Fiber reinforced polymer matrix composites, especially laminated composites, have been widely used as load-bearing structural materials. The susceptibility of their compressive performance to impact-induced damage has led to numerous research work investigating the mechanical behaviors of damaged composites under compressive loading. Compression-after-impact (CAI) testing has been commonly used to determine the residual strength of the impacted composites and investigate their failure behaviors. It provides great design guidelines for the load-bearing composite materials used in various applications such as aerospace, aviation, etc. This comprehensive review summarizes the recent progress in CAI testing and analysis as well as important findings discovered and reported. The effects of different variables, including impact energy level, fiber type and architecture, fiber stacking sequence, preloading, temperature, repair, etc. on the CAI performance of composite materials are illustrated. The failure mechanisms of the composites after CAI testing are reviewed. The perspectives and future work on CAI testing of laminated composites are finally described. This review provides insights to guide the development of more damage-tolerant composites.
NingH. Thermoplastic composites: principles and applications. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, 2021.
2.
LiuAZouYChenY, et al.Experimental investigation of impact resistance and compression behavior of CF/PEEK laminates after hot‐press fusion repair with different stacking sequences. Polym Compos2023; 44(10): 6467–6481.
3.
SukurEFElimsaSEskizeybekV, et al.Damage tolerance of basalt fiber reinforced multiscale composites: effect of nanoparticle morphology and hygrothermal aging. Compos B Eng2024; 273: 111234.
4.
JribiKAziziBMelloAW. In-Situ detection of delamination reinitiation in carbon fiber reinforced polymers post barely visible impact damage. Heliyon2024; 10(18): e37782.
5.
ZouJLeiZBaiR, et al.Damage evolution and failure mechanism of asymmetric composite laminates under low-velocity impact and compression after impact. Thin-Walled Struct2023; 182: 110177.
6.
LaiWSaeedipourHGohK. Experimental assessment of drilling-induced damage in impacted composite laminates for resin-injection repair: influence of open/blind hole-hole interaction and orientation. Compos Struct2021; 271: 114153.
7.
DondishALiLMelenkaG. Full-field deformation and failure analysis for compression after impact of carbon fibre reinforced polymer laminates. Compos Struct2023; 323: 117469.
8.
BalıkoğluFDemircioğluTKİnalO, et al.Compression after low velocity impact tests of marine sandwich composites: effect of intermediate wooden layers. Compos Struct2018; 183: 636–642.
9.
NaikNJoglekarMAryaH, et al.Impact and compression after impact characteristics of plain weave fabric composites: effect of plate thickness. Adv Compos Mater2004; 12(4): 261–280.
10.
KulkarniMDGoelRNaikN. Effect of back pressure on impact and compression-after-impact characteristics of composites. Compos Struct2011; 93(2): 944–951.
11.
AnuseVSShankarKVelmuruganR, et al.Compression-after-impact analysis of carbon/epoxy and glass/epoxy hybrid composite laminate with different ply orientation sequences. Thin-Walled Struct2023; 185: 110608.
12.
BianTLyuQFanX, et al.Effects of fiber architectures on the impact resistance of composite laminates under low-velocity impact. Appl Compos Mater2022; 29(3): 1125–1145.
13.
SaeedifarMSalehMNEl-DessoukyHM, et al.Damage assessment of NCF, 2D and 3D woven composites under compression after multiple-impact using acoustic emission. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2020; 132: 105833.
14.
PetitSBouvetCBergerotA, et al.Impact and compression after impact experimental study of a composite laminate with a cork thermal shield. Compos Sci Technol2007; 67(15-16): 3286–3299.
15.
GoSTugirumubanoAKimH. Analysis of impact characteristics and detection of internal defects for unidirectional carbon composites with respect to fiber orientation. Polymers2021; 13(2): 203.
16.
Sánchez-SáezSBarberoEZaeraR, et al.Compression after impact of thin composite laminates. Compos Sci Technol2005; 65(13): 1911–1919.
17.
YangBChenYLeeJ, et al.In-plane compression response of woven CFRP composite after low-velocity impact: modelling and experiment. Thin-Walled Struct2021; 158: 107186.
18.
KravchenkoSGVolleCKravchenkoOG. An experimental investigation on low-velocity impact response and compression after impact of a stochastic, discontinuous prepreg tape composite. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2021; 149: 106524.
19.
YinHIannucciL. An experimental and finite element investigation of compression-after-impact (CAI) behaviour of biaxial carbon fibre non-crimp-fabric (NCF) based composites. Compos Struct2022; 281: 115057.
20.
AnuseVSShankaKVelmuruganR, et al. Effect of graphene nano-platelets on the low-velocity-impact and compression-after-impact strength of the glass fiber epoxy composite laminates. J Compos Mater. 2024; 58(5): 601–618.
21.
LiHYuZTaoZ, et al.Experimental investigations on the repeated low velocity impact and compression‐after‐impact behaviors of woven glass fiber reinforced composite laminates. Polym Compos2024; 45(2): 1884–1897.
22.
YanHOskayCKrishnanA, et al.Compression-after-impact response of woven fiber-reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol2010; 70(14): 2128–2136.
23.
Roy XuLKarakoҫAFloresM, et al.Predicting the upper-bound of interlaminar impact damage in structural composites through a combined nanoindentation and computational mechanics technique. Compos Struct2022; 286: 115110.
24.
AlizadehFGuedes SoaresC. Influence of long-term moisture exposure and impact damage on the residual compressive strength of glass-reinforced vinylester. Compos Struct2021; 260: 113525.
25.
WuJAZhangZDaiX, et al.Effect of stacking sequence on multi‐point low‐velocity impact and compression after impact damage mechanisms of UHMWPE composites. Polym Compos2021; 42(12): 6500–6511.
26.
XiangYZhangZYangX, et al.Effect of stitch density on the damage inhibition and compression strength after high-velocity impact of UHMWPE fiber composites. Compos Struct2024; 328: 117728.
27.
LeeSHongCChoiT, et al.CSAI analysis of non-crimp fabric cross-ply laminate manufactured through wet compression molding process. Compos Struct2021; 255: 113056.
28.
SeyyednouraniMAkgunSUlusH, et al.Experimental investigation on compression-after-impact (CAI) response of aerospace grade thermoset composites under low-temperature conditions assisted with acoustic emission monitoring. Compos Struct2023; 321: 117260.
29.
DhaliwalGSNewazGM. Compression after impact characteristics of carbon fiber reinforced aluminum laminates. Compos Struct2017; 160: 1212–1224.
30.
WangPChenYYueC, et al.An experimental and numerical study on impact and compression after impact of stiffened composite panels. Polymers2022; 15(1): 165.
31.
PapaIRicciardiMRCalzolariA, et al.Mechanical behavior and damage degree of hybrid glass/carbon composites at low temperature. Polym Compos2021; 42(5): 2432–2444.
32.
ZhuXChenWLiuL, et al.Experimental investigation on high-velocity impact damage and compression after impact behavior of 2D and 3D textile composites. Compos Struct2023; 303: 116256.
33.
DemircanÖKadıoğluKÇolakP, et al.Compression after impact and charpy impact characterizations of glass fiber/epoxy/MWCNT composites. Fibers Polym2020; 21: 1824–1831.
34.
LaiJPengZHuangZ, et al.Effect of stitching, stitch density, stacking sequences on low-velocity edge impact and compression after edge impact (CAEI) behavior of stitched CFRP laminates. Materials2022; 15(24): 8822.
35.
YouGGaoYGaoX, et al. Study on impact properties of carbon/Kevlar fiber hybrid composites. Polym Compos. 2024; 45(10): 8665–8676.
36.
KodagaliKVakili RadCSockalingamS, et al.Low velocity impact and compression-after-impact response of hybrid pseudo-woven meso-architectured carbon/epoxy composite laminates manufactured via automated fiber placement. Compos B Eng2024; 271: 111154.
37.
WagmareRHarsheRPednekarJ, et al.Effect of nanosilica on low‐velocity impact and compression after impact properties of continuous carbon fiber‐reinforced epoxy composites manufactured by 3D printing. Polym Compos2023; 44(11): 7794–7803.
38.
ZhaoSYinXZhangD. An investigation into the impact resistance of bio‐inspired laminates with interlayer hybrid unidirectional/woven carbon fibers. Polym Compos2023; 44(11): 7485–7498.
39.
LyuQWangBZhaoZ, et al.Damage and failure analysis of hybrid laminates with different ply-stacking sequences under low-velocity impact and post-impact compression. Thin-Walled Struct2022; 180: 109743.
40.
YangKYangLGongP, et al.Experiment and analysis of mechanical properties of carbon fiber composite laminates under impact compression. E-Polymers2022; 22(1): 309–317.
41.
ParkRJangJ. Effect of stacking sequence on the compressive performance of impacted aramid fiber/glass fiber hybrid composite. Polym Compos2000; 21(2): 231–237.
42.
LiuXYangBZhangL, et al.Compression-after-impact behaviour of carbon fibre reinforced composites toughened by interleaving polyimide nonwoven veils. Thin-Walled Struct2025; 215: 113415.
43.
PatilSMallikarjuna ReddyDNaveenJ, et al.Low-velocity impact and compression after impact properties of hemp and jute fiber reinforced epoxy composites. J Nat Fibers2022; 19(15): 12309–12324.
44.
GrabiMChellilAHabibiM, et al.Characterization of low-velocity impact and post-impact damage of luffa mat composite using acoustic emission and digital image correlation. J Compos Mater2022; 56(11): 1651–1665.
45.
PandianAHameed SultanMTManikandanV, et al.Effect of stacking sequence of glass and jute fiber reinforced polymer composites on their low velocity impact properties. J Compos Mater2022; 56(16): 2599–2608.
46.
UmairMHussainMShakerK, et al.Impact performance of three-dimensional woven composites with novel binding yarn patterns. J Nat Fibers2022; 19(16): 14461–14476.
47.
HabibiMSelmiSLaperrièreL, et al.Experimental investigation on the response of unidirectional flax fiber composites to low-velocity impact with after-impact tensile and compressive strength measurement. Compos B Eng2019; 171: 246–253.
48.
LiYZhongJFuK. Low-velocity impact and compression-after-impact behaviour of flax fibre-reinforced composites. Acta Mech Solida Sin2020; 33: 431–448.
49.
PrasathKAArumugaprabuVAmuthakkannanP, et al.Low velocity impact, compression after impact and morphological studies on flax fiber reinforced with basalt powder filled composites. Mater Res Express2020; 7(1): 015317.
50.
Muhammad AmirSMHameed SultanMTMd ShahAU, et al.Low velocity impact and compression after impact properties on gamma irradiated Kevlar/oil palm empty fruit bunch hybrid composites. Coatings2020; 10(7): 646.
51.
JabbarAHussainJBasitA, et al. Influence of chemical treatments and nanocellulose spray coating on the mechanical, low velocity impact and compression after impact performance of nonwoven jute composites. J Nat Fibers. 2020; 17(12): 1785–1797.
52.
SafriSNASultanMTHJawaidM, et al.Analysis of dynamic mechanical, low-velocity impact and compression after impact behaviour of benzoyl treated sugar palm/glass/epoxy composites. Compos Struct2019; 226: 111308.
53.
NorAFMSultanMTHJawaidM, et al.Analysing impact properties of CNT filled bamboo/glass hybrid nanocomposites through drop-weight impact testing, UWPI and compression-after-impact behaviour. Compos B Eng2019; 168: 166–174.
54.
IsmailKSultanMShahA, et al.Low velocity impact and compression after impact properties of hybrid bio-composites modified with multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Compos B Eng2019; 163: 455–463.
55.
SelverEDalfiHYousafZ. Investigation of the impact and post-impact behaviour of glass and glass/natural fibre hybrid composites made with various stacking sequences: experimental and theoretical analysis. J Ind Textil2022; 51(8): 1264–1294.
56.
NagumoYHamanakaMShirasuK, et al.Fracture mechanism of carbon fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composite laminates under compression after impact. J Compos Mater2024; 58(11): 1377–1390.
57.
XieHLiuGYaoJ, et al.Finite element analysis of the effect of crystallinity on low-velocity impact performance of poly (aryl ether ketone) composites. J Compos Mater2024; 58(5): 585–600.
58.
LerewDFlaterPGaskeyB, et al.Mechanical behavior of bio-inspired helicoidal thermoplastic composites. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2024; 37(3): 1094–1110.
59.
AytenAİ. Low velocity and compression after impact behaviors of fiber‐reinforced MA‐g‐PP and MA‐g‐ABS matrix composites. Polym Compos2021; 42(8): 3922–3932.
60.
IshikawaTSugimotoSMatsushimaM, et al.Some experimental findings in compression-after-impact (CAI) tests of CF/PEEK (APC-2) and conventional CF/epoxy flat plates. Compos Sci Technol1995; 55(4): 349–363.
61.
Ghasemi NejhadMNParvizi-MajidiA. Impact behaviour and damage tolerance of woven carbon fibre-reinforced thermoplastic composites. Composites1990; 21(2): 155–168.
62.
GaoS-LKimJ-K. Cooling rate influences in carbon fibre/PEEK composites. Part III: impact damage performance. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2001; 32(6): 775–785.
63.
NayaFPernas-SánchezJFernándezC, et al. Experimental study of the importance of fibre breakage on the strength of thermoplastic matrix composites subjected to compression after impact. Compos Struct. 2024; 342: 1–11.
64.
EreminAVBurkovMVBogdanovAA, et al.Impact behavior and residual strength of PEEK/CF-Laminated composites with various stacking sequences. Polymers2024; 16(5): 717.
65.
LiuAChenYHuJ, et al.Low‐velocity impact damage and compression after impact behavior of CF/PEEK thermoplastic composite laminates. Polym Compos2022; 43(11): 8136–8151.
66.
LuTShenH-SWangH, et al.Compression-after-impact effect on postbuckling behavior of thermoplastic composite laminated plates. Aero Sci Technol2022; 121: 107384.
67.
VieilleBCasadoVMBouvetC. Influence of matrix toughness and ductility on the compression-after-impact behavior of woven-ply thermoplastic-and thermosetting-composites: a comparative study. Compos Struct2014; 110: 207–218.
68.
MurrayJJAllenTBickertonS, et al.Thermoplastic RTM: impact properties of anionically polymerised polyamide 6 composites for structural automotive parts. Energies2021; 14(18): 5790.
69.
CarvelliVNishidaHFujiiT, et al.Low velocity impact and CAI of woven carbon fibre reinforced highly polymerized thermoplastic epoxy modified with submicron diameter glass fibres. Compos Struct2020; 236: 111835.
70.
RehmanMMShakerKNawabY. Effect of poly ether ether ketone particles on v‐notched shear and drop weight impact behavior of carbon/epoxy composite. Polym Compos2022; 43(5): 3219–3227.
71.
YeWChengYDouH, et al.Low-velocity impact response and compression behaviour after the impact of 3D-printed CCFR self-sensing honeycomb structures. Compos B Eng2023; 266: 110992.
72.
ZhuKZhengXSunJ, et al.The relationship between repeated impacts and CAI strength of sandwich structure considering different impactor shape in individual impact. Eng Struct2024; 305: 117720.
73.
KuramotoBKStanfieldMLAdamsDO. Development and evaluation of the sandwich edgewise compression after impact test. J Sandw Struct Mater2024: 10996362231226333.
74.
NettlesATBarnesBWGuinWE, et al.The effects of impactor shape on the compression after impact strength of carbon/epoxy face sheet foam core sandwich structure. J Sandw Struct Mater2024; 26(1): 25–37.
75.
StaroverovOStrungarEWildemannV. Evaluation of the survivability of CFRP honeycomb-cored panels in compression after impact tests. Frat Ed Integrità Strutt2021; 15(56): 1–15.
76.
HuoXSunGZhangH, et al.Experimental study on low-velocity impact responses and residual properties of composite sandwiches with metallic foam core. Compos Struct2019; 223: 110835.
77.
MishraRWienerJMilitkyJ, et al.Compression resilience and impact resistance of fiber‐reinforced sandwich composites. Polym Adv Technol2019; 30(12): 3073–3082.
78.
NettlesATGuinWESadowskiI. The effects of loading direction on the compression after impact strength of quasi-isotropic face sheet honeycomb core sandwich structure. J Sandw Struct Mater2022; 24(7): 2013–2029.
79.
RajputMSBurmanMHallströmS. Evaluation of test methods and face-sheet thickness effects in damage tolerance assessment of composite sandwich plates. J Sandw Struct Mater2022; 24(2): 1340–1366.
80.
Jean-St-LaurentMDanoM-LPotvinM-J. Compression after impact behavior of carbon/epoxy composite sandwich panels with nomex honeycomb core subjected to low velocity impacts at extreme cold temperatures. Compos Struct2021; 261: 113516.
81.
AryalBMorozovEShankarK. Effects of ballistic impact damage on mechanical behaviour of composite honeycomb sandwich panels. J Sandw Struct Mater2021; 23(6): 2064–2085.
82.
FatimaNSDhaliwalGSNewazG. Influence of interfacial adhesive on impact and post-impact behaviors of CFRP/end-grain balsawood sandwich composites. Compos B Eng2021; 212: 108718.
83.
BaiRGuoJLeiZ, et al.Compression after impact behavior of composite foam-core sandwich panels. Compos Struct2019; 225: 111181.
84.
PanZHuWWangM, et al.Transverse impact damage and axial compression failure of square braided CFRP/PMI sandwich composite beams. Thin-Walled Struct2021; 162: 107547.
85.
BashaMWagihAMelaibariA, et al.On the impact damage resistance and tolerance improvement of hybrid CFRP/Kevlar sandwich composites. Microporous Mesoporous Mater2022; 333: 111732.
86.
CastellanosAGPrabhakarP. Elucidating the mechanisms of damage in foam core sandwich composites under impact loading and low temperatures. J Sandw Struct Mater2022; 24(1): 337–359.
87.
YeMYuanBHuY, et al.Compression‐after‐impact properties of carbon fiber composites with interlays of aramid pulp micro‐/nanofibers. Polym Compos2021; 42(9): 4424–4433.
88.
KinawyMRubinoFCanaleG, et al.Face damage growth of sandwich composites under compressive loading: experiments, analytical and finite element modeling. Materials2021; 14(19): 5553.
89.
WuYWanY. The low-velocity impact and compression after impact (CAI) behavior of foam core sandwich panels with shape memory alloy hybrid face-sheets. Sci Eng Compos Mater2019; 26(1): 517–530.
90.
TariqFUzairMShifaM. Residual compressive strength of aluminum alloy honeycomb sandwich panel in the presence of multiple impact dents. J Sandw Struct Mater2022; 24(2): 1189–1205.
91.
MunirajDSreehariV. Experimental damage evaluation of honeycomb sandwich with composite face sheets under impact load. Int J Eng2021; 34(4): 999–1007.
92.
YeHDaiXYuanT, et al.Residual compression property and response of honeycomb sandwich structures subjected to single and repeated quasi-static indentation. Rev Adv Mater Sci2021; 60(1): 404–417.
93.
ZhaoWXieZLiX, et al.Compression after impact behavior of titanium honeycomb sandwich structures. J Sandw Struct Mater2018; 20(5): 639–657.
94.
ZhangCTanK. Low-velocity impact response and compression after impact behavior of tubular composite sandwich structures. Compos B Eng2020; 193: 108026.
95.
YangBZhouQLeeJ, et al.Experimental and numerical study of low-velocity impact damage in sandwich panel with UHMWPE composite facings. Int J Solid Struct2023; 284: 112519.
96.
BashaMWagihAMelaibariA, et al.Impact and post-impact response of lightweight CFRP/wood sandwich composites. Compos Struct2022; 279: 114766.
97.
SusainathanJEymaFDe LuyckerE, et al.Experimental investigation of compression and compression after impact of wood-based sandwich structures. Compos Struct2019; 220: 236–249.
98.
WangKTaheriF. Experimental and numerical analysis of low-velocity impact and compression after impact responses of novel 3D hybrid composites. Compos Struct2024; 338: 118133.
99.
RathnasabapathyMMouritzAOrificiA. Impact-under-load damage tolerance of a fibre metal laminate. Compos Struct2022; 287: 115368.
100.
JakubczakPBieniaśJDadejK, et al.The issue of residual strength tests of thin fibre metal laminates. Composites Theory and Practice2014; 14(3): 134–138.
101.
VermaLJefferson AndrewJSivakumarSM, et al.Compression after high-velocity impact behavior of pseudo-elastic shape memory alloy embedded glass/epoxy composite laminates. Compos Struct2021; 259: 113519.
102.
JiangDQianHXuY, et al.Residual strength of C/SiC composite after low-velocity impact. Mater Today Commun2022; 30: 103140.
103.
GemiDSŞahinÖSGemiL. Experimental investigation of axial compression behavior after low velocity impact of glass fiber reinforced filament wound pipes with different diameter. Compos Struct2022; 280: 114929.
104.
CherniaevAPavlovaSPavlovA, et al.Prediction of load-bearing capacity of composite parts with low-velocity impact damage: identification of intra-and inter-ply constitutive models. Applied Mechanics2020; 1(1): 59–78.
105.
WuZShiLChengX, et al.Transverse impact behavior and residual axial compression characteristics of braided composite tubes: experimental and numerical study. Int J Impact Eng2020; 142: 103578.
106.
ShiLWuZChengX, et al.Residual crashworthiness of braided composite tube with transverse multi-impact damages: experimental and numerical study. Compos Struct2021; 255: 112903.
107.
DebskiHRozyloPGliszczynskiA. Effect of low-velocity impact damage location on the stability and post-critical state of composite columns under compression. Compos Struct2018; 184: 883–893.
108.
YunZZhaoWChenL, et al. Thermoplastic sandwich cylindrical structure with hierarchical honeycomb core: dynamic/static compression and compression-after-impact behavior. Static compression and compression-after-impact behavior. International Journal of Impact Engineering. 2025; 201: 105289.
109.
PengADengJCaiD, et al.On damage behavior and stability of composite T-shaped stiffened panels under compression after impact considering impact locations. Thin-Walled Struct2023; 182: 110295.
110.
GliszczynskiABogenfeldRDegenhardtR, et al.Corner impact and compression after impact (CAI) of thin-walled composite profile–An experimental study. Compos Struct2020; 248: 112502.
111.
SeamoneADavidsonPWaasAM, et al.Low velocity impact and compression after impact of thin and thick laminated carbon fiber composite panels. Int J Solid Struct2024; 292: 112745.
112.
LyuQWangBGuoZ. Predicting post-impact compression strength of composite laminates under multiple low-velocity impacts. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2023; 164: 107322.
113.
ShabaniPLiLLaliberteJ, et al.Compression after impact (CAI) failure mechanisms and damage evolution in large composite laminates: high-fidelity simulation and experimental study. Compos Struct2024; 339: 118143.
114.
Fakhreddini-NajafabadiSTorabiMTaheri-BehroozF. Nanoclay role in improving compression after impact strength of the carbon/epoxy composites. J Compos Mater2023; 57(17): 2717–2737.
115.
AktaşMKarakuzuRArmanY. Compression-after impact behavior of laminated composite plates subjected to low velocity impact in high temperatures. Compos Struct2009; 89(1): 77–82.
116.
ZhangDZhangWZhouJ, et al.Numerical investigation of the low-velocity impact damage resistance and tolerance of composite laminates with preloads. Aero Sci Technol2023; 142: 108650.
117.
KatuninADanekWWronkowiczA, et al.Methodology of residual strength prediction of composite structures with low-velocity impact damage based on NDT inspections and numerical-experimental CAI testing. Int J Impact Eng2023; 181: 104762.
118.
PsarrasSMuñozRGhajariM. Compression performance of composite plates after multi-site impacts: a combined experimental and finite element study. Compos Struct2023; 322: 117342.
119.
YokozekiTIwahoriYIshiwataS, et al.Mechanical properties of CFRP laminates manufactured from unidirectional prepregs using CSCNT-dispersed epoxy. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2007; 38(10): 2121–2130.
120.
SeamoneADavidsonPWaasAM, et al.Low velocity impact and compressive response after impact of thin carbon fiber composite panels. Int J Solid Struct2022; 257: 111604.
121.
LinSWaasAM. Accelerating computational analyses of low velocity impact and compression after impact of laminated composite materials. Compos Struct2021; 260: 113456.
122.
LiWNieH. Predicting post-impact compression strength of composite structures using the inverse method. Compos Struct2020; 245: 112348.
123.
JoglekarSRanatungaVPankowM. Validation of an efficient finite element analysis approach for simulation of low velocity impact and compression strength after impact response. Compos Struct2021; 255: 112945.
124.
VermaKKViswarupachariCGaddikeriKM, et al.Unfolding the effects of tuft density on compression after impact properties in unidirectional carbon/epoxy composite laminates. Compos Struct2021; 258: 113378.
125.
CaoDHuHWangY, et al.Experimental and numerical studies on influence of impact damage and simple bolt repair on compressive failure of composite laminates. Compos Struct2021; 275: 114491.
126.
ZhouSJiaYXXuL, et al.Study on the damage behavior of carbon fiber composite after low‐velocity impact under hygrothermal aging. J Appl Polym Sci2021; 138(17): 50289.
127.
TuoHLuZMaX, et al.Damage and failure mechanism of thin composite laminates under low-velocity impact and compression-after-impact loading conditions. Compos B Eng2019; 163: 642–654.
128.
Standard test method for measuring the damage resistance of a fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composite to a drop-weight impact event. ASTM D7136/D7136M. ASTM International Standards Organization, 2015.
129.
Jefferson AndrewJArumugamVSaravanakumarK, et al.Compression after impact strength of repaired GFRP composite laminates under repeated impact loading. Compos Struct2015; 133: 911–920.
130.
ElamvazhudiBGopalakannanS. Low-velocity impact and compression after impact behaviour of nanoparticles modified polymer composites. J Reinforc Plast Compos. 2023; 285: 1–9.
131.
KnoppAFunckEHoltzA, et al.Delamination and compression-after-impact properties of z-pinned composite laminates reinforced with circumferentially notched z-pins. Compos Struct2022; 285: 115188.
132.
RajendranBKumar P KD. Influence of cenosphere on compression after impact strength of glass epoxy laminates. Eng Res Express2021; 3(4): 045052.
133.
KostopoulosVKotrotsosAGeitonaA, et al.Low velocity impact response and post impact assessment of carbon fiber/epoxy composites modified with diels-alder based healing agent. A novel approach. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2021; 140: 106151.
134.
SalehMNEl-DessoukyHMSaeedifarM, et al.Compression after multiple low velocity impacts of NCF, 2D and 3D woven composites. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2019; 125: 105576.
135.
ZhuXChenWLiuL, et al.Experimental and numerical investigation on the compression after high-velocity impact behavior of composite laminates. Eng Fail Anal2024; 159: 108125.
136.
HouYTieYLiC, et al.On the damage mechanism of high-speed ballast impact and compression after impact for CFRP laminates. Compos Struct2019; 229: 111435.
137.
ZhangNZhouGGuoX, et al.High-velocity impact damage and compression after impact behavior of carbon fiber composite laminates: experimental study. Int J Impact Eng2023; 181: 104749.
138.
ASTM D7137/D7137M. Standard test method for compressive residual strength properties of damaged polymer matrix composite plates. ASTM International Standards Organization, 2017.
139.
International standard ISO 18352 carbon-fibre-reinforced plastics—determination of compression after impact properties at a specified impact-energy level. Beuth Verlag GmbH, 2009.
140.
SACMA recommended test method for compression after impact properties of oriented fiber-resin composites SRM 2R-94. Suppliers of Advanced Composite Materials Association, 1994.
141.
KokRCuvilloRRodríguez-GarcíaV, et al.Low velocity impact response of automated fiber placement advanced placed ply composites. Compos Sci Technol2024; 253: 110636.
142.
LisleTBouvetCHongkarnjanakulN, et al.Measure of fracture toughness of compressive fiber failure in composite structures using infrared thermography. Compos Sci Technol2015; 112: 22–33.
143.
Airbus Test Method. Fibre Reinforced Plastics—Determination of Compression Strength after Impact; 0,10,2005. Reference Number AITM1-0010; Airbus S.A.S. Blagnac, France, 2005.
144.
Boeing Advanced Composite Compression Tests. Boeing specification support standard BSS 7260. The Boeing Company, 1988.
145.
N.A.S.A. Aircraft industry standard specification for graphite fiber/toughened thermoset resin composite material. ACEE Composites Project Office. 1985.
146.
European Standard. Aerospace series—fibre reinforced plastics—test method—determination of the compression strength after impact. German and English version EN 6038: 0,2,2016. Beuth Verlag GmbH, 2016.
147.
GB/T 21239. Test method for compression after impact properties of fiber reinforced plastic laminates. China National Standards, 2007.
148.
NettlesATGuinWEMavoJP. The effects of edge quality on the measured compression strength of quasi-isoptropic composite specimens and its practical implication to the development of allowables. J Compos Mater2021; 55(6): 827–841.
149.
ThorssonSISringeriSPWaasAM, et al.Experimental investigation of composite laminates subject to low-velocity edge-on impact and compression after impact. Compos Struct2018; 186: 335–346.
150.
ASTM D8287/D8287M-Standard test method for compressive residual strength properties of damaged sandwich composite panels. ASTM International, 2022.
151.
JiaZGarnierCPastorM-L, et al.Experimental investigation of impacted multidirectional laminates under compressive static and cyclic loading. Compos Struct2023; 322: 117335.
152.
Amirashjaee-AsalemiKTaheri-BehroozFFakhreddini-NajafabadiS. Investigation of the low-velocity impact and compression after impact performance of CFRPs. J Eng Mech2023; 149(9): 04023066.
153.
SiegfriedMTolaCClaesM, et al.Impact and residual after impact properties of carbon fiber/epoxy composites modified with carbon nanotubes. Compos Struct2014; 111: 488–496.
154.
PengJCaiDQianY, et al.Low-velocity impact and compression after impact behavior of 3D integrated woven spacer composites. Thin-Walled Struct2022; 177: 109450.
155.
HarmanABWebbLChangP, et al.Post-impact fatigue durability assessment of composite laminates for enhanced aircraft sustainment. AIAA J2022; 60(2): 938–950.
156.
ShahSZHMegat-YusoffPKaruppananS, et al.Compression and buckling after impact response of resin-infused thermoplastic and thermoset 3D woven composites. Compos B Eng2021; 207: 108592.
157.
XuWLiuLXuW. Experiments and finite element simulations of composite laminates following low velocity on-edge impact damage. Polymers2022; 14(9): 1744.
158.
ChowdhurySTripathiLBeheraBK. Impact resistance and damage tolerance of 3D woven composites. J Mater Sci. 2024; 59(18): 7636–7699.
159.
CamineroMGarcía-MorenoIRodríguezGP. Experimental study of the influence of thickness and ply-stacking sequence on the compression after impact strength of carbon fibre reinforced epoxy laminates. Polym Test2018; 66: 360–370.
160.
IvañezIGarcia-CastilloSSanchez-SaezS, et al.Analysis of the impact location on damage tolerance of bonded-repaired composite laminates. Polym Test2019; 78: 106000.
161.
LinkeMFlüggeFOlivares-FerrerAJ. Design and validation of a modified compression-after-impact testing device for thin-walled composite plates. J Compos Sci2020; 4(3): 126.
162.
HabibF. A new method for evaluating the residual compression strength of composites after impact. Compos Struct2001; 53(3): 309–316.
163.
LinkeMGarcía-ManriqueJA. Contribution to reduce the influence of the free sliding edge on compression-after-impact testing of thin-walled undamaged composites plates. Materials2018; 11(9): 1708.
164.
JakubczakPPodolakP. The issue of CAI assessment of fibre metal laminates. Compos Struct2022; 281: 114959.
165.
WangXHuangJTanR, et al.Experimental investigation on damage mechanisms and buckling behaviors of thin composite laminates in compression after impact. Compos Struct2021; 256: 113122.
166.
DuarteAHerszbergIPatonR. Impact resistance and tolerance of interleaved tape laminates. Compos Struct1999; 47(1-4): 753–758.
167.
LiuDRajuBBDangX. Size effects on impact response of composite laminates. Int J Impact Eng1998; 21(10): 837–854.
168.
PrichardJCHoggP. The role of impact damage in post-impact compression testing. Composites1990; 21(6): 503–511.
169.
BogenfeldRGorskyC. An experimental study of the cyclic compression after impact behavior of CFRP composites. J Compos Sci2021; 5(11): 296.
170.
BiaginiDPascoeJAlderliestenR. Experimental investigation of fatigue after impact damage growth in CFRP. Procedia Struct Integr2022; 42: 343–350.
171.
TuoHWuTLuZ, et al.Evaluation of damage evolution of impacted composite laminates under fatigue loadings by infrared thermography and ultrasonic methods. Polym Test2021; 93: 106869.
172.
SunXHallettS. Failure mechanisms and damage evolution of laminated composites under compression after impact (CAI): experimental and numerical study. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2018; 104: 41–59.
173.
WanYWangLLiuY, et al. Experimental investigation on the low‐velocity impact response and the residual strength of CFRP tubes. Polym Compos. 2024; 45(10): 8677–8693.
174.
ZottiAZuppoliniSBorrielloA, et al.Hierarchical aerospace epoxy composites of carbon fiber and hyperbranched filler: toughening behavior from nanocomposites to composites. Compos Struct2024; 327: 117719.
175.
TuoHWuTLuZ, et al.Study of impact damage on composite laminates induced by strip impactor using DIC and infrared thermography. Thin-Walled Struct2022; 176: 109288.
176.
FrancesconiLLoiGAymerichF. Impact and compression-after-impact performance of a thin Z-pinned composite laminate. J Mater Eng Perform2023; 32(9): 3923–3937.
177.
LuTChenXWangH. Predicting compression-after-impact behavior of thermoplastic composite laminates by an experiment-based approach. Compos Sci Technol2021; 213: 108952.
178.
ElaminMLiBTanK. Compression after impact performance of carbon-fiber foam-core sandwich composites in low temperature arctic conditions. Compos Struct2021; 261: 113568.
179.
De FreitasMReisL. Failure mechanisms on composite specimens subjected to compression after impact. Compos Struct1998; 42(4): 365–373.
180.
PantelakisSGKatsiropoulosCVPolydoropoulouPV. Assessing the compression after impact behaviour of innovative multifunctional composites. Nanomater Nanotechnol2016; 6: 184798041667962.
181.
KostopoulosVBaltopoulosAKarapappasP, et al.Impact and after-impact properties of carbon fibre reinforced composites enhanced with multi-wall carbon nanotubes. Compos Sci Technol2010; 70(4): 553–563.
182.
TuoHLuZMaX, et al.An experimental and numerical investigation on low-velocity impact damage and compression-after-impact behavior of composite laminates. Compos B Eng2019; 167: 329–341.
183.
ParkCYJooYSKimMS, et al.Numerical prediction of compressive residual strengths of a quasi-isotropic laminate with low-velocity impact delamination. Int J Aeronaut Space Sci2024; 25: 954–965.
184.
RiccioASaputoSSellittoA, et al.On the mechanical behavior of laminated composite plates subjected to compression after impact tests. Mater Today Proc2021; 34: 53–56.
185.
LinSRanatungaVWaasAM. Experimental study on the panel size effects of the low velocity impact (LVI) and compression after impact (CAI) of laminated composites, part II: CAI. Compos Struct2022; 295: 115824.
186.
PanZWangMYingZ, et al.Failure mechanism of Ω-shape 3D orthogonal woven composite component under transverse low-velocity impact and subsequent axial compression load. Int J Damage Mech2022; 31(2): 246–274.
187.
SbarufattiCPatelBSánchez-RomateXF, et al. (eds). Self-sensing of CNT-Doped GFRP panels during impact and compression after impact tests. In: European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring: Special Collection of 2020 Papers-Volume 2. Springer, 2021.
188.
TsutsuiHKawamataASandaT, et al.Detection of impact damage of stiffened composite panels using embedded small-diameteroptical fibers. Smart Mater Struct2004; 13(6): 1284–1290.
189.
SbarufattiCGilioliADziendzikowskiM, et al.Compression after impact (CAI) test on CFRP panels with embedded FBG sensors. In: ICILSM2016, Turin, Italy, 2016.
190.
SalvettiMSbarufattiCGilioliA, et al.On the mechanical response of CFRP composite with embedded optical fibre when subjected to low velocity impact and CAI tests. Compos Struct2017; 179: 21–34.
191.
MajumderMGangopadhyayTKChakrabortyAK, et al.Fibre bragg gratings in structural health monitoring—Present status and applications. Sensor Actuator Phys2008; 147(1): 150–164.
192.
AlhusseinANQaidMRAgliullinT, et al.Fiber bragg grating sensors: design, applications, and comparison with other sensing technologies. Sensors2025; 25(7): 2289.
193.
IsmailMFSultanMTHamdanA, et al.Low velocity impact behaviour and post-impact characteristics of kenaf/glass hybrid composites with various weight ratios. J Mater Res Technol2019; 8(3): 2662–2673.
194.
LaiWSaeedipourHGohK. Dataset on open/blind hole-hole interaction in barely visible impact damaged composite laminates. Data Brief2021; 34: 106607.
195.
ZhangDZhengXZhouJ, et al.Bridging the low-velocity impact energy versus impact damage and residual compression strength for composite laminates. J Reinforc Plast Compos2021; 40(9-10): 378–390.
196.
SuemasuHIchikiM. Analytical study on low compressive strength of composite laminates with impact damage. Compos Struct2013; 104: 169–175.
197.
QiBHerszbergI. An engineering approach for predicting residual strength of carbon/epoxy laminates after impact and hygrothermal cycling. Compos Struct1999; 47(1-4): 483–490.
198.
SoutisCCurtisP. Prediction of the post-impact compressive strength of CFRP laminated composites. Compos Sci Technol1996; 56(6): 677–684.
199.
GonzálezEMaimíPMartín-SantosE, et al.Simulating drop-weight impact and compression after impact tests on composite laminates using conventional shell finite elements. Int J Solid Struct2018; 144: 230–247.
200.
XiaoSWuSXuZ, et al.A novel methodology to research the residual compressive mechanical properties of composite stiffened panel after low velocity impact based on quantification damage simulation. Polym Compos2022; 43(9): 5977–5995.
201.
ZhouJLiuBWangS. Finite element analysis on impact response and damage mechanism of composite laminates under single and repeated low-velocity impact. Aero Sci Technol2022; 129: 107810.
202.
KörbelinJJungeNFiedlerB. Modelling of low-velocity impact and compression after impact of CFRP at elevated temperatures. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2021; 147: 106418.
203.
PhamDCLuaJSunH, et al.A three-dimensional progressive damage model for drop-weight impact and compression after impact. J Compos Mater2020; 54(4): 449–462.
204.
ThorssonSIWaasAMRassaianM. Numerical investigation of composite laminates subject to low-velocity edge-on impact and compression after impact. Compos Struct2018; 203: 648–658.
205.
YangBFuKLiY. Modelling damage evolution and CAI strength of composite laminates under biaxial compression. J Compos Mater2021; 55(21): 2887–2898.
206.
ReinerJZobeiryNVaziriR. Efficient finite element simulation of compression after impact behaviour in quasi-isotropic composite laminates. Compos Commun2021; 28: 100967.
207.
GonzálezEMaimíPCamanhoP, et al.Simulation of drop-weight impact and compression after impact tests on composite laminates. Compos Struct2012; 94(11): 3364–3378.
208.
LiuHFalzonBGTanW. Experimental and numerical studies on the impact response of damage-tolerant hybrid unidirectional/woven carbon-fibre reinforced composite laminates. Compos B Eng2018; 136: 101–118.
209.
SotoAGonzálezEVMaimíP, et al.Low velocity impact and compression after impact simulation of thin ply laminates. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2018; 109: 413–427.
210.
GiannarosEKotzakoliosASotiriadisG, et al.A multi-stage material model calibration procedure for enhancing numerical solution fidelity in the case of impact loading of composites. J Compos Mater2021; 55(1): 39–56.
211.
SotoAGonzálezEVMaimíP, et al.A methodology to simulate low velocity impact and compression after impact in large composite stiffened panels. Compos Struct2018; 204: 223–238.
212.
ThorssonSIWaasAMRassaianM. Low-velocity impact predictions of composite laminates using a continuum shell based modeling approach Part B: BVID impact and compression after impact. Int J Solid Struct2018; 155: 201–212.
213.
AlabbadMVelSSLopez-AnidoRA. Computational model for predicting the low-velocity impact resistance and tolerance of composite laminates. Compos B Eng2022; 244: 110187.
214.
TanWFalzonBGChiuLN, et al.Predicting low velocity impact damage and compression-after-impact (CAI) behaviour of composite laminates. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2015; 71: 212–226.
215.
FalcóOLopesCSommerD, et al.Experimental analysis and simulation of low-velocity impact damage of composite laminates. Compos Struct2022; 287: 115278.
216.
OuyangTBaoRSunW, et al.A fast and efficient numerical prediction of compression after impact (CAI) strength of composite laminates and structures. Thin-Walled Struct2020; 148: 106588.
217.
YuanYLiXZhangZ, et al.Thin/thick-ply hybrid gradient laminate for low-velocity impact and compression-after-impact behaviors. Compos Commun2021; 25: 100743.
218.
LeongKZhiJTanV, et al.Adaptive multi-fidelity (AMF) modelling of damage in composites under low-velocity impact and compression after impact. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2024; 178: 107974.
219.
BorkowskiLBKumarRSPalliyaguruUR. Coupled analysis of low-velocity impact damage and compression after impact strength of composite laminates. J Aero Eng2021; 34(5): 04021051.
220.
GuoSLiXLiuT, et al.Parametric study on low-velocity impact (LVI) damage and compression after impact (CAI) strength of composite laminates. Polymers2022; 14(23): 5200.
221.
BullDSpearingSSinclairI. Image-enhanced modelling of residual compressive after impact strength in laminated composites. Compos Struct2018; 192: 20–27.
222.
ZhaoQWangWLiuY, et al.Multiscale modeling framework to predict the low-velocity impact and compression after impact behaviors of plain woven CFRP composites. Compos Struct2022; 299: 116090.
223.
RajaneeshABruyneelM. Low-velocity impact and compression after impact modeling of composites using modified mesoscale model. Compos Struct2023; 311: 116821.
224.
ZhaoJWangBLyuQ, et al.Compression after multiple impact strength of composite laminates prediction method based on machine learning approach. Aero Sci Technol2023; 136: 108243.
225.
CravenRIannucciLOlssonR. Delamination buckling: a finite element study with realistic delamination shapes, multiple delaminations and fibre fracture cracks. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2010; 41(5): 684–692.
226.
MekonnenAAWooKKangM, et al.Effects of size and location of initial delamination on post-buckling and delamination propagation behavior of laminated composites. Int J Aeronaut Space Sci2020; 21: 80–94.
227.
ZouJLeiZLiuD, et al.Rapid prediction of compression after impact properties of composite structures: an equivalent strategy for impact damage. Compos Struct2023; 307: 116655.
228.
SuemasuHSasakiWIshikawaT, et al.A numerical study on compressive behavior of composite plates with multiple circular delaminations considering delamination propagation. Compos Sci Technol2008; 68(12): 2562–2567.
229.
YangBFuKLeeJ, et al.Artificial neural network (ANN)-based residual strength prediction of carbon fibre reinforced composites (CFRCs) after impact. Appl Compos Mater2021; 28: 809–833.
230.
JiangFGuanZWangX, et al.Study on prediction of compression performance of composite laminates after impact based on convolutional neural networks. Appl Compos Mater2021; 28(4): 1153–1173.
231.
ReinerJVaziriRZobeiryN. Machine learning assisted characterisation and simulation of compressive damage in composite laminates. Compos Struct2021; 273: 114290.
232.
PuhuiCZhenSJunyangW. A new method for compression after impact strength prediction of composite laminates. J Compos Mater2002; 36(5): 589–610.
233.
NagarajMReinerJVaziriR, et al.Compressive damage modeling of fiber-reinforced composite laminates using 2D higher-order layer-wise models. Compos B Eng2021; 215: 108753.
234.
CózarITuronAGonzálezE, et al.A methodology to obtain material design allowables from high-fidelity compression after impact simulations on composite laminates. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2020; 139: 106069.
235.
ZhuXChenWLiuL, et al.A high fidelity multiscale approach for compression-after-impact behavior of 2D triaxially braided composites. Thin-Walled Struct2024; 199: 111793.
236.
SommerDEThomsonDFalcóO, et al.Damage modelling of carbon fibre composite crush tubes: numerical simulation and experimental validation of drop weight impact. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2022; 160: 107033.
237.
AbirMTayTRidhaM, et al.On the relationship between failure mechanism and compression after impact (CAI) strength in composites. Compos Struct2017; 182: 242–250.
238.
AbirMTayTRidhaM, et al.Modelling damage growth in composites subjected to impact and compression after impact. Compos Struct2017; 168: 13–25.
239.
MengZHuangLWangP, et al.Investigation on damage behavior of composite T-shaped stiffened panels under compression after multi-point impact considering impact positions. Thin-Walled Struct2024; 196: 111514.
240.
WangCNagashimaT. Compression-after-impact test analysis of CFRP skin-stringer specimen by FEM using a zig-zag type cohesive zone model. Mechanical Engineering Journal2022; 9(3): 22.
241.
HiguchiRWarabiSYoshimuraA, et al.Experimental and numerical study on progressive damage and failure in composite laminates during open-hole compression tests. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2021; 145: 106300.
242.
SerraJTrelluABouvetC, et al.Combined loadings after medium velocity impact on large CFRP laminated plates: discrete ply model simulations. Composites Part C: Open Access2021; 6: 100203.
243.
Olivares-FerrerAJLinkeMGarcía-ManriqueJA. Influence of geometric imperfections and internal damage patterns of thin-walled laminates on failure in compression-after-impact testing. Procedia Manuf2019; 41: 200–207.
244.
LiXYuanYZhangZ. Gradient ply thickness design for enhanced low-velocity impact resistance in ultra-thin ply composite. Extreme mech letters2023; 63: 102054.
245.
ArteiroAGrayPCamanhoP. Simulation of edge impact and compression after edge impact in CFRP laminates. Compos Struct2020; 240: 112018.
246.
HanXCaiHSunJ, et al.Numerical investigation on behaviors of composite laminates with initial delamination defects under impact and compression after impact. Polym Compos2023; 44(1): 413–431.
247.
ZouJLeiZBaiR, et al.Damage and failure analysis of composite stiffened panels under low-velocity impact and compression after impact. Compos Struct2021; 262: 113333.
248.
Ruivo FugaFDonadonMV. Low velocity impact on pre-loaded composite plates: a novel standard-based experimental apparatus. Compos Struct2021; 261: 113315.
249.
LiuDBaiRLeiZ, et al.Experimental and numerical study on compression-after-impact behavior of composite panels with foam-filled hat-stiffener. Ocean Eng2020; 198: 106991.
250.
YangBFuKLiY. Modeling of biaxial compression behavior of carbon fiber–reinforced composite after low-velocity impact. J Aero Eng2022; 35(3): 04022024.
251.
HuangWLiCXieL, et al.Experimental and numerical investigation on compression after impact behavior of hygrothermal aged CFRP laminates. Polym Compos2022; 43(9): 6678–6695.
252.
HuPJianYHuC, et al.On multiple low-velocity impact response and compression after impact of composite laminates. Mech Adv Mater Struct2024; 32: 1043–1057.
253.
KayaGSelverE. Self-healing potential of stitched glass/polypropylene/epoxy hybrid composites with various fibers. J Compos Mater2024; 58(11): 1319–1335.
254.
ZhangHGeYTangH, et al.Examination of low‐velocity impact and mechanical properties after impact of fiber‐reinforced prepreg composites. Polym Compos2019; 40(6): 2154–2164.
255.
ZhangYYanSJiangL, et al.Couple effects of multi-impact damage and CAI capability on NCF composites. Rev Adv Mater Sci2024; 63(1): 20240003.
256.
LeiZMaJSunW, et al.Low-velocity impact and compression-after-impact behaviors of twill woven carbon fiber/glass fiber hybrid composite laminates with flame retardant epoxy resin. Compos Struct2023; 321: 117253.
257.
LarssonF. Damage tolerance of a stitched carbon/epoxy laminate. Compos Appl Sci Manuf1997; 28(11): 923–934.
258.
FrancesconiLAymerichF. Damage mechanisms in the CAI failure of thin z-pinned composite laminates. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2022; 158: 106991.
259.
van HoornNKassapoglouCTurteltaubS, et al.Experimental damage tolerance evaluation of thick fabric carbon/epoxy laminates under low-velocity and high-velocity impact and compression-after-impact. J Compos Mater2022; 56(5): 761–778.
260.
AnuseVSShankarKVelmuruganR, et al.Compression-after-impact analysis of carbon fiber reinforced composite laminate with different ply orientation sequences. Int J Impact Eng2022; 167: 104277.
261.
ShahSKaruppananSMegat-YusoffP, et al.Impact resistance and damage tolerance of fiber reinforced composites: a review. Compos Struct2019; 217: 100–121.
262.
VasudevanAKumaranSSNareshK, et al. Layer-wise damage prediction in carbon/Kevlar/S-glass/E-glass fibre reinforced epoxy hybrid composites under low-velocity impact loading using advanced 3D computed tomography. Int J Crashworthiness. 2019; 25(1): 9–23.
263.
HongkarnjanakulNBouvetCRivallantS (eds). The effect of stacking sequence on the low-velocity impact response of composite laminates. In: ECCM15-15th European conference on composite materials, Venice, Italy, 24–28 June 2012.
264.
RiveraJYaraghiNAHuangW, et al.Modulation of impact energy dissipation in biomimetic helicoidal composites. J Mater Res Technol2020; 9(6): 14619–14629.
265.
NingHMonroeCGibbonsS, et al. A review of helicoidal composites: from natural to bio-inspired damage tolerant materials. Int Mater Rev. 2024; 69(3–4): 181–228.
266.
XiaoLLuCLiX, et al.Exploration of impact response and damage mechanism of discontinuous CFRP laminates subjected to low velocity impact. Polym Compos2023; 44(10): 6324–6336.
267.
AnuseVSShankarKVelmuruganR, et al.LVI and CAI analysis of woven carbon fiber reinforced composite laminates with different stacking sequence. Key Eng Mater2023; 969: 93–100.
268.
ChiuCLaiMWuC. Compression failure mechanisms of 3-D angle interlock woven composites subjected to low-energy impact. Polym Polym Compos2004; 12(4): 309–320.
SasikumarATriasDCostaJ, et al.Impact and compression after impact response in thin laminates of spread-tow woven and non-crimp fabrics. Compos Struct2019; 215: 432–445.
271.
LiuHFalzonBGTanW. Predicting the compression-after-impact (CAI) strength of damage-tolerant hybrid unidirectional/woven carbon-fibre reinforced composite laminates. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2018; 105: 189–202.
272.
YangXZhengLXieZ, et al.Low velocity impact behaviors and highly residual compressive strength of epoxy foam‐filled 3D woven composites. J Appl Polym Sci2023; 140(48): e54731.
273.
DalfiH. Improving the mechanical performance and impact damage tolerance of glass composite laminates via multi-scales of hybridisation. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L2022; 236(12): 2339–2356.
274.
MelaibariAWagihABashaM, et al.Sandwich composite laminate with intraply hybrid woven CFRP/dyneema core for enhanced impact damage resistance and tolerance. Journal of Materials Research and Technology2022; 21: 1784–1797.
275.
PrasathKAAmuthakkannanPArumugaprabuV, et al.Low velocity impact and compression after impact damage responses on flax/basalt fiber hybrid composites. Mater Res Express2019; 6(11): 115308.
276.
HuYLiuWShiY. Low-velocity impact damage research on CFRPs with kevlar-fiber toughening. Compos Struct2019; 216: 127–141.
277.
XueYLiZLuoJ, et al.Simultaneous toughening and strengthening of CF/EP composites through bi-component thermoplastics with hybrid phases between composite layers. Compos B Eng2024; 274: 111286.
278.
ImielińskaKGuillaumatL. The effect of water immersion ageing on low-velocity impact behaviour of woven aramid–glass fibre/epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol2004; 64(13-14): 2271–2278.
279.
VermaLSivakumarSMAndrewJJ, et al.Compression after ballistic impact response of pseudoelastic shape memory alloy embedded hybrid unsymmetrical patch repaired glass-fiber reinforced polymer composites. J Compos Mater2019; 53(28-30): 4225–4247.
280.
SaravanakumarKSubramanianHArumugamV, et al.Influence of milled glass fillers on the impact and compression after impact behavior of glass/epoxy composite laminates. Polym Test2019; 75: 133–141.
281.
AshrafiBGuanJMirjaliliV, et al.Enhancement of mechanical performance of epoxy/carbon fiber laminate composites using single-walled carbon nanotubes. Compos Sci Technol2011; 71(13): 1569–1578.
282.
ShinJ-HChoeH-SLeeJ-S, et al.Injection repair of CFRP using a multi-wall carbon nanotubes-modified epoxy resin: flexural and compression behavior. J Compos Mater2022; 56(28): 4231–4244.
283.
IqbalKKhanS-UMunirA, et al.Impact damage resistance of CFRP with nanoclay-filled epoxy matrix. Compos Sci Technol2009; 69(11-12): 1949–1957.
284.
LalLPJRameshSParasuramanS, et al.Compression after impact behaviour and failure analysis of nanosilica-toughened thin epoxy/gfrp composite laminates. Materials2019; 12(19): 3057.
285.
RavindranARLadaniRBKinlochAJ, et al.Improving the delamination resistance and impact damage tolerance of carbon fibre-epoxy composites using multi-scale fibre toughening. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2021; 150: 106624.
286.
LiCXHankTJKalfon-CohenE, et al. Manufacturing autoclave-grade thermoset carbon fiber-reinforced polymer aerospace composites without an autoclave using nanoporous materials. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2024; 16(19): 25280–25293.
287.
del CuvilloRArtero-GuerreroJPernas-SánchezJ, et al.Impact performance on industrial scalable graphene reinforcement composites. Aero Sci Technol2023; 141: 108480.
288.
SasikumarATriasDCostaJ, et al.Effect of ply thickness and ply level hybridization on the compression after impact strength of thin laminates. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2019; 121: 232–243.
289.
LinSRanatungaVWaasAM. Experimental study on the panel size effects of the low-velocity impact (LVI) and compression after impact (CAI) of laminated composites, Part I: LVI. Compos Struct2022; 296: 115822.
290.
GreenhalghEHileyM. The assessment of novel materials and processes for the impact tolerant design of stiffened composite aerospace structures. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2003; 34(2): 151–161.
291.
ScarponiCPerilloACutilloL, et al.Advanced TTT composite materials for aeronautical purposes: compression after impact (CAI) behaviour. Compos B Eng2007; 38(2): 258–264.
292.
ZhangXHounslowLGrassiM. Improvement of low-velocity impact and compression-after-impact performance by z-fibre pinning. Compos Sci Technol2006; 66(15): 2785–2794.
293.
ZhaoGLiMZhaoY, et al.Synergistic improvement of the compression-after-impact performance of composite laminates by multi-scale Cnf/Z-Pin reinforcement. Thin-Walled Struct2024; 204: 112332.
294.
FrancesconiLAymerichF (eds). Impact and post-impact behavior of composite laminates reinforced by Z-Pins. Mechanics of composite, hybrid and multifunctional materials. In: Proceedings of the 2018 annual conference on experimental and applied mechanics, Greenville, South Carolina, USA, June 4-7, 2018. Springer, Volume 5.
295.
TanKTWatanabeNIwahoriY, et al.Effect of stitch density and stitch thread thickness on compression after impact strength and response of stitched composites. Compos Sci Technol2012; 72(5): 587–598.
296.
AymerichFPrioloP. Characterization of fracture modes in stitched and unstitched cross-ply laminates subjected to low-velocity impact and compression after impact loading. Int J Impact Eng2008; 35(7): 591–608.
297.
ErdoganGBilisikK. Compression after low-velocity impact (CAI) properties of multistitched composites. Mech Adv Mater Struct2018; 25(8): 623–636.
298.
FarleyGLSmithBTMaidenJ. Compression response of thick layer composite laminates with through-the-thickness reinforcement. J Reinforc Plast Compos1992; 11(7): 787–810.
299.
MartinsAAbouraZHariziW, et al.Analysis of the impact and compression after impact behavior of tufted laminated composites. Compos Struct2018; 184: 352–361.
300.
SunJDaiYHuangL, et al.Failure assessment of 3D woven composites under compression after low-velocity impact. Mater Res Express2022; 9(10): 105301.
301.
SunJDaiYHuangL, et al.Micromechanisms and characterization of low-velocity impact damage in 3D woven composites. Materials2022; 15(19): 6636.
302.
LiNChenP. Experimental investigation on edge impact damage and compression-after-impact (CAI) behavior of stiffened composite panels. Compos Struct2016; 138: 134–150.
303.
HouYHuangJLiuY, et al.Low-velocity impact and compression after impact behaviors of rib-stiffened CFRP panels: experimental and numerical study. Aero Sci Technol2024; 146: 108948.
304.
OuyangTSunWGuanZ, et al.Experimental study on delamination growth of stiffened composite panels in compression after impact. Compos Struct2018; 206: 791–800.
305.
LiuLXuW. Effects of fillers on the impact damage and compressive residual properties of single hat-stiffened composite panels. Thin-Walled Struct2022; 180: 109705.
306.
BogenfeldRGorskyCWilleT. An experimental damage tolerance investigation of CFRP composites on a substructural level. Composites Part C: Open Access2022; 8: 100267.
307.
DuCLiHYanS, et al.Damage and failure analysis of composite stiffened panels under low-velocity impact and compression after impact with damp-heat aging. Sci Eng Compos Mater2022; 29(1): 378–393.
308.
GoyalVKPenningtonA (eds). FEA-based failure analysis of post-buckled composite multi-hat stiffened panel under static compression. In: American society for composites (ASC) 37th annual technical conference, Tucson, Arizona, 19–21 September 2022.
309.
LiHZhangQJiaJ, et al.Study on low-velocity impact damage and residual strength of reinforced composite skin structure. Materials2020; 13(11): 2573.
310.
MouhoubiSAzouaouiK. Residual properties of composite plates subjected to impact fatigue. J Compos Mater2019; 53(6): 799–817.
311.
KarakuzuRKıyıkSKandasH. Low-velocity impact and compression-after-impact behaviors of S2-glass/epoxy laminated composites under impact loading at low temperatures. Mech Adv Mater Struct2023; 31: 13390–13400.
312.
OthmanRKhashabaUAlmitaniKH. Compression after impact of CFRE composites immersed in distilled water. Int J Crashworthiness2021; 26(5): 490–500.
313.
de PaivaJMFHosokawaMNMontagnaLS, et al.Effect of hygrothermal conditioning on compressive strength after impact in carbon fiber/epoxy composites. J Appl Polym Sci2024; 141: e55237.
314.
DeshmukhAPaiY. Compression after impact & vibrational analysis of aramid-basalt/epoxy interply composites under hygrothermal conditions. Cogent Engineering2023; 10(2): 2262812.
315.
XiaoXShanyongXBinF. The strength recovery effect of scarf bonding on the CFRP laminates with impact damage. Heliyon2023; 9(8): e19143.
316.
UddinMBChakrabortySKelkarAD. Innovative repair technique for polymer composite laminates. In: Digit Libr: SAMPE neXus, Dallas, TX, 19–21 October 2021.
317.
WanYLiuYHuC, et al.The failure mechanism of curved composite laminates subjected to low-velocity impact. Acta Mech Sin2023; 39(12): 423113.
318.
DenizMEKarakuzuRSariM, et al.On the residual compressive strength of the glass–epoxy tubes subjected to transverse impact loading. J Compos Mater2012; 46(6): 737–745.
319.
PattarakunnanKGalosJDasR, et al.Impact damage tolerance of energy storage composite structures containing lithium-ion polymer batteries. Compos Struct2021; 267: 113845.
320.
ZhangDGuYZhangZ, et al.Effect of off-axis angle on low-velocity impact and compression after impact damage mechanisms of 3D woven composites. Mater Des2020; 192: 108672.
321.
LiuSLiZFengY, et al.Effect of ultraviolet radiation on the low‐velocity impact and compression after impact performances of aerospace composite laminates. Polym Compos2024; 45(4): 3284–3295.
322.
LimJKimS-W. Unleashing the potential of CFRP laminate: enhancing mechanical characteristics with STF-Impregnated woven carbon fabric. Adv Compos Mater2024; 33: 1003–1025.
323.
Al-KathemiNWilleTHeineckeF, et al.Interaction effect of out of plane waviness and impact damages on composite structures–An experimental study. Compos Struct2021; 276: 114405.
324.
CartiéDIrvingP. Effect of resin and fibre properties on impact and compression after impact performance of CFRP. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2002; 33(4): 483–493.
325.
RalphCDahaleMNealeG, et al.Influence of binder float length on the out-of-plane and axial impact performance of 3D woven composites. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2021; 147: 106459.
MasudMAliMDIrfanM, et al.Numerical investigation of impact and compression after impact performance of 45° biaxial composite laminates. Engineering Proceedings2022; 23(1): 18.
328.
BogenfeldRSchmiedelPKuruvadiN, et al.An experimental study of the damage growth in composite laminates under tension–fatigue after impact. Compos Sci Technol2020; 191: 108082.
329.
ManaiiRTerekhinaSChandreshahL, et al.Influence of fibre orientation, moisture absorption and repairing performance on the low-velocity impact response of woven flax/Elium® thermoplastic bio-composites. J Compos Mater2023; 57(23): 3601–3618.
330.
XinWSarasiniFTirillòJ, et al.Impact and post-impact properties of multiscale carbon fiber composites interleaved with carbon nanotube sheets. Compos B Eng2020; 183: 107711.
331.
BettsDSadeghianPFamA. Post-impact residual strength and resilience of sandwich panels with natural fiber composite faces. J Build Eng2021; 38: 102184.
332.
SarasiniFTirillòJD'AltiliaS, et al.Damage tolerance of carbon/flax hybrid composites subjected to low velocity impact. Compos B Eng2016; 91: 144–153.
333.
SantulliC. Post-impact flexural tests on jute/polyester laminates monitored by acoustic emission. J Mater Sci2006; 41: 1255–1259.
334.
De RosaIMSantulliCSarasiniF, et al.Post-impact damage characterization of hybrid configurations of jute/glass polyester laminates using acoustic emission and IR thermography. Compos Sci Technol2009; 69(7-8): 1142–1150.
335.
ScarponiCSarasiniFTirilloJ, et al.Low-velocity impact behaviour of hemp fibre reinforced bio-based epoxy laminates. Compos B Eng2016; 91: 162–168.
336.
DalfiHBabu-KatnumKPotluriP, et al.The role of hybridisation and fibre architecture on the post-impact flexural behaviour of composite laminates. J Compos Mater2021; 55(11): 1499–1515.
337.
BaranIWeijermarsW. Residual bending behaviour of sandwich composites after impact. J Sandw Struct Mater2020; 22(2): 402–422.
338.
LiuWZhangHFengH, et al.Effect of fiber architecture on the residual strength of laminate glass fiber-reinforced polymer composites after impact. Adv Compos Lett2020; 29: 2633366X19897919.
339.
SouzaGSCRibeiroMLTitaV. A damage index proposal for shear-after-impact of laminated composite plates. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2023; 45(11): 561.
340.
LiuLXuW. A study on the in-plane shear-after-impact properties of CFRP composite laminates. Materials2022; 15(14): 5029.
341.
ZhouJOuyangTGuanZ, et al.Investigation on impact damage and shear after impact (SAI) behavior of grid stiffened panels. Compos Struct2021; 277: 114640.
342.
LiBCaoP-FSaitoT, et al.Intrinsically self-healing polymers: from mechanistic insight to current challenges. Chem Rev2022; 123(2): 701–735.
