Empirical study has worn essential theoretical edges from the power transition theory and rival balance-of-power theories, leaving a misshapen question: does parity in quantitative power capabilities of opposing individual states discourage or encourage war between those two states? Distortions of both theory and evidence—mixing balances of power with balances of terror; overlooking political geography, political incapacity, and alliance formations; and confining observations to state-dyads—render the evidence poor and weak. When the distortions are removed, the very strong evidence is that approximate parity in power capabilities encouraged war between great power disputants between 1816 and 1989.
Achen, C. H. , and D. Snidal. 1989. Rational deterrence theory and comparative case studies. World Politics41:143-169.
2.
Anderson, M. S.1970. The great powers and the Near East, 1774-1923. London: Arnold.
3.
Bartlett, C.1979. Britain and the European balance,1815-1848. In Europe's balance of power, 1815-1848, edited by A. Sked. London: Macmillan.
4.
Bled, J.-P.1992. Franz Joseph. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
5.
Bosworth, R. J. B.1979. Italy: The least of the great powers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Bremer, S. A.1980. National capabilities and war proneness. In The Correlates of War II: Testing some real-politik models, edited by J. David Singer. New York: Free Press.
7.
Bremer, S. A.1992. Dangerous dyads: Conditions affecting the likelihood of interstate war,1816-1965. Journal of Conflict Resolution36:309-341.
8.
Bueno de Mesquita, B.1981. The war trap. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9.
Clayton, G. D.1974. Britain and the eastern question: Missolongi to Gallipoli. London: Lion Library.
10.
Conquest, R.1973. The great terror: Stalin's purge of the thirties. London: Macmillan.
11.
Coox, A. D.1985. Nomonhan: Japan against Russia, 1939. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
12.
Craig, G. [1964] 1975. The battle of Koniggratz. Reprint, Westport, CT: Greenwood.
13.
Davies, N.1982. God's playground: A history of Poland. Vol. 2. New York: Columbia University Press.
14.
Dawson, W. H.1971. Forward policy and reaction. In The Cambridge history of British foreign policy, 1783-1919, edited by A. W. Ward and G. P. Gooch. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
15.
de Soysa, I. ,J. R. Oneal, and Yong-Hee Park. 1997. Testing power transition theory using alternative measures of national capabilities. Journal of Conflict Resolution41:509-528.
16.
Diehl, P. D.1985. Contiguity and military escalation in major power rivalries,1816-1980. Journal of Politics47:1203-1211.
17.
Doran, C. , and W. Parsons. 1980. War and the cycle of relative power. American Political Science Review74:947-965.
18.
Encyclopaedia Britannica. 1910-1911. 11th ed.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Erickson, J.1962. The soviet high command. New York: St. Martin's.
20.
Freeman, L. C.1986. Order-based statistics and monotonicity: A family of ordinal measures of association. Journal of Mathematical Sociology12:49-69.
21.
Geller, D. S.1990. Nuclear weapons, deterrence, and crisis escalation. Journal of Conflict Resolution34:291-310.
22.
Geller, D. S.1996. Relative power, rationality, and international conflict. In Parity and war: Evaluations and extensions of “the war ledger,” edited by J. Kugler and D. Lemke. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
23.
Hallberg, C. W.1955. Franz Joseph and Napoleon III, 1852-1864: A study of Austro-French relations.New York: Bookman.
24.
Harding, H.1991. The Chinese state in crisis. In The People's Republic: Part 2. Revolutions within the Chinese Revolution, 1966-1982, vol. 15, The Cambridge history of China, edited by R. MacFarquhar and J. K. Fairbank. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Hata Ikuhiko . 1976. The Japanese-Soviet confrontation,1935-1939. In Deterrent diplomacy: Japan, Germany, and the USSR, 1935-1940, edited by J. Wm. Morely. New York: Columbia University Press.
26.
Hochman, J.1984. The Soviet Union and the failure of collective security, 1934-1938. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
27.
Houweling, H. , and J. Siccama. 1988. Power transitions as a cause of war. Journal of Conflict Resolution31:87-102.
28.
Houweling, H. , and J. Siccama. 1991. Power transitions and critical points as predictors of great power war. Journal of Conflict Resolution35:642-658.
29.
Houweling, H. , and J. Siccama. 1996. A two-level explanation of world war. In Parity and war: Evaluations and extensions of 'the war ledger,” edited by J. Kugler and D. Lemke. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
30.
Jones, D. M. ,S. A. Bremer, and J. D. Singer. 1996. Militarized interstate disputes,1816-1992: Rationale, coding rules, and empirical patterns. Conflict Management and Peace Studies15:163-213.
31.
Kim, Woosang . 1989. Power, alliance and major wars,1816-1975. Journal of Conflict Resolution33:255-273.
32.
Kim, Woosang . 1991. Alliance transitions and great power war. American Journal of Political Science35:833-850.
33.
Kim, Woosang . 1996. Power parity, alliance and war from 1648-1975. In Parity and war: Evaluations of “the war ledger,” edited by J. Kugler and D. Lemke. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
34.
Kuropatkin, A.1909. The Russian army and the Japanese war: Being historical and critical comments on the military policy and power of Russia and on the campaign in the Far East. 2 vols. New York: E. P. Dutton.
35.
Langer, Wm.1968. An encyclopedia of world history. 4th ed.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
36.
Lemke, D.1996. Small states and war: An expansion of power transition theory. In Parity and war: Evaluations and extensions of “the war ledger,” edited by J. Kugler and D. Lemke. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
37.
Lemke, D.2002. Regions of war and peace. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Lemke, D. , and J. Kugler. 1996. The evolution of the power transition perspective. In Parity and war: Evaluations and extensions of “the war ledger,” edited by J. Kugler and D. Lemke. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
39.
Lemke, D. , and S. Werner. 1996. Power parity, commitment to change, and war. International Studies Quarterly40:235-260.
40.
Lobanov-Rostovsky, A.1954. Russia and Europe, 1825-1878. Ann Arbor, MI: George Wahr.
41.
Mack Smith, D.1988. The making of Italy, 1796-1866. New York: Holmes and Meier.
42.
Maddison, A.1995. Monitoring the world economy, 1820-1992. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
43.
Mearsheimer, J. J.2001. The tragedy of great power politics. New York: W. W. Norton.
44.
Mitchell, A.1979. The German influence in France after 1870: The formation of the republic. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
45.
Mitchell, A.1981. “A situation of inferiority”: French military reorganization after the defeat of 1870. American Historical Review86:49-62.
46.
Morgenthau, H. J.1964. Four paradoxes of nuclear strategy. American Political Science Review58:23-35.
47.
Morgenthau, H. J.1967. Politics among nations. 4th ed.New York: Knopf.
48.
Most, B. A. , and H. Starr. 1989. Inquiry, logic and international politics. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
49.
Moul, W. B.1988. Balances of power and the escalation to war of serious disputes among European great powers, 1815-1939: Some evidence. American Journal of Political Science32:241-275.
50.
Moul, W. B.1989. Measuring the “balances of power”: A look at some numbers. Review of International Studies15:101-121.
51.
Moul, W. B.2002a. Dangerous balances,1816-1989: A simple theory with longitudinal evidence. Review of International Studies28:657-676.
52.
Moul, W. B.2002b. Counting the seven weeks war. Unpublished manuscript. University of Waterloo. Ontario, Canada.
53.
Niou, E. M. S. ,P. C. Ordeshook, and G. F. Rose. 1989. The balance of power: Stability in international systems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
54.
Okamoto, S.1970. The Japanese oligarchy and the Russo-Japanese War. New York: Columbia University Press.
55.
Oneal, J. R.1989. Measuring the material base of the contemporary east-west balance of power. International Interactions15:177-196.
56.
Organski, A. F. K.1968. World politics. 2d ed.New York: Knopf.
57.
Organski, A. F. K. , and J. Kugler. 1980. The war ledger. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
58.
Rothenberg, G. E.1976. The army of Francis Joseph. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
59.
Senese, P. D.1999. Geographical proximity and issue salience: Their effects on the escalation of militarized interstate conflict. In A road map to war: Territorial dimensions of international conflict, edited by P. F. Diehl. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
60.
Singer, J. D. ,S. Bremer, and J. Stuckey. 1972. Capability distribution, uncertainty, and major power war, 1820-1965. In Peace, war and numbers, edited by Bruce M. Russett. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
61.
Small, M. , and J. D. Singer. 1969. Formal alliances,1816-1965: An extension of the basic data. Journal of Peace Research3:257-282.
62.
Small, M. , and J. D. Singer. 1982. Resort to arms: International and civil wars, 1816-1980. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
63.
Sumner, B. H.1933. The secret Franco-Russian treaty of 3 March 1859. English Historical Review89:65-83.
64.
Taylor, T.1979. Munich: The price of peace. New York: Doubleday.
65.
Vasquez, J. A.1996. Distinguishing rivals that go to war from those that do not: A quantitative comparative case study of the two paths to war. International Studies Quarterly40:531-558.
66.
Wawro, G.1996. The Austro-Prussian war: Austria's war with Prussia and Italy in 1866. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
67.
Williamson, S. R.1969. The politics of grand strategy: Britain and France prepare for war, 1904-1914. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
