Proponents of the democratic peace have been criticized for failing to discuss colonial wars. Democratic countries have repeatedly fought such wars, which critics hold to be incompatible with democratic peace theory. Three reasons are suggested to explain why colonial wars do not invalidate the democratic peace argument. First, although democracies rarely, if ever, fight one another, they participate in war as much as nondemocracies. Thus, mixed political dyads have the greatest propensity for war. If nonstate adversaries are commonly perceived to be nondemocratic, democracies should fight colonial wars more frequently. Second, the nature of colonial conflict has changed over time. The relationship between democracy and colonial war is examined in colonial, imperialist, and postcolonial periods. Finally, a correct assessment of the democratic peace argument needs to rely on a multivariate model. With a suitable set of control variables, the positive relationship between war and democracy disappears. We also observe that in the post-World War II period, democracies fight colonial wars less frequently than non-democracies. We surmise that this might be related to changes in the perception of non-European peoples.
Barkawi, Tarak , and Mark Laffey, eds. 2001. Introduction: The international relations of democracy, liberalism, and war. In Democracy, liberalism, and war: Rethinking the democratic peace debate, edited by T. Barkawi and M. Laffey, 1-23. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
2.
Beck, Nathaniel , Jonathan N. Katz, and Richard Tucker. 1998. Taking time seriously, time-series cross-section analysis with a binary dependent variable. American Journal of Political Science42 (4): 1260-1288.
3.
Betts, Raymond F.1968. Europe overseas: Phases of imperialism. London: Basic Books.
4.
Blainey, Geoffrey . 1988. The causes of war. 3d ed.New York: Free Press.
5.
Brandt, Patrick T. , John T. Williams, Benjamin O. Fordham, and Brian Pollins. 2000. Dynamic modeling for persistent event-count time series. American Journal of Political Science44 (4): 823-843.
6.
Bremer, Stuart . 1992. Dangerous dyads: Conditions affecting the likelihood of interstate war, 1816-1965. Journal of Conflict Resolution36 (4): 309-341.
7.
Chan, Steve . 1984. Mirror, mirror, on the wall: Are the freer countries more pacific?Journal of Conflict Resolution28 (4): 617-648.
8.
Chan, Steve . 1997. In search of democratic peace, problems and promise. Mershon International Studies Review41 (1): 59-91.
9.
Crawford, Neeta C.1993. Decolonization as an international norm: The evolution of practices, arguments, and beliefs. In Emerging norms of justified intervention, edited by Laura R. Reed and Carl Kaysen, 37-61. Cambridge, MA: Committee of International Security Studies, American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
10.
Diamond, Jared . 1993. The third chimpanzee: The evolution and future of the human animal. New York: HarperPerennial.
11.
Dixon, William J.1994. Democracy and the peaceful settlement of international conflict. American Political Science Review88 (1): 14-32.
12.
Doyle, Michael W.1983a. Kant, liberal legacies, and foreign affairs: Part 1. Philosophy & Public Affairs12(3): 205-235.
13.
Doyle, Michael W.1983b. Kant, liberal legacies, and foreign affairs: Part 2. Philosophy & Public Affairs12 (4): 322-353.
14.
Ember, Carol , Melvin Ember, and Bruce Russett. 1992. Peace between participatory polities: A cross-cultural test of the “democracies rarely fight each other” hypothesis. World Politics44 (4): 573-599.
15.
Ferro, Marc . 1997. Colonization: A global history. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
16.
Fieldhouse, David K.1989. The colonial empires. London: Macmillan.
17.
Forsythe, David P.1992. Democracy, war and covert action. Journal of Peace Research29 (4): 385-395.
18.
Galtung, Johan . 1996. Peace by peaceful means: Peace and conflict, development, and civilization. London: Sage.
19.
Gleditsch, Kristian S. , and Michael D. Ward. 1997. Double take: A re-examination of democracy and autocracy in modern polities. Journal of Conflict Resolution41 (3): 361-383.
20.
Gleditsch, Kristian S. , and Michael D. Ward. 1999. A revised list of independent states since the Congress of Vienna. International Interactions25 (4): 393-413.
21.
Gleditsch, Nils Petter . 1988. Norge i verdenssamfunnet, En statistisk händbok [Norway in theworld community: A statistical handbook]. Oslo: Pax.
22.
Gleditsch, Nils Petter , and Hävard Hegre. 1997. Peace and democracy: Three levels of analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution41 (2): 283-310.
23.
Gleditsch, Nils Petter , and Hävard Hegre. 1998. Hazardous states and safeneighborhoods: Thedemocratic peaceat thenation-statelevel. Paper presented at the 39th annual conference of the International Studies Association, February, Minneapolis, MN.
24.
Gowa, Joanne . 1999. Ballots and bullets—The elusive democratic peace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25.
Haas, Michael . 1995. When democracies fight one another, just what is the punishment for disobeying the law? Paper presented at the 91st annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, August, Chicago.
26.
Hegre, Hävard , Tanja Ellingsen, Scott Gates, and Nils Petter Gleditsch. 2001. Towards a democratic civil peace: Democracy, democratization, and civil war 1834-1992. American Political Science Review95(1): 33-48.
27.
Henderson, Errol A.2002. Democracy and war: The end of an illusion. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
28.
Hermann, Margaret G. , and Charles W. Kegley. 1998. The US use of military intervention to promote democracy: Evaluating the record. International Interactions24 (2): 91-114.
29.
Hunt, Michael H.1987. Ideology and US foreign policy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
30.
Huth, Paul K.1996. Standing your ground: Territorial disputes and international conflict. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
31.
Jaggers, Keith , and Ted Gurr. 1995. Transitions to democracy: Tracking the third wave with Polity III indicators of democracy and autocracy. Journal of Peace Research32 (4): 469-482.
32.
James, Patrick , and Glenn E. Mitchell. 1995. Targets of covert pressure: The hidden victims of the democratic peace. International Interactions21 (1): 85-107.
33.
King, Gary , Michael Tomz, and Jason Wittenberg. 2000. Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science44 (2): 347-361.
Mann, Michael . 2001. Democracy and ethnic war. In Democracy, liberalism, and war: Rethinking the democratic peace debate, edited by T. Barkawi and M. Laffey, 67-85. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
36.
Mansfield, Edward D. , and Jack Snyder. 1995. Democratization and the danger of war. International Security20 (1): 5-38.
37.
Maoz, Zeev , and Bruce Russett. 1993. Normative and structural causes of democratic peace, 1946-86. American Political Science Review87 (3): 623-638.
38.
McLaughlin, Sara , Scott Gates, Hävard Hegre, Ranveig Gissinger, and Nils Petter Gleditsch. 1998. Timing the changes in political structures: A new polity database. Journal of Conflict Resolution42 (2): 231-242.
39.
Oneal, John R. , and Bruce Russett. 1999. Assessing the liberal peace with alternative specifications: Trade still reduces conflict. Journal of Peace Research36 (4): 423-442.
40.
Palmer, Robert R. , and Joel Colton. 1971. A history of the modern world. New York: McGraw-Hill.
41.
Raknerud, Arvid , and Hävard Hegre. 1997. The hazard of war: Reassessing the evidence for the democratic peace. Journal of Peace Research34 (4): 385-404.
42.
Ravlo, Hilde. 1999. Does democracy matter in preventing extrasystemic war? Ph.D. diss., Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Sociology and Political Science, Trondheim.
43.
Reiter, Dan , and Allan C. Stam. 2002. Democracies at war. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
44.
Reynolds, Henry . 1996. Aboriginal sovereignty: Three nations, one Australia?Crows Nest, New South Wales: Allen & Unwin.
45.
Robinson, Eric . 2001. Reading and misreading the ancient evidence for democratic peace. Journal of Peace Research38 (5): 593-608.
46.
Rummel, Rudolph J.1983. Libertarianism and international violence. Journal of Conflict Resolution27 (1):27-71.
47.
Rummel, Rudolph J.1995. Democracy, power, genocide, and mass murder. Journal of Conflict Resolution39 (1): 3-26.
48.
Rummel, Rudolph J.1997. Power kills: Democracy as a method of nonviolence. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
49.
Russett, Bruce . 1993. Grasping the democratic peace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
50.
Russett, Bruce , and William Antholis. 1992. Do democracies fight each other? Evidence from the Peloponnesian war. Journal of Peace Research29 (4): 415-435.
51.
Russett, Bruce , and John R. Oneal. 2001. Triangulating peace: Democracy, interdependence, and international organizations. New York: Norton.
52.
Russett, Bruce , and Harvey Starr. 2000. From democratic peace to Kantian peace: Democracy and conflict in the international system. In Handbook of war studies, 2d ed., edited by Manus Midlarsky, 93-128. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
53.
Sarkees, Meredith R.2000. The correlates of war data on war: An update to 1997. Conflict Management and Peace Science18 (1): 123-144.
54.
Singer, J. David , and Melvin Small. 1969. Formal alliances: An extension of the basic data. Journal of Peace Research6 (3): 257-282.
55.
Singer, J. David , and Melvin Small. 1993. Correlates of War project: National material capabilities data 1816-1985. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
56.
Singer, J. David , and Melvin Small. 1994. Correlates of War project: International and civil war data, 1816-1992 data file. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
57.
Small, Melvin , and J. David Singer. 1982. Resort to arms: International and civil wars, 1816-1980. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
58.
Snyder, Jack . 1991. Myths of empire, domestic politics and international ambition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
59.
Tomz, Michael , Jason Wittenberg, and Gary King. 1999. CLARIFY: Software for interpreting and presenting statistical results. Version 1.2.1. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. Retrieved from http://gking.harvard.edu/
60.
Tatu . 2000. A new dataset for measuring democracy, 1810-1998. Journal of Peace Research37(2): 251-265.
61.
Walt, Stephen . 1985. Allianceformation and thebalanceof world power. International Security9 (1): 42-43.
62.
Ward, Michael D. , and Kristian S. Gleditsch. 1998. Democratizing for peace. American Political Science Review41 (3): 51-61.
63.
Weart, Spencer . 1998. Never at war: Why democracies will not fight one another. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
64.
Woodruff, William . 1989. A concise history of the modern world. London: Macmillan.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
