The poliheuristic theory of foreign policy decision making posits a two-stage process wherein the decision maker first employs a noncompensatory decision rule to eliminate politically unacceptable alternatives and then employs a (perhaps) traditional decision procedure to select from the remaining set of acceptable alternatives. Ageneral decision analysis is used to provide a structured account of the elimination process of the first stage of the poliheuristic theory by displaying a noncompensatory decision rule for eliminating unacceptable policy alternatives. The results show how general decision analysis can be used to specify when an alternative is unacceptable to a political decision maker who is sensitive to public opinion.
Camerer, C.1995. Individual decision making. In The handbook of experimental economics, edited by J. H. Kagel and A. Roth, 587-703. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
Carnap, Rudolf . 1966. Philosophical foundations of physics. New York: Basic Books.
3.
de Rivera, Joseph H.1968. The psychological dimension of foreign policy.Columbus, OH: Merrill.
4.
DeRouen, Karl . 2001. Politics, economics, and presidential use of force decision making. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen.
5.
Ellsberg, Daniel . 2002. Secrets. New York: Viking.
6.
Friedman, Daniel . 1998. Monty Hall’s three doors: Construction and deconstruction of a choice anomaly. American Economic Review88 (4): 933-946.
7.
Glimcher, Paul W.2003. Decisions, uncertainty, and the brain: The science of neuroeconomics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8.
Harbaugh, William T. , Kate Krause, and Lise Vesterlund. 2002. Risk attitudes of children and adults: Choices over small and large probability gains. Experimental Economics5:3-84.
9.
Herring, George , and Richard Immerman. 1984. Eisenhower, Dulles, and Dien Bien Phu: “The daywe didn’t go to war” revisited. Journal of American History71:343-363.
10.
Hilpinen, Risto . 1968. Rules of acceptance and inductive logic. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Janis, Irving L. , and Leon Mann. 1977. Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. New York: Free Press.
13.
Kahneman, Daniel , and Amos Tversky. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica47: 263-291.
14.
Kahneman, Daniel , and Amos Tversky. 2001. Choices, values, and frames. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Keeney, Ralph L. , and Howard Raiffa. 1976. Decisions with multiple objectives. New York: John Wiley.
16.
Levy, Jack S.2003.Applications of prospect theory to political science. Synthese135:215-241.
17.
Margolis, Howard . 1996. Dealing with risk. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
Mintz, Alex . 1993.The decision to attack Iraq: A noncompensatory theory of decision making. Journal of Conflict Resolution37:595-618.
19.
Mintz, Alex , and Nehemia Geva. 1997. The poliheuristic theory of foreign policy decision making. In Decision making on war and peace, edited by N. Geva and A. Mintz, 81-101. Boulder, CO: Lynn Rienner.
20.
Mintz, Alex , Nehemia Geva, and Karl DeRouen. 1994.Mathematical models of foreign policy decisionmaking: Compensatory vs. noncompensatory. Synthese100:441-460.
21.
Palfrey, Thomas R. , and Howard Rosenthal. 1991. Testing game-theoretic models of free riding: New evidence on probability bias and learning. In Laboratory research in political economy, edited by T. R. Palfrey, 239-268. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
22.
Rabin, Matthew . 1998.Psychology and economics. Journal of Economic Literature36:11-46.
23.
Redd, Steven B.2002.The influence of advisors on foreign policy decision making. Journal of Conflict Resolution46:335-364.
24.
Tversky, Amos , and Daniel Kahneman. 1992.Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty5:297-323.
