A theory of sanction duration that focuses on differences between democratic and nondemocratic states in the structure of leaders’ support coalitions is tested, using a hazard model to analyze a data set of 47 sanction events with 272 observations. Results show that leadership change strongly affects the duration of sanctions only in the case of nondemocratic states. Leadership change in democratic states is unrelated to the duration of sanctions; however, leadership change in nondemocratic sender and nondemocratic target states is strongly related to the ending of economic sanctions.
Alesina, A. , and H. Rosenthal. 1995. Partisan politics, divided government, and the economy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Allison, P.1984. Event history analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
3.
Baldwin, D. A.1985. Economic statecraft. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4.
Bennett, D. S.1999. Parametric models, duration dependence, and time-varying data revisited. American Journal of Political Science43: 256-270.
5.
Bennett, D. S. , and A. C. Stam. 1996. The duration of interstate Wars. American Political Science Review90: 239-257.
6.
Bennett, D. S. , and A. C. Stam. 2000. EUGene: A conceptual manual. International Interactions26: 179-204.
7.
Bienen, H. , and N. Van de Walle. 1991. Of time and power: Leadership duration in the modern world. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
8.
Bolks, S. M. , and D. Al-Sowayel. 2000. How long do economic sanctions last? Examining the sanctioning process through duration. Political Research Quarterly53: 241-265.
9.
Bueno de Mesquita, B.1981. The war trap. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10.
Bueno de Mesquita, B. , J. D. Morrow, R. Siverson, and A. Smith. 2002. Political institutions, policy choice and the survival of leaders. British Journal of Political Science32 (4): 559-590.
11.
Buenode Mesquita, B. , and R. Siverson. 1995. War and the survival of political leaders: A comparative study of regime types and political accountability. American Political Science Review89: 841-855.
12.
Bueno de Mesquita, B. , A. Smith, R. M. Siverson, and J. D. Morrow. 2003. The logic of political survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13.
Bunce, V.1981. Do new leaders make a difference? Executive succession and public policy under capitalism and socialism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
Cox, G.1990. Centripetal and centrifugal incentives in electoral systems. American Journal of Political Science34: 903-935.
15.
Dashti-Gibson J. , P. Davis, and B. Radcliff. 1997. On the determinants of success of economic sanctions: An empirical analysis. American Journal of Political Science41: 608-618.
16.
Diermeier, D. , and R. Stevenson. 2000. Cabinet terminations and critical events. American Political Science Review94: 627-640.
17.
Dorussen, H. , and J. Mo. 2001. Ending economic sanctions: Audience costs and rent-seeking as commitment strategies. Journal of Conflict Resolution45: 395-427.
18.
Downs, A.1957. An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
19.
Doxey, M.1987. A framework for analysis with special reference to the UN and Southern Africa. International Organization26: 527-550.
20.
Drezner, D.1999. The sanctions paradox. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Drezner, D.2000. Bargaining, enforcement and multilateral economic sanctions. International Organization54: 73-102.
22.
Fearon, James D.1997. Signaling foreign policy interests: tying hands versus sinking costs. Journal of Conflict Resolution41: 68-90.
23.
Galtung, J.1967. On the effects of economic sanctions. World Politics19: 378-416.
24.
Goemans, H. E.2000. Fighting for survival: The fate of leaders and the duration of war. Journal of Conflict Resolution44: 555-580.
25.
Gordon, S. C.2002. Stochastic dependence in competing risks. American Journal of Political Science46: 200-217.
26.
Gowa, Joanne . 1999. Ballots and bullets: The elusive democratic peace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27.
Greene, William H.1993. Econometric analysis. 3rd ed.New York: Macmillan.
28.
Guisinger, A. , and A. Smith. 2002. Honest threats: The interaction of reputation and political institutions in international crises. Journal of Conflict Resolution46: 172-200.
29.
Hart, R. A., Jr.2000. Democracy and the successful use of economic sanctions. Political Research Quarterly53: 267-284.
30.
Hass, R. N. , ed. 1998. Economic sanctions and American diplomacy. Washington, DC: Brookings University Press.
31.
Hass, R. N. , and M. L. O’Sullivan, eds. 2000. Honey and vinegar. Washington, DC: Brookings University Press.
32.
Hibbs, D. A., Jr.1977. Political parties and macroeconomic policy. American Political Science Review71: 1467-1487.
33.
Hofferbert, R. , and I. Budge. 1993. Controversies: Party platforms and government spending. American Political Science Review87: 744-759.
34.
Hufbauer, G. C. , J. J. Schott, and K. E. Elliot. 1990. Economic sanctions reconsidered. Washington, DC: Institution for International Economics.
35.
Kaempfer, W. , and A. D. Lowenberg. 1988. The theory of international economic sanctions: A public choice approach. American Economic Review4: 786-793.
36.
Knorr, K.1977. International economic leverage and its uses. In Economic issues and national security, edited by Klaus Knorr and Frank N. Trager, 99-126. Lawrence, KS: Regents.
37.
Lancaster, T.1990. The econometric analysis of transition data. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Lenway, S. A.1988. Between war and commerce: Economic sanctions as a tool of statecraft. International Organization42: 397-426.
McGillivray, F. , and A. Smith. 2000. Trust and cooperation through agent-specific punishments. International Organization54: 809-824.
41.
Morgan, C. , and V. Schwebach. 1997. Fools suffer gladly: The use of economic sanctions in international crises. International Interactions21: 27-50.
42.
North, D. C.1981. Structure and change in economic history. New York: Norton.
43.
Olson, M., Jr.1993. Dictatorship, democracy and development. American Political Science Review87: 567-576.
44.
Pape, R.1997. Why economic sanctions do not work. International Security2: 90-136.
45.
Purcell, S.1998. Cuba. In Economic sanctions and American diplomacy, edited by R. N. Hass. Washington, DC: Brookings University Press.
46.
Rogers, E. S.1996. Using economic sanctions to control regional conflicts. Security Studies5: 43-72.
47.
Schreiber, A. P.1973. Economic coercion as an instrument of foreign policy: U.S. measures against Cuba and the Dominican Republic. World Politics25: 387-413.
48.
Schultz, K. A.1998. Domestic opposition and signaling in international crises. American Political Science Review92: 829-844.
49.
Smith, A.1996. The success and use of economic sanctions. International Interactions21: 229-245.
50.
Sodhy, P.1988. Malaysian-American relations during Indonesia’s confrontation against Malaysia, 1963-66. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies19: 111-136.
51.
Tsebelis, G.1990. Are sanctions effective? A game theoretic analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution34: 2-28.
52.
Tsebelis, G.1999. Veto players and law production in parliamentary democracies: An empirical analysis. American Political Science Review93: 591-608.
53.
USA ENGAGE. 2004. Statement of purpose. http://www.usaengage.org/archives/background/purpose.html/.
54.
Wallensteen, P.1968. Characteristics of economic sanctions. Journal of Peace Research3: 248-267.
55.
Warwick, P.1994. Government survival in parliamentary democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
56.
Wendt, A.1999. A social theory of international politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
