Are Lives a Substitute for Livelihoods? Terrorism,Security,and US Bilateral Imports

Abstract

In this article, we assess the impact of counterterrorism measures on trade. Our work brings three value addition to the literature: (1) it develops a simple theory to emphasize the endogeneity between terrorism acts, counterterrorism measures, and trade; (2) it delivers an original strategy to identify empirically the effect of counterterrorism security measures on trade flows (using third country incidents); and (3) it uses a new data set on business visas issued by the United States to test further the hypothesis that terrorism is affecting trade through the security channel. Our results suggest that counterterrorism security measures matter for US imports. The level of the impact is up to three times higher when the acts result in a relatively high number of victims, when the products are sensitive to shipping time, or when they ask for networks and business people mobility in order to be sold.

Keywords

terrorism trade security

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alesina

Devleeschauwer

Easterly

Kurlat

. 2003. “Fractionalization.” Journal of Economic Growth 8 (2): 155–94.

Anderson

2008. “Terrorism Trade and Public Policy.” Boston College Working Paper, Boston, MA.

Anderson

Marcouiller

. 1997. “Trade and Security, i: Anarchy.” NBER Working Paper No. 6223.

Anderson

Marcouiller

. 2002. “Insecurity and the Pattern of Trade: An Empirical Investigaton.” Review of Economics and Statistics 84:345–52.

Archick

2005. “US-EU Cooperation against Terrorism.” CRS Report for Congress.

Blomberg

Hess

. 2006. “How Much Does Violence Tax Trade.” Review of Economics and Statistics 88 (4): 599–612.

Blomberg

Hess

. 2008. “The Lexus and the Olive Branch: Globalization, Democratization, and Terrorism.” In The Lexus and the Olive Branch: Globalization, Democratisation and Terrorism, edited by Keefer

Loayza

, 116–47. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Feenstra

Lipsey

. 2005. “World Trade Flows: 1962-2000.” NBER Working Papers No.11040.

Frey

Luechinger

Stutzer

. 2007. “Calculating Tragedy: Assessing the Costs of Terrorism.” Journal of Economic Survey 21 (1): 1–24.

10.

Glick

Taylor

. 2005. “Collateral Damage: Trade Disruption and the Economic Impact of War.” NBER Working Paper 11565.

11.

Hummels

2001. “Time as a Trade Barrier,” GTAP Working Papers 1152, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University.

12.

Krueger

Laitin

2008. “Kto Kogo?: A Cross Country Study of the Origins and Targets of Terrorism”. In Terrorism, Economic Development, and Political Openness, edited by Keefer

Loayza

, 148–173. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Universty Press.

13.

Schaub

. 2004. “Economic Globalization and Transnational Terrorism.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 48 (2): 230–598.

14.

Martin

Mayer

Thoenig

. 2005. “Make Trade not War?” CEPR Working Paper 5218.

15.

Martin

Mayer

Toenig

. 2008a. “Civil Wars and International Trade.” Journal of the European Economic Association 6 (2–3): 541–50.

16.

Martin

Mayer

Toenig

. 2008b. “Make Trade not War?” Review of Economic Studies 75 (3): 865–900.

17.

Mickolus

Sandler

Murdock

Flemming

. 2004. International Terrorism Attributes of Terrorism Events, Iterate: 1968-2003. Dunn Loring, VA: Vinyard Software.

18.

Mirza

Verdier

. 2006. “Are Lives a Substitute for Livelihoods: Terrorism, Security and US Bilateral Imports.” CEPR Working Paper No. 6173.

19.

Mirza

Verdier

. 2008. “International Trade, Security and Transnational Terrorism: Theory and a Survey of Empirics.” Journal of Comparative Economics 36 (2): 179–94.

20.

Rauch

1996. “Networks Versus Market in International Trade.” NBER Working Paper 5617.

21.

Sandler

Enders

. 2004. “An Economic Perspective on Transnational Terrorism.” European Journal of Political Economy 20:301–16.

22.

Santos Silva

Tenreyro

. 2006. “The Log of Gravity.” Review of Economics and Statistics 88 (4): 641–58.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.15 MB

0.00 MB