Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026
Study on the optimization of the melt extrusion process for the preparation of T700/PPS prepregs for hydrogen pipelines and their NOL ring mechanical properties
To meet the demand for raw materials for high-performance thermoplastic composite materials for winding hydrogen pipelines, the problems existing in the hot melt extrusion process, such as insufficient and uneven resin impregnation, high porosity, and poor mechanical properties of the composite materials, were optimized. This paper studied the influence of key process parameters of the hot melt extrusion process on the quality of T700/PPS prepreg, designed single-factor experiments, used the response surface to analyze the influence of different process parameters (mold temperature, extrusion temperature, traction rate) in the hot melt extrusion process on the quality of prepreg (resin content, surface density), and explored the coupling effect among different process parameters. The T700/PPS prepreg prepared by the hot melt extrusion process was directly wound into NOL ring specimens using the in-situ consolidation winding process, and the interlayer shear strength and tensile strength of the thermoplastic composite material were tested. The results showed that the average surface density of the optimized prepreg was 339.95 g/m2, the resin content was 63.02 vol%, and the porosity was reduced from 12.5% before optimization to 1.5%. The average porosity of the NOL ring was 0.08%, the average ring tensile strength increased from 1541.54 MPa to 2212.31 MPa, and the average interlayer shear strength increased from 30.12 MPa to 50.18 MPa.
KoSQiaoYRoosendaalTJ, et al.Low-velocity impact resistance and failure characteristics of all thermoplastic woven polymer-fiber-reinforced plastic composites. J Compos Mater2025; 59: 269–282.
2.
Ghavami pourMKoloorSRPetrůM, et al.Critical review of interlaminar damage process and failure analysis in fiber-reinforced composite laminates encompassing fiber-bridging phenomenon. J Compos Mater2025; 59: 1553–1591.
3.
QiaoYFringLDPallakaMR, et al.A review of the fabrication methods and mechanical behavior of continuous thermoplastic polymer fiber–thermoplastic polymer matrix composites. Polym Compos2023; 44(2): 694–733.
4.
LinghongTWeiweiCBoZ, et al.Research progress in the preparation of fiber reinforced thermoplastic resin prepreg. J Mater Eng2021; 49: 42–53.
5.
OzturkFCobanogluMEceRE. Recent advancements in thermoplastic composite materials in aerospace industry. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2024; 37(9): 3084–3116.
6.
ShinJHKimDCenteaT, et al.Thermoplastic prepreg with partially polymerized matrix: material and process development for efficient part manufacturing. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2019; 119: 154–164.
7.
ChenJWangKDongA, et al.A comprehensive study on controlling the porosity of CCF300/PEEK composites by optimizing the impregnation parameters. Polym Compos2018; 39: 3765–3779.
8.
MaYJinSUedaM, et al.Higher performance carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites from thermoplastic prepreg technique: heat and moisture effect. Compos B Eng2018; 154: 90–98.
9.
StavrovVPMarkovAVZhernovskiiAV, et al.Effect of viscosity of a thermoplastic prepreg and matrix upon winding of rings. Mech Compos Mater2000; 36: 249–254.
10.
FlemmingTKressGFlemmingM. A new aligned short-carbon-fiber-reinforced thermoplastic prepreg. Adv Compos Mater1996; 5: 151–159.
11.
WeiTJieYShengruL, et al.The research progress of the composites of polyphenylese sulfide. Chemical Research and Application2002; 14: 718–722.
12.
ZhipingWZichenG. Preparation and characterization of Carbon Fber/Polyphenylene sulfide prepreg by powder fluidized impregnation. China Plast Ind2019; 47: 22.
13.
HongRZhangKLiuB, et al.Improvement of mechanical properties of polyphenylene Sulfide/Carbon fiber composites modified by aminated reinforcement. Mater Sci Forum2015; 815: 523–528.
14.
GaoYZhouXZhangM, et al.Polyphenylene sulfide-based membranes: recent progress and future perspectives. Membranes2022; 12(10): 924.
15.
RahateASNemadeKRWaghuleySA. Polyphenylene sulfide (PPS): state of the art and applications. Rev Chem Eng2013; 29(6): 471–489.
16.
GrouveWAkkermanR. Consolidation process model for film stacking glass/PPS laminates. Plast Rubber Compos2010; 39: 208–215.
17.
KohlerTRodingTGriesT, et al.An overview of impregnation methods for carbon fibre reinforced thermoplastics. Key Eng Mater2017; 742: 473–481.
18.
TianyunWHuihuangMZijianW, et al.Optimization of powder impregnation process parameters of carbon fiber reinforced polyether-ether-ketone prepreg tape by response surface methodology. Fibers Polym2022; 23: 1672–1683.
19.
YankuanLZichenGZhipingW. Preparation technology and development trend of continuous-fiber-reinforced thermoplastic prepregs. China Plastics2022; 36: 172–181.
20.
DongdongSHaitaoWZhenhuaY. Application of thermoplastic polyimide composite in aerospace field. Plastics2013; 42: 46–48.
21.
LiNZongLWuZ, et al.Compatibilization effect of aminated poly(phthalazinone ether ketone)s in carbon fiber‐reinforced copoly(phthalazinone ether sulfone)s composites. Polym Compos2018; 39: 4139–4147.
22.
ChenHRLiYHuanDJ, et al.Quality control and performance study of T700/PEEK thermoplastic automated tape laying prepreg preparation. Journal of Aeronautics2018; 39: 233–242.
23.
RenFYuYYangJ, et al.A mathematical model for continuous fiber reinforced thermoplastic composite in melt impregnation. Appl Compos Mater2017; 24: 675–690.
24.
NygårdPGustafsonC. Continuous glass fiber-polypropylene composites made by melt impregnation:: influence of processing method. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2004; 17: 167–184.
25.
ZhangGJiangZ. Overview of hydrogen storage and transportation technology in China. Unconventional Resources2023; 3: 291–296.
26.
YichenW. Development path and future prospects of hydrogen transportation and storage. Jest2024; 2(6): 124.
27.
XuYZhouYLiY, et al.Research progress and application prospects of solid-state hydrogen storage technology. Molecules2024; 29(8): 1767.
28.
YalcinESunerM. The changing role of diesel oil-gasoil-LPG and hydrogen based fuels in human health risk: a numerical investigation in ferry ship operations. Int J Hydrogen Energy2020; 45: 3660–3669.
29.
LahnaouiAWulfCHeinrichsH, et al.Optimizing hydrogen transportation system for mobility via compressed hydrogen trucks. Int J Hydrogen Energy2019; 44: 19302–19312.
30.
ZhouNLiXLiX, et al.Effect of hydrogen addition on the explosion characteristicsof methane-hydrogen-air mixture in T-shaped bifurcation pipe. Energy Sources, Part A Recovery, Util Environ Eff2022; 44: 3808–3822.
31.
ZhouCYeBSongY, et al.Effects of internal hydrogen and surface-absorbed hydrogen on the hydrogen embrittlement of X80 pipeline steel. Int J Hydrogen Energy2019; 44: 22547–22558.
32.
RuiCJinyangZPingX, et al.Hydrogen embrittlement of metallic materials in high-pressure hydrogen at normal temperature. Acta Energiae Solaris Sin2008; 29: 502–508.
33.
NamJSeferisJCKimS, et al.Gas permeation and viscoelastic deformation of prepregs in composite manufacturing processes. Polym Compos1995; 16(5): 370–377.
34.
EvansDReedRP. The permeability of resin based composite materials to radiolytic gases. Cryogenics1998; 38: 149–154.
35.
SahaSSullivanRW. A review on gas permeability of polymer matrix composites for cryogenic applications. J Compos Mater2024; 58: 827–847.
36.
Condé-WolterJRufMGLiebschA, et al.Hydrogen permeability of thermoplastic composites and liner systems for future mobility applications. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2023; 167: 107446.
37.
GuanCZhanLShiH, et al.Simulation and experiment analysis of relationship between voids and permeability of composites. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L2021; 236(1): 23–36.
38.
KatsivalisISignoriniVOhlssonF, et al.Hydrogen permeability of thin-ply composites after mechanical loading. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2024; 176: 107867.
39.
KinnaMA. NOL ring test methods. 1964.
40.
ChunyinRJiangpingDYipengZ, et al.Preparation and properties of carbon fiber fabric reinforced polyphenylene sulfide composites. Mater Rev2012; 26: 77.
41.
HomkhiewCCheewawuttipongWSrivabutC, et al.Machinability of wood-plastic composites from the CNC milling process using the box-behnken design and response surface methodology for building applications. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2025; 38: 161–187.
42.
GuerraJVelásquezLRubio-ClementeA, et al.Design and optimization of a siphon turbine using the response surface methodology. Results Eng2024; 22: 102241.
43.
PourahmadiEShadmehriFGanesanR. Prediction of transverse tensile strength of in-situ-consolidated Carbon/PEEK thermoplastic composite material based on micromechanical modeling and simulation. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2025; 197: 109062.
44.
ZhenSYingjieQShuhuaC, et al.Study on the laser in-situ winding process of carbon fiber reinforced PEEK composite. J Solid Rocket Technol2019; 42: 229–233.
