This study examines the effect of biased versus neutral mediation on the content of peace agreements. The author argues that neutral mediators, who are engaged primarily because of their interest to end the war, will have incentives to hasten the reaching of an agreement to the expense of its quality. By contrast, biased mediators, seeking to protect their protégés, will take care to ensure that there are stipulations in an agreement guaranteeing the interest of “their” side or use their particular access and leverage to make their side agree to costly concessions. Biased mediation processes are therefore more likely than neutral mediation processes to lead to elaborated institutional arrangements that are generally considered conducive to democracy and durable peace, such as power sharing, third-party security guarantees, and justice provisions. Empirical analysis, covering the 1989—2004 period and building on data from 124 peace agreements, supports these claims.
Bass, Gary J.2004. Jus post bellum. Philosophy & Public Affairs32 (4): 384-412.
2.
Beardsley, Kyle.2005. Not all mediators are created equal: Choosing who mediates . Prepared for the 2005 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, September 1-4.
3.
---. 2008. Agreement without peace? International mediation and time inconsistency problems. American Journal of Political Science52 (4): 723-40.
4.
Beck, Nathaniel, Jonathan N. Katz, and Richard Tucker.1998. Taking time seriously in binary time-series-cross-section analysis. American Journal of Political Science42 (4): 1260-88.
5.
Bell, Christine.2003. Peace agreements and human rights. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
6.
Bercovitch, Jacob.2002. Introduction: Putting mediation in context. In Studies in international mediation: Essays in honor of Jeffrey Z. Rubin, ed. Jacob Bercovitch.New York : Palgrave Macmillan.
7.
Buhaug, Halvard.2006. Relative capability and rebel objective in civil war. Journal of Peace Research43 (6): 691-708.
8.
Carnevale, Peter J., and Sharon Arad.1996. Bias and impartiality in international mediation. In Resolving international conflicts: The theory and practice of mediation, ed. Jacob Bercovitch , 39-53. London: Lynne Rienner.
9.
Cornell, Svante E.2002. Autonomy as a source of conflict: Caucasian conflicts in theoretical perspectives. World Politics54 (January): 245-76.
10.
Frei, Daniel.1976. Conditions affecting the effectiveness of international mediation. Papers of the Peace Science Society (International) 26.
11.
Gloppen, Siri.2005. Roads to reconciliation: A conceptual framework. In Roads to reconciliation, ed. Elin Skaar, Siri Gloppen, and Astri Suhrke.Lanham, MD: Lexington.
12.
Greig, Michael J.2005. Stepping into the fray: When do mediators mediate?American Journal of Political Science49 (2): 249-66.
13.
Greig, Michael J., and Patrick M. Regan .2008. When do they say yes? An analysis of the willingness to offer and accept mediation in civil wars. International Studies Quarterly52:759-81.
14.
Gurr, Ted Robert.1993. Minorities at risk: A global view of ethno-political conflicts . Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
15.
Hoddie, Matthew, and Caroline Hartzell .2003a. Civil war settlements and the implementation of military power-sharing arrangements. Journal of Peace Research40 (3): 303-20.
16.
---. 2003b. Institutionalizing peace: Power sharing and post-civil war conflict management. American Journal of Political Science47 (2): 318-32.
17.
---. 2003c. Civil war settlements and the implementation of military power-sharing arrangements. Journal of Peace Research40 (3): 303-20.
18.
---. 2005. Power sharing in peace settlements: Initiating the transition from civil war. In Sustainable peace: Power and democracy after civil wars, ed. Philip G. Roeder and Donald Rothchild.Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell University Press.
19.
Höglund, Kristine, and Isak Svensson.2008. Mediating between tigers and lions: Norwegian peace diplomacy in Sri Lanka's civil war. Contemporary South Asia, forthcoming.
20.
Jarstad, Anna, and Desirée Nilsson .2008. From words to deeds: The implementation of power-sharing pacts in peace accords. Conflict Management and Peace Science25 (3): 206-223.
21.
Jarstad, Anna, and Ralph Sundberg.2007. Peace by pacts: Data on the implementation of peace agreements. In Globalization and challenges to building peace, ed. Ashok Swain, Ramses Amer, and Joakim Öjendal.London: Anthem.
22.
King, Gary, Michael Tomz, and Jason Wittenberg .2000. Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science44 (2): 347-61.
23.
Kressel, Kenneth, Edward A. Frontera, Samuel Forlenza, Frances Butler, and Linda Fish.1994. The settlement-orientation vs. the problem-solving style in custody mediation. Journal of Social Issues50 (1): 67-84.
24.
Kydd, Andrew.2003. Which side are you on? Bias, credibility, and mediation . American Journal of Political Science47 (4): 597-611.
25.
Lake, David A., and Donald Rothchild .2005. Territorial decentralization and civil war settlements. In Sustainable peace: Power and democracy after civil wars, ed. Philip G. Roeder and Donald Rothchild.Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell University Press.
26.
Licklider, Roy.2001. Obstacles to peace settlement. In Turbulent peace: The challenges of managing international conflict, ed. Chester Crocker, Fen Osler Hampson, and Pamela Aall, 697-718. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
27.
Lie, Tove Grete, Helga Malmin Binningsbo, and Scott Gates.2006. Post-conflict justice and sustainable peace. Paper prepared for the PAC Workshop, Nicosia, Cyprus, April 26-29.
28.
Long, William J., and Peter Brecke.2003. War and reconciliation: Reason and emotion in conflict resolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29.
Mason, David T., and Patrick J. Fett .1996. How civil wars end: A rational choice approach. Journal of Conflict Resolution40 (4): 546-68.
30.
Maundi, Mohammed O., I. William Zartman, Gilbert Khadiagala, and Kwaku Nuamah.2006. Getting in: Mediators' entry into the settlement of African conflicts. Washington, DC: United Institute of Peace Press.
31.
Morrison, Stephen J., and Alex de Waal.2005. Can Sudan escape its intractability? In Grasping the nettle: Analyzing cases of intractable conflict , ed. Chester A. Crocker, Fen Osler Hampson, and Pamela Aall, 161-82. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
32.
Nilsson, Desirée, Isak Svensson, and Ralph Sundberg.2006. The terms of peace agreements data (TOPAD) codebook. Uppsala, Sweden: Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University.
33.
Öberg, Magnus.2002. The onset of ethnic war as a bargaining process: Testing a costly signaling model. Vol. Report No. 65. Uppsala, Sweden: Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University .
34.
Pankhurst, Donna.1999. Issues of justice and reconciliation in complex political emergencies: Conceptualising reconciliation, justice and peace. Third World Quarterly20 (1): 239-56.
35.
Pruitt, Dean G., and Sung Hee Kim .2004. Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
36.
Rauchhaus, Robert W.2006. Asymmetric information, mediation, and conflict management . World Politics58:207-41.
37.
Rothchild, Donald, and Philip G. Roeder .2005. Power sharing as an impediment to peace and democracy. In Sustainable peace: Power and democracy after civil wars, ed. Philip G. Roeder and Donald Rothchild.Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell University Press.
38.
Saideman, Stephan M.2002. Overlooking the obvious: Bringing international politics back into ethnic conflict management. International Studies Review4 (3): 63-86.
39.
Savun, Burcu.2008. Information, bias and mediation success. International Studies Quarterly52:25-47.
40.
Schmidt, Holger.2005. When (and why) do brokers have to be honest? Impartiality and the effectiveness of third-party support for negotiated civil war settlements, 1945-1999. Paper prepared for the 63rd Annual National Conference of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, April 7-10.
41.
Shriver, Donald W.2003. Where and when in political life is justice served by forgiveness? In Burying the past: Making peace and doing justice after civil conflict, ed. Nigel Biggar.Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press .
42.
Svensson, Isak.2007. Bargaining, bias and peace brokers: How rebels commit to peace. Journal of Peace Research44 (2): 177-94.
43.
---. 2009. Guaranteeing peace: The credibility of third-party mediators in civil wars. In International conflict mediation: New approaches and findings, ed. Jacob Bercovitch and Scott Sigmund Gartner.London and New York: Routledge .
44.
Toft, Monica Duffy.2004. The geography of ethnic violence: Identity, interests, and the indivisibility of territory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
45.
Touval, Saadia.1975. Biased intermediaries: Theoretical and historical considerations . Jerusalem Journal of International Relations1 (1): 51-69.
46.
---. 1993. Gaining entry to mediation in communal strife. In The internationalization of communal strife, ed. Manus I. Midlarsky.London and New York: Routledge.
47.
Touval, Saadia, and I.W. Zartman.2001. International mediation in the post-Cold War era. In Turbulent peace: The challenges of managing international conflict, ed. Chester Crocker, Fen Osler Hampson, and Pamela Aall, 427-43. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
48.
Ucdp, Uppsala Conflict Data Program. 2005. Uppsala University. http://www.pcr.uu.se/database/index.php.
49.
---. 2006. Definitions. http://www.Pcr.Uu.Se/Database/Definitions_All.Htm (accessed November 2006).
Walter, Barbara F.1997. The critical barrier to civil war settlement. International Organization51 (3): 335-64.
52.
---. 2002. Committing to peace: The successful settlement of civil wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
53.
Zartman, I. William.1995. Dynamics and constraints in negotiations in internal conflicts . In Elusive peace: Negotiating an end to civil wars, ed. I. William Zartman, 3-29. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
54.
---. 2001. Negotiating forward- and backward-looking outcomes. In Peace versus justice: Negotiating forward- and backward-looking outcomes, ed. I. William Zartman and Victor Kremenyuk.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
