Fiber metal laminates (FMLs) enhanced with nanofillers have been explored for thermal management in the automotive and aerospace applications; however, their thermal behavior as a function of distance remains inadequately investigated. This study evaluated the thermal barrier efficacy of aluminium–glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) fiber metal laminates modified with titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles, graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs), and silica (SiO2) nanoparticles at heat source distances of 15, 20, and 30 cm. A full factorial design (four materials × three distances × three replicates; n = 36) was implemented with controlled convective heating using a 1000 W hot-air dryer for 10 s. The transient thermal response was assessed using the temperature increase, heating rate, and cooling rate. The TiO2-modified laminate exhibited the lowest temperature increase at 15 cm (0.70 ± 0.03°C), representing a 63% reduction compared to the unfilled control (p < 0.001; Cohen’s d = 60.34). Conversely, GNP-modified laminates displayed non-monotonic distance-dependent behavior, with temperature increase rising from 2.40°C at 15 cm to 2.90°C at 20 cm, and then decreasing to 1.40°C at 30 cm. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated significant effects of material, distance, and their interaction (p < 0.001), showing a clear coupling between the material composition and heat source proximity. The anomalous graphene response warrants microstructural investigation. TiO2 recorded the most consistent performance across all distances. This work systematically quantifies coupled material–distance interaction effects in nano-modified FMLs, establishing that nanofiller selection and standoff distance must be jointly considered in thermal barrier design.
BakhbergenSSaraçMFBilirV, et al.Interface strengthening mechanisms in fiber metal laminates: a comprehensive review. Polym Compos2024; 45(8): 6754–6779.
2.
XieMZhanLMaB, et al.Classification of fiber metal laminates (FMLs), adhesion theories and methods for improving interfacial adhesion: a review. Thin-Walled Struct2024; 198: 111744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2024.111744
3.
HussainMZakiWUmerR. Flexural performance of shape memory alloy/CF-PEKK fiber metal laminates for aircraft morphing under varied temperature conditions. Sci Rep2025; 15: 14093. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-99123-4
4.
LiuZSimonettoEGhiottiA, et al.Modelling of fiber metal laminates thermoforming using superimposed membrane–shell elements. Int J Mech Sci2025; 302: 110518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2025.110518
5.
MondalKNúñezIIILDowneyCM, et al.Thermal barrier coatings overview: design, manufacturing, and applications in high-temperature industries. Ind Eng Chem Res2021; 60(17): 6061–6077. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.1c00788
6.
SidebothamG. Heat transfer modes: conduction, convection, and radiation. Heat Transfer Modeling: An Inductive Approach. Springer, 2015, pp. 61–93.
7.
AlexanderQGLundermanCV. Thermal camera reliability study: FLIR one pro. Engineer Research and Development Center (US), ERDC Technical Report, 2021.
8.
LiangCChenJGuJ, et al.State-of-the-art review on the flexural behavior of carbon fiber–reinforced aluminum laminates (CARALL). Compos B Eng2026; 315: 113444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2026.113444
9.
PanLXingTZhaoY, et al.Bending behavior of fiber metal laminate plates under thermo–mechanical loads. Materials2025; 18(19): 4640. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18194640
10.
YanBLiBWangX, et al.Measuring thermal conductivity of materials at room temperature in atmosphere using a continuous-wave laser and a neural network model. Int J Heat Mass Tran2022; 189: 122704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2022.122704
11.
MohamedMAAAdelMAbd El-AzizAM. Recent trends in two-dimensional graphene derivatives-based composites: review on synthesis, properties and applications. J Compos Mater2023; 57(27): 4327–4364. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219983231191271
12.
AhamadNMohammadASadasivuniKK, et al.Structural and mechanical characterization of stir cast Al–Al2O3–TiO2 hybrid metal matrix composites. J Compos Mater2020; 54(21): 2985–2997. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998320906207
13.
MaYLiHBridgesD, et al.Zero-dimensional to three-dimensional nanojoining: current status and potential applications. RSC Adv2016; 6(79): 75916–75936. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra15897h
14.
ZhuWWangQZhangP, et al.Functional graphene/epoxy resin composites prepared by a novel two-phase extraction method toward enhanced mechanical properties and thermal stability. Front Chem2024; 12: 1433727. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2024.1433727
15.
LiJLiuJLiN, et al.High thermal conductivity graphene-based interfacial materials through oriented assembly and catalytic graphitization for thermal management. Carbon2025; 235: 120081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2025.120081
16.
KlepkaTPodkościelnaBCzerwińskiD, et al.The influence of silica nanoparticles on the thermal and mechanical properties of crosslinked hybrid composites. Materials2021; 14(23): 7431. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14237431
17.
PhanMVTranTKTPhamQN, et al.Controllable synthesis of hollow silica nanoparticles using layered double hydroxide templates and application for thermal insulation coating. ACS Omega2023; 8(34): 31399–31409. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c03917
18.
BalajiDKumarPSBhuvaneshwariV, et al.A review on effect of nanoparticle addition on thermal behavior of natural fiber–reinforced composites. Heliyon2024; 11(1): e41192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41192
19.
SaidZPandeyAKTiwariAK, et al.Nano-enhanced phase change materials: fundamentals and applications. Prog Energy Combust Sci2024; 104: 101162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2024.101162
20.
JamshideasliDBabaeiHKeblinskiP, et al.Interfacial thermal conductance between multi-layer graphene sheets and solid/liquid octadecane: a molecular dynamics study. J Energy Storage2021; 37: 102469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2021.102469
21.
BakhbergenUAbbassiFKalimuldinaG, et al.Recent approaches of interface strengthening in fibre metal laminates: processes, measurements, properties and numerical analysis. Compos B Eng2024; 285: 111744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111744
22.
WangLWangJHuJ, et al.The effect of graphene nanofiller on electromagnetic-related primary resonance of an axially moving nanocomposite beam. Symmetry2025; 17(5): 651. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17050651
23.
ThiyaguCNarendraKumarU. Effect of graphene on thermal, mechanical, and shape memory properties of polyurethane nanocomposite. Appl Phys A2022; 128(10): 937. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-022-06078-8
ASM International Handbook Committee. Properties and selection–irons, steels, and high-performance alloys. ASM Handbook, Vol. 1. Materials Park, OH: ASM International, 1990.
27.
Rajesh KannanAMohan KumarSPramodR, et al.Microstructure and mechanical properties of dissimilar aluminum alloys AA5052-H32 and AA2219-T31 welded using cold metal transfer process. Materials Performance and Characterization2021; 10(1): 651–657. https://doi.org/10.1520/mpc20210043
28.
HarrisD. Design and development of a hyphenated technique for monitoring the cure of epoxy–amine resin systems. PhD Thesis. University of Birmingham, 2011.
29.
Siwińska-StefańskaKKubiakAPiaseckiA, et al.TiO2–ZnO binary oxide systems: comprehensive characterization and tests of photocatalytic activity. Materials2018; 11(5): 841. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11050841
MoriISumiyaY. Molecular origin of adhesion at epoxy resin–titania composite interfaces: crystal phase and hydroxylation effects. Langmuir2026; 42(5): 3964–3975, In press.
32.
SharmaSKSharmaLKPradhanR, et al.Interphase-centric and mechanism-driven advances in polymer composites reinforced with nano-synthetic, and inorganic fillers. Polymers2026; 18(3): 323. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18030323
33.
MendonçaFAVitoraziLHuamanNRC, et al.Development and characterization of graphene-reinforced epoxy nanocomposites optimized via box–behnken design. J Mater Res Technol2025; 39: 3137–3155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2025.10.045
34.
SepetciogluHLapčíkLLapčíkováB, et al.Improved mechanical properties of graphene-modified basalt fibre–epoxy composites. Nanotechnol Rev2024; 13(1): 20240052. https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2024-0052
35.
LiuZWangHChenY, et al.Study on curing kinetics and the mechanism of ultrasonic curing of an epoxy adhesive. Polymers2022; 14(3): 512. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14030512
36.
BelnoueJP-HNixon-PearsonOJThompsonAJ, et al.Consolidation-driven defect generation in thick composite parts. J Manuf Sci Eng2018; 140(7): 071006. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039555
37.
MukhtarMKlostermanDMorganAB. Preparation, cure, characterization, and mechanical properties of reactive flame-retardant cyanate ester/epoxy resin blends and their carbon fiber reinforced composites. Compos B Eng2024; 282: 111580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111580
38.
ASTM International. Standard test method for thermal diffusivity by the flash method. ASTM Standard E1461–13. ASTM International, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1520/E1461
39.
WenC-DMudawarI. Emissivity characteristics of roughened aluminum alloy surfaces and assessment of multispectral radiation thermometry (MRT) emissivity models. Int J Heat Mass Tran2004; 47(17–18): 3591–3605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2004.04.025
ChengC-S. Theory of factorial design. Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2016.
42.
BhanariyaS (2015) An assessment of effective thermal conductivity of epoxy–TiO2 composites. MSc Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology (NIT).
LiXYaoXPengH, et al.Anisotropic mPPO/TiO2 composites with enhanced permittivity and thermal conductivity via planar and uniaxial orientation strategies. J Alloys Compd2025; 1024: 180179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2025.180179
45.
LangeRANavrotskyA. Heat capacities of TiO2-bearing silicate liquids: evidence for anomalous changes in configurational entropy with temperature. Geochem Cosmochim Acta1993; 57(13): 3001–3011. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(93)90289-9
46.
RatanapornSBunriwWHarnchanaV, et al.Electrostatic energy-driven contact electrification mechanism from the ReaxFF molecular dynamics perspective. J Chem Phys2024; 161(9): 094702. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0217824
47.
LapčíkLSepetciogluHMurtajaY, et al.Study of mechanical properties of epoxy/graphene and epoxy/halloysite nanocomposites. Nanotechnol Rev2023; 12(1): 20220520. https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2022-0520
48.
JangJNamHESoSO, et al.Thermal percolation behavior in the thermal conductivity of polymer nanocomposites with lateral size of graphene nanoplatelets. Polymers2022; 14(2): 323. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14020323
49.
Mohammad NejadSBozorg BigdeliMSrivastavaR, et al.Heat transfer at the interface of graphene nanoribbons with different relative orientations and gaps. Energies2019; 12(5): 796. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12050796
50.
HuangSFuQYanL, et al.Characterization of interfacial properties between fibre and polymer matrix in composite materials: a critical review. J Mater Res Technol2021; 13: 1441–1484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.05.076
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
