This study focuses on the varying effectiveness of three mediation styles—facilitation, formulation, and manipulation—on international crises. Effectiveness is assessed in terms of three outcome variables: formal agreement, post-crisis tension reduction, and contribution to crisis abatement. The authors analyze new data on the mediation process from the International Crisis Behavior project (1918-2001). Manipulation has the strongest effect on the likelihood of both reaching a formal agreement and contributing to crisis abatement. Facilitation has the greatest influence on increasing the prospects for lasting tension reduction. The authors explore how the different styles affect the strategic bargaining environment to explain these differences in impact. The findings suggest that mediators should use a balance of styles if they are to maximize their overall effectiveness.
Achen, Christopher. 1986. The statistical analysis of quasi-experiments. Berkeley: SAGE Publications.
2.
Beardsley, Kyle. 2004. Seeking counseling: The strategic selection of mediation in international crises. Paper presented at the 2004 meeting of the Peace Science Society, November, Houston, TX.
3.
Bercovitch, Jacob. 1992. The structure and diversity of mediation in international relations. In Mediation in international relations: Multiple approaches to conflict management, edited by Jacob Bercovitch and Jeffrey Z. Rubin, 1-29. New York: St. Martin’s.
4.
Bercovitch, Jacob. 1996. Understanding mediation’s role in preventative diplomacy. Negotiation Journal12 (3): 241-258.
5.
Bercovitch, Jacob. 1997. Mediation in international conflict: An overview of theory, a review of practice. In Peacemaking in international conflict, edited by William Zartman and J. Lewis Rasmussen, 125-153. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Institute of Peace Press.
6.
Bercovitch, Jacob. 2003. Studies in international mediation: Essays in honor of Jeffrey Z. Rubin. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
7.
Bercovitch, Jacob, J. Theodore Anagnoson, and Donnette L. Wille. 1991. Some conceptual issues and empirical trends in the study of successful mediation in international relations. Journal of Peace Research28 (1): 7-17.
8.
Bercovitch, Jacob, and Allison Houston. 1996. The study of international mediation: Theoretical issues and empirical evidence. In Resolving international conflicts, edited by Jacob Bercovitch, 11-35. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner.
9.
Bercovitch, Jacob, and Allison Houston. 2000. Why do they do it like this? An analysis of factors influencing mediation behavior in international conflicts. Journal of Conflict Resolution44 (2): 170-202.
10.
Bercovitch, Jacob, and Richard Jackson. 2001. Negotiation or mediation? An exploration of factors affecting the choice of conflict management in international conflict. Negotiation Journal17 (1): 59-77.
11.
Bercovitch, Jacob, and Jeffrey Langley. 1993. The nature of dispute and the effectiveness of international mediation. Journal of Conflict Resolution37 (4): 670-691.
12.
Blainey, Geoffrey. 1973. The causes of war. New York: Free Press.
13.
Bloomfield, David, Charles Nupen, and Peter Harris. 1998. Negotiation processes. In Democracy and deep-rooted conflict: Options for negotiators, edited by Peter Harris and Benjamin Reilly, 59-120. Stockholm, Sweden: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA).
14.
Brecher, Michael, and Jonathan Wilkenfeld. 2000. A study of crisis. 2nd ed. (with CD-ROM). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
15.
Burton, John W.1969. Conflict and communication: The use of controlled communication in international relations. New York: Free Press.
16.
Burton, John W.1984. Global conflict: The domestic sources of international crisis. Brighton, UK: Wheatsheaf.
17.
Carnevale, Peter J. D.1986. Strategic choice in mediation. Negotiation Journal2:41-56.
18.
Carnevale, Peter J. D., and Richard Pegnetter. 1985. The selection of mediation tactics in public-sector disputes: A contingency analysis. Journal of Social Issues41 (2): 65-81.
19.
Dixon, William J.1996. Third-party techniques for preventing conflict escalation and promoting peaceful settlement. International Organization50 (4): 653-681.
20.
Druckman, Daniel. 1993. The situational levers of negotiating flexibility. Journal of Conflict Resolution37 (2): 236-276.
21.
Druckman, Daniel. 1994. Determinants of compromising behavior in negotiation: A meta-analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution38 (3): 507-556.
22.
Fearon, James D.1995. Rationalist explanations for war. International Organization49 (3): 379-414.
23.
Fisher, Roger, and William Ury. 1981. Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
24.
Fisher, Ronald J.1972. Third party consultation: A method for the study and resolution of conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution16:67-94.
25.
Fisher, Ronald J., and Loraleigh Keashly. 1988. Distinguishing third party interventions in intergroup conflict: Consultation is not mediation. Negotiation Journal4 (4): 381-393.
26.
Greig, J. Michael. 2005. Stepping into the fray: When do mediators mediate?American Journal of Political Science49 (2): 249-266.
27.
Hopmann, P. Terrance. 1996. The negotiation process and the resolution of international conflicts. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
28.
Hopmann, P. Terrance. 2001. Bargaining and problem solving: Two perspectives on international negotiation. In Turbulent peace: The challenges of managing international conflict, edited by Chester A. Crocker, Fen Osler Hampson, and Pamela Aall, 445-468. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Institute of Peace Press.
29.
Keashly, Loraleigh, and Ronald J. Fisher. 1996. A contingency perspective on conflict interventions: Theoretical and practical considerations. In Resolving international conflicts, edited by Jacob Bercovitch. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
30.
Kelman, Herbert C.1992. Informal mediation by the scholar/practitioner. In Mediation in international relations: Multiple approaches to conflict management, edited by Jacob Bercovitch and Jeffrey Z. Rubin, 64-96. New York: St. Martin’s.
31.
Kleiboer, Marieke. 1996. Understanding success and failure of international mediation. Journal of Conflict Resolution40 (2): 360-390.
32.
Kleiboer, Marieke. 1998. The multiple realities of international mediation. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
33.
Kraus, Sarit, Jonathan Wilkenfeld, and Gilad Zlotkin. 1995. Multi-agent negotiation under time constraints. Artificial Intelligence Journal75:297-345.
34.
Kressel, Kenneth. 1972. Labor mediation: An exploratory survey. Albany, NY: Association of Labor Mediation Agencies.
35.
Lemke, Douglas, and William Reed. 2001. War and rivalry among great powers. American Journal of Political Science45 (2): 457-469.
36.
Mitchell, Christopher. 1993. The processes and stages of mediation: The Sudanese case. In Making war and waging Peace, edited by David R. Smock, 139-159. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Institute of Peace Press.
37.
Morgan, T. Clifton. 1994. Untying the knot of war: A bargaining theory of international crises. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
38.
Powell, Robert. 1999. In the shadow of power: States and strategies in international politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39.
Princen, Thomas. 1992. Intermediaries in international conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40.
Raiffa, Howard. 1982. The art and science of negotiation. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
41.
Regan, Patrick M., and Allan C. Stam III.2000. In the nick of time: Conflict management, mediation timing, and the duration of interstate disputes. International Studies Quarterly44:239-260.
42.
Riskin, Leonard L.2003. Decision-making in mediation: The new old grid and the new new grid system. Notre Dame Law Review79:1-53.
43.
Saideman, Stephen M.2002. Overlooking the obvious: Bringing international politics back into ethnic conflict management. International Studies Review4 (3): 63-86.
44.
Schelling, Thomas C.1960. The strategy of conflict. Cambridge, MA: President and Fellows of Harvard College.
45.
Schrodt, Philip A., and Deborah J. Gerner. 2004. An event analysis of third-party mediation in the Middle East and Balkans. Journal of Conflict Resolution48 (3): 310-330.
46.
Smith, Alastair, and Allan C. Stam. 2003. Mediation and peacekeeping in a random walk model of civil and interstate war. International Studies Review5 (4): 115-135.
47.
Touval, Saadia, and William Zartman. 1985. Introduction: Mediation in theory. In International mediation in theory and practice, edited by Saadia Touval and I. William Zartman, 7-17. Boulder, CO: Westview.
48.
Touval, Saadia, and William Zartman. 2001. International mediation in the post-cold war era. In Turbulent peace: The challenges of managing international conflict, edited by Chester A. Crocker, Fen Osler Hampson, and Pamela Aall, 427-443. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Institute of Peace Press.
49.
Wall, James A., John B. Stark, and Rhetta L. Standifer. 2001. Mediation: A current review and theory development. Journal of Conflict Resolution45 (3): 370-391.
50.
Walter, Barbara F.2002. Committing to peace: The successful settlement of civil wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
51.
Werner, Suzanne, and Amy Yuen. 2005. Making and keeping peace. International Organization59 (2): 261-292.
52.
Wilkenfeld, Jonathan, Kathleen Young, Victor Asal, and David Quinn. 2003. Mediating international crises: Cross-national and experimental perspectives. Journal of Conflict Resolution47 (3): 279-301.
53.
Wilkenfeld, Jonathan, Kathleen Young, David Quinn, and Victor Asal.2005. Mediating international crises. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
54.
Young, Oran R.1967. The intermediaries: Third parties in international crises. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
55.
Zartman, William, and Saadia Touval.1996. International mediation in the post-cold war era. In Managing global chaos, edited by Chester A. Crocker and Fen Osler Hampson (with Pamela Aall), 445-461. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Institute of Peace Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
