Why are democracies unusually successful in war? We find that superior human capital, harmonious civil-military relations, and Western cultural background are largely responsible. These traits correlate positively with democracy, and account for democracy’s apparent effectiveness bonus. This is either good news or bad news for democratic effectiveness theorists. Many believe that democracy causes these traits. If so, our findings strengthen democratic effectiveness theory by explicating its causal mechanism. But others see democracy as a consequence rather than a cause of such traits. If so, our findings challenge the thesis by identifying alternative causes of the effectiveness bonus previously attributed to democracy. Either way, the results show a powerful effect for unit level variables in military performance. In the process, these same results sharpen our understanding of military effectiveness in general, and the relationship between military performance and regime type in particular.
Andreski, Stanislav. 1968. Military organization and society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
2.
Baker, Raymond. 1978. Egypt’s uncertain revolution under Nasser and Sadat. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
Banks, Arthur S.1976. Cross-national time series, 1815-1973 (Computer file). ICPSR ed.Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research (producer and distributor).
4.
Bennett, D. Scott, and Allan C. Stam III. 1996. The duration of interstate wars, 1816-1985. American Political Science Review90 (2): 239-257.
5.
Biddle, Stephen. 1988. The European conventional balance: A reinterpretation of the debate. Survival30(2): 99-121.
6.
Biddle, Stephen. 1996. Victory misunderstood: What the Gulf War tells us about the future of conflict. International Security20 (2): 139-179.
Biddle, Stephen. 2001. Rebuilding the foundations of offense-defense theory. Journal of Politics63 (3): 741-774.
9.
Biddle, Stephen. 2004. Military power: Explaining victory and defeat in modern battle. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
Biddle, Stephen, Wade Hinkle, and Michael Fischerkeller. 2002. The interaction of skill and technology in combat. Military Operations Research7 (1): 39-56.
11.
Biddle, Stephen, and Robert Zirkle. 1996. Technology, civil-military relations, and warfare in the developing world. Journal of Strategic Studies19 (2): 171-212.
12.
Blumenson, Martin. 1961. Breakout and pursuit. Washington, DC: U.S. Army Office of the Chief of Military History.
13.
Bollen, Kenneth A.1979. Political democracy and the timing of development. American Sociological Review44 (4): 572-587.
14.
Bollen, Kenneth A., and Robert W. Jackman. 1985. Political democracy and the size distribution of income. American Sociological Review50 (4): 438-457.
15.
Brooks, Risa. 1998. Political-military relations and the stability of Arab regimes. Adelphi Paper no. 324. London: International Institute for Strategic Studies.
16.
Brooks, Risa. 2003. Conceptualizing military effectiveness. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 27, in Philadelphia.
17.
Brown, Harold. 1983. Thinking about national security. Boulder, CO: Westview.
18.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and Randolph M. Siverson. 1995. War and the survival of political leaders: A comparative study of regime types and political accountability. American Political Science Review89 (4): 841-855.
19.
Candan, U., L. S. Dewald, and L. R. Speight.1987. Present NATO practice in land wargaming. STC-PP-252. The Hague, the Netherlands: SHAPE Technical Center.
20.
Cederman, Lars-Erik.1997. Emergent actors in world politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21.
CHASE. 1986. Combat history analysis study effort (CHASE): Progress report for the period August 1984- June 1985. CAA-TP-86-2. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Army Concepts Analysis Agency.
22.
Christensen, Thomas J., and Jack Snyder. 1990. Chain gangs and passed bucks: Predicting alliance patterns in multipolarity. International Organization44 (2): 137-168.
23.
CIA. 2001. The world factbook 2001. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
24.
Cohen, Eliot A.1986. Distant battles: Modern war in the third world. International Security10(4):143-171.
25.
Cohen, Eliot A.2001. The unequal dialogue: The theory and reality of civil-military relations and the use of force. In Soldiers and civilians: The civil-military gap and American national security, ed. Peter D. Feaver and Richard H. Kohn, 429-458. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26.
Cohen, Eliot A.2002. Supreme command: Soldiers, statesmen, and leadership in wartime. New York: Free Press.
27.
Cole, Hugh M.1965. The Ardennes: Battle of the Bulge. Washington, DC: U.S. Army Office of the Chief of Military History.
28.
Copeland, Dale C.2000. The origins of major war. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
29.
Davis, Paul, and Donald Blumenthal. 1991. The base of sand problem: A white paper on the state of military combat modeling. N-3148-OSD/DARPA. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
30.
Desch, Michael. 1999. Cultural clash: Assessing the importance of ideas in security studies. International Security23 (1): 141-170.
31.
Desch, Michael. 2002. Democracy and victory: Why regime type hardly matters. International Security27(2):5-47.
32.
Downs, George W., and David M. Rocke. 1994. Conflict, agency, and gambling for resurrection: The principal-agent problem goes to war. American Journal of Political Science38:362-380.
33.
Dupuy, Trevor. 1984. Analysis of factors that have influenced outcomes of battles and wars. Vol. 1. CAA SR-84-6. Dunn Loring, VA: Historical Evaluation and Research Organization.
34.
Edmonds, Sir James E.1935. Military operations, France and Belgium, 1918. London: MacMillan and Co, Ltd.
35.
Ellis, L.F.1962. Victory in the West. Vol. 1, The battle of Normandy. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
36.
Epstein, Joshua. 1989. The 3:1 rule, the adaptive dynamic model, and the future of security studies. International Security13 (4): 90-127.
37.
Fearon, James D. 1995. The offense-defense balance and war since 1648. Presented to the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Chicago.
38.
Feaver, Peter D.2003. Armed servants: Agency, oversight, and civil-military relations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39.
Feaver, Peter D., and Richard H. Kohn. 2001. Conclusion: The gap and what it means for American national security. In Soldiers and civilians: The civil-military gap and American national security, ed. Peter D. Feaver and Richard H. Kohn, 459-474. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40.
Feng, Yi. 1997. Democracy, political stability and economic growth. British Journal of Political Science27 (3): 391-418.
41.
Gibbs, Brian, and J. David Singer. 1993. Empirical knowledge on world politics. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
42.
Gilpin, Robert. 1981. War and change in world politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
43.
Glantz, David M.1991. From the Don to the Dnepr. London: Frank Cass.
44.
Glaser, Charles. 1994-95. Realists as optimists. International Security19 (3): 50-90.
45.
Goemans, H. E.2000. War and punishment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
46.
Granato, Jim, and Ronald Inglehart, and David Leblang. 1996. The effects of cultural values on economic development: Theory, hypotheses, and some empirical tests. American Journal of Political Science40 (3): 607-631.
47.
Hamner, Christopher. 1997. Memorandum for the record: Historical review of U.S. Army CDB90 dataset. Manuscript (typescript prepared for Stephen Biddle on a contract basis and available from the authors upon request).
48.
Helmbold, Robert. 1990. A compilation of data on rates of advance in land combat operations. CAA-RP-90-04. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Army Concepts Analysis Agency.
49.
Herring, George C.1986. America’s longest war: The United States and Vietnam, 1950-1975. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
50.
Hinkle, Wade P., Michael Fischerkeller, Matthew Diascro, and Rafael Bonoan. 1999. Why nations differ in military skill. IDA D-2372. Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analyses.
51.
Hopf, Ted. 1991. Polarity, the offense-defense balance, and war. American Political Science Review85 (2): 475-494.
52.
Huntington, Samuel. 1957. The soldier and the state: The theory and politics of civil-military relations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53.
Huth, Paul. 1996. Standing your ground. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
54.
Jaggers, Keith, and Ted Robert Gurr.1996. Polity III: Regime change and political authority, 1800-1994 (Computer file). 2nd ICPSR version. Boulder, CO: Keith Jaggers/College Park, MD: Ted Robert Gurr (producers), 1995. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research (distributor).
55.
Jervis, Robert. 1978. Cooperation under the security dilemma. World Politics30 (2): 167-214.
56.
Johnson, Alastair Iain. 1995a. Cultural realism: Strategic culture and grand strategy in Chinese history. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
57.
Johnson, Alastair Iain. 1995b. Thinking about strategic culture. International Security19 (4): 32-64.
58.
Kennedy, Paul. 1988. Britain in the First World War. In Military effectiveness, vol. 1, ed. Allan Millett and Williamson Murray, 31-79. Boston: Allen & Unwin.
59.
Kennedy, Paul. 1991. Grand strategy in war and peace: Toward a broader definition. In Grand strategies in war and peace, ed. Paul Kennedy, 1-10. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
60.
Kier, Elizabeth. 1997. Imagining war. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
61.
King, Gary, James Honaker, Anne Joseph, and Kenneth Scheve. 2001. Analyzing incomplete political science data: An alternative algorithm for multiple imputation. American Political Science Review95 (1): 49-69.
Lake, David A.1992. Powerful pacifists: Democratic states and war. American Political Science Review86 (1): 24-37.
64.
Lake, David A., and Matthew A. Baum. 2001. The invisible hand of democracy: Political control and the provision of public services. Comparative Political Studies34 (6): 587-621.
65.
Levi, Margaret. 1997. Consent, dissent, and patriotism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66.
Liddell Hart, Basil H.1939. The defense of Britain. London: Faber and Faber.
67.
Liddell Hart, Basil H.1954. Strategy. New York: Penguin.
68.
Liddell Hart, Basil H.. 1960. The ratio of troops to space. Military Review40:3-14.
69.
Lynn-Jones, Sean. 1995. Offense-defense theory and its critics. Security Studies4 (4): 660-691.
70.
Mearsheimer, John J.1983. Conventional deterrence. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
71.
Mearsheimer, John J.1989. Assessing the conventional balance: The 3:1 rule and its critics. International Security13 (4): 54-89.
72.
Mearsheimer, John J.2001. The tragedy of great power politics. New York: Norton.
73.
Merritt, Richard L., and Dina Zinnes. 1989. Alternative indexes of national power. In Power in world politics, ed. Richard Stoll and Michael Ward, 11-28. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
74.
Morgenthau, Hans. 1948/1978. Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace. New York: Knopf.
75.
Nalebuff, Barry.1986. Brinksmanship and nuclear deterrence. Conflict Management and Peace Science9:19-30.
76.
Perlmutter, Amos, and Valerie Plave Bennett. 1980. The political influence of the military. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
77.
Perry, William. 1989. Defense technology. In Defense technology, ed. Asa Clark and John Lilley, 23-30. New York: Praeger.
78.
Playfair, I. S. O.1960. The Mediterranean and Middle East. Vol. 3. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
79.
Pollack, Kenneth M. 1996. The influence of Arab culture on Arab military effectiveness. Ph.D. diss., Massa-chusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
80.
Powell, Robert. 1999. In the shadow of power. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
81.
Quester, George H.1977. Offense and defense in the international system. New York: Wiley.
82.
Reiter, Dan. 1995. Political structure and foreign policy learning: Are democracies more likely to act on the lessons of history?International Interactions21:39-62.
83.
Reiter, Dan, and Allan C. Stam III. 1997. The soldier’s decision to surrender: Prisoners of war and world politics. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
84.
Reiter, Dan, and Allan C. Stam III. 1998. Democracy and battlefield military effectiveness. Journal of Conflict Resolution42 (3): 259-277.
85.
Reiter, Dan, and Allan C. Stam III. 2002. Democracies at war. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
86.
Rosen, Stephen. 1995. Military effectiveness: Why society matters. International Security19 (4): 5-31.
87.
Rosen, Stephen. 1996. Societies and military power: India and its armies. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
88.
Rotte, Ralph, and Christoph M. Schmidt, 2003. On the production of victory: Empirical determinants of battlefield success in modern war. Defense and Peace Economics14 (3): 175-192.
89.
Schultz, Kenneth, and Barry Weingast. 2003. The democratic advantage: Institutional foundations of financial power in international competition. International Organization57 (1): 3-42.
90.
Scobell, Andrew. 2002. China and strategic culture. Carlisle, PA: U.S. Army War College Strategic Studies Institute.
91.
Snyder, Jack. 1991. Myths of empire: Domestic politics and international ambition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
92.
Stam, Allan C., III. 1996. Win, lose or draw. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
93.
Taylor, James. 1983. Lanchester models of warfare. 2 vols. Arlington, VA: Operations Research Society of America.
94.
Thompson, James A., and Nanette C. Gantz. 1987. Conventional arms control revisited: Objectives in the new phase. N-2697-AF. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
95.
Van Evera, Stephen. 1994. Hypotheses on nationalism and war. International Security18 (4): 5-39.
96.
Van Evera, Stephen. 1998. Offense, defense, and the causes of war. International Security22 (4): 5-43.
97.
Van Evera, Stephen. 1999. Causes of war. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
98.
Walt, Stephen M.1987. The origins of alliances. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
99.
Waltz, Kenneth N.1979. Theory of international politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
100.
Waltz, Kenneth N.1989. The origins of war in neorealist theory. In The origin and prevention of major wars, ed. Robert I. Rotberg and Theodore K. Rabb, 39-52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
