The poliheuristic (PH) theory of decision making has made important contributions to our understanding of political decision making but remains silent about certain key aspects of the decision process. Specifically, PH theory contends that leaders screen out politically unacceptable options, but it provides no guidance on (1) the crucial threshold at which leaders reject options as politically unacceptable, (2) whether this threshold varies across leaders and situations, and, (3) if so, which factors shape variation in this threshold. We integrate PH theory with research on political leadership and decision context and derive hypotheses from this modified PH framework. An experimental test reveals that situational context and leadership style affect both (1) the ``noncompensatory threshold'' at which decision makers reject options as politically unacceptable and (2) how much decision makers rely on their constituents' views in making policy choices. We conclude that a modified PH theory incorporating these insights will have enhanced explanatory and predictive power.
Anderson, Paul A.1981. Justifications and precedents as constraints in foreign policy decision-making. American Journal of Political Science25:738-61.
2.
Bales, Robert.1950. Interaction process analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
Beer, Francis A., Alison G. Aylward, Alice F. Healy, and Lyle E. Bourne Jr.2008. What would Arnold do now? Masculine and feminine men and women react to experimental terrorist attacks. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, San Francisco, CA, March.
4.
Blake, Robert R., and Jane S. Mouton.1964. The managerial grid: Key orientations for achieving production through people. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing.
5.
Burris, Val.1992. Race, gender, and the response to war. Paper presented at the Conference on the Political Consequences of War, Washington, DC, February 28.
6.
Byars, Robert S.1972. The task/affect quotient: A technique for measuring orientations of political leaders. Comparative Political Studies5:109-20.
7.
---. 1973. Small-group theory and shifting styles of political leadership . Comparative Political Studies5:443-69.
8.
Caprioli, Mary.1999. The myth of women's pacifism. In Taking sides: Clashing views on controversial issues in world politics, ed. John T. Rourke, 326-32. Guilford, CT : McGraw-Hill/Dushkin.
9.
Conover, Pamela Johnston, and Virginia Sapiro .1993. Gender, feminist consciousness, and war. American Journal of Political Science37:1079-99.
10.
Dixon, William.1994. Democracy and the peaceful settlement of international conflict. American Political Science Review88:14-32.
11.
Driver, Michael J.1977. Individual differences as determinants of aggression in the inter-nation simulation. In A psychological examination of political leaders, ed. M. Hermann, 337-53. New York: Free Press.
12.
Dyson, Stephen Benedict.2007. Alliances, domestic politics, and leader psychology: Why did Britain stay out of Vietnam and go into Iraq?Political Psychology28:647-66.
13.
Elman, Miriam Fendius, ed. 1997. Paths to peace. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14.
Fearon, James D.1994. Domestic political audiences and the escalation of international disputes. American Political Science Review88:577-92.
15.
Fiedler, Fred E.1967. A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
16.
Fodor, Eugene M., and Terry Smith.1982. The power motive as an influence on group decision making . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology42:178-85.
17.
Foyle, Douglas C.1999. Counting the public in: Presidents, public opinion, and foreign policy. New York: Columbia University Press.
18.
George, Alexander.1979. The causal nexus between cognitive beliefs and decision-making behavior: The ``operational code.'' In Psychological models in international politics, ed. L. S. Falkowski , pp. 95-124. Boulder, CO: Westview .
19.
Goldstein, Joshua S.2001. War and gender: How gender shapes the war system and vice versa. Cambridge. UK: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Green, Melanie C., Penny S. Visser, and Philip E. Tetlock .2000. Coping with accountability cross-pressures: Low-effort evasive tactics and high-effort quests for complex compromises. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin26:1380-91.
21.
Hagan, Joe.1994. Domestic political systems and war proneness. Mershon International Studies Review38:183-207.
22.
Hermann, Margaret G.1984. Personality and foreign policy decision making: A study of 53 heads of government. In Foreign policy decision making: Perceptions, cognition, and artificial intelligence, ed. D. A. Sylvan and S. Chan, 53-80. New York: Praeger.
23.
---. 1999. Assessing leadership style: A trait analysis. http://www.socialscienceautomation.com (accessed April 13, 2008).
24.
Hermann, Margaret G., and Charles Kegley Jr.1995. Rethinking democracy and international peace: Perspectives from political psychology. International Studies Quarterly39:511-33.
25.
Herrmann, Richard K., and Jonathan W. Keller .2004. Beliefs, values and strategic choice: U.S. leaders' decisions to engage, contain and use force in an era of globalization. Journal of Politics66:557-80.
26.
Hersey, Paul, and Kenneth H. Blanchard .1982. Management of organizational behavior: Utilizing human resources. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
27.
Holsti, Ole R.1962. The belief system and national images: John Foster Dulles and the Soviet Union. PhD diss., Stanford University , California.
28.
---. 1970. The ``operational code'' approach to the study of political leaders: John Foster Dulles' philosophical and instrumental beliefs . Canadian Journal of Political Science3:123-57.
29.
Huth, Paul K., and Todd L. Allee .2002. Domestic political accountability and the escalation and settlement of international disputes. Journal of Conflict Resolution46:754-90.
30.
Ireland, Michael J., and Scott Sigmund Gartner .2001. Time to fight: Government type and conflict initiation in parliamentary systems. Journal of Conflict Resolution45:547-68.
31.
Keller, Jonathan W.2005a. Leadership style, regime type, and foreign policy crisis behavior: A contingent monadic peace?International Studies Quarterly49:205-31.
32.
---. 2005b. Constraint respecters, constraint challengers, and crisis decision making in democracies: A case study analysis of Kennedy vs. Reagan . Political Psychology26:835-67.
33.
Koch, Michael, and Scott Sigmund Gartner .2005. Casualties and constituencies: Democratic accountability, electoral institutions, and costly conflicts. Journal of Conflict Resolution49:874-94.
34.
Leblang, David, and Steve Chan.2003. Explaining wars fought by established democracies: Do institutional constraints matter? Political Research Quarterly56:385-400.
35.
Leeds, Brett Ashley.1999. Domestic political institutions, credible commitments, and international cooperation. American Journal of Political Science43:979-1002.
36.
Lennox, Richard D., and Raymond N. Wolfe .1984. Revision of the self-monitoring scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology46:1349-64.
37.
Lerner, Jennifer S., Julie H. Goldberg, and Philip E. Tetlock .1998. Sober second thought: The effects of accountability, anger, and authoritarianism on attributions of responsibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin24:563-74.
38.
Lerner, Jennifer S., and Philip E. Tetlock .1999. Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin125:255-75.
39.
Likert, Rensis.1967. The human organization. New York: McGraw-Hill.
40.
McLellan, David.1976. Dean Acheson: The State Department years. New York: Dodd, Mead & Co.
41.
McClelland, Douglas.1961. The achieving society. Princeton, NJ : D. Van Nostrand.
42.
---. 1975. Power: The inner experience. New York : Irvington.
43.
McGregor, Douglas.1960. The human side of enterprise. New York : McGraw-Hill.
44.
Melander, Erik.2005. Gender equality and intrastate armed conflict. International Studies Quarterly49:695-14.
45.
Miller, Patrice M., Dorothy L. Danaher, and David Forbes.1986. Sex-related strategies for coping with interpersonal conflict in children aged five to seven. Developmental Psychology22:543-48.
46.
Mintz, Alex.1993. The decision to attack Iraq: A noncompensatory theory of decision making. Journal of Conflict Resolution37:595-618.
47.
---. 2003. Theory development and integration in foreign policy analysis: Directions for future research. In Integrating cognitive and rational theories of foreign policy decision making, ed. Alex Mintz, pp. 159-68. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
48.
---. 2004a. How do leaders make decisions? A poliheuristic perspective . Journal of Conflict Resolution48:3-13.
49.
---. 2004b. Foreign policy decision making in familiar and unfamiliar settings: An experimental study of high-ranking military officers. Journal of Conflict Resolution48:91-104.
50.
---. 2005. Applied decision analysis: Utilizing poliheuristic theory to explain and predict foreign policy and national security decisions. International Studies Perspectives6:94-98.
51.
Mintz, Alex, and Nehemia Geva.1997. The poliheuristic theory of foreign policy decision making. In Decision making on war and peace: The cognitive-rational debate, ed. Nehemia Geva and Alex Mintz, pp. 88-101. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
52.
Mintz, Alex, Nehemia Geva, Steven Redd, and Amy Carnes.1997. The effect of dynamic and static choice sets on political decision making: An analysis using the decision board platform . American Political Science Review91:533-66.
53.
Morgan, T. Clifton, and Sally Campbell.1991. Domestic structure, decisional constraints, and war. Journal of Conflict Resolution35:187-211.
54.
Ostrom, Charles W., Jr. and Brian L. Job.1986. The president and the political use of force. American Political Science Review80:541-66.
55.
Preston, Thomas.2001. The president and his inner circle: Leadership style and the advisory process in foreign affairs. New York: Columbia University Press.
56.
Preston, Thomas, and Paul `t Hart. 1999. Understanding and evaluating bureaucratic politics: The nexus between political leaders and advisory systems. Political Psychology20:49-98.
57.
Prins, Brandon C., and Christopher Sprecher .1999. Institutional constraints, political opposition, and interstate dispute escalation: Evidence from parliamentary systems, 1946-89. Journal of Peace Research36:271-87.
58.
Redd, Steven.2005. The influence of advisers and decision strategies on foreign policy choices: President Clinton's decision to use force in Kosovo . International Studies Perspectives6:129-50.
59.
Reiter, Dan, and Erik R. Tillman .2002. Public, legislative, and executive constraints on the democratic initiation of conflicts. Journal of Politics64:810-26.
60.
Renshon, Stanley A.2003. The world according to George W. Bush: Good judgment or cowboy politics? In Good judgment in foreign policy: Theory and application, ed. S. A. Renshon and D. W. Larson, 271-308. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
61.
Rotter, Julian B.1966. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs80:1-28.
62.
---. 1967. A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust . Journal of Personality35:651-65.
63.
---. 1971. Generalized expectancies of interpersonal trust . American Psychologist26:443-52.
64.
Ruddick, Sara.1989. Maternal thinking: Towards a politics of peace . Boston, MA: Beacon.
65.
Russett, Bruce.1993. Grasping the democratic peace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
66.
Sathasivam, Kanishkan.2003. No other choice: Pakistan's decision to test the bomb . In Integrating cognitive and rational theories of foreign policy decision making, ed. Alex Mintz, pp. 55-76. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
67.
Snyder, Mark.1974. Self-monitoring of expressive behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology30:526-37.
68.
Stern, Eric.2004. Contextualizing and critiquing the poliheuristic theory . Journal of Conflict Resolution48:105-26.
69.
Stoessinger, John G.1979. Crusaders and pragmatists: Movers of modern American foreign policy. New York: W. W. Norton.
70.
Stuart, Douglas, and Harvey Starr.1982. The inherent bad faith model reconsidered: Dulles, Kennedy, and Kissinger. Political Psychology3:1-33.
71.
Tetlock, Philip E., and Jae D. Kim .1987. Accountability and judgment processes in a personality prediction task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology52:700-9.
72.
Tucker, Robert C.1965. The dictator and totalitarianism. World Politics17:555-83.
73.
Walker, Steve.1995. Psychodynamic processes and framing effects in foreign policy decision-making: Woodrow Wilson's operational code. Political Psychology16:697-717.
74.
Wilkenfeld, Jonathan.1975. A time series perspective on conflict in the Middle East . In Sage international yearbook of foreign policy studies , ed. Patrick J. McGowan, 177-212. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
75.
---. 1991. Trigger-response transitions in foreign policy crises, 1929-1985. Journal of Conflict Resolution35:143-69.
76.
Winter, David G.1973. The power motive. New York: Free Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
