
KelmanH. C. 1997. “Some Determinants of the Oslo Breakthrough.” International Negotiation2 (2): 183–94.
25.
KissingerH.1968. “The Vietnam Negotiations.”Foreign Affairs47:211–34.
26.
KyddA.2003. “Which Side Are You on? Bias, Credibility, and Mediation.”American Journal of Political Science47 (4): 597–611.
27.
LacinaB.GleditschN. P.. 2005. “Monitoring Trends in Global Combat: A New Dataset of Battle Deaths.”European Journal of Population/Revue Europeenne De Demographie21 (2): 145–66.
28.
MarshallM. G.JaggersK.. 2002. “Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800-2002.” Dataset Users’ Manual, Center for International Development and Conflict Management, University of Maryland, College Park.
29.
MasonT. D.FettP. J.. 1996. “How Civil Wars End: A Rational Choice Approach.”Journal of Conflict Resolution40 (4): 546–68.
30.
MasonT. D.WeingartenJ. P.FettP. J.. 1999. “Win, Lose, or Draw: Predicting the Outcome of Civil Wars.” Political Research Quarterly52 (2) (June): 239–68.
31.
MelanderE.MollerF.ObergM.. 2009. “Managing Intrastate Low-intensity Armed Conflict 1993-2004: A New Dataset.” International Interactions35 (1): 58–85.
32.
MelinM.SvenssonI.. 2009. “Incentives for Talking: Accepting Mediation in International and Civil Wars.” International Interactions35 (3): 249–71.
33.
NasiC.2009. “Colombia’s Peace Processes (1982-2002).” In Colombia: Building Peace in a Time of War, edited by BouvierVirginia M., 39–64. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.
34.
PetterssonT.2011. “Pillars of Strength—External Support to Warring Parties.” In States in Armed Conflict 2010, edited by PetterssonTheréseThemnérLotta, 41–60. Uppsala, Sweden: Universitetstryckeriet.
35.
PevehouseJ.NordstromT.WarnkeK.. 2004. “The COW-2 International Organizations Dataset Version 2.0.”Conflict Management and Peace Science21 (2): 101–19.
PowellJ.ThyneC.. 2011. “Global Instances of Coups from 1950 to 2010: A New Dataset.”Journal of Peace Research48 (2): 249–59.
38.
PowellR.2004. “Bargaining and Learning While Fighting.”American Journal of Political Science48 (2): 344–61.
39.
PrincenT.1992. Intermediaries in International Conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40.
RaleighC.LinkeA.HegreH.KarlsenJ.. 2010. “Introducing ACLED: An Armed Conflict Location and Event Dataset: Special Data Feature.” Journal of Peace Research47 (5): 651–60.
41.
ReganP. M.2002. “Third-party Interventions and the Duration of Intrastate Conflicts.”Journal of Conflict Resolution46 (1): 55–73.
42.
ReganP. M.FrankR. W.AydinA.. 2009. “Diplomatic Interventions and Civil War: A New Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research46 (1): 135–46.
43.
ReganP. M.StamA. C.. 2000. “In the Nick of Time: Conflict Management, Mediation Timing, and the Duration of Interstate Disputes.”International Studies Quarterly44 (2): 239–60.
44.
ReiterD.2003. “Exploring the Bargaining Model of War.”Perspectives on Politics1 (1): 27–43.
45.
RichmondO.1998. “Devious Objectives and the Disputants’ View of International Mediation: A Theoretical Framework.” Journal of Peace Research35 (6): 707–22.
46.
SlantchevB. L.2004. “How Initiators End their Wars: The Duration of Warfare and the Terms of Peace.”American Journal of Political Science48 (4): 813–29.
47.
SteinJ. 1996. “Image Identity and Conflict Resolution.”In Managing Global Chaos: Sources of and Responses to International Conflict, edited by Chester A. Crocker, Fen Osler Hampson, and Pamela R. Aall, 93–101. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.
48.
StanleyE. A.SawyerJ. P.. 2009. “The Equifinality of War Termination: Multiple Paths to Ending War.”Journal of Conflict Resolution53 (5): 651–76.
SvenssonI.2007. “Bargaining, Bias and Peace Brokers: How Rebels Commit to Peace.”Journal of Peace Research44 (2): 177–94.
51.
SvenssonI. 2009. “Who Brings Which Peace? Neutral versus Biased Mediation and Institutional Peace Arrangements in Civil Wars.” Journal of Conflict Resolution53 (3): 446–69.
52.
ToftM.2003. The Geography of Ethnic Violence: Identity, Interests, and the Indivisibility of Territory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
53.
ToftM. 2006. “Issue Indivisibility and Time Horizons as Rationalist Explanations for War.” Security Studies15 (1): 34–69.
54.
WagnerR.2000. “Bargaining and War.”American Journal of Political Science44 (3): 469–84.
55.
WalterB.2002. Committing to Peace: The Successful Settlement of Civil Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
56.
WalterB.2006. “Building Reputation: Why Governments Fight Some Separatists but Not Others.”American Journal of Political Science50 (2): 313–30.
57.
WernerS. 1998. “Negotiating the Terms of Settlement: War Aims and Bargaining Leverage.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution42 (3): 321–43.
58.
ZartmanI. W.1995. Elusive Peace: Negotiating an End to Civil Wars. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
59.
ZubekJ. M.PruittD. G.PeirceR. S.McGillicuddyN. B.SynaH.. 1992. “Disputant and Mediator Behaviors Affecting Short-term Success in Mediation.” Journal of Conflict Resolution36 (3): 546–72.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
