This article studies the effects of human rights international nongovernmental organizations (INGOs) on domestic antigovernment protest. Unlike mainstream scholarship, the authors argue that human rights INGOs are not simply the magic bullet in orchestrating nonviolent protests; different types of human rights INGO activity have varying effects on protest. Moreover, some human rights INGO activities may lead to higher levels of violent protest. The empirical tests use new data on the activities of over 400 human rights INGOs and domestic nonviolent and violent protest globally from 1991 to 2004. The authors find that increases in human rights INGO activities reflecting a greater commitment to the domestic population are associated with higher levels of both violent and nonviolent protest.
Allen, Susan Hannah.2008. The domestic political costs of economic sanctions . Journal of Conflict Resolution52 (6): 916-44.
2.
Andrews, Kenneth T., and Michael Biggs.2006. The dynamics of protest diffusion: Movement organizations, social networks, and news media in the 1960 sit-ins . American Sociological Review71 (October): 752-77.
3.
An-Na’im, Abudullahi.2002. Toward a more people-centered human rights movement . In Human rights-from the frontiers of research, ed. Diana Amneus and Goran Gunner , 33-8. Uppsala, Sweden: Iustus Fola.
4.
Banks, Arthur S.2008. Cross-national time-series data archive. Databanks International . Jerusalem, Israel; see http://www.databanksinternational.com.
5.
Bartley, Tim.2007. How foundations shape social movements: the construction of an organizational field and the rise of forest certification. Social Problems54 (3): 229-55.
6.
Berkovitch, Nitza, and Neve Gordon.2008. The political economy of transnational regimes: The case of human rights. International Studies Quarterly52:881-904.
7.
Bhasin, Tavishi.2008. Democracy and dissent: explaining protest and state response. Ph.D. diss., Emory University.
8.
Bob, Clifford.2005. The marketing of rebellion: insurgents, media, and international activism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Boli, John, and George M. Thomas .1999. INGOs and the organization of world culture. In Constructing World culture: International non-governmental organizations since 1875, ed. John Boli and George M. Thomas, 13-49. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
10.
Bond, D., J. Bond, C. Oh, J.C. Jenkins, and C.L. Taylor.2003. Integrated data for events analysis (IDEA): An event typology for automated events data development. Journal of Peace Research40 (6): 733.
11.
Carey, Sabine S.2006. The dynamic relationship between protest and repression . Political Research Quarterly. 26(1): 1-11.
12.
Carpenter, R. Charli.2007. Setting the advocacy agenda: theorizing issue emergence and nonemergence in transnational advocacy networks. International Studies Quarterly51 (1): 99-120.
13.
Cingranelli, David L., and David L. Richards .1999. Respect for human rights after the end of the Cold War. Journal of Peace Research36 (5): 511-34.
14.
Cingranelli, David L. and David L. Richards.2008. The Cingranelli-Richards human rights dataset. http://www.humanrightsdata.org (accessed: October 1, 2008).
15.
Clark, Cindy, Ellen Sprenger, and Lisa VeneKlasen .2006. Where is the money for women’s rights. http://awid.org/eng/About-AWID/AWID-Initiatives/Where-is-the-Money-for-Women-s-Rights (accesssed April 10, 2007).
16.
Clarke, G.1998. The politics of NGOs in South-East Asia: participation and protest in the Philippines. London: Routledge.
17.
Cooley, Alexander, and James Ron.2002. The NGO scramble: Organizational insecurity and the political economy of transnational action. International Security27 (1): 3-39.
18.
Earl, Jennifer, Andrew Martin, John D. McCarthy, and Sarah A. Soule .2004. The use of newspaper data in the study of collective action. Annual Review of Sociology30:65-80.
19.
Elbadawi, I., and N. Sambanis.2002. How much war will we see? Explaining the prevalence of civil war. Journal of Conflict Resolution46 (3): 307.
20.
Fearon, James.1995. Rationalist explanations of war. International Organization49 (3): 379-414.
21.
Grant, Ruth, and Robert O. Keohane .2005. Accountability and abuses in world politics. American Political Science Review99 (1): 29-43.
22.
Gupta, D.K., H. Singh, and T. Sprague.1993. Government coercion of dissidents: Deterrence or provocation?Journal of Conflict Resolution37 (2): 301.
23.
Hafner-Burton, Emilie.2008. Sticks and stones: Naming and shaming the human rights enforcement problem. International Organization62 (4): 689-716.
24.
Haines, Herbert H.1984. Black radicalization and the funding of civil rights: 1957-1970. Social Problems32 (1): 31-43.
25.
Haines, Herbert H.2006. Dangerous issues and public identities: The negotiation of controversy in two movement organizations. Sociological Inquiry76 (2): 231-63.
26.
Hopgood, Stephen.2006. Keepers of the flame: Understanding Amnesty International . Cornell University Press.
27.
Inclan, Maria de la Luz.2009. Repressive threats, procedural concessions, and the Zapatista cycle of protests, 1994-2003. Journal of Conflict Resolution53(5): 794-819.
28.
Jenkins, J. Craig.1983. Resource mobilization theory and the study of social movements . Annual Review of Sociology9:527-53.
29.
Iqbal, Zaryab, and Christopher Zorn .2008. The political consequences of assassination. Journal on Conflict Resolution52 (3): 385-400.
30.
Keck, Margaret E., and Kathryn Sikkink .1998. Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
31.
Kern, Holger Lutz.2008. Foreign media and protest diffusion in authoritarian regimes: The case of the 1989 East German Revolution. Working Paper Submitted to The Society for Political Methodology. http://polmeth.wustl.edu/workingpapers.php (accessed December 27, 2009).
32.
King, Gary.1989. Variance specification in event count models: from restrictive assumptions to a generalized estimator. American Journal of Political Science33 (3): 762-84.
33.
King, Gary, and Will Lowe.2003. An Analysis automated information extraction tool for international conflict data with performance as good as human coders: A rare events evaluation design. International Organization57 (617-642): 3.
34.
Klees, Steven J.1998. NGOs: Progressive force or neo-liberal tool?Current Issues in Comparative Education1 (1): 49-54.
35.
Koopmans, Ruud, and Susan Olzak.2004. Discursive opportunities and the evolution of right-wing violence in Germany. American Journal of Sociology110:198-230.
36.
Korey, William.1998. NGOs and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights . New York: St. Martin’s Press.
37.
Landman, Todd.2005. Protecting human rights: A comparative study. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
38.
Marshall, Monty, and Keith Jaggers.2007. Polity IV project. Center for Systemic Peace. http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm
39.
McCarthy, John D., and Mayer N. Zald .1977. Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology82 (6): 1212.
40.
McCormick, John.1999. The role of environmental NGOs in international regimes . In The global environment: Institutions, law, and policy , ed. Norman J. Vig and Regina S. Axelrod.London: Earthscan.
41.
Murdie, Amanda.2009. Signals without borders: The conditional impact of INGOs . Ph.D. diss., Emory University.
42.
Murdie, Amanda and David R. Davis.2008. Shaming, framing, and bargaining for change: the conditional impact of human rights INGOs on human rights practices . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, San Francisco, March.
43.
Myers, Daniel J.2000. The diffusion of collective violence: infectiousness, susceptibility, and mass media networks. American Journal of Sociology106:173-208.
44.
Nam, Taehyun.2006. What you use matters: coding protest data. PS: Political Science and Politics39:281-7.
45.
Neumayer, Eric.2005. Do international human rights treaties improve respect for human rights?Journal of Conflict Resolution49 (6): 925.
46.
Okafor, Obiora Chinedu.2006. Legitimizing human rights NGOs: Lessons from Nigeria . Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press .
47.
Oliver, Pamela E., and Daniel J. Myers .2002. Networks, diffusion, and cycles of collective action. In Social movement analysis: The network perspective, ed. M. Diani and D. McAdam.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
48.
Olzak, Susan.2006. The global dynamics of racial and ethnic mobilization . Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
49.
Olzak, Susan, and Kiyoteru Tsutsui .1998. Status in the world system and ethnic mobilization. Journal of Conflict Resolution42 (6):691-720.
50.
Poe, Steven, and C. Neal Tate .1994. Repression of human rights to personal integrity in the 1980s: A global analysis. American Political Science Review88 (4): 853-72.
51.
Risse, Thomas, and Steven C. Ropp.1999. International human rights norms and domestic change. In The power of human rights: International norms and domestic change, ed. Thomas Risse , Steven Ropp, and Kathryn Sikkink.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
52.
Schatzman, Christina.2005. Political challenge in Latin America: Rebellion and collective protest in an era of democratization. Journal of Peace Research42 (3): 291-310.
53.
Schepers, D.H.2006. The impact of NGO network conflict on the corporate social responsibility strategies of multinational corporations. Business and Society45 (3): 282.
54.
Schmitz, Hans Peter.2002. From lobbying to shaming: The evolution of human rights activism Since the 1940s. Paper presented for the International Studies Association Meeting2002.
55.
Schock, Kurt.1996. A conjunctural model of political conflict: The impact of political opportunities on the relationship between economic inequality and violent political conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution40 (1): 98-133.
56.
Schock, Kurt.2005. Unarmed insurrections: People power movements in nondemocracies . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
57.
Smith, Jackie, and Dawn Wiest.2005. The uneven geography of global civil society: National and global influences on transnational association. Social Forces84 (2): 621.
58.
Stephan, Maria, and Erica Chenoweth .2008. Why civil resistance works . International Security33 (1): 7-44.
59.
Sundstrom, Lisa MacIntosh.2006. Funding civil society: Foreign assistance and NGO development in Russia. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
60.
Taylor, Rupert.2002. South Africa: The role of peace and conflict resolution organizations in the struggle against apartheid. In Mobilizing for peace: Conflict resolution in Northern Ireland, Israel/Palestine, and South Africa, ed. Benjamin Gidron, Stanley Katz, and Yeheskel Hasenfeld, 69-93. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
61.
Tomz, Michael, Jason Wittenberg, and Gary King.2003. CLARIFY: Software for interpreting and presenting statistical results. Journal of Statistical Software8 (1): 1-30.
62.
Tsutsui, Kiyoteru.2004. Global civil society and ethnic social movements in the contemporary world. Sociological Forum19 (1): 63-87.
63.
Tsutsui, Kiyoteru, and Christine M. Wotipka .2004. Global civil society and the international human rights movement: Citizen participation in human rights international nongovernmental organizations. Social Forces83 (2): 587-620.
64.
Ucdp/Prio.2008. UCDP/PRIO armed conflict program. http://www.prio.no/CSCW/Datasets/Armed-Confict/UCDP-PRIO/ (accessed September 30, 2008).
65.
UIA.2008/2009. Yearbook of international organizations. Vol. 1-4. 45 ed. Union of International AssociationsMunich, Germany: De Gruyter.
66.
Wallander, Celeste A.2005. Ukraine’s election: The role of one international NGO. CSIS, REP. March 1. http://www.csis.org (accessed November 15, 2009).
67.
WDI.2008. World development indicators. World Bank. CD-Rom.
68.
Willetts, Peter.2002. What is a non-governmental organization?UNESCO Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems. http://www.staf.city.ac.uk/p.willetts/CS-NTWKS/NGO-ART.HTM (accesssed November 18, 2009).
69.
Wilson, A.2006. Ukraine’s orange revolution, NGOs and the role of the West. Cambridge Review of International Affairs19 (1): 21-32.
70.
Wooldridge, Jeffrey.2002. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
