This study investigates the small-hole drilling behaviour of additively manufactured hybrid Kevlar fiber reinforced polymer (KFRP) laminates, addressing the critical challenge of drilling-induced damage in advanced composite structures, and introduces an integrated experimental-MCDM framework for robust optimization of drilling parameters. KFRPs are gaining importance in aerospace and automotive sectors due to their exceptional toughness, impact resistance, and low weight. However, drilling these composites remains challenging because of excessive thrust, torque variation, fiber pullout, and delamination, which compromise hole integrity. The experiments were conducted on 3D-printed laminates fabricated using Fused deposition modelling (FDM), considering drill diameter (1.0–1.6 mm), spindle speed (2000–3000 rpm), and feed rate (0.01–0.03 mm/rev). Results revealed that thrust force increased notably with drill diameter (17.02–49.96 N), while torque peaked at 1.3 mm due to complex fiber-tool interactions. Delamination emerged as the predominant damage, intensifying with higher feed rates. To achieve optimal drilling conditions, Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) techniques TOPSIS, COCOSO, and MOORA were employed. All methods converged on the 1.3 mm drill, 3000 rpm spindle speed, and 0.01 mm/rev feed rate as the optimal parameters, minimizing thrust (13.303 N), torque (0.09 Nm), and delamination (Fd = 1.154). Sensitivity analysis validated the robustness of these results, highlighting delamination weighted scenarios favouring the 1.6 mm drill. The study uniquely integrates experimental analysis with MCDM optimization, establishing a systematic framework for precision drilling of additively manufactured KFRPs. The proposed framework provides a practical decision-support tool for selecting drilling parameters in hybrid composite machining, with direct relevance to precision manufacturing applications.
LiHQinXHuangT, et al.Machining quality and cutting force signal analysis in UD-CFRP milling under different fiber orientation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2018; 98: 2377–2387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2312-3
2.
PandelidiCBatemanSPiegertS, et al.The technology of continuous fibre-reinforced polymers: a review on extrusion additive manufacturing methods. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2021; 113: 3057–3077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06837-6
3.
GuoGFinkenstadtVLRizviR. Twin-screw extrusion of short Kevlar fiber–reinforced nylon composite filaments with enhanced mechanical properties and morphology. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2024; 130: 3553–3559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12927-4
ChenWZhangQCaoH, et al.Effect of fibre arrangements on tensile properties of 3D printed continuous fibre-reinforced thermoplastic composites. Plast Rubber Compos2022; 51: 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/14658011.2021.1939588
6.
ThandavamoorthyRKumarSLAdinarayananA, et al.Evaluation of mechanical and water absorption properties of kevlar/carbon/basalt fibers reinforced nano cellulose particulates Bisphenol-F LY556 epoxy composite. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. Epub ahead of print 22 August 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12152-z
7.
MelenkaGWCheungBKOSchofieldJS, et al.Evaluation and prediction of the tensile properties of continuous fiber-reinforced 3D printed structures. Compos Struct2016; 153: 866–875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.07.018
8.
YangCTianXLiuT, et al.3D printing for continuous fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites: mechanism and performance. Rapid Prototyp J2017; 23: 209–215. https://doi.org/10.1108/rpj-08-2015-0098
9.
DongGTangYLiD, et al.Mechanical properties of continuous kevlar fiber reinforced composites fabricated by fused deposition modeling process. Procedia Manuf2018; 26: 774–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.090
10.
ChabaudGCastroMDenoualC, et al.Hygromechanical properties of 3D printed continuous carbon and glass fibre reinforced polyamide composite for outdoor structural applications. Addit Manuf2019; 26: 94–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.01.005
SenMEryilmazOBakirB. Multi-objective process optimization of micro-drilling parameters on carbon and carbon–aramid (hybrid) fabric composites. Arab J Sci Eng2025; 50: 9535–9552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-024-09616-z
13.
PapaISilvestriATRicciardiMR, et al.Effect of fibre orientation on novel continuous 3D-printed fibre-reinforced composites. Polymers (Basel)2021; 13: 2524. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13152524
14.
NagarajanVASundaramSThyagarajanK, et al.Measuring delamination severity of glass fiber-reinforced epoxy composites during drilling process. Exp Tech2013; 37: 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1567.2012.00809.x
15.
DemiralMSaracyakupogluTŞahinB, et al.Minimizing delamination in CFRP laminates: experimental and numerical insights into drilling and punching effects. Polymers (Basel)2025; 17: 3056. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17223056
16.
ShiWYanTLiuY, et al.Simulation analysis of aramid fiber reinforced polymer hole machining and experimental study on delamination mechanism. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2023; 125: 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10645-x
17.
ZhangWDuHZhouH, et al. Study of burr and tear defects at the entrance and exit surface during drilling of Kevlar composites. AIP Adv. 1 May 2025; 15(5): 055106. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0230484
YalçınBBolatÇErgeneB, et al.Effect of drilling parameters and tool diameter on delamination and thrust force in the drilling of high-performance glass/epoxy composites for aerospace structures with a new design drill. Polymers (Basel)2024; 16: 3011. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16213011
20.
PathakSRMalikAMaliHS. Investigating effect of tool geometry on drilling performance of carbon fiber-reinforced polypropylene thermoplastic composite. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2025; 38: 3559–3584. https://doi.org/10.1177/08927057251318719
21.
PathakSRMalikAMaliHS. Experimental investigation on drilling behavior of carbon-Kevlar monolithic and interyarn hybrid composite. Compos B Eng2025; 301: 112499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2025.112499
22.
ElhadiAAmrouneSSlamaniM, et al.Evaluation of thrust force, delamination and hole quality during drilling an alfa-jute/epoxy natural fiber hybrid composite. J Compos Mater2026; 60: 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219983251362295
23.
DemiralMSaracyakupogluTŞahinB, et al.Minimizing delamination in CFRP laminates: experimental and numerical insights into drilling and punching effects. Polymers (Basel)2025; 17: 3056. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17223056
24.
KınaMKöklüUMorkavukS, et al.Comparative analyses of drilling force, temperature, and damage in natural and glass fiber-reinforced Al–epoxy composites. Polymers (Basel)2026; 18: 229. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18020229
25.
BenyettouRAmrouneSMohamedS, et al.Experimental investigation of the absorption behavior of date palm fiber reinforced iso-polyester composites: Artificial neuron network (ANN) modeling. J Nat Fibers2022; 19: 15902–15918. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2022.2136323
26.
SlamaniMChatelainJF. Issues and challenges in robotic trimming of CFRP. In: 12th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics (ICINCO), Colmar, France, 21–23 July, 2015, 2015.
27.
JiangZZhengLSunX, et al.Study on ultrasonic vibration-assisted drilling process and surface quality of KFRP. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf, Epub ahead of print 16 October 2025. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544054251383789
28.
WicaksonoSChaiGB. A review of advances in fatigue and life prediction of fiber-reinforced composites. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L2013; 227: 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464420712458201
29.
NgahASalmanSDLemanZ, et al.Effects of drilling parameters on delamination of kenaf-glass fibre reinforced unsaturated polyester composites. J Ind Textil2022; 51: 3057S–3076S. https://doi.org/10.1177/15280837211062053
30.
ArslaneMSlamaniMElhadiA, et al.Advanced optimization of drilling parameters in composite materials: a topsis-based approach for enhanced manufacturing precision. J Nat Fibers; 22: 2527276. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2025.2527276
31.
ShunmugeshKGaneshMBhavaniR, et al.Enhancing drilling performance in 3D printed PLA implants application of PIV and ML models. Sci Rep2025; 15: 13314. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-96126-z
32.
BarikTParidaSPalK. Optimizing process parameters in drilling of CFRP laminates: a combined MOORA–TOPSIS–VIKOR approach. Fibers Polym2024; 25: 1859–1876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-024-00531-6
33.
BarikTPalK. Optimization of process variables in drilling of carbon fiber reinforced plastics using various multi criteria decision making approaches. Materwiss Werksttech2023; 54: 45–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/mawe.202100300
34.
BarailyADasSSapkotaG, et al.Optimizing drilling process parameters: an MCDM-based comparative analysis using CRITIC, MOORA and CoCoSo. J Phys Conf Ser2024; 2818: 012028. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2818/1/012028
35.
SinghRPathakVKKumarR, et al.A historical review and analysis on MOORA and its fuzzy extensions for different applications. Heliyon2024; 10: e25453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25453
36.
SapkotaGShanmugasundarGKratochvilJ, et al.Optimizing drilling operation of hybrid aluminium composites using Merec and entropy-based weighting strategies-SN MCDM based comparative study. MM Sci J2025. Epub ahead of print 2 June 2025. https://doi.org/10.17973/MMSJ.2025_06_2025064
37.
AntilPSinghSMannaA. Electrochemical discharge drilling of SiC reinforced polymer matrix composite using Taguchi’s grey relational analysis. Arab J Sci Eng2018; 43: 1257–1266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-017-2822-6
38.
NiranjanTSingaravelBSrinivasulu RajuS. Optimization of hole quality parameters using TOPSIS method in drilling of GFRP composite. Mater Today Proc2022; 62: 2109–2114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.03.042
39.
ChakrabortyS. Applications of the MOORA method for decision making in manufacturing environment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2011; 54: 1155–1166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2972-0
40.
JananiKMohanrasuSSKashkynbayevA, et al.Ensemble feature selection via CoCoSo method extended to interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Math Comput Simul2025; 229: 50–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2024.09.023
41.
ChaubeySKGuptaK. Developing meso and microholes by spark-erosion based drilling processes: a critical review. Micromachines2022; 13: 885. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13060885
42.
GeierNPatraKAnandRS, et al.A critical review on mechanical micro-drilling of glass and carbon fibre reinforced polymer (GFRP and CFRP) composites. Compos B Eng2023; 254: 110589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110589
43.
RysavaZBruschiSCarmignatoS, et al.Micro-drilling and threading of the Ti6Al4V titanium alloy produced through additive manufacturing. Proced CIRP2016; 46: 583–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.04.030
ElhadiAAmrouneSSlamaniM, et al.Assessment and analysis of drilling-induced damage in jute/palm date fiber-reinforced polyester hybrid composite. Biomass Convers Biorefin2025; 15: 4243–4258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-05251-0
46.
ThirukkumaranKMenakaMMukhopadhyayCK, et al.A study on temperature rise, tool wear, and surface roughness during drilling of Al–5%SiC composite. Arab J Sci Eng2020; 45: 5407–5419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-04427-4
47.
Raj KumarDJeyaprakashNYangC-H, et al.Investigation on drilling behavior of CFRP composites using optimization technique. Arab J Sci Eng2020; 45: 8999–9014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-04649-6
48.
JagadeeshPMavinkere RangappaSSuyambulingamI, et al.Drilling characteristics and properties analysis of fiber reinforced polymer composites: a comprehensive review. Heliyon2023; 9: e14428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14428
49.
İlhanÇÇavuşYKatmerŞ, et al.Optimization of drilling parameters to minimize delamination in (PEKK/CFRP) thermoplastic polymer matrix composites for aerospace applications. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2025; 38: 2101–2119. https://doi.org/10.1177/08927057241292306
50.
ElhadiAAmrouneSSlamaniM, et al.Evaluation of drilling by induced delamination of hybrid biocomposites reinforced with natural fibers: a statistical analysis by RSM. J Compos Mater2024; 58: 2515–2530. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219983241271035
VaratharajuluMDuraiselvamMKumarMB, et al.Multi criteria decision making through TOPSIS and COPRAS on drilling parameters of magnesium AZ91. J Magnesium Alloys2022; 10: 2857–2874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2021.05.006
53.
TranQPNguyenVNHuangSC. Drilling process on CFRP: multi-criteria decision-making with entropy weight using grey-topsis method. Appl Sci (Switzerland)2020; 10: 7207. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10207207
54.
Gabriel RasoanaivoRYazdaniMZaratéP, et al.Combined compromise for ideal solution (CoCoFISo): a multi-criteria decision-making based on the CoCoSo method algorithm. Expert Syst Appl2024; 251: 124079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124079
55.
EisaAAbouHawaMFattouhM. Multi-objective optimization of HS-WEDM for hole cutting in thin-walled CFRP composites using COCOSO and genetic algorithms. J King Saud Univ Eng Sci. Epub ahead of print June 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2024.06.001
56.
Pérez-DomínguezLSánchez MojicaKYOvalles PabónLC, et al.Application of the MOORA method for the evaluation of the industrial maintenance system. J Phys Conf Ser2018; 1126: 012018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1126/1/012018
57.
ArslaneMAmrouneSSlamaniM, et al.Optimized fixture design for precision machining of tensile specimens in hybrid composites. J Mater Manuf2025; 4: 21–34.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
