The poliheuristic theory of decision (PH) is placed in its proper historical context through a brief diachronic overview of the evolution of the foreign policy decision-making tradition from Snyder, Bruck, and Sapin to the present. The PH program is examined and contextualized in synchronic fashion via juxtaposition with three parallel lines of theoretical and empirical foreign policy decision-making research: cognitive institutionalism, problem representation, and decision units. These approaches are found to exhibit different methodological strengths and weaknesses and to emphasize different aspects of the decision-making process. Substantial complementarities exist, suggesting that the potential for synergy and cross-fertilization is great.
Abelson, R. P. , and A. Levi. 1985. Decision making and decision theory. In Handbook of social psychology, 3d ed., edited by G. Lindzey and E. Aronson, 231-309. New York: Random House.
2.
Allison, G. T.1971. Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis. Boston: Little, Brown.
3.
Allison, G. T. , and P. Zelikow. 1999. Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis. 2d ed.New York: Longman.
4.
Anderson, P. A.1987. What do foreign policy makers do when they make a foreign policy decision? The implications for the comparative study of foreign policy. In New directions in the study of foreign policy, edited by C. F. Hermann, C. W. Kegley, and J. N. Rosenau, 285-308. Boston: Allen & Unwin.
5.
Baldwin, D.1993. Neorealism and neoliberalism: The contemporary debate. New York: Columbia University Press.
6.
Bass, B. M.1997. Transformational leadership: Industrial, military, and educational impact. Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum.
7.
Beasley, R. , J. Kaarbo, C. F. Hermann, and M. Hermann2001. People and processes in foreign policymaking. International Studies Review3 (2): 217-250.
8.
Bendor, J. , and T. Hammond. 1992. Rethinking Allison’s models. American Political Science Review86:301-322.
9.
Billings, R. , and C. F. Hermann. 1998. Problem identification in sequential policy decision making: The rerepresentation of problems. In Problem representation in foreign policy decision making, edited by D. Sylvan and J. Voss. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Bobrow, D. B.1989. Stories remembered and forgotten. Journal of Conflict Resolution33 (2): 187-209.
11.
Bovens, M. , and P. ‘t Hart. 1996. Understanding policy fiascoes. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
12.
Brändström, A. , F. Bynander, and P. ‘t Hart. Governing by looking back: Historical Analogies and Crisis Management. Public Administration82 (forthcoming).
13.
Brändström, A. , and S. Kuipers. 2003. From “normal incidents” to political crises: Understanding the selective politicization of policy failures. Government and Opposition38 (3): 279-305.
14.
Brecher, M.1974. The foreign policy system of Israel. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15.
Brecher, M.1993. Crises: In world politics theory and reality. New York: Pergamon.
16.
Brecher, M.1999. International studies in the 20th century and beyond: Flawed dichotomies, synthesis, cumulation. International Studies Quarterly43 (2): 213-264.
17.
Brecher, M. , B. Steinburg, and J. Stein. 1969. A framework for research on foreign policy behavior. Journal of Conflict Resolution13:75-101.
18.
Brecher, M. , and J. Wilkenfeld. 1997. A study of crisis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
19.
Burnstein, E. , and M. Berbaum. 1983. Stages in group decision making: The decomposition of historical narratives. Political Psychology4:531-561.
20.
Byman, D. L. , and K. M. Pollack. 2001. Let us now praise great men: Bringing the statesman back in. International Security25 (Spring): 107-146.
21.
Bynander, F.1998. The 1982 Hårsfjärden submarine hunt: A decision-making analysis. Cooperation and Conflict33 (4): 367-407.
22.
Callahan, P. , L. Brady, and M. G. Hermann. 1982. Describing foreign policy behavior. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
23.
Carlsnaes, W.1986. Ideology and foreign policy. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
24.
Carlsnaes, W.1992. The agency-structure problem in foreign policy analysis. International Studies Quarterly36:245-270.
25.
Carlsnaes, W.2002. Handbook of international relations. London: Sage.
26.
Chaiken, S. , and Y. Trope, eds. 1999. Dual process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford.
27.
Charlick-Payley, T. , and D. Sylvan. 2000. The use and evolution of stories as a mode of problem representation: Soviet and French officers face the loss of empire. Political Psychology21 (4): 697-728.
28.
Cottam, R.1977. Foreign policy motivation. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
29.
Crawfoord, N.2000. The passion of world politics: Propositions on emotion. International Security24 (4): 116-156.
30.
Dawes, R.1998. Behavioral decision making and judgment. In Gilbert, Fiske, and Linzey eds. Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th ed., vol. 1, edited by O. Gilbert, S. Fiske, and G. Lindzey, 497-548. New York: McGraw-Hill.
31.
DeRouen, K. , and C. Sprecher. 2004. Initial crisis reaction and poliheuristic theory. Journal of Conflict Resolution48 (1):56-68.
32.
East, M. , S. A. Salmore, and C. F. Hermann. 1978. Why nations act. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
33.
Easton, D.1953. The Political System. New York: Knopf.
34.
Eriksson, J. , ed. 2001. Threat politics: Newperspectives on security, risk, and crisis management. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
35.
Farnham, B.1997. Roosevelt and the Munich crisis: A study of political decision-making.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36.
Fischer, F. , and J. Forester. 1993. The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
37.
Fiske, A. , and P. Tetlock. 1997. Taboo trade-offs: Reactions to transactions that transgress the spheres of justice. Political Psychology18 (2): 255-297.
38.
Fiske, S. , and S. Taylor. 1991. Social cognition. 2d ed.New York: McGraw-Hill.
39.
Garrison, J.1999. Games advisers play. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
40.
Garrison, J.2001. Framing foreign policy alternatives in the inner circle: President Carter, his advisers, and the struggle for the arms control agenda. Political Psychology22:775-807.
41.
George, A. L.1979. Case studies and theory development: The method of structured, focused comparison. In New approaches in history, theory and policy, edited by P. Lauren, 43-68. New York: Free Press.
42.
George, A. L.1980. Presidential decisionmaking in foreign policy: The effective use of information and advice. Boulder, CO: Westview.
43.
George, A. L.1997. From groupthink to contextual process analysis. In Beyond groupthink, edited by P. ‘t Hart, E. Stern, and B. Sundelius, 35-54. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
44.
George, A. L. , and J. L. George. 1964. WoodrowWilson and Colonel House: A personality study. NewYork: Dover.
45.
George, A. L. , and T. J. McKeown. 1985. Case studies and theories of organizational decisionmaking. In Advances in information processing in organizations, vol. 2, edited by R. Coulam and R. Smith, 21-58. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
46.
George, A. L. , and E. Stern. 2002. Harnessing conflict in foreign policymaking: From devil’s to multiple advocacy. Presidential Studies Quarterly32 (3): 484-508.
47.
Goertz, G.1994. Contexts of international politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
48.
Goertz, G.2004. Constraints, compromises, and decision making. Journal of Conflict Resolution48 (1): 14-37.
49.
Grönvall, J.2001. Mad cow disease: The role of experts and European crisis management. In Managing crisis: Threats, dilemmas, opportunities, edited by U. Rosenthal, R. A. Boin, and L. Comfort, 155-174. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
Haney, P. J.1997. Organizing for foreign policy crises: Presidents, advisers and the management of decision making. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
52.
Hargrove, E. C.1998. The president as leader: Appealing to the better angels of our nature. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
53.
Hermann, C. F.1963. Some consequences of crisis which limit the viability of organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly8:61-82.
54.
Hermann, C. F. , C. W. Kegley, and J. N. Rosenaueds. 1987. New directions in the study of foreign policy. Boston: Allen & Unwin.
55.
Hermann, M. G.2001. How decision units shape foreign policy: A theoretical framework. International Studies Review3 (2): 47-81.
56.
Hermann, M. G. , and C. F. Hermann. 1989. Who makes foreign policy decisions and how? An empirical inquiry. International Studies Quarterly33 (3): 361-387.
57.
Hermann, M. G. , C. F. Hermann, and J. Hagan. 1987. How decision units shape foreign policy behavior. In New directions in the study of foreign policy, edited by C. F. Hermann, C. W. Kegley, and J. N. Rosenau, 309-338. Boston: Allen & Unwin.
58.
Houghton, D.2001. USforeign policy and the Iran hostage crisis. NewYork: Cambridge University Press.
59.
Hudson, V.1995. Foreign policy analysis: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. (Mershon) International Studies Review39:209-238.
60.
Hudson, V.2003. Foreign policy decision making (revisited).New York: Palgrave.
61.
Janis, I.1972. Victimis of groupthink: A psychological study of policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
62.
Janis, I.1989. Crucial decisions: Leadership in policymaking and crisis management. New York: Free Press.
63.
Janis, I. , and L. Mann. 1977. Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. New York: Free Press.
64.
Jones, C. M.2002. Rejection of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty: The politics of ratification. In Contemporary cases inU.S. foreign policy: From terrorism to trade, edited by R. C. Carter, 160-195. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
65.
Kaarbo, J. , and R. Beasley. 1999. A practical guide to the comparative case study method in political psychology. Political Psychology20 (2): 369-369.
66.
Kennedy, J. F.1961. Profiles in courage. New York: Harper & Row.
67.
Khong, Y. F.1992. Analogies at war. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
68.
Kingdon, J. P.1984. Agendas, alternatives and public policies. Boston: Little, Brown.
69.
Kleiboer, M.1998. The multiple realities of international mediation. Boulder, CO: Lynn Rienner.
70.
Klein, G.2001. Sources of power: How people make decisions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
71.
Kowert, P.2002. Groupthink or deadlock?New York: State University of New York Press.
72.
Krasner, S.1972. Are bureaucracies important (or Allison’s Wonderland)?Foreign Policy7:159-179.
73.
Larson, D. W.1985. The origins of containment: A psychological explanation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
74.
Larsson, S. , and J. Lundgren. 2003. The 14 against Austria. Stockholm: CRISMART/Swedish National Defense College.
75.
Lawrence, P. R. , and L. Lorch. 1969. Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
76.
Lebow, N.1981. Between peace and war: The nature of international crises. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
77.
Lebow, N. , and J. Stein. 1994. We all lost the cold war. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
78.
Lepgold, J. , and A. Lamborn. 2001. Locating bridges: Connecting research agendas on cognition and strategic choice. International Studies Review3 (3): 3-29.
79.
Levy, J.1997. Prospect theory and cognitive-rational debate. In Decision-making on war and peace, edited by N. Geva and A. Mintz, 33-50. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
80.
Lindgren, K. 2003. “Vad styr lederen? Om beslutsfattare och policyförändring i säkerhetspolitiska kriser“ [What guides the leader? On decisionmakers and policy change in security policy crises]. Ph.D. diss., Peace and Conflict Studies, Uppsala University.
81.
Lintonen, R.2002. Finland and the crisis management in the EU yearbook of Finnish foreign policy. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of International Affairs.
82.
MacGregor Burns, J. , and G. Sorenson. 2000. Dead center: Clinton-Gore leadership and the perils of moderation. New York: Scribner’s.
83.
Maoz, Z.1990. National Choices and International Processes. New York: Cambridge University Press.
84.
McDermott, R.1998. Risk-taking in international politics: Prospect theory in American foreign policy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
85.
Mintz, A.1993. The decision to attack Iraq: A non-compensatory approach to foreign policy decision making. Journal of Conflict Resolution37:484-503.
86.
Mintz, A.2003. Integrating cognitive and rational theories of foreign policy making. New York: Palgrave.
87.
Mintz, A. , and N. Geva. 1997. The poliheuristic theory of decision of foreign policy decisionmaking. In Decision making on war and peace: The cognitive rational debate, edited by N. Geva and A. Mintz, 81-102. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
88.
Mintz, A. , N. Geva, S. Redd, and A. Carnes. 1997. The effect of dynamic and static choice sets on political decision making: An analysis utilizing the decision board platform. American Political Science Review91 (September): 533-566.
89.
Mintz, A. , and S. Redd. 2003. Framing effects in international relations. Synthese135 (2): 193-213.
90.
Mintzberg, H. , D. Raisanghani, and A. Theoret. 1976. The structure of unstructured decision processes. Administrative Sciences Quarterly21:246-275.
91.
Morgan, G.1986. Images of organization. London: Sage.
92.
Morgenthau, H.1948. Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace. New York: Knopf.
93.
Neustadt, R.1990. Presidential power and the modern presidents. New York: Free Press.
94.
Neustadt, R. , and E. May. 1986. Thinking in time: The uses of history for decision makers. New York: Free Press.
95.
Newlove, L. , E. Stern, and L. Svedin. 2003. Auckland unplugged: Managing critical infrastructure failure. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
96.
Olsson, E. K.2001. The EU and the dioxin crisis. Stockholm: Swedish National Defense College.
97.
Paige, G. D.1968. The Korean decision. New York: Free Press.
98.
Parker, C. , and E. Stern. 2002. September 11 and the origins of the strategic surprise. Political Psychology23 (2): 601-630.
99.
Pennington, N. , and R. Hastie. 1981. Juror decision making models: The generalization gap. Psychological Bulletin89 (2): 246-287.
100.
Pennington, N. , and R. Hastie. 1988. Explanation-based decision making: Effects of memory structure on judgement. Journal of Experimental Psychology14 (3): 521-533.
101.
Peters, B. G.1999. Institutional theory in political science: The new institutionalism. London: Pinter.
102.
Peterson, S.1996. Crisis bargaining and the state: The domestic politics of international conflict. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
103.
Porfiriev, B. , and L. Svedin, eds. 2002. Crisis management in Russia. Stockholm: CRISMART/National Defense College of Sweden.
104.
Preston, T.2000. The president and his inner circle. New York: Columbia University Press.
105.
Redd, S.2002. The influence of advisers on foreign policy decision making. Journal of Conflict Resolution46 (3): 335-364.
106.
Ripley, B.1993. Psychology, foreign policy, and international relations theory. Political Psychology14 (3): 403-416.
107.
Rochefort, D. , and R. Cobb, eds. 1994. The politics of problem definition: Reshaping the policy agenda. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
108.
Rosati, J.2001. The power of human cognition in the study ofworld politics. International Studies Review2 (3): 45-75.
109.
Rubino-Hallman, S.1998. When gender goes to combat: The impact of representations in collective decision making. In Problem representation in foreign policy decision making, edited by D. Sylvan and J. Voss, 261-278. New York: Cambridge University Press.
110.
Sabatier, P.1993. Top-downand bottom-up approaches to implementation research. In The policy process: A reader, edited by M. Hill, 266-293. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
111.
Smith, S. , and M. Clarke, eds. 1985. Foreign policy implementation. London: Allen & Unwin.
112.
Snyder, R. C. , H. Bruck, and B. Sapin. 1963. Foreign policy decision making. New York: Free Press.
113.
Snyder, R. C. , H. Bruck, and B. Sapin. 2002. Foreign policy decision making (revisited).New York: Palgrave.
114.
Staw, B. , L. Sandelands, and J. Dutton. 1981. Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: Amultilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly26 (4): 501-524.
115.
Steinbrunner, J.1974. The cybernetic theory of decision. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
116.
Steinbrunner, J.2002. The cybernetic theory of decision: New dimensions of political analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
117.
Stern, E.1997. Crisis and learning: A conceptual balance sheet. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management5 (2): 69-86.
118.
Stern, E.1999. Crisis decisionmaking: A cognitive-institutional approach. Stockholm Studies in Politics 66. Stockholm: Stockholm University.
119.
Stern, E. , and D. Hansen, eds. 2000. Crisis management in a transitional society: The Latvian experience. Stockholm: National Defense College of Sweden.
120.
Stern, E. , and D. Hansen, eds. 2001. Framing the Palme assassination. In Threat politics: New perspectives on security, risk, and crisis management, edited by J. Erikssoned, 164-188. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
121.
Stern, E. , and D. Nohrstedt, eds. 1999. Crisis management in Estonia: Theory and practice. Stockholm: Swedish Agency for Civil Emergency Planning.
122.
Stern, E. , and B. Sundelius. 1992. Managing asymmetrical crisis: Sweden, the USSR, and U137. International Studies Quarterly36:213-239.
123.
Stern, E. , and B. Sundelius. 1997. Sweden’s twin monetary crises of 1992: Rigidity and learning in crisis decision making. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management5 (1): 32-48.
124.
Stern, E. , and B. Sundelius. 2002. Crisis management Europe: An integrated regional research and training program. International Studies Perspectives3:71-88.
125.
Stern, E. , B. Sundelius, D. Nohrstedt, D. Hansen, L. Newlove, and P. ‘t Hart. 2002. Crisis management in transitional democracies: The Baltic experience. Government and Opposition37 (4): 524-550.
126.
Stern, E. , and B. Verbeek, eds. 1998. Whither the study of governmental politics in foreign policymaking? A symposium. (Mershon) International Studies Review42:205-255.
127.
Stewart, P. , C. F. Hermann, and M. G. Hermann. 1989. Modelling the 1973 Soviet decision to support Egypt. American Political Science Review83 (1): 35-59.
128.
Stoessinger, J.1979. Crusaders and pragmatists: Movers of modern American foreign policy. New York: Norton.
129.
Suedfeld, P. , and D. Leighton. 2002. Early communications in thewar against terrorism: Anintegrative complexity analysis. Political Psychology23 (3): 585-600.
130.
Sundelius, B.1995. A decisionmaking approach to integration. In European foreign policy, edited by W. Carlsnaes and S. Smith. London: Sage.
131.
Sundelius, B. , E. Stern, and F. Bynander. 1997. Krishantering på svenska: teori och praktik[Crisis management the Swedish way: Theory and practice]. Stockholm: Nerenius & Santérus förlag.
132.
Sylvan, D.1998a. Introduction. In Problem representation in foreign policy decision making, edited by D. Sylvan and J. Voss, 3-7. New York: Cambridge University Press.
133.
Sylvan, D.1998b. Reflecting on the study of problem representation: How are we studying it and what are we learning? In Problem representation in foreign policy decision making, edited by D. Sylvan and J. Voss, 333-342. New York: Cambridge University Press.
134.
Sylvan, D. , and D. Haddad. 1998. Reasoning and problem representation in foreign policy: Groups, individuals, and stories. In Problem representation in foreign policy decision making, edited by D. Sylvan and J. Voss, 187-212. New York: Cambridge University Press.
135.
Sylvan, D. , M. Diascro, and D. Haddad. 1996. Stories, ledgers, and Bayesian calculations: Studying problem representation in foreign policy. Paper presented at the Annual Scientific Meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, June, Vancouver, BC.
136.
Sylvan, D. , T. Ostrom, and K. Gannon. 1994. Case-based, model-based, and explanation-based styles of reasoning in foreign policy. International Studies Quarterly38 (1): 61-90.
137.
Sylvan, D. , and J. Voss, eds. 1998. Problem representation in foreign policy decision making. New York: Cambridge University Press.
138.
‘t Hart, P.1994. Groupthink in government. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
139.
‘t Hart, P. , E. Stern, and B. Sundelius, eds. 1997. Beyond groupthink: Political group dynamics and foreign policymaking. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
140.
Taber, C.1998. The interpretation of foreign policy events: Acognitive process theory. In Problem representation in foreign policy decision making, edited by D. Sylvan and J. Voss, 29-52. New York: Cambridge University Press.
141.
Tetlock, P.1985. Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice. In Research in organizational behavior, vol. 7, edited by K. L. Cummings and B. M. Staw, 297-332. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
142.
Vasquez, J. A.1983. The power of power politics: Acritique. NewBrunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
143.
Verbeek, B. , and B. Reinalda, eds. 1998. Autonomous policymaking by international organizations. London: Routledge.
144.
Vertzberger, Y. I.1990. The world in their minds: Information processing, cognition, and perception in foreign policy decisionmaking. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
145.
Vertzberger, Y. I.1998. Risk taking and decisionmaking: Foreign military intervention decisions. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
146.
Voss, J.1998. On the representation of problems: An information processing approach to foreign policy decisionmaking. In Problem representation in foreign policy decision making, edited by D. Sylvan and J. Voss, 8-28. New York: Cambridge University Press.
147.
Walker, S.1995. Psychodynamic processes and framing effects in foreign policy decision-making: Woodrow Wilson’s operational code. Political Psychology16 (4): 697-717.
148.
Welch, D.1992. The organizational and bureaucratic politics paradigms: Retrospect and prospect. International Security17 (2): 112-146.
Young, M.1998. Representing problem representation. In Problem representation in foreign policy decision making, edited by D. Sylvan and J. Voss, 213-248. New York: Cambridge University Press.
