Fiber-reinforced polymer composites are increasingly adopted in energy absorption applications due to their low density and superior energy absorption per unit mass compared to metals. In addition to their lightweight characteristics, these materials offer high specific stiffness, strength, and durability in corrosive environments. This study presents a systematic evaluation of the crashworthiness performance of three commercially available fiber-reinforced composites—glass fiber/polypropylene (GF/PP), glass fiber/polyamide-6 (GF/PA6), and carbon fiber/epoxy (CF/Epoxy)—using a sinusoidal specimen geometry. The novelty of this work lies in the combined investigation of temperature (−40°C to 80°C) and impact velocity (quasi-static to 9.3 m⋅s−1) effects on crash energy absorption using standardized, automotive-grade materials. Key crashworthiness metrics—specific energy absorption (SEA), crush force efficiency (CFE), and steady-state crush stress (SSCS)—were used to characterize rate–temperature dependence. The CF/Epoxy system consistently yielded the highest SEA (up to 93 kJ⋅kg−1), while the thermoplastic GF/PA6 and GF/PP materials showed competitive SEA values of 88 and 75 kJ⋅kg−1, respectively. This full-factorial analysis provides critical insight into how thermoset and thermoplastic composites behave under realistic crash conditions and supports ongoing efforts to standardize crashworthiness testing methods for non-tubular composite structures.
ZhuGSunGYuH, et al.Energy absorption of metal, composite and metal/composite hybrid structures under oblique crushing loading. Int J Mech Sci2018; 135: 458–483.
2.
OthmanRIsmailNPahmiM, et al.Application of carbon fiber reinforced plastics in automotive industry: a review. Journal of Mechanical Manufacturing2018; 1: 144–154.
3.
GrahamBarnesColesIanRobertsRichardAdamsDaniel O.GarnerDavid M.. Crash safety assurance strategies for future plastic and composite intensive vehicles (pcivs). Technical report, National Transportation Library. 2008. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/9142.
4.
BrosiusD. Carbon fiber: the automotive material of the twenty-first century starts fulfilling the promise. In: Proceedings of the SPE Automotive Composites Conference & Exhibition (ACCE). Society of Plastics Engineers (SPE), 2003. https://archives.speautomotive.com/SPEA_CD/SPEA2003/pdf/f01.pdf.
5.
JacobGCStarbuckJMSimunovicS, et al.Energy absorption in glass-reinforced continuous strand mat composites. J Appl Polym Sci2003; 90(12): 3222–3232.
6.
RajakDPagarDMenezesP, et al.Fiber-reinforced polymer composites: manufacturing, properties, and applications. Polymers2019; 11(10): 1667.
7.
BarnettPRVignaLMartínez-ColladoJL, et al.Crashworthiness of recycled carbon fiber composite sinusoidal structures at dynamic rates. Compos Struct2023; 311: 116847.
8.
RyzińskaGDavidMPrustyG, et al.Effect of fibre architecture on the specific energy absorption in carbon epoxy composite tubes under progressive crushing. Compos Struct2019; 227: 111292.
9.
RicciardiMRPapaILoprestoV, et al.Experimental characterization of the crashworthiness of carbon fiber reinforced epoxy composites. Prog Aero Sci2024; 148: 101003.
10.
OshkovrSEshkoorRTaherS, et al.Crashworthiness characteristics investigation of silk/epoxy composite square tubes. Compos Struct2012; 94: 2337–2342.
JacobGCFellersJFSimunovicS, et al.Energy absorption in polymer composites for automotive crashworthiness. J Compos Mater2002; 36(7): 813–850.
13.
FazitaNurulM.R.KhalilAbdulH.P.S.IzzatiNor AmiraA.RizalSamsul. Effects of strain rate on failure mechanisms and energy absorption in polymer composites. Failure Analysis in Biocomposites, Fibre-Reinforced Composites and Hybrid Composites. Woodhead Publishing, 2019, pp. 51–78.
14.
IsaacCWEzekwemC. A review of the crashworthiness performance of energy absorbing composite structure within the context of materials, manufacturing and maintenance for sustainability. Compos Struct2021; 257: 113081.
15.
LukaszewiczDHJA. Automotive composite structures for crashworthiness. In: Advanced Composite Materials for Automotive Applications. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2013, pp. 99–127.
16.
FeraboliP. Development of a corrugated test specimen for composite materials energy absorption. J Compos Mater2008; 42(3): 229–256.
17.
ThorntonPHHarwoodJJBeardmoreP. Fiber-reinforced plastic composites for energy absorption purposes. Compos Sci Technol1985; 24(4): 275–298.
18.
HamadaHRamakrishnaSSatoH. Effect of testing temperature on the energy absorption behavior of carbon fiber/peek composite tubes. J Reinforc Plast Compos1996; 15(1): 30–47.
19.
RamakrishnaSHamadaH. Energy absorption characteristics of crash worthy structural composite materials. In Key Engineering Materials, Volume 141–143. 1997. pp. 585–622.
20.
ElyasSFTanKYRajuKS. Trigger mechanisms of progressive crushing – energy absorption in flat plate fiber-reinforced composites. In: Proceedings: 5th Annual Symposium: Graduate Research and Scholarly Projects. Wichita State University, pp. 94–95.
21.
HanagudSCraigJISriramP, et al.Energy absorption behavior of graphite epoxy composite sine webs. J Compos Mater1989; 23(5): 448–459.
22.
SebaeyTA. Effect of exposure temperature on the crashworthiness of carbon/epoxy composite rectangular tubes under quasi-static compression. Polymers2020; 12(9): 2028.
23.
AmaroAMReisPNBNetoMA. Experimental study of temperature effects on composite laminates subjected to multi-impacts. Compos B Eng2016; 98: 23–29.
24.
HufenbachWBöhmRThiemeM, et al.Polypropylene/glass fibre 3d-textile reinforced composites for automotive applications. Mater Des2011; 32(3): 1468–1476.
25.
KangKWKimHSChungTJ, et al.Temperature effect of low velocity impact resistance of glass/epoxy laminates. Int J Mod Phys B2010; 24(15-16): 2657–2663.
26.
JiaZLiTChiangFP, et al.An experimental investigation of the temperature effect on the mechanics of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites. Compos Sci Technol2018; 154: 53–63.
27.
MamalisAGRobinsonMManolakosDE, et al.Crashworthy capability of composite material structures. Compos Struct1997; 37(2): 109–134.
28.
FarleyGL. The effects of crushing speed on the energy-absorption capability of composite tubes. J Compos Mater1991; 25(10): 1314–1329.
29.
FarleyGL. Energy absorption of composite materials. J Compos Mater1983; 17(3): 267–279.
AhmadHMarkinaAAPorotnikovMV, et al.A review of carbon fiber materials in automotive industry. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng2020; 971: 032011.
33.
KhanFardinHossainNayemJannat MimJuhiRahmanMaksudurS.M.IqbalJayedMd.BillahMostakimAsaduzzaman ChowdhuryMohammad. Advances of Composite Materials in Automobile Applications – A review. Journal of Engineering Research (Elsevier). 2024. doi:10.1016/j.jer.2024.02.017, In press.
34.
CatalinNegoitaCristacheNicoletaBodorMarius. The epoxy resin - history and perspectives. Mater Plast. 2016; 53(3): 564–567.
35.
VolpeVLanzilloSAffinitaG, et al.Lightweight high-performance polymer composite for automotive applications. Polymers2019; 11(2): 326.
36.
MontgomeryDC. Design and analysis of experiments. 9 ed. John Wiley & Sons, 2017.
37.
FarottiGMoliternoGBoccardiS, et al.Adiabatic shear banding in isotactic polypropylene under dynamic compression: a coupled experimental and numerical investigation. Polymer2022; 246: 124702.
38.
ElmahdyAZottiABorrielloA, et al.In-depth analysis of the high strain rate compressive behavior of rtm6 epoxy using digital image correlation. Polymers2022; 14(9): 1771.
39.
XuLQLYWangZ. The strain rate effect on energy absorption characteristics of carbon-fiber/epoxy composite tubes under axial crushing. Compos B Eng2017; 112: 248–260.
40.
ZhengXJWSunY. High strain rate compressive behavior of cfrp laminates using a split hopkinson pressure bar. Mater Des2016; 103: 250–260.
41.
LuoHYeLMaiYW. Crushing behavior and energy absorption of hybrid square cfrp-al tubes under quasi-static axial loading. Compos B Eng2012; 43(2): 964–973.
