There is a substantial moralistic streak in U.S. elite attitudes about war against states perceived as evil. Among opinion leaders, death penalty supporters were substantially more likely than opponents to support the 1991 Gulf War, condone the Iraqi death toll, and favor escalating the war to topple Saddam Hussein. These relationships persist after controlling for ideology, nationalism, and instrumental beliefs about force and thus probably result from individual differences in retributiveness and humanitarianism, moral values known to underlie death penalty attitudes. Foreign policy expertise moderated this effect only on the regime change issue, and then only moderately, suggesting that “moral punitiveness” might also influence the thinking of decision makers. President George H. W. Bush evidently felt real moral outrage during the crisis about Iraq’s aggression, but he refrained from escalating the war to punish Saddam more severely for it.
Aguilar, Edwin Eloy, Benjamin O. Fordham, and G. Patrick Lynch. 1997. The foreign policy beliefs of political campaign contributors. International Studies Quarterly41 (2): 355-365.
2.
Aguilar, Edwin Eloy, Benjamin O. Fordham, and G. Patrick Lynch. 2001. The foreign policy beliefs of political campaign contributors: A post-cold war analysis. Social Science Quarterly82 (1): 89-104.
3.
Altemeyer, Robert. 1996. The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
Batson, C. Daniel. 1991. The altruism question: Toward a social psychological answer. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
Bawn, Kathleen. 1999. Constructing “us”: Ideology, coalition politics, and false consciousness. American Journal of Political Science43 (2): 303-334.
6.
Beckett, Katherine. 1997. Making crime pay: Law and order in contemporary American politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
7.
Bennett, W. Lance, and David L. Paletz, eds. 1994. Taken by storm: The media, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy in the Gulf War. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
Bohm, R. M., L. J. Clark, and A. F. Aveni. 1991. Knowledge and death-penalty opinion: A test of the Marshall hypotheses. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency28 (3): 360-387.
9.
Brown, Richard Maxwell. 1991. No duty to retreat: Violence and values in American history and society. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.
Bush, George H. W.1990. Remarks at the Aspen Institute symposium in Aspen, Colorado, August 2, 1990. In Public papers of the presidents of the United States 1990, vol. 2. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
11.
Bush, George H. W., and Brent Scowcroft. 1999. A world transformed. New York: Simon & Schuster.
12.
Carlsmith, Kevin M., John M. Darley, and Paul H. Robinson. 2002. Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology83 (2): 284-299.
13.
Chittick, William O., Keith R. Billingsley, and Rick Travis. 1995. A three-dimensional model of American foreign policy beliefs. International Studies Quarterly39 (3): 313-331.
14.
Christensen, Thomas J.1996. Useful adversaries: Grand strategy, domestic mobilization, and Sino-American conflict, 1947-1958. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15.
CNN.2002. Former president Bush: ‘I hate Saddam’. CNN.com, September 18. Accessed June 10, 2006, from http://archives.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/09/18/elder.bush.saddam.
16.
CNN.2003. Bush: Saddam should face death penalty. CNN.com, December 17. Accessed June 10, 2006, from http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/12/16/sprj.irq.main/index.html.
17.
Cook, Kimberly J.1998. Divided passions: Public opinion on abortion and the death penalty. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
18.
Darley, John M., Kevin M. Carlsmith, and Paul H. Robinson. 2000. Incapacitation and just deserts as motives for punishment. Law and Human Behavior24 (6): 659-684.
19.
de Quervain, Dominique J.-F., Urs Fischbacher, Valerie Treyer, Melanie Schellhammer, Ulrich Schnyder, Alfred Buck, and Ernst Fehr. 2004. The neural basis of altruistic punishment. Science305 (5688): 1254-1258.
20.
Delli Carpini, Michael, and Scott Keeter. 1996. What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21.
DeNardo, James. 1995. The amateur strategist: Intuitive deterrence theories and the politics of the nuclear arms race. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Dorman, William A., and Steven Livingston. 1994. News and historical content: The establishing phase of the Persian Gulf policy debate. In Taken by storm: The media, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy in the Gulf War, edited by W. L. Bennett and D. L. Paletz, 63-81. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23.
Doty, Richard M., David G. Winter, Bill E. Peterson, and Markus Kemmelmeier. 1997. Authoritarianism and American students’ attitudes about the Gulf War, 1990-1996. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin23 (11): 1133-1143.
24.
Eichenberg, Richard C.2005. Victory has many friends: U.S. public opinion and the use of military force, 1981-2005. International Security30 (1): 140-177.
25.
Ellsworth, Phoebe C., and Samuel R. Gross. 1994. Hardening of the attitudes: Americans’ views on the death penalty. Journal of Social Issues50 (2): 19-52.
26.
Ellsworth, Phoebe C., and Lee Ross. 1983. Public opinion and capital punishment: A close examination of the views of abolitionists and retentionists. Crime and Delinquency29 (116): 116-169.
27.
Entman, Robert M.2004. Projections of power: Framing news, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28.
Foyle, Douglas. 1999. Counting the public in: Presidents, public opinion, and foreign policy. New York: Columbia University Press.
29.
Freedman, Lawrence, and Efraim Karsh. 1993. The Gulf conflict, 1990-1991. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
French, Peter A.2001. The virtues of vengeance. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
31.
Funke, Friedrich. 2005. The dimensionality of right-wing authoritarianism: Lessons from the dilemma between theory and measurement. Political Psychology26 (2): 195-218.
32.
Gallup, Alec, and Frank Newport. 1991. Death penalty support remains strong. Gallup Poll Monthly309: 40-45.
33.
Garvey, Stephen P.2000. The emotional economy of capital sentencing. New York University Law Review75 (1): 26-73.
34.
Gelpi, Christopher. 2002. The power of legitimacy: Assessing the role of norms in crisis bargaining. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
Gelpi, Christopher, Peter D. Feaver, and Jason Reifler. 2005-2006. Casualty sensitivity and the war in Iraq. International Security30 (3): 7-46.
36.
Goldberg, J. H., J. S. Lerner, and Philip E. Tetlock. 1999. Rage and reason: The psychology of the intuitive prosecutor. European Journal of Social Psychology29 (5-6): 781-795.
37.
Grasmick, Harold G., Elizabeth Davenport, Mitchell B. Chamlin, and Robert J. Bursik Jr.1992. Protestant fundamentalism and the retributive doctrine of punishment. Criminology30 (1): 21-45.
38.
Haidt, Jonathan. 2001. The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review108 (4): 814-834.
39.
Harkavy, Robert E.2000. Defeat, national humiliation, and the revenge motif in international politics. International Politics37 (3): 345-368.
40.
Herrmann, Richard K., and Jonathan W. Keller. 2004. Beliefs, values, and strategic choice: U.S. leaders’ decisions to engage, contain, and use force in an era of globalization. Journal of Politics66 (2): 557-580.
41.
Herrmann, Richard K., and Vaughn P. Shannon. 2001. Defending international norms: The role of obligation, material interest, and perception in decision making. International Organization55 (3): 621-654.
42.
Holsti, Ole R.2004. Public opinion and American foreign policy. Rev. ed.Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
43.
Holsti, Ole R., and James N. Rosenau. 1996a. Foreign Policy Leadership Project, 1976-1996 (ICPSR 2614). Duke University; George Washington University; University of Southern California [producers]. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
44.
Holsti, Ole R., and James N. Rosenau. 1996b. Liberals, populists, libertarians, and conservatives: The link between domestic and international affairs. International Political Science Review17 (1): 29-53.
45.
Hurwitz, Jon, and Mark Peffley. 1987. How are foreign policy attitudes structured? A hierarchical model. American Political Science Review81 (4): 1099-1120.
46.
Jennings, M. Kent. 1992. Ideological thinking among mass publics and political elites. Public Opinion Quarterly56: 419-440.
47.
Jentleson, Bruce. 1992. The pretty prudent public: Post-Vietnam American opinion on the use of force. International Studies Quarterly36 (1): 49-74.
48.
Jentleson, Bruce. 1994. With friends like these: Reagan, Bush, and Saddam 1982-1990. New York: W. W. Norton.
49.
Jentleson, Bruce, and Rebecca L. Britton. 1998. Still pretty prudent: Post-cold war American public opinion on the use of military force. Journal of Conflict Resolution42: 395-417.
50.
Jervis, Robert. 1998. System effects: Complexity in political and social life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
51.
Koopman, Cheryl, Jack Snyder, and Robert Jervis. 1989. American elite views of relations with the Soviet Union. Journal of Social Issues45 (2): 119-138.
52.
Kunda, Ziva. 1990. The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin108 (3): 480-498.
53.
Liberman, Peter. 2006. An eye for an eye: Public support for war against evildoers. International Organization60 (3): 687-722.
54.
Long, J. Scott. 1997. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55.
Lord, C. G., L. Ross, and M. R. Lepper. 1979. Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology37 (3): 2098-2109.
56.
MacDonald, Scot. 2002. Hitler’s shadow: Historical analogies and the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait. Diplomacy & Statecraft13 (4): 29-59.
57.
Mandelbaum, Michael, and William Schneider. 1979. The new internationalisms. In Eagle entangled: U.S. foreign policy in a complex world, edited by K. A. Oye, D. Rothchild, and R. J. Lieber, 34-70. New York: Longman.
58.
McFarland, Sam G.2005. On the eve of war: Authoritarianism, social dominance, and American students’ attitudes toward attacking Iraq. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin31 (3): 360-367.
59.
Mueller, John E.1994. Policy and opinion in the Gulf War. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
60.
Mullen, Elizabeth, and Linda J. Skitka. 2006. Exploring the psychological underpinnings of the moral mandate effect: Motivated reasoning, group differentiation, or anger? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology90 (4): 629-643.
61.
Murray, Shoon Kathleen. 1996. Anchors against change: American opinion leaders’ beliefs after the cold war. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
62.
Murray, Shoon Kathleen, and Jonathan A. Cowden. 1999. The role of “enemy images” and ideology in elite belief systems. International Studies Quarterly43 (3): 455-481.
63.
Murray, Shoon Kathleen, Jonathan A. Cowden, and Bruce M. Russett. 1999. The convergence of American elites’ domestic beliefs with the foreign policy beliefs. International Interactions25 (2): 153-180.
64.
Nadler, Janice, and Mary R. Rose. 2003. Victim impact testimony and the psychology of punishment. Cornell Law Review88 (2): 429-456.
65.
Neapolitan, Jerry. 1983. Support for and opposition to capital punishment: Some associated social-psychological factors. Criminal Justice and Behavior10 (2): 195-208.
66.
Nossal, Kim Richard. 1989. International sanctions as international punishment. International Organization43 (2): 301-322.
67.
Offer, Avner. 1995. Going to war in 1914: A matter of honor? Politics & Society23 (3): 213-241.
68.
Ogloff, J. R. P., and Neil Vidmar. 1994. The impact of pretrial publicity on jurors. Law and Human Behavior18 (5): 507-526.
69.
Pelton, Leroy H.2003. Biblical justice. Journal of the American Academy of Religion71 (4): 737-765.
70.
Pollock, Philip H., III, Stuart A. Lilie, and M. Elliot Vittes. 1993. Hard issues, core values and vertical constraint: The case of nuclear power. British Journal of Political Science23 (1): 29-50.
71.
Pratto, Felicia, Lisa M. Stallworth, and S. Conway-Lanz. 1998. Social dominance orientation and the ideological legitimization of social policy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology28 (20): 1853-1875.
72.
Radelet, Michael L., and Marian J. Borg. 2000. The changing nature of death penalty debates. Annual Review of Sociology26: 43-61.
73.
Rohrer, Tim. 1995. The metaphorical logic of (political) rape: The new wor(l)d order. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity10 (2): 115-137.
74.
Rosen, Stephen Peter. 2004. War and human nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
75.
Russett, Bruce M., and Elizabeth C. Hanson. 1975. Interest and ideology: The foreign policy beliefs of American businessmen. San Francisco: Freeman.
76.
Sargent, M. J.2004. Less thought, more punishment: Need for cognition predicts support for punitive responses to crime. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin30 (11): 1485-1493.
77.
Sawyer, Darwin O.1982. Public attitudes toward life and death. Public Opinion Quarterly46 (4): 521-533.
78.
Schweizer, Peter, and Rochelle Schweizer. 2004. The Bushes: Portrait of a dynasty. New York: Doubleday.
79.
Sherry, Michael. 2005. Dead or alive: American vengeance goes global. Review of International Studies31 (Suppl. 1): 245-263.
80.
Small, Deborah A., and George Loewenstein. 2005. The devil you know: The effects of identifiability on punitiveness. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making18 (5): 311-318.
81.
Sobel, Richard. 2001. The impact of public opinion on U.S. foreign policy since Vietnam. New York: Oxford University Press.
82.
Steinberg, Blema S.1991. Shame and humiliation in the Cuban Missile Crisis. Political Psychology12 (4): 653-690.
83.
Taber, Charles, Milton Lodge, and Jill Glather. 2001. The motivated construction of political judgments. In Citizens and politics: Perspectives from political psychology, edited by J. H. Kuklinski, 198-226. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
84.
Tetlock, Philip E.2005. Expert political judgment: How good is it? How can we know?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
85.
Tomz, Michael, Jason Wittenberg, and Gary King. 2003. Clarify: Software for interpreting and presenting statistical results, version 2.1. Stanford University, University of Wisconsin, and Harvard University.
86.
Tyler, Tom R., and Renee Weber. 1982. Support for the death penalty: Instrumental response to crime or symbolic attitude? Law & Society Review17 (1): 121-145.
87.
U.S. Department of Justice. 1994. Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics, 1994. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
88.
Van Koppen, Peter J., Dick J. Hessing, and Christianne J. De Poot. 2002. Public reasons for abolition and retention of the death penalty. International Criminal Justice Review12 (1): 77-92.
89.
Vidmar, Neil. 1974. Retributive and utilitarian motives and other correlates of Canadian attitudes toward the death penalty. Canadian Psychologist15 (4): 337-356.
90.
Welch, David A.1993. Justice and the genesis of war. New York: Cambridge University Press.
91.
Western, Jon. 2005. Selling intervention and war: The presidency, the media, and the American public. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
92.
Woodward, Bob. 1991. The commanders. New York: Simon & Schuster.
93.
Woodward, Bob. 2002. Bush at war. New York: Simon & Schuster.
94.
Yetiv, Steven A.2004. Explaining foreign policy: U.S. decision-making and the Persian Gulf War. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
95.
Zaller, John R.1992. The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
