Gender differences regarding support for the use of force average around 8 percent and are twice the size of differences on non-force issues. This article investigates a related gender gap in support for the use of torture. I investigate threat perceptions as a possible explanation for the gap and find strong support for this hypothesis. Specifically, increased threat perceptions lead men but not women to be more likely to support the use of torture. In addition to providing an explanation for the gender gap in support for torture, this extends prior work that finds increased threat perceptions with respect to terrorism lead to greater support for aggressive policies.
AldrichJohn H.SullivanJohn L.BorgidaEugene. 1989. ““Foreign Affairs and Issue Voting: Do Presidential Candidates” Waltz before a Blind Audience?” The American Political Science Review83:123–41.
2.
ANES (American National Election Studies). 2008. The ANES 2008 Time Series Study[dataset]. Stanford University and the University of Michigan [producers]. Accessed January 10, 2011. www.electionstudies.org.
3.
BaronReuben M.KennyDavid A.. 1986. “The Moderator–mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51 (6): 1173.
4.
BaumMatthew A.2004. “How Public Opinion Constrains the Use of Force: The Case of Operation Restore Hope.” Presidential Studies Quarterly34 (2): 187–226.
5.
BendynaMary E.FinucaneTamaraKirbyLynnO’DonnellJohn P.WilcoxClyde. 1996. “Gender Differences in Public Attitudes toward the Gulf War: A Test of Competing Hypotheses.” The Social Science Journal33 (1): 1–22.
BrandesLisa. 1992. “The Gender Gap and Attitudes Toward War.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 9-11, 1992.
8.
BursteinPaul. 2003. “The Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy: A Review and an Agenda.” Political Research Quarterly56 (1): 29–40.
9.
ConoverPamela JohnstonSapiroVirginia. 1993. “Gender, Feminist Consciousness, and War.” American Journal of Political Science37:1079–99.
10.
EichenbergRichard C.2003. “Gender Differences in Public Attitudes toward the Use of Force by the United States, 1990-2003.” International Security28 (1): 110–41.
11.
EichenbergRichard C.2007. “Gender Differences in Support for the Use of Military Force in Cross-national Perspective: The War System, Modernization, and the Universal Logics of Military Action.” Midwest Political Science Association Conference, Chicago, IL. Accessed February 20, 2011. http://ase.tufts.edu/polsci/faculty/eichenberg/genderDiffsSupport.pdf.
12.
EichenbergRichard C.2010. “When Gender (Sometimes) Trumps Party Citizen Attitudes toward Torture in the War against Terror and the Use of Poison Gas in World War II.” Midwest Political Science Association Conference, Chicago, IL. Accessed February 20, 2011. http://ase.tufts.edu/polsci/faculty/eichenberg/GenderTrumpsParty.pdf.
13.
FerraroKenneth F.1996. “Women’s Fear of Victimization: Shadow of Sexual Assault?” Social Forces75 (2): 667–90.
14.
FoyleDouglas C.2004. “Leading the Public to War? The Influence of American Public Opinion on the Bush Administration’s Decision to Go to War in Iraq.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research16 (3): 269–94.
15.
GronkePaulRejaliDariusDrenguisDustinHicksJamesMillerPeterNakayamaBryan. 2010. “US Public Opinion on Torture, 2001-2009.” PS: Political Science and Politics43 (3): 437–44.
16.
Haider-MarkelDonald P.VieuxAndrea. 2008. “Gender and Conditional Support for Torture in the War on Terror.” Politics and Gender4 (1): 5–33.
17.
HetheringtonMarcSuhayElizabeth. 2011. “Authoritarianism, Threat, and Americans’ Support for the War on Terror.” American Journal of Political Science55 (3): 546–60.
18.
HillKevin A.1993. “The Domestic Sources of Foreign Policymaking: Congressional Voting and American Mass Attitudes toward South Africa.” International Studies Quarterly37:195–214.
19.
HolstiOle R.1992. “Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: Challenges to the Almond-Lippmann Consensus Mershon Series: Research Programs and Debates.” International Studies Quarterly36 (4): 439–66.
20.
HolstiOle R.2004. Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy. Rev. ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
21.
HuddyLeonieFeldmanStanleyCapelosTheresaProvostColin. 2002. “The Consequences of Terrorism: Disentangling the Effects of Personal and National Threat.” Political Psychology23 (3): 485–509.
22.
HuddyLeonieFeldmanStanleyCasseseErin. 2009. “Terrorism, Anxiety, and War.” In Terrorism and Torture: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, edited by StritzkeW.LewandowskyS.DenemarkD.MorganF.ClareJ.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23.
HuddyLeonieFeldmanStanleyTaberCharlesLahavGallya. 2005. “Threat, Anxiety, and Support of Antiterrorism Policies.” American Journal of Political Science49 (3): 593–608.
24.
HuddyLeonieFeldmanStanleyWeberChristopher. 2007. “The Political Consequences of Perceived Threat and Felt Insecurity.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science614 (1): 131–53.
25.
HurwitzJonPeffleyMark. 1987. “How Are Foreign Policy Attitudes Structured? A Hierarchical Model.” The American Political Science Review81 (4): 1099–120.
26.
JacobsLawrence R.PageBenjamin I.. 2005. “Who Influences U.S. Foreign Policy?” American Political Science Review99 (1): 107–23.
27.
JamesLawrence R.BrettJeanne M.. 1984. “Mediators, Moderators, and Tests for Mediation.” Journal of Applied Psychology69 (2): 307.
28.
KrosnickJon A.BrannonLaura A.. 1993. “The Impact of the Gulf War on the Ingredients of Presidential Evaluations: Multidimensional Effects of Political Involvement.” American Political Science Review87:963–75.
29.
KrosnickJon A.FabrigarLeandre R.. 1997. “Designing Rating Scales for Effective Measurement in Surveys.” In Survey Measurement and Process Quality, edited by LybergL.BiemerP.CollinsM.de LeeuwE.DippoC.SchwarzN.TrewinD., 141–64. New York: John Wiley.
30.
LibermanPeter. 2013. “Retributive Support for International Punishment and Torture.” Journal of Conflict Resolution57 (2): 285–306.
31.
MayerJeremy D.ArmorDavid J.. 2012. “Support for Torture over Time: Interrogating the American Public about Coercive Tactics.” The Social Science Journal49 (4): 439–46.
32.
NincicMiroslavNincicDonna J.. 2002. “Race, Gender, and War.” Journal of Peace Research39 (5): 547–68.
33.
NincicMiroslavRamosJennifer. 2011. “Torture in the Public Mind.” International Studies Perspectives12 (3): 231–49.
34.
NorranderBarbara. 2008. “The History of the Gender Gaps.” In Voting the Gender Gap, edited by WhittakerLois Duke, 9–32. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
35.
PowlickPhilip J.1991. “The Attitudinal Bases for Responsiveness to Public Opinion among American Foreign Policy Officials.” Journal of Conflict Resolution35 (4): 611–41.
36.
PowlickPhilip J.1995. “The Sources of Public Opinion for American Foreign Policy Officials.” International Studies Quarterly39:427–51.
RamosJenniferNincicMiroslav. 2011. “Support for Torture: Some Ideational Predictors.” American Political Science Association Conference, Seattle, WA. Accessed March 15, 2014. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1900434.
39.
SapiroVirginiaConoverPamela Johnston. 1997. “The Variable Gender Basis of Electoral Politics: Gender and Context in the 1992 US Election.” British Journal of Political Science27 (4): 497–523.
40.
SattlerDavid N.KaiserCharles F.HittnerJames B.. 2000. “Disaster Preparedness: Relationships among Prior Experience, Personal Characteristics, and Distress1.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology30 (7): 1396–420.
41.
ShapiroRobert Y.MahajanHarpreet. 1986. “Gender Differences in Policy Preferences: A Summary of Trends from the 1960s to the 1980s.” Public Opinion Quarterly50 (1): 42–61.
42.
WemlingerElizabeth. 2014. “The Gender Gap and Torture: Opposition to Torture among Men and Women in the USA.” The Social Science Journal51 (1): 113–19.
43.
WesternJon. 2005. Selling Intervention and War: The Presidency, the Media, and the American Public. Baltimore, MD: JHU Press.
44.
ZallerJohn. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
45.
ZallerJohn. 1994. “Elite Leadership of Mass Opinion.” In Taken by Storm: The Media, Public Opinion and US Foreign Policy in the Gulf War, edited by BennettLancePaletzDavid, 250–74. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
