What affects global public opinion about U.S. foreign policy? The authors examine this question using a cross-national survey conducted during and immediately after the 2001 U.S.-led war in Afghanistan. They propose three models of global public opinion— interests, socialization, and influence—and discuss their empirical validity. Socialization variables (e.g., Muslim population and past terrorist incidents) tend to exhibit significant effects. A variable measuring shared security interests, North Atlantic Treaty Organization membership, has significant effects in favor of U.S. policy, but other mutual defense pacts with the U.S. have a backlash effect. Shared economic interests, represented by levels of trade, also have a positive influence. Variables measuring conflicting security interests as well as those measuring U.S. efforts to influence foreign public opinion have insignificant or weak effects.
Abramson, Paul R., and Ronald Inglehart. 1995. Value change in global perspective. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
2.
Arian, Asher, and Sigalit Olzaeker. 1999. Political and economic interactions with national security opinion: The Gulf War period in Israel. Journal of Conflict Resolution43 (1):58-77.
3.
Atran, Scott. 2003. Genesis of suicide terrorism. Science299:1534-1539.
4.
Central Intelligence Agency. 2000. The world factbook 2000. Washington, DC: Central Intelligence Agency.
5.
Cheeseman, Graeme, and Ian McAllister. 1996. Australian opinion on international trade and the security link with the United States. Pacific Review9 (2): 265-274.
6.
Duffield, John S.1999. Political culture and state behavior: Why Germany confounds neorealism. International Organization53 (4): 765-803.
7.
Eichenberg, Richard C.1989. Public opinion and national security inWestern Europe. London: Macmillan.
8.
Gibler, Douglas M.2000. Alliances: Why some causewar and others cause peace. In What do we know about war? edited by John A. Vasquez. Lanham, MA: Rowman & Littlefield.
9.
Gourevitch, Peter. 1978. The second image reversed: The international sources of domestic politics. International Organization32 (4): 881-912.
10.
Haddad, Simon, and Hilal Khashan. 2002. Islam and terrorism: Lebanese Muslim views on September 11. Journal of Conflict Resolution46 (6): 812-828.
11.
Hill, Christopher. 1996. World opinion and the empire of circumstance. International Affairs72 (1): 109-131.
12.
Holsti, Ole R.1992. Public opinion and foreign policy: Challenges to the Almond-Lippmann consensus. International Studies Quarterly36 (4): 436-466.
13.
Holsti, Ole R.1996. Public opinion and American foreign policy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
14.
Hook, Stephen W.1995. National interest and foreign aid. Boulder, CO.: Lynne Rienner.
15.
Inglehart, Ronald. 1990. Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
Inglehart, Ronald, andWayne E. Baker. 2000. Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review65 (1): 19-51.
17.
Isernia, Pierangelo, Zoltan Juhasz, and Hans Rattinger. 2002. Foreign policy and the rational public in comparative perspective. Journal of Conflict Resolution46 (2): 201-224.
18.
Iyengar, Shanto, and Donald R. Kinder. 1987. News that matters: Television and American opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
Iyengar, Shanto, and Adam Simon. 1993. News coverage of the Gulf crisis and public opinion: A study of agenda-setting, priming, and framing. Communication Research20 (3): 365-383.
20.
James, Patrick, and Jean Sebastian Rioux. 1998. International crises and linkage politics: The experiences of the United States, 1953-1994. Political Research Quarterly51 (3): 781-812.
21.
Jensen, Lloyd. 1969. Postwar democratic polities: National-international linkages in the defense policy of defeated states. In Linkage politics: Essays on the convergence of national and international systems, edited by James N. Rosenau. New York: Free Press.
22.
Jentleson, Bruce W.1992. The pretty prudent public: Post post-Vietnam American opinion and the use of military force. International Studies Quarterly36 (1): 49-74.
23.
Jentleson, Bruce W., and Rebecca L. Britton. 1998. Still pretty prudent: Post–coldwar American opinion on the use of military force. Journal of Conflict Resolution42 (4): 395-417.
24.
Jervis, Robert. 1976. Perception and misperception in international relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25.
Jordan, Donald L., and Benjamin I. Page. 1992. Shaping foreign-policy opinions: The role ofTVnews. Journal of Conflict Resolution36 (2): 227-241.
26.
Kaufmann, Daniel, Aart Kraay, and Pablo Zoidi-Lobatón. 2002. Governance matters II: Updated indicators for 2000/01. Working Paper 2772, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
27.
Keohane, Robert O., and Joseph S. Nye. 1977. Power and interdependence: World politics in transition. Boston: Little, Brown.
28.
King, Gary. 1997. A solution to the ecological inference problem: Reconstructing individual behavior from aggregate data. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
Lipson, Charles. 1997. American support for Israel: History, sources, limits. In U.S.-Israeli relations at the crossroads, edited by Gabriel Sheffer. London: Frank Cass.
Martin, Lisa L.2000. Democratic commitments: Legislatures and international cooperation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32.
Millard, William J.1999. International public opinion of the United Nations: A comparative analysis. International Journal of Public Opinion Research5 (1): 92-99.
33.
Monroe, Alan D.1998. Public opinion and public policy, 1980-1993. Public Opinion Quarterly62 (1): 6-28.
34.
Morgenthau, Hans J.1978. Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace. 5th ed.New York: Knopf.
35.
Munton, Don. 1992. Up (or down) on arms: American and Canadian public attitudes in the mid-1980s. In East-West arms control: Challenges for the Western alliance, edited by David Dewitt and Hans Rattinger. New York: Routledge Kegan Paul.
36.
Nacos, Brigitte L., Robert Y. Shapiro, and Pierangelo Isernia, eds. 2000. Decisionmaking in a glass house:Mass media, public opinion, and American and European foreign policy in the 21st century. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
37.
Nincic, Miroslav. 1992. Asensible public: Newperspectives on popular opinion and foreign policy. Journal of Conflict Resolution36 (4): 772-789.
38.
Ninkovich, Frank. 1999. TheWilsonian century: United States foreign policy since 1900. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39.
Oneal, John R., and Bruce M. Russett. 1997. The classical liberals were right: Democracy, interdependence, and conflict, 1950-1985. International Studies Quarterly41 (2): 267-293.
40.
Organski, A. F. K.1990. The $36 billion bargain: Strategy and politics in U.S. assistance to Israel. New York: Columbia University Press.
41.
Page, Benjamin I., and RobertY. Shapiro. 1992. The rational public: Fifty years of trends inAmericans'policy preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42.
Page, Benjamin I., RobertY. Shapiro, and Glenn R. Dempsey. 1987. What moves public opinion?AmericanPolitical Science Review81 (1): 23-44.
43.
Payne, Rodger A.1994. Public-opinion and foreign threats: Eisenhower's response to Sputnik. ArmedForces and Society21 (1): 89-112.
44.
Powlick, Philip, and Andrew Z. Katz. 1998. Defining the American public opinion foreign policy nexus. International Studies Review42 (1): 29-61.
45.
Putnam, Robert D.1988. Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. InternationalOrganization42 (3): 427-460.
46.
Ray, James Lee. 1985. The future of American-Israeli relations: A parting of ways?Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.
47.
Risse-Kappen, Thomas. 1991. Public opinion, domestic structure, and foreign policy in liberal democracies. World Politics43 (4): 479-512.
48.
Rosenau, James N.1969. Toward the study of national-international linkages. In Linkage politics: Essays on the convergence of national and international systems, edited by James N. Rosenau. New York: Free Press.
49.
Rusciano, Frank Louis. 2001. A world beyond civilizations: New directions for research on world opinion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research13 (1): 10-24.
50.
Rusciano, Frank Louis, and Roberta Fiske-Rusciano. 1990. Towards a notion of ‘world opinion.’International Journal of Public Opinion Research2 (4): 305-322.
51.
Russett, Bruce. 1993. Grasping the democratic peace: Principles for a post–cold war world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52.
Shapiro, Robert Y., and Benjamin I. Page. 1988. Foreign policy and the rational public. Journal of ConflictResolution32 (2): 211-247.
53.
Sobel, Richard. 2001. The impact of public opinion on US foreign policy since Vietnam: Constraining the colossus. New York: Oxford University Press.
54.
Strobel, Warren. 1997. Late-breaking foreign policy: The news media's influence on peace operations. Washington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace Press.
55.
Trumbore, Peter F.1998. Public opinion as a domestic constraint in international negotiations: Two-level games in the Anglo-Irish peace process. International Studies Quarterly42 (3): 545-565.
56.
Waltz, Kenneth N.1979. Theory of international politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
57.
Wang, T. Y.1999. U.S. foreign aid and UN voting: An analysis of important issues. International StudiesQuarterly45 (1): 199-210.
58.
Wilcox, Clyde, Lara Hewitt, and Dee Allsop. 1996. The gender gap in attitudes toward the Gulf War: A cross-national perspective. Journal of Peace Research33 (1): 67-82.
59.
Wilcox, Clyde, Aiji Tanaka, and Dee Allsop. 1993. World opinion in the Gulf crisis. Journal of ConflictResolution37 (1): 69-93.
60.
Zimmerman, William. 2002. The Russian people and foreign policy: Russian elite and mass perspectives,1993-2000Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
